L0rinda

hearthstone Design Team Comment on Health of Hearthstone and Yogg

7 posts in this topic

pOSom9b.jpg

IGN have conducted a very interesting interview with Designers Mike Donais and Dean Ayala regarding the health of Hearthstone at the moment.

The article covers a lot of the questions that have been raised by the community recently. Donais admits there is more Shaman on ladder than he would like right now, but seems comfortable waiting to see if it dies down when players stop experimenting with new builds (Presumably with regards to Spirit Claws). He talks a bit about Priest, and the implication is that Priest will probably be helped in the next set.

He also comments on Yogg-Saron, Hope's End, saying "Yogg-Saron is definitely on our radar." This is probably no real cause for excitement just yet, but it's good to see that they are taking a look. The whole article, in fact, is a reminder of how much the design team are constantly monitoring all kinds of statistics. It is also good that they are aware of which current decks that require high skill caps, as many players believe that Hearthstone needs high skill cap decks to be credible as an esport.

Blizzard LogoIksar  (Dean Ayala)

Yeah, like the Raging Worgen Warrior, Anyfin Paladin, Miracle Rogue, Freeze Mage is still being played, and this Malygos Druid, and all of those decks are very very complex, and all have some amount of success on ladder right now. 

The second half of the article talks in-depth about the how the changes to the Arena were made. As always, it is fascinating to read how the design team reaches their decisions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Im glad Blizzard actually listens to its users unlike other companies.. Props to you Blizzard

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How much would it impact the usefulness of Yogg if it only played your class' spells? I imagine he'd become even better for some classes, even worse for others?

Maybe even restrict the maximum number of spells he can cast?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Blainie said:

How much would it impact the usefulness of Yogg if it only played your class' spells? I imagine he'd become even better for some classes, even worse for others?

Maybe even restrict the maximum number of spells he can cast?

I'd like to see him only cast spells up to the amount of mana cast on spells during the game so far. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A question I would like to ask Hearthstone Research&Development team would probably be "do you put "fun" in "fundamental" (excuse this horrible pun)"

How much do they value a factor of fun? How do they even measure this if they do, and are we put to mercy of their judgment on the subject? 

Is "not fun", "frustrating to play as\against" a relevant argument in some decisions? Because oh boy, they'd definetly showed us they hate fun when Miracle and Patron were nerfed, Kappa.

Perhaps I'm just a fun hater and I'm definetly not a qualified game designer, but when I'm thinking about some things that can be in the game but they aren't : mechanics, interactions, whole dimensions and axises (axi?) of gameplay, maybe it's all left behind because "it ain't fun", and if it so, I'd like to know about it. And the other option is "R&D is stupid" which sucks. 

My opinion is that "fun" should be a secondary factor if you try to brand a game as competitive, even as an E-Sports discipline.

 


Regarding the actual interview, I didn't like the Priest part and their "trick" explaination. Personally I don't feel like weird stuff is a part of Priest's identity from the original game, i mean, guys have a healing spell called "Heal". And "Great Heal" which heals more. And "Flash Heal" that heals fast. And then there are spells like "Power Word : Shield" or ":Pain" or ":Death", guess what they do, too.

If you position a class like that, like a "trick class", there is no way it's going to work out any way, because when it doesn't, it sucks, and when it does, you nerf it, or it happens like once in a lifetime and it still sucks. Priest should have more basic feel, down-to-earth design, with actual creatures, killing spells and card draws, because that's what Hearthstone at its Heart is all about, and as I explained, Priest is a pretty "basic" class for what it's worth. Well, it used to be.

Just look at the other "Trick Class", Rogue. They are actually viable, because their tricks are "normal" - as much as "normal" can a turn 3 10\10 Van Cleef be, he is still just a big dumb beater, and so on.

Dragon Priest was a good shot. Even a LoE Control Priest felt like a normal deck. If they stop messing around and put on their thinking caps, we can have a game with 9 classes but without the 9th class. And that would be great.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, L0rinda said:

I'd like to see him only cast spells up to the amount of mana cast on spells during the game so far. 

This was more along the lines of what I meant. Something that stops those super cheap druid spells turning into something worth 15-20 times the mana.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By positiv2
      We decided to use Paracel's suggestion and make it into a weekly round-up thread. 
      Druid
      Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Jade Druid No Giants Gadgetzan Standard Deck (fixed) Budget Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Hunter
      Midrange Beast Hunter Gadgetzan Standard Deck Mage
      Nothing yet :( Paladin
      Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck (actually contains murlocs this time :P ) Budget Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Priest
      Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Priest No Cleric Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Rogue
      Questing Miracle Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Shaman
      N'Zoth Control Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Kobold Midrange Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warlock
      Reno Combo Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warrior
      Pirate Aggro Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck N'Zoth Control Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck If you have any suggestions or questions, feel free to leave them in the comments.
    • By L0rinda
      The new meta is still forming, but even at this early stage it seems that Kazakus will be a large part of it. This article shows all of the available potions, and explains how the ordering of the spells when cast is likely to change.
      The first trick to remembering all of the options is to realise that  in the potion creation stage, nearly all of the choices are fundamentally the same no matter whether the spell costs 1, 5, or 10 mana. The cost of the spell simply powers up the effect. There are ten different effects to choose from, which are outlined below. The spells are remembered more easily when you group the effects by numbers.
      1, 2, 3 effects:
      Icecap: Freezes 1, 2, or 3 enemy minions.
      Ichor of Undeath: Summons 1, 2, or 3 friendly minions that died this game.
      Kingsblood: Draws 1, 2, or 3 cards.
      Shadow Oil: Adds 1, 2, or 3 random Demons to your hand.

      Other effects in number order:
      Felbloom: Deals 2, 4, or 6 damage to all minions. 
      Goldthorn: Gives your minions 2, 4, or 6 extra health. 
      Netherbloom: Summons a 2/2, 5/5, or 8/8 demon.
      Heart of Fire: Deals 3, 5, or 8 damage.
      Stonescale Oil: Gives 4, 7, or 10 Armor.
      Mystic Wool: This card is unique in that it has no effect for 1 mana. It either turns a random enemy minion into a 1/1 Sheep, or all enemy minions into 1/1 Sheep.

      At the moment, many of the pairings work according to the game engine, rather than in the best order, which means that Kazakus is not working as intended. An example of this would be minions that are getting killed by damage are then getting frozen before leaving play. This is correct in terms of how the game works, as deaths are always processed last, but the spells are going to be made to work outside of the regular game engine. This will make them more powerful and intuitive.
      Mike Donais
      We are already working on this. Feel free to post stuff like this on our bug forums. (source) This reply on Reddit confirms that the idea of the custom Spell is that it will resolve in an order beneficial to the caster, and that it will likely be changed very soon.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Questing Miracle Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Jade Druid No Giants Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck.