Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Damien

Hearthstone Card Advantage

8 posts in this topic

Card advantage doesn't mean having more cards than your opponent in your hand.  While that is likey to result from gaining card advantage that is not what it means to have it.

 

Card advantage is the sole result of playing cards that give more or cost more cards than your opponents.  For the arcane intellect example it means that you traded the one card (actually using arcane intellect) for two more so you net one extra card off the 2 for 1.

 

for the minions that draw cards most of them will net 2 for 1 since they replace themselves and will usually cost your opponent a card.

 

In the example given in the article it expressed correct play, not card advantage.  Card advantage gained would be assuming the yeti had killed something else and got to kill a second thing (probably netting a 3 for 1 given the opponent will usually have to use another card to get rid of it).  Or talking about the fact that the weapon will go on to kill a few more minions, or how the agent will probably cost a card from your opponent to get rid of it.

 

Also the biggest way to gain card advantage is generally related to getting the most mileage out of your hero power, particularly with the druid, mage, rogue killing off 1 health or low health minions, the warlock just trading life for cards.  The paladin and the shaman can get alot of mileage out of there powers as well when it comes to killing things.  The priest can force an opponent to commit more resources to killing an minion so results in an indirect method.  The warrior and the hunter affect more the rate and life is lost so while good, are not direct generators of card advantage.

 

Lastly stat buffing a weaker minion to kill a stronger minion will usually result in card disadvantage, unless the source of the buff is another minion, or the buff causes them to survive the confrontation. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Card advantage doesn't mean having more cards than your opponent in your hand.  While that is likey to result from gaining card advantage that is not what it means to have it.

 

Card advantage is the sole result of playing cards that give more or cost more cards than your opponents.  For the arcane intellect example it means that you traded the one card (actually using arcane intellect) for two more so you net one extra card off the 2 for 1.

 

for the minions that draw cards most of them will net 2 for 1 since they replace themselves and will usually cost your opponent a card.

 

In the example given in the article it expressed correct play, not card advantage.  Card advantage gained would be assuming the yeti had killed something else and got to kill a second thing (probably netting a 3 for 1 given the opponent will usually have to use another card to get rid of it).  Or talking about the fact that the weapon will go on to kill a few more minions, or how the agent will probably cost a card from your opponent to get rid of it.

 

Also the biggest way to gain card advantage is generally related to getting the most mileage out of your hero power, particularly with the druid, mage, rogue killing off 1 health or low health minions, the warlock just trading life for cards.  The paladin and the shaman can get alot of mileage out of there powers as well when it comes to killing things.  The priest can force an opponent to commit more resources to killing an minion so results in an indirect method.  The warrior and the hunter affect more the rate and life is lost so while good, are not direct generators of card advantage.

 

Lastly stat buffing a weaker minion to kill a stronger minion will usually result in card disadvantage, unless the source of the buff is another minion, or the buff causes them to survive the confrontation. 

 

You are under some fundamental misapprehensions (and that's fine).

 

Card advantage does mean having more cards than your opponent. There is really no debate there. You can't claim to have card advantage if you do not have more cards than your opponent. It's really simple.

 

What you are describing, "playing cards that give more or cost more cards than your opponents" is not card advantage. That's simply a way to maximise the value of your cards in an attempt to achieve card advantage.

 

The article gave an example of "correct play", yes. It even calls it that.

 

I also agree that good use of the Hero Power often leads to getting card advantage, as I do with your statement about buffing minions.

 

But whether you get card advantage by using a massive Divine Favor, or by slowly and surely getting more mileage out of your cards, or anything else, it doesn't really affect the fact that having more cards means having card advantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to see this article expanded as soon as Hearthstone is out of beta Kappa

 

Jokes aside, I enjoyed reading it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to see this article expanded as soon as Hearthstone is out of beta Kappa

 

Jokes aside, I enjoyed reading it!

*still looking for the joke*

 

We're glad you enjoyed it! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great Article!

Thanks for taking the time to explain Card Advantage. When I first started playing, I noticed that I would run out of cards before my opponents quite often.

These days I'm able to extract a lot more utility from my cards, though it would have made a big difference to have known this earlier on. In future revisions of this article it would be great to see some more "situation-specific" examples along with further suggestions on how to maintain card advantage as often as possible.

Keep up the good work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am slightly confused... 

In the example about playing your cards efficiently I would have played the weapon, the SI:7 Agent'ed the Swamp Ooze, hit the Sen'jin with my weapon and Yeti. That would have killed all of the enemy minons, which the two examples given did not do...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Guest Sammich said:

I am slightly confused... 

In the example about playing your cards efficiently I would have played the weapon, the SI:7 Agent'ed the Swamp Ooze, hit the Sen'jin with my weapon and Yeti. That would have killed all of the enemy minons, which the two examples given did not do...

The second example would kill all opponent's minions as well - SI:7 Agent + Chillwind Yeti kill Sen'jin Shieldmasta, and your weapon kills Acidic Swamp Ooze. The way you would have played simply changes the order of opponent's minions death and overdamage done to them, but with the same result - your board has Chillwind Yeti with 1HP, full SI:7 Agent and 3 charges left on your Assassin's Blade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda
      YouTuber, Disguised Toast, is never far from the front of Hearthstone science, and his latest video is spectacular. This video investigates the strange interactions caused by Weasel Tunneler's Deathrattle.
      Weasel Tunneler's Deathrattle seems simple enough, it reads: Shuffle this minion into your opponent's deck. However, when tested by Disguised Toast, it turns out that even this simple looking text can result in rather odd results. The ordering of other Deathrattles on the board, and effects by other cards on Deathrattles is what makes it so unpredictable. Take a look for yourself!
      The fact your deck displays as full, no matter how many cards left, is probably the strangest interaction of all. Even Toast doesn't  attempt to describe how that one happens.
    • By L0rinda
      Blizzard have updated the breakdown of the amount each gang's classes are being played.
      On their Gadgetzan page, there is an infographic showing who controls the town of Gadgetzan today. The percentages are worked out by how often each class is being used. Even with the huge amount of Pirate Warrior on ladder at the moment, the Grimy Goons are unable to control the city! That honour goes, currently, to the Kabal. With people having success with Reno Warlock AND Reno Priest, it will be fun to see if they hold that position in the coming days.

    • By etaeta
      So I got a lot of jade cards for druid and neutral in the 15-20 packs I've opened, and I wanted to make a jade druid deck, right? But I'm poor, so I look up "Jade Druid Budget Deck". I find one on this site with the following deck list:
       
      2x Innervate 2x Jade Idol MSG 2x Living Roots TGT 2x Raven Idol LoE 2x Wild Growth 2x Wrath 2x Feral Rage TOG 2x Jade Blossom MSG 2x Swipe 2x Nourish 2x Jade Behemoth MSG 2x Jade Spirit MSG 2x Azure Drake 2x Gadgetzan Auctioneer 2x Arcane Giant Kara But I don't have Raven Idol. Or nourish, though I can just craft that since it's in classic. So can anyone suggest an option for replacing the raven idols? I don't want to get all of League of Explorers just to play with it for a month then watch it turn to dust so I can craft other cards for decks in standard. I have one branch, but that's it. I was thinking maybe 1 jeweled scarab, though I know that card is frowned upon for reasons I've never been made aware of, for flexibility, and a loot hoarder for pure draw.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Aggro Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck.