Damien

Hearthstone Druid Minions and Spells

24 posts in this topic

There's at least one word missing in Claw's Contructed Play section. The first sentence is "Claw can be great if the meta game is extremely aggressive, especially if are using Wild Pyromancer as well." Considering the card, I think it's supposed to be "you", but less experienced players could maybe think you were talking about the meta using Wild Pyromancer a lot.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to talk about how you talk about Beast Druid in Druid of the Flame's description and also Druid of the Fang's. I understand it mostly says that Beast Druid is totally not worth it, but I'd argue that one can totally make one since the release of TGT. There's enough interesting cards to make something interesting with Beast synergy in Druid and I feel like those descriptions might steer people away from it instead of encouraging them to try it with good synergy cards.

EDIT: You also say something very similar in Savage Combatant's description and I'd like to add that even LoE adds another reason to play Beast Druid with the fantastic Mounted Raptor.

Edited by EDL666

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to talk about how you talk about Beast Druid in Druid of the Flame's description and also Druid of the Fang's. I understand it mostly says that Beast Druid is totally not worth it, but I'd argue that one can totally make one since the release of TGT. There's enough interesting cards to make something interesting with Beast synergy in Druid and I feel like those descriptions might steer people away from it instead of encouraging them to try it with good synergy cards.

EDIT: You also say something very similar in Savage Combatant's description and I'd like to add that even LoE adds another reason to play Beast Druid with the fantastic Mounted Raptor.

 

The main problem is that the synergy is not strong enough. You only have Wildwalker and Druid of the Fang. For example, Mech Mage has Mechwarper, Blastmage, Cogmaster, Technician and sometimes even Clockwork Knight. That is what I call synergy. Having two cards that synergise is not enough. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I would like to talk about how you talk about Beast Druid in Druid of the Flame's description and also Druid of the Fang's. I understand it mostly says that Beast Druid is totally not worth it, but I'd argue that one can totally make one since the release of TGT. There's enough interesting cards to make something interesting with Beast synergy in Druid and I feel like those descriptions might steer people away from it instead of encouraging them to try it with good synergy cards.

EDIT: You also say something very similar in Savage Combatant's description and I'd like to add that even LoE adds another reason to play Beast Druid with the fantastic Mounted Raptor.

 

The main problem is that the synergy is not strong enough. You only have Stablemaster and Druid of the Fang. For example, Mech Mage has Mechwarper, Blastmage, Cogmaster, Technician and sometimes even Clockwork Knight. That is what I call synergy. Having two cards that synergise is not enough. 

 

Well Stablemaster is a Hunter card(but there's also Wildwalker and Knight of the Wild) and I don't think you can compare Mech Mage to this, there's just Blastmage that's a Mage exclusive and you could totally make a Mech Druid with the same cards!

What I'm trying to say is that you don't have to put shitty Beasts to be able to make those cards work! You now have good beasts! Savage Combatant is good, Mounted Raptor is good, Druid of the Flame is good, Druid of the Claw is good, Druid of the Saber is good! Malorne is crazy good! Aside from that, you could experiment a little, nobody said that YOU have to ramp you could just curve out with more excellent Beasts like Haunted Creeper(Ironbeak Owl possibly if you REALLY want to not have Keeper of the Grove but I wouldn't recommend it), Tomb Spider, Stranglethorn Tiger, Stampeding Kodo, Mukla's Champion, Captured Jormungar, The Beast. King Mukla can be good if you can apply enough pressure. You could use Fossilized Devilsaur if you want more huge taunts besides Ironbark Protector... There's enough material there! Okay, BGH whatever you want to say that people are using because of the meta. I mean, If they use BGH on a big thingy and you play another, and another, or you just have so many beasts... That's a valid concept to me! I know Force of Nature + Savage Roar is incredibly stupid. That doesn't mean Beast Druid isn't good. It's just not that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, yeah, I meant Wildwalker, not Stablemaster, sorry! The Knight of The WIld could be good, but if you get a bad draw, he won't be played before turn 6 anyway.

Yes, the beast cards are great, but as long as the synergy cards aren't that strong, you shouldn't focus on the synergy itself and rather build a midrange deck with good cards (and some of them will definitely be beasts). The problem with playing a big thing after another is that if you get BGHed once, you lose tempo (except for Boom, yay) and druids can't play from behind the board. This is one of the reasons why Ramp Druid plays without BGH targets. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said, no need to ramp. Just because ramp Druid is popular doesn't mean you can't try something else

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like I said, no need to ramp. Just because ramp Druid is popular doesn't mean you can't try something else

Just because Beast Druid exists doesn't mean you should play it. It is not a competitive deck, at least not as competitive as Ramp druid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Like I said, no need to ramp. Just because ramp Druid is popular doesn't mean you can't try something else

Just because Beast Druid exists doesn't mean you should play it. It is not a competitive deck, at least not as competitive as Ramp druid.

 

My original complaint was about not discouraging people that wanted to try it. Because it is quite good now. It is not the best, but you don't expect people playing on a budget to actually use the best deck either. I mean I get it that it's weird to want to use really shitty cards like Dalaran Mage. But Druid of the Flame isn't a bad card and a Druid Beast deck is not a bad deck either. Sure you won't explode ladder and crush everyone on legend, but is this a requirement to give tips about it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a guide up for Beast Druid in the Unique decks section, so i'm not really sure what your criticism is.

 

We're not exactly dealing with statements like "You freaking noob! Why would you even think Beast Druid would be a thing! Learn to play before you dare read our site!"

The statements are like "but these decks have so far not proven to be successful." and "Druid Beast decks are also currently a long way from being viable." which are just accurate statements. Then on top of that, I have a guide published for people that want to experiment with it anyway.

So...yeah?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I actually do think that players on budget who visit sites such as this want a good deck, instead of spending dust on decks that do not work as well as the "meta decks". Also, the price difference between Sottle's fast druid and Beast druid is 400 dust. The difference is low enough for newer players to play the meta decks instead. 
As I said previously, the beasts are good, it's the synergy that is not good enough. Druid of the Flame is played in midrange and so are Savage Combatant and Druid of the Claw. You can find Druids of the Saber and Mounted Raptors in aggro. The beast tag just doesn't matter, same as Azure Drake's dragon tag. Dragon decks weren't played either. Although there was some synergy, it just wasn't strong enough (but that got changed with TGT), same as Beast Druid.
 

I have a guide up for Beast Druid in the Unique decks section, so i'm not really sure what your criticism is.


I am not criticising your deck, all I am saying that beast tag is not strong enough to be considered meta. That it is and will stay for some time with the Unique decks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a guide up for Beast Druid in the Unique decks section, so i'm not really sure what your criticism is.

 

We're not exactly dealing with statements like "You freaking noob! Why would you even think Beast Druid would be a thing! Learn to play before you dare read our site!"

The statements are like "but these decks have so far not proven to be successful." and "Druid Beast decks are also currently a long way from being viable." which are just accurate statements. Then on top of that, I have a guide published for people that want to experiment with it anyway.

So...yeah?

I'm sorry, I just wanted to give some input, but if you all think it's fine, we're having a discussion. It just feels like it's pushing away from the card rather than actual tips on how to use it like the description says it does, but it is my opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, why does the "druid" pictured in the artwork seem to be wearing shaman 25 man T9 Heroic? Seems like a pretty massive mistake for the QC team, or am I just missing something obvious lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Um, why does the "druid" pictured in the artwork seem to be wearing shaman 25 man T9 Heroic? Seems like a pretty massive mistake for the QC team, or am I just missing something obvious lol.

It would be nice to know which card exactly you're reffering to. Also, a lot of different clothing look alike and maybe the guy making the artwork just felt like it was better like this... I don't think anyone here can really answer that... Unless the guy that made the artwork is here, which I doubt a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it might be interesting to tell people which ramp cards will give them excess mana when played at 10 crystals and which ones won't. I didn't check all the cards, but Astral Communion doesn't(not that it really affects the card's playability in that specific case).

Also, in the Arena section of Savagery, Mark of Nature, Astral Communion, Poison Seeds, Soul of the Forest and Tree of Life, you might wanna take into account that they can't be drafted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, EDL666 said:

I think it might be interesting to tell people which ramp cards will give them excess mana when played at 10 crystals and which ones won't. I didn't check all the cards, but Astral Communion doesn't(not that it really affects the card's playability in that specific case).

AC does give you the draw card, as does Wild Growth. If it is a spell effect that grants a permanent crystal, it will give you Excess Mana.

I'll note down your other points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not all cards that give permanent crystals give Excess Mana at 10 crystals. If I'm not mistaken, only Wild Growth and Astral Communion do. It was a suggestion as I've seen my opponents sometimes picking the crystal option with Mire Keeper at 10 crystals even though it doesn't give Excess Mana and I thought it wasn't that much a useless information in a guide aiming at teaching how to best use the card...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, EDL666 said:

No, not all cards that give permanent crystals give Excess Mana at 10 crystals. If I'm not mistaken, only Wild Growth and Astral Communion do. It was a suggestion as I've seen my opponents sometimes picking the crystal option with Mire Keeper at 10 crystals even though it doesn't give Excess Mana and I thought it wasn't that much a useless information in a guide aiming at teaching how to best use the card...

I've made a note of it for Sottle, but let me correct myself slightly:

If there is no other effect on the card that can be generated and it is a spell, it will generate excess mana. Darnassus Aspirant, Mire Keeper can still do things when played on Turn 10 that are not related to the mana increase. AC, Wild Growth do absolutely nothing but generate crystals, so they grant EM.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about this, but it says in the Arena section of Mark of the Lotus that, since you usually only play one minion per turn, you are "likely" to find value out of the card. Isn't it the opposite? I could be wrong on that one.

 

The second sentence in the Arena section of Jade Blossom should be improved because it is quite difficult to read. It is possible to understand but I'm fairly sure it is worded incorrectly and could be faster to understand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, EDL666 said:

The second sentence in the Arena section of Jade Blossom should be improved because it is quite difficult to read. It is possible to understand but I'm fairly sure it is worded incorrectly and could be faster to understand

I find it very easy to understand. Do not draft ramp in general, but draft this ramp if you have jade golem cards. Is there a specific different wording you'd suggest?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, positiv2 said:

I find it very easy to understand. Do not draft ramp in general, but draft this ramp if you have jade golem cards. Is there a specific different wording you'd suggest?

It's not particularly difficult to understand, just difficult to read. Does removing "the card" between "Jade Golem" and "justifies it" preserves the intended meaning? English not being my main language I sometimes have difficulties that might not actually apply to the average English-reader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is quite minor, but there's an apostrophe missing in the General Comments section of Lunar Vision. "Being able to draw 2 minions effectively reduces the cards Mana cost to 1"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Grimy Goons Dragon Paladin Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Control Jade Shaman Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)