L0rinda

hearthstone Big Hearthstone Esports Changes For 2017

2 posts in this topic

WMd4HVT.jpg

Hearthstone esports will be even bigger in 2017. Not only will there be a bigger Championship Tour, but there will be other global events as well.

Due to the success of the 2016 Hearthstone Championship Tour (HCT), it is easy to forget that this is only the third year of competitive Hearthstone. Blizzard have been working hard on improving this for 2017, and have recently announced their plans for next year.

The changes to the HCT itself are pretty spectacular. There will be a global Season Championship instead of regional ones, and they will be held at locations that allow spectators, rather than in a closed studio. Season Championships will include 4 players from each region (Americas, Asia-Pacific, Europe, and China). These players will be decided using regional Playoffs (to replace Preliminaries), and they will use the Swiss Tournament format. 

The Championships will be synched with Standard. This should mean that the meta is always fresh during the Championship events, and will hopefully reward deckbuilding. Magic: The Gathering uses this format already, and it is something that should greatly benefit Hearthstone viewing. On top of these changes, points and cups have been tidied up, and the prize pool for the year has been set at $2 million.

There will also be Hearthstone Global Games, which is a world team league featuring teams from different countries, and Inn-vitationals, which will include streamers and celebrities in a more light hearted setting.

I think that these changes will make a huge difference to our viewing experience in 2017. What do you think? As always, feel free to comment below.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now, that the World Championship is over, I'm coming to the conclusion tournament changes for Hearthstone are much needed, and these are pretty much what the doctor ordered.

The first major flaw was that people who qualified for Blizzcon during Winter did so playing literally another format that had very little in common with what was there. Granted, this did not affect the outcome of the event (no spoilers) - these players looked good in current Standard - but the point still stands. If you want your World Championship to be a multi-format challenge (like Worlds in M:TG are) - then state in clearly and follow your patterns consistently.

Swiss implemention is a change that I'm asking for the most, because small brackets showcase a little in a game with random elements. In M:TG, when you go to the highest level of a competition - Pro Tour, for example, you have to get through Fifteen. Rounds. Of Magic. That's 15 hours of your best play over two days, which takes not only great skill but incredible fortitude, physical and/or mental, as well. And 12-3-1 puts you in just in a Top 8. That's just Heroic Brawl level.

When you are in a 4-man group following 8-man bracket, you can just highroll through the whole thing. Try doing it in 15+ series, not 6. I'm not spoiling anything or voicing opinions on the matter (yet), but this can realistically happen.

And consistency is something that's pushed as a main quality of "e-sports" in Hearthstone. What is perceived as outstanding, professional level play is not mechanics in "traditional" e-sports games - like Starcraft, CS or DotA - HS asks you to engage in a battle of wits in a huge variety of situations with a huge sample. That's how Legend system works, and in my opinion, it's rather a good way of measuring level of play - because factors other that ability to make good decisions and think well are eliminated. Swiss in Tournaments will do the same - and that's a win-win, because hey, Blizzard get a ton of Hearthstone to broadcast, and we get a ton of Hearthstone to watch. 

I hope, though, that they won't still tournament system from M:TG absolutely, because Pro Tours have their problems, being not exactly top tier tournaments, but rather big, flashy commercials for new sets. But this discussion does not really belong here ;)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By positiv2
      We decided to use Paracel's suggestion and make it into a weekly round-up thread. 
      Druid
      Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Jade Druid No Giants Gadgetzan Standard Deck (fixed) Budget Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Hunter
      Midrange Beast Hunter Gadgetzan Standard Deck Mage
      Nothing yet :( Paladin
      Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck (actually contains murlocs this time :P ) Budget Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Priest
      Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Priest No Cleric Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Rogue
      Questing Miracle Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Shaman
      N'Zoth Control Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Kobold Midrange Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warlock
      Reno Combo Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warrior
      Pirate Aggro Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck N'Zoth Control Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck If you have any suggestions or questions, feel free to leave them in the comments.
    • By L0rinda
      The new meta is still forming, but even at this early stage it seems that Kazakus will be a large part of it. This article shows all of the available potions, and explains how the ordering of the spells when cast is likely to change.
      The first trick to remembering all of the options is to realise that  in the potion creation stage, nearly all of the choices are fundamentally the same no matter whether the spell costs 1, 5, or 10 mana. The cost of the spell simply powers up the effect. There are ten different effects to choose from, which are outlined below. The spells are remembered more easily when you group the effects by numbers.
      1, 2, 3 effects:
      Icecap: Freezes 1, 2, or 3 enemy minions.
      Ichor of Undeath: Summons 1, 2, or 3 friendly minions that died this game.
      Kingsblood: Draws 1, 2, or 3 cards.
      Shadow Oil: Adds 1, 2, or 3 random Demons to your hand.

      Other effects in number order:
      Felbloom: Deals 2, 4, or 6 damage to all minions. 
      Goldthorn: Gives your minions 2, 4, or 6 extra health. 
      Netherbloom: Summons a 2/2, 5/5, or 8/8 demon.
      Heart of Fire: Deals 3, 5, or 8 damage.
      Stonescale Oil: Gives 4, 7, or 10 Armor.
      Mystic Wool: This card is unique in that it has no effect for 1 mana. It either turns a random enemy minion into a 1/1 Sheep, or all enemy minions into 1/1 Sheep.

      At the moment, many of the pairings work according to the game engine, rather than in the best order, which means that Kazakus is not working as intended. An example of this would be minions that are getting killed by damage are then getting frozen before leaving play. This is correct in terms of how the game works, as deaths are always processed last, but the spells are going to be made to work outside of the regular game engine. This will make them more powerful and intuitive.
      Mike Donais
      We are already working on this. Feel free to post stuff like this on our bug forums. (source) This reply on Reddit confirms that the idea of the custom Spell is that it will resolve in an order beneficial to the caster, and that it will likely be changed very soon.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Questing Miracle Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Jade Druid No Giants Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck.