Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Damien

[Archived] S8 Hearthstone Low Budget Shaman Control Deck

20 posts in this topic

Played a number of games with the Low Budget Shaman Control Deck starting at rank 11 with 0 stars. Dropped me down to rank 12 with 2 stars

 

Game 1 - vs Shaman - Loss - Turn 10

Game 2 - vs Druid - Win - Turn 10

Game 3 - vs Warloc - Loss - Turn 10

Game 4 - vs Warloc - Loss - Turn 10

Game 5 - vs Warloc - Loss - Turn 10

 

 

Every game I lost was in the late game, where unfortunately this deck could not keep up with the number of legendaries being summoned. So I believe that even though the record shows 1-4, that the deck itself is solid as these games were hard fought and won always bringing my opponents life to single digits and having an 'assured victory' until the epics and legendaries start dropping in left and right

 

If there's anything this deck could use is a bit more of extra draw power. So many times I felt like if i had extra draw power i'd be able to do something about the legendaries, specially when i missed so many great opportunities to win because bloodlust would just not show up at the right time before they took back control

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Played a number of games with the Low Budget Shaman Control Deck starting at rank 11 with 0 stars. Dropped me down to rank 12 with 2 stars
 
Game 1 - vs Shaman - Loss - Turn 10
Game 2 - vs Druid - Win - Turn 10
Game 3 - vs Warloc - Loss - Turn 10
Game 4 - vs Warloc - Loss - Turn 10
Game 5 - vs Warloc - Loss - Turn 10
 
 
Every game I lost was in the late game, where unfortunately this deck could not keep up with the number of legendaries being summoned. So I believe that even though the record shows 1-4, that the deck itself is solid as these games were hard fought and won always bringing my opponents life to single digits and having an 'assured victory' until the epics and legendaries start dropping in left and right
 
If there's anything this deck could use is a bit more of extra draw power. So many times I felt like if i had extra draw power i'd be able to do something about the legendaries, specially when i missed so many great opportunities to win because bloodlust would just not show up at the right time before they took back control

 

I would agree that rank 11 is cutting it pretty close for a low budget deck. Especially once you start getting swarmed with legendaries, it becomes difficult to keep up without hard-hitters of your own. Mana Tide Totem might be good for card draw, but let's see what Poyo thinks too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing deck i have got to rank 12 with it, helped a lot thanks! biggrin.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience so far is that this deck is pretty solid until rank 15, where good legendaries start to pop. I'm not a very skilled player and managed to climb from scratch to rank 12 in around 40-50 matches. 

 

As soon you start gaining dust from packs, what would be the best options to improve the deck?

I was thinking in trading Al'akir for Argent commander, as it's more powerful for an extra crystal, but I'm not that experienced in deck building smile.png

 

Thanks for your comments

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if I could improve the deck with any of the following:

Leeroy, Onyxia, Ysera, and Sea Giant.  If so which should I swap for which?

 

Thanks in advance =)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was wondering if I could improve the deck with any of the following:

Leeroy, Onyxia, Ysera, and Sea Giant.  If so which should I swap for which?

 

Thanks in advance =)

Definitely!

Onyxia can work great with Bloodlust, however this will mostly be fun value and not really improving your deck. 

Leeroy can be a great finisher and if you decide to go for more aggressive approach, you could include it.

Sea Giant is out of the question, in most cases you will just give your opponent a nice target for Big Game Hunter.

Ysera is probably the best late game card you can play. I would definitely go for it.

I would probably take out Bloodlust for Ysera.

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would probably take out Bloodlust for Ysera.

 

I'm pretty much only missing 1 feral spirit now but I should be able to craft them soon.

 

Managed to grab Doomhammer and was wondering if there's anything I should swap out for that?

 

Thanks again in advance! =) Can't wait to mess around with this shaman build!

Edited by Ukyo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my first time posting on this site... So, hi!

 

There are a few changes from this that I have in my deck... It seems to be working fine, I'm mainly wondering your all's opinion(s)?

 

I only have 1 unbound elemental.

No Earth Shock or Argent Squire.

2 Stormforged axes (to help clear early minions on both).

I have the 3 mana 4/2 stealth cat (sorry, don't know the name), instead of the harvest golems. This seems to help provide a very strong finisher, if patient enough with them.

An extra mana tide totem instead of the Gadgetzan Auctioneer (more draw power, earlier on?).

No Argent Commanders (I have 2 that I can add, depending what happens - where though?), but a 2nd Azure Drake and a Windspeaker (Windfury can be a great finisher).

2 Forked Lightnings (in replace of earthshocks) More early game minion clearing.

2 Ancestral healings, providing the taunt this seems to miss in late game.

I also added an injured blademaster, which provides a great combo with ancestral healing.

 

I have Sea Giant and Deathwing - Anywhere these may fit better into?

 

-Thanks! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey,

 

i just finished the deck, and i wondered: what should be my next crafting goal? should i go for earth elemental? al'akir? some neutral legendary? (ragnaros, ysera, ?) 

I do feel like i need more taunts, especially since you tend to lose health real fast with the doomhammer, so for now i think i'll include one defender of argus over one of the chillwind yeti's, but that's why i thought of the earth elementals.

i also have acidic swamp ooze over pyromancer, because i just like it that much more. (instant 1-for-0 as a battlecry? hell yes!)

 

i currently have no neutral legendaries or even epics, because my only lucky pack was a gruul sleep.png

 

-thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey,

 

i just finished the deck, and i wondered: what should be my next crafting goal? should i go for earth elemental? al'akir? some neutral legendary? (ragnaros, ysera, ?) 

I do feel like i need more taunts, especially since you tend to lose health real fast with the doomhammer, so for now i think i'll include one defender of argus over one of the chillwind yeti's, but that's why i thought of the earth elementals.

i also have acidic swamp ooze over pyromancer, because i just like it that much more. (instant 1-for-0 as a battlecry? hell yes!)

 

i currently have no neutral legendaries or even epics, because my only lucky pack was a gruul sleep.png

 

-thanks

Hey, WonderDuck

Earth Elementals may seem decent but their overload will kill you and The Black Knight simply destroys your game, which makes Earth Elementals a rather poor choice in the current meta game.

If you need taunts, you can consider including replacing your Chillwind Yeti with Sen'jin Shieldmasta. Defender of Argus works great as you have already figured it out.

Acidic Swamp Ooze is great if metagame is full of weapons - I support!

I personally would craft Ragnaros if you like playing control decks as it is most commonly used as a finisher, however in regards to SHaman decks, AlÁkir might be a better choice.

Hope this helps,

Best of luck

 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a heads up, the deck description makes reference to a Legendary card, which isn't part of the build.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The description on this deck refers to Argent Squire but there is no Argent Squire in the Low-budget deck. I see the Mid-budget version has Argent Squire instead of Loot Hoarder (which is in the Low-budget deck).

 

So is the description wrong here on this Low-budget deck when referring to Argent Squire or is Argent Squire suppose to be here instead of Loot Hoarder?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a heads up, the deck description makes reference to a Legendary card, which isn't part of the build.

Thank you very much. It's fixed.

 

The description on this deck refers to Argent Squire but there is no Argent Squire in the Low-budget deck. I see the Mid-budget version has Argent Squire instead of Loot Hoarder (which is in the Low-budget deck).

 

So is the description wrong here on this Low-budget deck when referring to Argent Squire or is Argent Squire suppose to be here instead of Loot Hoarder?

The Argent Squire was never meant to be in the deck, so we've fixed it now. Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I build the low budget Shamane deck and was 1 Azure Drake short, so i replaced it with gadgetzan auctioneer.

This is working wonders for me since there are 12 low mana spells in this deck....so i wonder if i should replace it anyways when i got the dust or if its even an improvement? the +1 spellpower for sure is nice but i think as some guys here mentioned this deck leeks some drawpower once manatide is destroyed. enlighten me please if im wrong wink.png

 

Much thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I crafted this low budget shamane deck and was just 1 azure drake short so i replaced it with gadgetzan auctoneer. this is working wonders for me since there are 12 low mana spells in this deck. now im wondering if i even should replace it when i got the dust to craft azure. since one guy mentioned this deck might leak drawpower lategame it might be an improvement? or is the +1 spellpower too essential? please enlighten me!

much thx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I crafted this low budget shamane deck and was just 1 azure drake short so i replaced it with gadgetzan auctoneer. this is working wonders for me since there are 12 low mana spells in this deck. now im wondering if i even should replace it when i got the dust to craft azure. since one guy mentioned this deck might leak drawpower lategame it might be an improvement? or is the +1 spellpower too essential? please enlighten me!

much thx

Azure Drake is often better against aggressive deck as it will give you the card instantly and potentially amp one of ur spells, however when it comes to decks that give you enough room to breathe (mid range / control), Gadgetzan is superior as it can give you insane card advantage.

You can easily stick with Gadgetzan Auctioneer - the shaman deck I played had 1x Auctioneer, 2x Azure drake and I removed auctioneer as I was constantly matched against zoo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My perceptions must be skewed. I don't see a deck with 9 uncommons, 10 rares and 1 epic as 'low budget'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It costs 1760 arcane dusts to create this deck, compared to the 6440 required for the legendary version of Shaman deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really good deck. Got into rank 10 and hopefully further !

 

Edit. Ye I made an account just to say this. Cause it's just too gooooood !

Edited by Stemu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Gul'dan Strategy guide.
    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Wizard Manald Channeling Build.
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)