Damien

[Archived] S8 Hearthstone Mid Budget Mage Antonidas Aggro Deck

23 posts in this topic

I had build an Antonidas deck using the previous mid-cost mage deck that was here as a template. My current mage deck looks like this: 

 

Mage
2x Mirror Image
2x Arcane Missiles
2x Ice Lance
2x Frostbolt
2x Sorcerer's Apprentice
2x Arcane Intellect
2x Ice Barrier
2x Ice Block
2x Water Elemental
2x Blizzard
2x Pyroblast 
1x Archmage Antonidas
 
Neutral
2x Loot Hoarder 
2x Novice Engineer
2x Azure Drake
1x Gadgetzan Auctioneer 
 
What are your thoughts? And if i wanted to build the one you have posted here using the cards I have available to me currently which replaces would you recommend as i seem to be short about 3-4 cards one of them being legendary. 
 
Mage Specific: 
2x Ice Lance
2x Mana Wyrm
2x Sorcerer's Apprentice
2x Ice Barrier
2x Ice Block
2x Cone of Cold
2x Blizzard
1x Archmage Antonidas
2x Pyroblast
 
Neutral
2x Abusive Sergeant
2x Argent Squire
1x Hungry Crab
2x Leper Gnome
1x Lightwarden
2x Murloc Tidecaller
2x Amani Berserker
2x Ancient Watcher
1x Doomsayer
2x Faerie Dragon
2x Ironbeak Owl
2x Knife Juggler
2x Loot Hoarder
1x Mad Bomber
2x Sunfury Protector
2x Wild Pyromancer
2x Acolyte of Pain
2x Arcane Golem
1x Big Game Hunter
2x Coldlight Oracle
2x Coldlight Seer
2x Earthen Ring Farseer
2x Harvest Golem
2x Imp Master
2x Injured Blademaster
2x Murloc Warleader
2x Scarlet Crusader
2x Dark Iron Dwarf
2x Defender of Argus
1x Leeroy Jenkins
2x Spellbreaker
2x Twilight Drake
2x Azure Drake
1x Faceless Manipulator
2x Fen Creeper
1x Gadgetzan Auctioneer
2x Argent Commander
1x Sylvanas Windrunner
2x Molten Giant
Edited by Akaitsuki

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey, Akaitsuki

 

I've made a general response to your multiple posts, you can find it here.

 

Let us know if it helps, 

Regards,

Poyo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the reasoning behind including counterspell in this deck? It seems to me hit-and-miss at best, and I don't think it's worth two slots. I would use two ice barriers if I were throwing in secrets. Please explain the reasoning here. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the reasoning behind including counterspell in this deck? It seems to me hit-and-miss at best, and I don't think it's worth two slots. I would use two ice barriers if I were throwing in secrets. Please explain the reasoning here. smile.png

Ice Barriers can be great when playing against aggressive decks as they will help you get past the early stages of the match, however Counterspell will have much greater impact on the match in late stages. 

Also... there is nothing more annoying for your opponent than playing Anotnidas + Counterspell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Poyo.

 

Looks like a great deck as the combinations seems to work well. I found this deck since i got one antonidas and want to find any deck building around him. I'm very new to this game, so couple of questions want to ask.

 

1. What would be the best starting card in your opinion (Like mirror image, frost bolt)?

 

2. When i collect the secret card, should i put it onto board as long as i have additional crystal or should i keep it to protect antonidas? 

 

3. Can you give a simple strategy when battling with any other classes, especially fast decks?

 

Thanks a lot~

 

Fay

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sort of tweaked this deck into a pretty legendary heavy deck that seems to work very well. 

 

 

Mage Specific

 

Arcane Missles x2 

Mirror Image x2 

Mana wyrm x2 

Frostbolt X2

Sorcerer's Apprentice x1

Arcane Intellect x2

Counterspell x2

Fireball x2

Polymorph x2

Water Elemental x2

Flamestike x2 

Pyroblast x1

Archmage Antondias x1

 

Neutral

 

Nat pagle x1

Bloodmage Thalnos x1

Harcvest Golem x2

Azure Drake x2

Cairne Bloodhoof x1

The Black Knight x1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't get a single win with this deck

What do you feel is killing you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys. Long time reader I'm new to hearthstone was wondering if you guys had any tips for grinding out dust I guess to create a legendary. 11000 plus dust seems like it would take months to gather. Any advice for the newbie trying to build a Mage deck. Love mages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't get a single win with this deck

 

 

same here.

I'd like to make a suggestion :D

Take out Nat Pagle, 2x Counterspell, 1x Archmage and replace them with 2x Sunfury Protector and 2x Defender of Argus. It will make the deck a bit more mid-range aggressive. The deck works, however getting Archmage to roll is often hard and I know that some players may destroy their game trying to force an Archmage kill. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is there any aggro deck that works on this meta?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is there any aggro deck that works on this meta?

Yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poyo can u make 1 good mage with Secret's deck? 1 version of aggro and 1 of Control.. 

 

 

(the current Legendarys i got is Antonidas & Leeroy Jekins)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These decks don't work good anymore ... they need urgently an update please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've won plenty with this deck. It's not the best deck, of course, but it's very fun to play! The best is when you have double sorc apprentice and Archmage on the board. 3-5 fireballs in 1 turn always feels good. I didn't have nat pagle so I used a sunfury to help with cheesy decks. Replaced one Azure with a Gadgetzan, and the second counterspell with a blizzard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Poyo,

Hi all,

 

My first contribution to this forum is:

 

Tauren Warrior or Ragen Worgen, for a 3 mana replace of Harvest Golem ?

 

I like the idea of activating the enrage of either with Fireblast, but do you feel that is truly viable? Do any even survive one round to be able to pull that off?

 

For this deck, since it's an agressive deck, I would think the Worgen would be a better fit. 

 

But can you think of other good cards to trade for Harvest Golem for the noobs like me that haven't got one yet in a booster? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Poyo,

Hi all,

 

My first contribution to this forum is:

 

Tauren Warrior or Ragen Worgen, for a 3 mana replace of Harvest Golem ?

 

I like the idea of activating the enrage of either with Fireblast, but do you feel that is truly viable? Do any even survive one round to be able to pull that off?

 

For this deck, since it's an agressive deck, I would think the Worgen would be a better fit. 

 

But can you think of other good cards to trade for Harvest Golem for the noobs like me that haven't got one yet in a booster? smile.png

Hey, WurmD!

I know Enrage minions might be appealing, but you need to consider the impact they will have on the board. Tauren Warrior is absolutely horrible and you should not consider it in any constructed deck - it is simply too expensive and Amani Berserker will always make a much better alternative - it would, however, make your deck heavy on 2 mana drops.

Raging Worgen could work, however you need to understand that it will get taken out by a single spell and you will rarely get to enrage it. Check the new deck list, you might like it a lot with Kirin Tor Mage, can be a really nasty play :)

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck seriously need some tweaking. I can only reach rank 17-16 with this deck -.- last season i reached rank 10 with a bit weaker deck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed with above poster. Got to rank 14 with my own, bad aggro deck (mage) that is minion heavy. Drew the Archmage and started using this, but I just keep losing almost every game. It feels like this deck loses to nearly all aggro decks (who have far more minions), as well as any shaman control deck.

Nearly all my few victories have been against players who have had weak early or if I had miraculously good early with perfect starting hand and draws. I don't know if it's me doing something really wrong or if thr deck isn't working as intended.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck got me down to about rank 14...  then promptly kicked back up to 18 or so, because not everyone is retarded. It's just not an aggro deck with the Secrets and Archmage synergy. Trying to roll a Counterspell with an Archmage, and hoping for an Antonidas by turn 7?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't get beyond Rank 13...still a nice deck, but i will switch back to my own secret mage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Wizard Manald Channeling Build.
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)
    • By Zadina
      Ben Brode was active on the official forums and on social media these past few days and he had a lot of interesting things to say about various hot topics. Most notably, he noted that it's possible that additional Basic and Classic set cards may be nerfed or rotated out of Standard in the future.
      You probably remember that with the release of the Standard format, something less than a year ago, 12 Basic and Classic cards were nerfed. Now, Game Director Ben Brode revealed that more Basic & Classic card nerfs can happen or at least they may be rotated out of Standard. The reasoning behind this is that the team wants to keep a fresh feeling in Standard and they don't want to see the same core cards appear too frequently. That's why they are also not considering buffing underused vanilla cards, since Basic and Classic cards are already being used a lot and they want new sets to be more impactful.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide The goal with Standard is to keep the meta fresh for each yearly rotation. There are some benefits to keeping Basic and Classic cards in Standard: Returning players have an entry-point to the new format, and new players experience classics like "Hogger" and "Arcane Missiles" that are iconic and great introductions to the game. People take breaks from Hearthstone, and being able to jump right back in with a few cards you already own and understand makes that experience a lot better. That upside has a real downside in working directly against the big goal for Standard. It needs to feel different each year, and if Basic and Classic cards are still appearing in large densities year after year, we will not be achieving our goals for Standard.
      We knew we weren't going to get there when the Year of the Kraken began, so we nerfed 12 basic/classic cards, to put more of the weight of the meta into the rotating sets. We always knew we'd have to watch the meta to see if any future changes would be needed when we got ready for the next year of Standard. If things are looking like they are going to be too same-y for that next year, we could see more nerfs, or we might rotate some additional classic cards to Wild, like we did with Old Murk Eye. No matter what, we're committed to making Standard fresh and exciting each new year. (source)
       
