Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Damien

[Archived] S8 Hearthstone Mid Budget Mage Aggro Deck

30 posts in this topic

Great build! Played, 5-1 untill now. Just 1 question, why 2 pyroblast and 1 flamestrike, and not 2 flamestikes and 1 pyroblast? Thanks for the reply!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great build! Played, 5-1 untill now. Just 1 question, why 2 pyroblast and 1 flamestrike, and not 2 flamestikes and 1 pyroblast? Thanks for the reply!

Because Flamestrike is pretty situational. It's so threatening that most players will be very scared of it and do a lot to avoid exposing themselves to it. Most likely, you'll get one good Flamestrike off, but the opponent will never re-build a board to make a second Flamestrike useful.

 

Pyroblast, on the other hand, is pretty much always useful. Once you get to 10 mana, 2 turns will almost always be enough to guarantee a win with your Pyroblasts (and having 2 increases the chances of drawing at least 1 - which also often wins you the game).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would you play in a legendary mage aggro deck with zero cost restictions.. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck seems to perform pretty bad in the current meta. Taunts hard counter this build, pretty every other class will be able to establish board presence and overrun you with their minions, so your spells are pretty much useless. 
Have been playing against two mages, in one I got raped, the other one was not close as well. 

A shaman has murdered me as well. 

 

I am in the 14-16 ranks usually and must say, that this deck really underperforms. Even if you have a perfect starting hand, you need the perfect mana curve in the game as well to even have a chance. I will try it out a bit more... but at the moment, I must say, this deck is shit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck seems to perform pretty bad in the current meta. Taunts hard counter this build, pretty every other class will be able to establish board presence and overrun you with their minions, so your spells are pretty much useless. 

Have been playing against two mages, in one I got raped, the other one was not close as well. 

A shaman has murdered me as well. 

 

I am in the 14-16 ranks usually and must say, that this deck really underperforms. Even if you have a perfect starting hand, you need the perfect mana curve in the game as well to even have a chance. I will try it out a bit more... but at the moment, I must say, this deck is shit.

Guess we're going to look into this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I replaced the defender of argus x2 with a blood mage thalnos and Polymorph. This deck has worked really well for me because of it's consistent damage from beginning to late game. I am rank 8, just from this deck. I've played this deck for a long time so I know how to counter each situation, and I think it's a matter of skill when people don't adjust well to the deck after only playing it 6 or 7 times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

meh this deck i got only 1 problem. most of times i won before  turn 10 biggrin.png great deck thanks 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I replaced the defender of argus x2 with a blood mage thalnos and Polymorph. This deck has worked really well for me because of it's consistent damage from beginning to late game. I am rank 8, just from this deck. I've played this deck for a long time so I know how to counter each situation, and I think it's a matter of skill when people don't adjust well to the deck after only playing it 6 or 7 times.

May I ask for some suggestions on hoe to use the bloodmage. He always gets killed as soon as I put him out but I'm still new to the game. He just so happened to be I'm the first pack that I received. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its good to keep a poly instead of 2 pyro, I alose switched out a arcane intelect to arcane explotion because hunters and murlucks are everywhere

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask for some suggestions on hoe to use the bloodmage. He always gets killed as soon as I put him out but I'm still new to the game. He just so happened to be I'm the first pack that I received. Any suggestions would be appreciated.

You can always hold on to him and play other cards. Play Bloodmage once you wish to empower a specific spell. However, if you have nothing to play in early game, it will often be better to cycle it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I switch something for Ysera? (I have ysera, onyxia, and a sea giant).  I'm thinking ysera would be a good replacement for pyroblast or something else?

 

Thanks in advance!

Edited by Ukyo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I switch something for Ysera? (I have ysera, onyxia, and a sea giant).  I'm thinking ysera would be a good replacement for pyroblast or something else?

 

Thanks in advance!

You can always try :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went:

-2 Arcane Intellect

-2 Leper Gnomes

+1 Bloodmage Thalnos

+1 Sylvanas Windrunner

+2 Arcane Explosion (stops the 1-2 hp rush, and it's a mini-flamestrike with bloodmage)

 

I've been using:

-1 Pyroblast

for

+1 Ysera.

 

I'm thinking of swapping something else for Alexstrasza.

 

What do you guys think would work better with my changes?

Edited by Ukyo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck worked very well up until about a month ago. It seems as if people are just flat out buying build decks now, so the odds of winning if you haven't put money into a top built deck, the chances of winning are kind of slim. It's just what I've noticed, been playing around with the game since the beta key.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I started with a midbuget control warrior deck and I really liked it but it seems people are better prepared for it now. then I made a mid budget agro paladin and hunter deck. I think this one is better than the paladin deck because its easier to plan with this one instead of hoping you get lucky and pull a  sword of justice. the hunter deck is ok too. If you don't spend money on decks those last 3 are good because they share leeroy Jenkins and many of other cards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does any one know if I cast leeroy Jenkins when I have knife juggler on the board id the 2 whelps I summon for my opponent will trigger my knife juggler since I summoned them?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does any one know if I cast leeroy Jenkins when I have knife juggler on the board id the 2 whelps I summon for my opponent will trigger my knife juggler since I summoned them?

