Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Sepums

Is Naxxramas still worth buying?

13 posts in this topic

Sorry for such a bad first post.

I am a fairly mediocre player who hasn't bought any adventures yet but is eager to, and while I see that loe might be the adventure most worth purchasing for now, I am still interested in buying naxx and brm.

The thing is, with the new way to play coming to hearthstone, seeing that naxx cards will become craftable (correct me if I'm wrong?) I don't exactly need to buy naxx to get the good cards that I want it for.

So, is it worth buying naxxramas for the experience of the adventure, and not having to grind dust for the cards? or should I just ignore naxx (in addition to gvg) and just stick to standard when it comes out?

I feel okay since I haven't spent any money on the game so far and I know that I can simply ignore wild and stick to standard, but wild seems more fun at the moment with all the decks that I have seen but never was able to play because I didn't buy any adventures.

As many people have already stated, we will still need to collect various cards from current and later expansions for standard, and cards from current adventures/expansions will become obsolete as time goes, so I just don't know how I'm supposed to deal with this.

I don't understand the direction with the new way to play, it doesn't make much sense to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Naxxramas cost 3500 Gold or 25$ and you will be able to disenchant it for 3140 dust.

 

If you buy it for money, it's better dust/$ than you would get from buying packs, so I'd buy it just for the dust. The adventure and any cards you might want to keep are just bonus. (Of course, if you buy packs, you would not disenchant all the cards, so it's not a 100% fair comparison.)

 

If you buy it for gold, you'd get slightly more dust from buying packs (on average, it's about 1 dust per gold), so it's less obvious which choice is better.

 

Personally, I liked the PvE adventure, but everyone is different, so I don't know whether you'd think it's worth it. There are also a lot of great cards in it that would be expensive to craft - e.g. Loatheb. If you are interested in Wild at all, you probably want to buy the adventure now, as it'll be cheaper than getting the dust to craft these cards.

 

If you are only interested in Standard and planing on buying adventures with gold, skip Naxx.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly it depends on your current collection, whether you will play wild or standard. Naxx is really important for the decks out there right now, (and presumably in wild) but once formats roll in it will be obsolete in Standard. If you don't already have a decent collection you will be spending a lot of resources and end up playing catchup in wild. While Standard will be featuring cards from BRM (dragons and thaurassan and possibly even patrons) and LOE (reno, tunnel trogg), you probably wont be as far behind as you would be in wild without naxx. If you plan on spending gold for naxx, classic packs may be a better choice (unless you already have a big classic collection). If later you want to play a particular deck in wild you would be better off crafting those specific cards. More than half the cards in most decks are (as of now) made out of the core set (basic +Classic). The cards which are most used currently are Sludge belcher, loatheb, zombie chow and haunted creeper, with shade of naxx, death's bite, Sometimes kel'thuzzad and [Naxx priest card] used by specific classes. IF you can give an idea of how big your collection is from each set, we could have a better idea.

 

Edit: It might be worth mentioning that naxx was a really creative and fun adventure to play. Whether you factor that in or not is up to you.  

Edited by Valkyr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then I suppose I'll skip naxx and just stick to standard mode, completely ignoring wild.

The last reason I want to play naxx for is the adventure itself, with all the "humor" and stuff, but meh.

I could skip brm as well and just buy loe since brm will become obsolete in a year or so.

In that case, should I also start disenchanting all my GvG cards before they get their dust cost reduced? (as we presume?)

Edited by Sepums

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, ignoring Naxx and GvG is probably the best option now. LoE offers high value and so does BrM. Still, the strongest set are classic cards. Wild is gong to "die out" anyway. However, BrM and LoE will become obsolete at the same time, so don't take into account that BrM is older.

The cost of crafting and the "reward" for disenchanting GvG should stay the same. No need to start disenchanting now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I just want a clearer look at this.

How will BrM and LoE become obsolete at the same time? Wasn't LoE released a year later? Pardon me if I'm wrong.

Anyway, can you also confirm that the reward for disenchanting GvG is going to stay the same? You said "should" which is only a probability.

Sorry if I sound like a dick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I just want a clearer look at this.

How will BrM and LoE become obsolete at the same time? Wasn't LoE released a year later? Pardon me if I'm wrong.

Anyway, can you also confirm that the reward for disenchanting GvG is going to stay the same? You said "should" which is only a probability.

Sorry if I sound like a dick.

Yes, LoE was released after a time period of almost one year, but they were released in the same calendar year of 2015, which is what matters (according to current information "You’ll play Standard using a deck built solely from a pool of cards that were released in the current and previous calendar year, along with a core foundation of the Basic and Classic card sets"). 

I can't find any source to support my statement that GvG will be disenchantable for the price usual cards will be disenchanted. I derived it from the statement that the cards won't be disenchantable for the full crafting price and from the information/values at HearthPwn Innkeeper. I have found information only for Adventures.

Do not worry, as long as you are polite (which you are), I am happy to (try to) help you :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would get both adventures! Yes, the Naxxramas cards will rotate soon, but adventures are fun to play on their own. I remember the challenge of defeating Heroic Frost Wyrm Lair. Don't forget that some of the coolest card backs come from the adventures!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although they are fun to play, they are currently not worth buying for their value, and since a lot of players are F2P, spending 3500 gold on something that will be gone in a few months is not really an option if they want to have better decks.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although they are fun to play, they are currently not worth buying for their value, and since a lot of players are F2P, spending 3500 gold on something that will be gone in a few months is not really an option if they want to have better decks.

I suppose so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty sure you would get the same amount of dust you get from disenchanting GvG post update as you do now. People wanted Blizzard to give them full dust (i.e dust required to craft) from Disenchanting, but blizzard has refused. I did not realize BRM and LOE were same year... So when the new expansion rolls out in 2017 we lose TgT LoE and BRM... Damn. TgT really failed to capture the community...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tgt was pretty meh, I'm not going to miss it at all compared to gvg.

The only cards I'm going to miss are probably Confessor and Gormok, Mukla's champion, and Mogor's champion because he never got a trophy.

Gvg filled many gaps in many classes and introduced so much. (goodbye darkbomb, implosion, malganis, lightbomb, velen's chosen, glaivezooka, snowchugger, crackle, bouncing blade, mech bear cat, tinkmaster's oil, and others I can't remember off the top of my head right now.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely going to miss all Warlock cards from GvG, especially Mal'ganis. In the same vein, I will miss dreadsteed from TgT. I love dreadsteed riverdare mal'ghanis shenanigans. Hopefully it will be viable one day in wild! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      We have a new Tavern Brawl this week! Its name is Spellbook Duel.
      For this Brawl, you choose your class and then you pick 10 different cards to fill your deck. Instead of drawing cards each turn, you Discover a copy of a card from your deck. If you use card drawing mechanics, like Arcane Intellect, you don't actually draw from your deck. You will, in fact, get a 1-mana spell called Peruse, which again allows you to Discover a copy of a card from your deck.
      Obviously, there are a lot of possible deck combinations you can use to tackle this new Tavern Brawl. The first things that pop into mind are anything that contains Reno Jackson and Kazakus, as well as Jade Druid to extend the possibility of getting these precious Jade Idols. Once again, Mage is the clear winner of this Brawl with cards like Sorcerer's Apprentice, Arcane Intellect and Flamewaker.
      Bear in mind that some cards are not recommended, since they remove cards from your Discover pool. Examples are Fel Reaver and Tracking. Moreover, cards that put another card directly into play, like Mysterious Challenger and Mad Scientist, will also make your Discover pool smaller. Lastly, according to a Reddit user, Renounce Darkness won't deduct 1 mana from the cards you discover throughout the game.
      There are already a lot of disgusting decks for Spellbook Duel out there. We are waiting for your suggestions and any other useful info in the comments!
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Grimy Goons Dragon Paladin Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Control Jade Shaman Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.