Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Damien

Hearthstone Card Advantage

8 posts in this topic

Card advantage doesn't mean having more cards than your opponent in your hand.  While that is likey to result from gaining card advantage that is not what it means to have it.

 

Card advantage is the sole result of playing cards that give more or cost more cards than your opponents.  For the arcane intellect example it means that you traded the one card (actually using arcane intellect) for two more so you net one extra card off the 2 for 1.

 

for the minions that draw cards most of them will net 2 for 1 since they replace themselves and will usually cost your opponent a card.

 

In the example given in the article it expressed correct play, not card advantage.  Card advantage gained would be assuming the yeti had killed something else and got to kill a second thing (probably netting a 3 for 1 given the opponent will usually have to use another card to get rid of it).  Or talking about the fact that the weapon will go on to kill a few more minions, or how the agent will probably cost a card from your opponent to get rid of it.

 

Also the biggest way to gain card advantage is generally related to getting the most mileage out of your hero power, particularly with the druid, mage, rogue killing off 1 health or low health minions, the warlock just trading life for cards.  The paladin and the shaman can get alot of mileage out of there powers as well when it comes to killing things.  The priest can force an opponent to commit more resources to killing an minion so results in an indirect method.  The warrior and the hunter affect more the rate and life is lost so while good, are not direct generators of card advantage.

 

Lastly stat buffing a weaker minion to kill a stronger minion will usually result in card disadvantage, unless the source of the buff is another minion, or the buff causes them to survive the confrontation. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Card advantage doesn't mean having more cards than your opponent in your hand.  While that is likey to result from gaining card advantage that is not what it means to have it.

 

Card advantage is the sole result of playing cards that give more or cost more cards than your opponents.  For the arcane intellect example it means that you traded the one card (actually using arcane intellect) for two more so you net one extra card off the 2 for 1.

 

for the minions that draw cards most of them will net 2 for 1 since they replace themselves and will usually cost your opponent a card.

 

In the example given in the article it expressed correct play, not card advantage.  Card advantage gained would be assuming the yeti had killed something else and got to kill a second thing (probably netting a 3 for 1 given the opponent will usually have to use another card to get rid of it).  Or talking about the fact that the weapon will go on to kill a few more minions, or how the agent will probably cost a card from your opponent to get rid of it.

 

Also the biggest way to gain card advantage is generally related to getting the most mileage out of your hero power, particularly with the druid, mage, rogue killing off 1 health or low health minions, the warlock just trading life for cards.  The paladin and the shaman can get alot of mileage out of there powers as well when it comes to killing things.  The priest can force an opponent to commit more resources to killing an minion so results in an indirect method.  The warrior and the hunter affect more the rate and life is lost so while good, are not direct generators of card advantage.

 

Lastly stat buffing a weaker minion to kill a stronger minion will usually result in card disadvantage, unless the source of the buff is another minion, or the buff causes them to survive the confrontation. 

 

You are under some fundamental misapprehensions (and that's fine).

 

Card advantage does mean having more cards than your opponent. There is really no debate there. You can't claim to have card advantage if you do not have more cards than your opponent. It's really simple.

 

What you are describing, "playing cards that give more or cost more cards than your opponents" is not card advantage. That's simply a way to maximise the value of your cards in an attempt to achieve card advantage.

 

The article gave an example of "correct play", yes. It even calls it that.

 

I also agree that good use of the Hero Power often leads to getting card advantage, as I do with your statement about buffing minions.

 

But whether you get card advantage by using a massive Divine Favor, or by slowly and surely getting more mileage out of your cards, or anything else, it doesn't really affect the fact that having more cards means having card advantage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to see this article expanded as soon as Hearthstone is out of beta Kappa

 

Jokes aside, I enjoyed reading it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to see this article expanded as soon as Hearthstone is out of beta Kappa

 

Jokes aside, I enjoyed reading it!

*still looking for the joke*

 

We're glad you enjoyed it! :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great Article!

Thanks for taking the time to explain Card Advantage. When I first started playing, I noticed that I would run out of cards before my opponents quite often.

These days I'm able to extract a lot more utility from my cards, though it would have made a big difference to have known this earlier on. In future revisions of this article it would be great to see some more "situation-specific" examples along with further suggestions on how to maintain card advantage as often as possible.

Keep up the good work!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am slightly confused... 

In the example about playing your cards efficiently I would have played the weapon, the SI:7 Agent'ed the Swamp Ooze, hit the Sen'jin with my weapon and Yeti. That would have killed all of the enemy minons, which the two examples given did not do...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Guest Sammich said:

I am slightly confused... 

In the example about playing your cards efficiently I would have played the weapon, the SI:7 Agent'ed the Swamp Ooze, hit the Sen'jin with my weapon and Yeti. That would have killed all of the enemy minons, which the two examples given did not do...

The second example would kill all opponent's minions as well - SI:7 Agent + Chillwind Yeti kill Sen'jin Shieldmasta, and your weapon kills Acidic Swamp Ooze. The way you would have played simply changes the order of opponent's minions death and overdamage done to them, but with the same result - your board has Chillwind Yeti with 1HP, full SI:7 Agent and 3 charges left on your Assassin's Blade.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

  Only 75 emoticons maximum are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      The next expansion will be Journey to Un'goro. 
      Blizzard have released a short video revealing that, as speculated, the next expansion will be Journey to Un'goro. Four cards from the next set were shown in the reveal video.
      The expansion will be released in early April, and will contain 135 cards. It is set in Un'Goro, an area filled with dinosaurs, with a volcano at the heart of the region. The launch of the set will trigger the start of The Year of the Mammoth.

      Volcano, adding to the flavour of the set, was the first card to be revealed. It is similar to Elemental Destruction, but not as reliable. While on the subject of Elementals, the word Elemental is going to be used as a tribal name. Many cards will be tagged as Elemental, which presumably will allow for cards that interact with them to be printed, along the same lines as Beast has currently.

      The image above only tells half of the story. After Pyros dies as a 6/6, it returns back to hand yet again as a 10/10 that costs 10! This mechanic might imply that there is a focus on value as opposed to tempo, although of course one card is a meaningless sample size! There could also be a Quest to play a certain number of Elemental cards in a game, although it seems unlikely that it would be a Mage Quest.

      Adapt is a new keyword, along the lines of discover. There are ten different powers to choose from. Taunt, Windfury, Divine Shield, Cannot be targeted, +3 Attack, Deathrattle: Summon two 1/1 Plants are the six shown in the video. We've also been warned that plants are not just plants, so we can only speculate on what a 1/1 Plant might do.

      One of the more interesting features of the new expansion is the Quest mechanic. Quests start in your opening hand and have a big reward for completion. It is displayed in the same place as Secrets, however both players can see the Quest, and how close it is to being completed.

      As you can see, the rewards are very powerful
      More reveals will be made on March 17th. Until then, we will just have to speculate as to what else lies in Un'Goro.
    • By L0rinda

      Iksar has confirmed that the Matchmaking in Legend Ranks has been changed.
      As stated in our previous article, Legendary players have been noticing that in the last few days that they have been matched with players much closer to their own rank than usual. There was some confusion regarding this, as Iksar had not been made aware of the changes, but he has now confirmed that there are definitely changes in place.
      It is hard to precisely evaluate community feeling on the the new system, especially as I personally think they're a step in the right direction, but there are some players who are not keen on the changes. RayC and Xzirez have been the two highest profile players so far to disagree with the change. The issues that people against it have can be summarised as follows: Counter-Queuing: Many top Legends do not like counter-queuing, which is where you change your deck to try to counter your opponent. With the new system meaning you can often play the same person several times in a row, counter-queuing will become an important part of the game.
      Early Legend Advantage: People opposed to the changes claim that it overly favours the players who reach Legend early on. The older system made it easier to catch up at the end of the season.
      Win Trading: Due to the increased chance of playing against the same opponent, it is now easier to cover your tracks if you lose to a friend many times in a row to boost their ranking.
      There does seem to be a majority of players who support the new system however. The ladder system has been a cause of much debate for a long time now, and these changes, alongside the recent addition of ladder floors, seem to show that at the very least, ladder is currently a high priority for Blizzard to get right.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Menagerie Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our Murloc Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck.