Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
L0rinda

hearthstone Hearthstone Lead Designer Ben Brode on Card Text Consistency

1 post in this topic

14951-hearthstone-lead-designer-ben-brod


Hearthstone lead designer, Ben Brode has released a Designer Insights video discussing card text consistency in Hearthstone. He uses Druid of the Claw as a starting point throughout the video, and talks about inconsistencies of other cards with similar wording.



What Brode makes clear is that the design team are aware of many inconsistencies in card text in Hearthstone, but they are not sure that it is a problem. He compares Druid of the Claw to Ancient of War, and mentions that Ancient of War can be silenced down to a 5/5, while Druid of the Claw cannot be silenced. He points out that you can work out the difference while playing, in two ways. Firstly the toughness on Ancient of War is green to signify a buff, and secondly if you hover over a card, it tells you the power/toughness that it will have if it is silenced. For those reasons he believes that it is not an issue when you are playing with, or against, a card.

u1Gu69H.png


Brode does however think there is an issue when you don't get to play with a card. For instance, when reading new cards on spoilers, you wouldn't know if Anodized Robo Cub functioned in the same way as Ancient of War, or whether it worked like Druid of the Claw. He says that they have begun to address this issue by using the word "Transform" on cards such as Druid of the Flame and Druid of the Saber but is uncomfortable touching classic cards as they were done that way originally for a reason. The reason being to make them easier to parse rather than specific in what they do. He does think that Druid of the Claw may change in the future and asks the viewers to think about what they would like to see.

He also addresses Ysera and says that although you have to learn what a Dream Card does by using the internet, or by playing a lot. He feels that is okay because the computer looks after the gameplay, unlike a physical card game. This makes cards like Ysera possible and he likes that there is some "exploration" involved.
 


He finishes off by saying there are some instances of cards not being consistent that are far more obvious, and admits that some of those are actually bugs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Aggro Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Aggro Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Reno Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By positiv2
      We decided to use Paracel's suggestion and make it into a weekly round-up thread. 
      Druid
      Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Jade Druid No Giants Gadgetzan Standard Deck (fixed) Budget Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Hunter
      Midrange Beast Hunter Gadgetzan Standard Deck Mage
      Nothing yet :( Paladin
      Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck (actually contains murlocs this time :P ) Budget Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Priest
      Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Priest No Cleric Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Rogue
      Questing Miracle Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Shaman
      N'Zoth Control Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Kobold Midrange Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warlock
      Reno Combo Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warrior
      Pirate Aggro Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck N'Zoth Control Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck If you have any suggestions or questions, feel free to leave them in the comments.
    • By L0rinda
      The new meta is still forming, but even at this early stage it seems that Kazakus will be a large part of it. This article shows all of the available potions, and explains how the ordering of the spells when cast is likely to change.
      The first trick to remembering all of the options is to realise that  in the potion creation stage, nearly all of the choices are fundamentally the same no matter whether the spell costs 1, 5, or 10 mana. The cost of the spell simply powers up the effect. There are ten different effects to choose from, which are outlined below. The spells are remembered more easily when you group the effects by numbers.
      1, 2, 3 effects:
      Icecap: Freezes 1, 2, or 3 enemy minions.
      Ichor of Undeath: Summons 1, 2, or 3 friendly minions that died this game.
      Kingsblood: Draws 1, 2, or 3 cards.
      Shadow Oil: Adds 1, 2, or 3 random Demons to your hand.

      Other effects in number order:
      Felbloom: Deals 2, 4, or 6 damage to all minions. 
      Goldthorn: Gives your minions 2, 4, or 6 extra health. 
      Netherbloom: Summons a 2/2, 5/5, or 8/8 demon.
      Heart of Fire: Deals 3, 5, or 8 damage.
      Stonescale Oil: Gives 4, 7, or 10 Armor.
      Mystic Wool: This card is unique in that it has no effect for 1 mana. It either turns a random enemy minion into a 1/1 Sheep, or all enemy minions into 1/1 Sheep.

      At the moment, many of the pairings work according to the game engine, rather than in the best order, which means that Kazakus is not working as intended. An example of this would be minions that are getting killed by damage are then getting frozen before leaving play. This is correct in terms of how the game works, as deaths are always processed last, but the spells are going to be made to work outside of the regular game engine. This will make them more powerful and intuitive.
      Mike Donais
      We are already working on this. Feel free to post stuff like this on our bug forums. (source) This reply on Reddit confirms that the idea of the custom Spell is that it will resolve in an order beneficial to the caster, and that it will likely be changed very soon.