Hey, Mike

Should you have Knife Juggler on the board, your Leeroy Jenkins will trigger its ability only once for Leeroy, but not for the whelps, which will inflict 1 damage to a random enemy target.

Since you have brought Knife Juggler + Leeroy up, I would like to point out that if your opponent has Juggler, it will do 2 damage when you play Leeroy and it can happen that Juggler can kill your Leeroy :D

Its nasty and it can happen :D

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, that would be so depressing if I killed my own Leeroy. On a side note, I've had pretty good luck with this deck against Priests. I hate Priests! they seem to best me more often than not on my decks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm having trouble against other rush decks like the  mid budget paladin agro deck. It seems they out pressure me even when I get a starting hand with 1-2 mana costing minions. I start to minion trade and end up losing by a little. I also had trouble against shamans. Shamans can usually wipe out my first 2 minions with their 2-3 damage aoe.  any ideas on how to approach shamans especially? IE should I get a starting hand with more spells? I also find myself hardly ever getting a chance to use ice lance since my minion that can freeze Is usually removed quickly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, tried this deck for some time now. I do not know what I do wrong but I fail badly. Deck before this one I had more luck with. I was actually up at lvl 8 but now I can not go away from lvl 16-15. I actually have more luck with "Low Budget Mage Alternative Aggro/Rush Deck"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

I'm having trouble against other rush decks like the  mid budget paladin agro deck. It seems they out pressure me even when I get a starting hand with 1-2 mana costing minions. I start to minion trade and end up losing by a little. I also had trouble against shamans. Shamans can usually wipe out my first 2 minions with their 2-3 damage aoe.  any ideas on how to approach shamans especially? IE should I get a starting hand with more spells? I also find myself hardly ever getting a chance to use ice lance since my minion that can freeze Is usually removed quickly.

Hey, Mike

Ice lance is a finisher usually and you should simply pair it with Frostbolt. Frost Elemental can indeed provide the freeze, but its main objective is to bring crazy value on the board for its cost.

Against a shaman, you need to keep up with their totems and attempt to squeeze any damage to their hero in early game, trying to push them in kill range. Shaman will always run Lightning Storm and you simply can't over extend on the board: Play a Loot Hoarder or Arcane Intellect instead of further committing to pressure or simply use your hero power if you already offered your opponent a 2-for-1 Lightning Storm.

 

 

Hi, tried this deck for some time now. I do not know what I do wrong but I fail badly. Deck before this one I had more luck with. I was actually up at lvl 8 but now I can not go away from lvl 16-15. I actually have more luck with "Low Budget Mage Alternative Aggro/Rush Deck"

Hey, Minres

This deck leans towards mid-range which enforces different play style and if you try to play it as you played your Alternative Aggro, you will most likely run out of steam before you can finish your opponent. Go for the kill later, attempt to push for board control early and start nuking your opponent after you have pressured them lower.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree about Ice Lance, it tends to be a dead card in my hand.  I'd also be careful about putting Leeroy in the deck, in play mode adding a legendary means going up against legendary-filled decks.  Take him out and you only go up against decks with rares.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree about Ice Lance, it needs to be paired with another card to be effective so you *have* to have drawn both by turn 8 and done enough damage for this last 7 to be a finisher... with perhaps a fireball too.  13 damage for only 6 mana is pretty good but ah, what is your opponent doing?  Probably bringing out lots of taunters to force you to go into removal mode with weenies... a first-turn Voidwalker means you can't even afford to put out a soon-to-be-dead Knife Juggler yet.

 

I'd also be careful about having Leeroy in a deck with nothing else that's even Epic... adding a single legendary means Play mode includes all the hardcore decks.  Take him out and you'll play this deck against nothing but rares in Play mode.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey i just played today, and i've got some budget with me and went build this deck

 

