Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Zadina

hearthstone Hearthstone: A Recap of the Curse Trials

1 post in this topic

16091-hearthstone-a-recap-of-the-curse-t

The Curse Trials, organised by Team Archon and Curse, lasted from the 17th to the 19th of February. The main rule of this tournament was that cards from the Curse of Naxxramas and the Goblins vs Gnomes sets were banned.

 

The intention behind this rule was to have a tournament as close to the upcoming Standard format as possible. However, the Standard format will bring numerous new features that will completely change the game: a new set of cards (aka an expansion), as well as various changes to a lot of Basic and Classics cards (most notably the Druid ones). Moreover, participants in the Curse Trials could still use banned cards if they were generated by other cards, like Spellslinger or Nexus-Champion Saraad etc.

 

It was no surprise, therefore, that players brought mostly Druid to the tournament, along with Freeze Mage and Dragon decks.  Other popular decks were Rogue and Face Shaman. An honorable mention should be made to SuperJJ, whose Rogue game was on point and who was also the only one to bring a Midrange Shaman.

 

Onto the format of the Curse Trials, it was Conquest best out of five, with the preliminaries of the first two days having a double elimination element. The 16 invited players were: Amnesiac, Trump, Savjz, Lifecoach, ThijsNL, Eloise, Kolento, StrifeCro, Ostkaka, Firebat, Zalae, SuperJJ, Kibler, Forsen, Orange and RDU. The prize pool was at $30,000.

 

It all came down to Thijs ‘ThijsNL’ Molendijk versus Janne ‘Savjz’ Mikkonen in the grand final. Thijs easily took the first two games and only had to win with his Dragon Warrior to be crowned as victor of the Curse Trials. However, Savjz fought back and managed to even the score to 2-2. The decider game was between Thijs’ Dragon Warrior and Savjz’ Dragon Priest. With Thijs making a couple of mistakes, the game was really close and it had reached the fatigue stage. Everyone thought that Thijs’ last card was Nefarian, but he triumphantly drew the Bash that gave him the victory and left Savjz in utter disbelief.

 

 

You can watch the VODs of all the games of the Curse trials here, but you should definitely check the following out:

  • Lifecoach vs Zalae at Day 2. Zalae showed that even a Face Shaman can be exceptionally skilled, but Lifecoach proved his mettle and made the 0-2 into a 3-2.
  • Ostkaka vs Firebat at Day 2, also known as the battle of the World Champions. Firebat brought some interesting aggro decks, but it was Ostkaka who took the series with 3-2.
  • ThijsNL vs Ostkaka semi-final (3-2). This was a repeat of the Blizzcon 2015 semi-final, arguably one of the best games of 2015. This time, however, Ostkaka’s favourite Rogue deck let him down. In the last game, with Thijs having the upper hand and an empty board on Ostkaka's side, the latter drew three useless spells in three consecutive turns.

As you can see, Thijs posted his winning decks on Twitter. You can find all decks from the Curse Trials participants on Hearthpwn, as soon as they are uploaded.

 

Lastly, there’s no tournament without a bit of drama! Dog was originally one of the 16 invited players, but for some reason the organisers completely forgot about him, as he revealed on his stream. Kibler also made a slight mistake by including Crush, a banned GvG card, in his Warrior deck during his matches against Forsen at Day 1.

 

Overall, the idea behind the Curse Trials wasn’t bad, but there’s a huge difference on how Standard Format looks now and how it will look after the almost complete overhaul of the game in a few weeks. The previous weekend had a lot of tournament action, so stay tuned for the latest Hearthstone news!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      We have a new Tavern Brawl this week! Its name is Spellbook Duel.
      For this Brawl, you choose your class and then you pick 10 different cards to fill your deck. Instead of drawing cards each turn, you Discover a copy of a card from your deck. If you use card drawing mechanics, like Arcane Intellect, you don't actually draw from your deck. You will, in fact, get a 1-mana spell called Peruse, which again allows you to Discover a copy of a card from your deck.
      Obviously, there are a lot of possible deck combinations you can use to tackle this new Tavern Brawl. The first things that pop into mind are anything that contains Reno Jackson and Kazakus, as well as Jade Druid to extend the possibility of getting these precious Jade Idols. Once again, Mage is the clear winner of this Brawl with cards like Sorcerer's Apprentice, Arcane Intellect and Flamewaker.
      Bear in mind that some cards are not recommended, since they remove cards from your Discover pool. Examples are Fel Reaver and Tracking. Moreover, cards that put another card directly into play, like Mysterious Challenger and Mad Scientist, will also make your Discover pool smaller. Lastly, according to a Reddit user, Renounce Darkness won't deduct 1 mana from the cards you discover throughout the game.
      There are already a lot of disgusting decks for Spellbook Duel out there. We are waiting for your suggestions and any other useful info in the comments!
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Grimy Goons Dragon Paladin Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Control Jade Shaman Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.