       
      Are you guys considering, besides nerfs, implementing buffs for underused vanilla cards?
      Given the goal of Standard is to keep the game fresh each year, it's important to keep a lot of the power of the cards in the expansions, and not in the basic and classic sets. It's not clear what that balance of power should look like (is it ~10 cards from the basic and classic sets on average?), but we're currently skewed so high towards basic and classic cards in decks, that we are at high risk for 'samey-ness' as the years change in Standard. Buffing Basic/Classic cards *increases* that risk. If the goal is to get more cool cards into the meta, just releasing awesome new cards in expansions should make an impact there, and still keep Standard fresh. (source)
      Obviously, this comment caused a lot of reactions and Ben took to Reddit (specifically this thread) and Twitter, where he answered various questions. A brief summary of his responses is that the Basic set is currently the most powerful in the game (source), while the team intends to keep the vanilla set unchanged (the term used was 'evergreen' - source). Ben repeated that the team's intention behind any future Basic and Classic card nerfs or changes is to keep Standard format fresh and "less same-y". A difficult question was posed to the community: would they prefer the affected vanilla cards to be nerfed, rotated out of Standard format or remain as they are, even if it results in a staler meta?
      On the same Reddit thread, Brode also talked about why the Charge nerf was necessary due to the Grimy Goons synergy and how new/F2P players are currently still able to reach Legend rank - something that he expects to keep happening in the future as well.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We nerfed Charge (the spell) because we knew the upcoming Grimy Goons mechanic in combination with Enraged Worgen and Charge was not really fair or fun. There have always been F2P players at Legend, and there have continued to be since that change. (source) Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide We did this in 2016 when we nerfed 12 classic cards and it made a huge difference in how much the meta was able to change with the release of Old Gods (instead of just continuing to be Druid Combo). New players were able to reach legend without spending money after that change, and I expect that will be continue to be true if we change a few more cards in 2017. (source) On a somewhat relevant topic, with the end of the Year of the Kraken the end of Reno Jackson is also approaching. Ben excluded the possibility of this game-changing card making it into the Classic set - once again the reason being "keeping the meta fresh".
      Placeholder for tweet 817625802116214784 For consistency's sake, I've also included two Brode blue posts from last week. In the first one, he talks about the new player experience and how it still needs more work. For example. the climb from the introductory quests to actually playing the game feels steep, while getting into Ranked is also difficult. However, for their first games new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool designed to match new players with each other. There has also been a 15% increase in new player winrates on Casual.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide Hey there! We agree that the new player experience needs more work. We've been tweaking it for years and have seen significant increases in retention among new players since launch. Most new players start playing against the AI and then take on other players in Casual. The Casual matchmaker has gone through a lot of iteration and new player winrates have increased by ~15%.
      Ranked is a different story. Ranked is becoming more difficult for new players over time. I spoke about some of the challenges we are currently facing with our ladder system before I left for paternity leave here: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/58pxgt/ben_brode_confirms_the_2_game_win_streak_is_not/
      Something you may not realize is that new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool for their first several sessions. In Casual, we match them entirely against other brand new players with similarly-sized collections.
      That all said, we think the introductory missions up through Illidan feel pretty good, and after that it still feels like a bit of a cliff. It's definitely something we're aware of. Thanks for your feedback, and for the feedback of everyone else who's been chiming in on this over the last few months.
      (source) Lastly, Ben made an interesting post about another community hot topic: the ladder system.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently - we're not 100% happy with it.
      Here are some things we are currently discussing:
      Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn't make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that's a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it'd be better if expectations and reality matched here.
      We've received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn't feel all that great.
      We've received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.
      We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.
      We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when "3-star master" was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.
      Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn't necessarily any one player's individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as "good", at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.
      (source)