everything was quite good for me even thought in ranked i got bullied sometimes

but i wonder whats the use of leeroy jenkins? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Wizard Manald Channeling Build.
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)
    • By Zadina
      Ben Brode was active on the official forums and on social media these past few days and he had a lot of interesting things to say about various hot topics. Most notably, he noted that it's possible that additional Basic and Classic set cards may be nerfed or rotated out of Standard in the future.
      You probably remember that with the release of the Standard format, something less than a year ago, 12 Basic and Classic cards were nerfed. Now, Game Director Ben Brode revealed that more Basic & Classic card nerfs can happen or at least they may be rotated out of Standard. The reasoning behind this is that the team wants to keep a fresh feeling in Standard and they don't want to see the same core cards appear too frequently. That's why they are also not considering buffing underused vanilla cards, since Basic and Classic cards are already being used a lot and they want new sets to be more impactful.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide The goal with Standard is to keep the meta fresh for each yearly rotation. There are some benefits to keeping Basic and Classic cards in Standard: Returning players have an entry-point to the new format, and new players experience classics like "Hogger" and "Arcane Missiles" that are iconic and great introductions to the game. People take breaks from Hearthstone, and being able to jump right back in with a few cards you already own and understand makes that experience a lot better. That upside has a real downside in working directly against the big goal for Standard. It needs to feel different each year, and if Basic and Classic cards are still appearing in large densities year after year, we will not be achieving our goals for Standard.
      We knew we weren't going to get there when the Year of the Kraken began, so we nerfed 12 basic/classic cards, to put more of the weight of the meta into the rotating sets. We always knew we'd have to watch the meta to see if any future changes would be needed when we got ready for the next year of Standard. If things are looking like they are going to be too same-y for that next year, we could see more nerfs, or we might rotate some additional classic cards to Wild, like we did with Old Murk Eye. No matter what, we're committed to making Standard fresh and exciting each new year. (source)
       
       
      Are you guys considering, besides nerfs, implementing buffs for underused vanilla cards?
      Given the goal of Standard is to keep the game fresh each year, it's important to keep a lot of the power of the cards in the expansions, and not in the basic and classic sets. It's not clear what that balance of power should look like (is it ~10 cards from the basic and classic sets on average?), but we're currently skewed so high towards basic and classic cards in decks, that we are at high risk for 'samey-ness' as the years change in Standard. Buffing Basic/Classic cards *increases* that risk. If the goal is to get more cool cards into the meta, just releasing awesome new cards in expansions should make an impact there, and still keep Standard fresh. (source)
      Obviously, this comment caused a lot of reactions and Ben took to Reddit (specifically this thread) and Twitter, where he answered various questions. A brief summary of his responses is that the Basic set is currently the most powerful in the game (source), while the team intends to keep the vanilla set unchanged (the term used was 'evergreen' - source). Ben repeated that the team's intention behind any future Basic and Classic card nerfs or changes is to keep Standard format fresh and "less same-y". A difficult question was posed to the community: would they prefer the affected vanilla cards to be nerfed, rotated out of Standard format or remain as they are, even if it results in a staler meta?
      On the same Reddit thread, Brode also talked about why the Charge nerf was necessary due to the Grimy Goons synergy and how new/F2P players are currently still able to reach Legend rank - something that he expects to keep happening in the future as well.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We nerfed Charge (the spell) because we knew the upcoming Grimy Goons mechanic in combination with Enraged Worgen and Charge was not really fair or fun. There have always been F2P players at Legend, and there have continued to be since that change. (source) Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide We did this in 2016 when we nerfed 12 classic cards and it made a huge difference in how much the meta was able to change with the release of Old Gods (instead of just continuing to be Druid Combo). New players were able to reach legend without spending money after that change, and I expect that will be continue to be true if we change a few more cards in 2017. (source) On a somewhat relevant topic, with the end of the Year of the Kraken the end of Reno Jackson is also approaching. Ben excluded the possibility of this game-changing card making it into the Classic set - once again the reason being "keeping the meta fresh".
      Placeholder for tweet 817625802116214784 For consistency's sake, I've also included two Brode blue posts from last week. In the first one, he talks about the new player experience and how it still needs more work. For example. the climb from the introductory quests to actually playing the game feels steep, while getting into Ranked is also difficult. However, for their first games new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool designed to match new players with each other. There has also been a 15% increase in new player winrates on Casual.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide Hey there! We agree that the new player experience needs more work. We've been tweaking it for years and have seen significant increases in retention among new players since launch. Most new players start playing against the AI and then take on other players in Casual. The Casual matchmaker has gone through a lot of iteration and new player winrates have increased by ~15%.
      Ranked is a different story. Ranked is becoming more difficult for new players over time. I spoke about some of the challenges we are currently facing with our ladder system before I left for paternity leave here: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/58pxgt/ben_brode_confirms_the_2_game_win_streak_is_not/
      Something you may not realize is that new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool for their first several sessions. In Casual, we match them entirely against other brand new players with similarly-sized collections.
      That all said, we think the introductory missions up through Illidan feel pretty good, and after that it still feels like a bit of a cliff. It's definitely something we're aware of. Thanks for your feedback, and for the feedback of everyone else who's been chiming in on this over the last few months.
      (source) Lastly, Ben made an interesting post about another community hot topic: the ladder system.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently - we're not 100% happy with it.
      Here are some things we are currently discussing:
      Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn't make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that's a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it'd be better if expectations and reality matched here.
      We've received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn't feel all that great.
      We've received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.
      We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.
      We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when "3-star master" was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.
      Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn't necessarily any one player's individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as "good", at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.
      (source)