Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Odinn

hearthstone Interview with Mamytwink - The 45 Hour Hearthstone Turn

2 posts in this topic

11581-interview-with-mamytwink-the-45-ho

 

After completing the world-record setting 45 hour, 18 minute, and 24 second Hearthstone turn, Mamytwink spoke to us about the setup, future challenges, and some of the technical problems posed by the limitations of the game client


 
Mamytwink is a French YouTube use who started out producing guides for World of Warcraft twinks (hence the name). He has since expanded into Hearthstone and Heroes of the Storm. Working alongside him is Zecharia, who did the interview with us and works on all of Mamytwink's websites and projects.
 
The record turn was achieved using 9 Arcane Missiles cast with a board full of Velen's Chosen-buffed Prophet Velens (apropos!), so that each individual spell cast would fire 26,752 missiles. The setup obviously required a Priest vs. Mage game, and took long enough that Mamytwink worried they would run into European maintenance on Wednesday morning.

 

http://www.twitch.tv/mamytwink/v/3940340

A video of the setup process for the eventual 45 hour turn.

 

Here is the complete interview transcript between Damien of Icy Veins and Zecharia: 
 

1. Why did you do that?

We like the concept of testing the game's limits and discovering how far we could go with Hearthstone. We try to do things that seem impossible to see if we can break the game’s limits. We have a Youtube playlist dedicated to videos, which we call “défis inutiles” (French for “useless challenges”) and in which we illustrate that concept. This time around, we felt that a livestream format would work better, given the duration of the challenge.

2. So, you have other challenges lined up for the coming weeks?

Yes, although we will most likely not stream them and release them directly on Youtube, as we usually do. I don’t want to give any spoiler, but I can give you an example of one thing we had in mind. We wanted to do a sort of OTK Jaraxxus, with 10 Jaraxxus in the hand and 4 Demonic Portals on the board, and then you can play all 10 Jaraxxus and attack with them (yes, it’s possible). We discovered that this is no longer possible, because Blizzard reduced the duration of a turn.

2.a So the turn no longer lasts long enough to do all the action?

That’s exactly that. Before, the turn lasted 90 seconds, leaving enough time to play all the animations, but now the turn lasts 70 seconds and we cannot play all the cards. No one really noticed that the turn duration had changed, except for people like us.

3. How did you set up everything? In theory, it is easy to understand that you had 7 Prophet Velen, all buffed with numerous Velen’s Chosen, but you can only play so many cards per turn and there are only so many turns you can play before you die to fatigue. So, how did you manage to play all these Prophet Velen and Velen’s Chosen?

There were several phases.

The first phase is buffing one Prophet Velen. So, we played Velen, Lorewalker Cho, and we buffed him with spell power through Velen’s Chosen (but not too much, we had an attempt with so much + spell power that the game crashed before the first Arcane Missiles could fire its first missile). At the same time, the Mage played its Ice Block and a copy of it was given to the Priest by Lorewalker Cho. Then, Cho is killed and the Priest plays its Ice Block, and another Cho is played (both decks are running their own copy). This way, Ice Block, which is needed for the Priest to remain alive during the Arcane Missiles turn, is out of the way.

The second phase consists in duplicating Prophet Velen with Faceless Manipulators. The idea is for the Mage to have 7 copies of Faceless Manipulator, which is achieved through Lorewalker Cho and Mind Vision. Once this is done, the 7 Faceless Manipulators are played in successive turns to copy the Priest’s buffed Prophet Velen.

The third phase is all about accumulating Arcane Missiles in the Mage’s hand, which is done through Mind Vision (with which the Priest copies Arcane Missiles) and Lorewalker Cho (which gives Mage another copy of Arcane Missile when Priest plays it). We managed to get 9 copies, but I think that if we had tried some more, we could have gotten 10.

The last phase is the launching of the missiles. The Arcane Missiles must be played in quick succession, in such a way that they are all played before the animation of the first one starts and prevents the Mage from doing anything else.

We needed about a dozen attempts, but that’s because we are very used to this kind of setup for our other challenges. We had a previous failed attempt where we had the right setup and Mamytwink misclicked when trying to change the sound volume for the stream and he conceded the game. We have a video that shows the entire setup process (it shows Mamytwink going back and forth between 2 PCs, but that’s because I had to leave after the good attempt where he mistakenly conceded, so he had to set the game again all by himself).

The main problem we faced with the setup was drawing an Arcane Missiles in the early turns. It made using Mind Vision much more complicated.

4. Which decklists did you use?

(Editor's note: We don’t have the deck lists yet, but were given the following comment.)

The idea is that, besides the required cards, the decks should be filled with 1 health minions that can easily trade against one another or be killed with the Mage’s Hero Power. Obviously, that excludes Clockwork Gnome, because of the Spare Part he gives.

5. The Guinness World Records logo, is that something official or just for laughs?

At the beginning, it was just for fun. We even made a fake Guinness logo by adding the Hearthstone logo in it. Mamytwink tried to get in touch with them to submit an application. I don’t know if this will lead to anything, though.

 
What kinds of challenges would you be interested in seeing in the future?

 

UPDATE: Mamytwink has provided us with links to the decks he used over on www.hearthstone-decks.com (note: These sites are in French):

 

Priest: http://www.hearthstone-decks.com/deck/voir/tour-de-45-heures-8415

Mage: http://www.hearthstone-decks.com/deck/voir/tour-de-45-heures-9157
 

And you thought Control Paladin mirror matches took a long time - read our interview with Mamytwink about the 45-hour Hearthstone turn.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love stuff like this - entirely pointless but fun none the less!

 

Trust the French eh Damien ;)

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Grimy Goons Dragon Paladin Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Control Jade Shaman Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)