Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

hearthstone Interview with Mamytwink - The 45 Hour Hearthstone Turn

2 posts in this topic



After completing the world-record setting 45 hour, 18 minute, and 24 second Hearthstone turn, Mamytwink spoke to us about the setup, future challenges, and some of the technical problems posed by the limitations of the game client

Mamytwink is a French YouTube use who started out producing guides for World of Warcraft twinks (hence the name). He has since expanded into Hearthstone and Heroes of the Storm. Working alongside him is Zecharia, who did the interview with us and works on all of Mamytwink's websites and projects.
The record turn was achieved using 9 Arcane Missiles cast with a board full of Velen's Chosen-buffed Prophet Velens (apropos!), so that each individual spell cast would fire 26,752 missiles. The setup obviously required a Priest vs. Mage game, and took long enough that Mamytwink worried they would run into European maintenance on Wednesday morning.

A video of the setup process for the eventual 45 hour turn.


Here is the complete interview transcript between Damien of Icy Veins and Zecharia: 

1. Why did you do that?

We like the concept of testing the game's limits and discovering how far we could go with Hearthstone. We try to do things that seem impossible to see if we can break the game’s limits. We have a Youtube playlist dedicated to videos, which we call “défis inutiles” (French for “useless challenges”) and in which we illustrate that concept. This time around, we felt that a livestream format would work better, given the duration of the challenge.

2. So, you have other challenges lined up for the coming weeks?

Yes, although we will most likely not stream them and release them directly on Youtube, as we usually do. I don’t want to give any spoiler, but I can give you an example of one thing we had in mind. We wanted to do a sort of OTK Jaraxxus, with 10 Jaraxxus in the hand and 4 Demonic Portals on the board, and then you can play all 10 Jaraxxus and attack with them (yes, it’s possible). We discovered that this is no longer possible, because Blizzard reduced the duration of a turn.

2.a So the turn no longer lasts long enough to do all the action?

That’s exactly that. Before, the turn lasted 90 seconds, leaving enough time to play all the animations, but now the turn lasts 70 seconds and we cannot play all the cards. No one really noticed that the turn duration had changed, except for people like us.

3. How did you set up everything? In theory, it is easy to understand that you had 7 Prophet Velen, all buffed with numerous Velen’s Chosen, but you can only play so many cards per turn and there are only so many turns you can play before you die to fatigue. So, how did you manage to play all these Prophet Velen and Velen’s Chosen?

There were several phases.

The first phase is buffing one Prophet Velen. So, we played Velen, Lorewalker Cho, and we buffed him with spell power through Velen’s Chosen (but not too much, we had an attempt with so much + spell power that the game crashed before the first Arcane Missiles could fire its first missile). At the same time, the Mage played its Ice Block and a copy of it was given to the Priest by Lorewalker Cho. Then, Cho is killed and the Priest plays its Ice Block, and another Cho is played (both decks are running their own copy). This way, Ice Block, which is needed for the Priest to remain alive during the Arcane Missiles turn, is out of the way.

The second phase consists in duplicating Prophet Velen with Faceless Manipulators. The idea is for the Mage to have 7 copies of Faceless Manipulator, which is achieved through Lorewalker Cho and Mind Vision. Once this is done, the 7 Faceless Manipulators are played in successive turns to copy the Priest’s buffed Prophet Velen.

The third phase is all about accumulating Arcane Missiles in the Mage’s hand, which is done through Mind Vision (with which the Priest copies Arcane Missiles) and Lorewalker Cho (which gives Mage another copy of Arcane Missile when Priest plays it). We managed to get 9 copies, but I think that if we had tried some more, we could have gotten 10.

The last phase is the launching of the missiles. The Arcane Missiles must be played in quick succession, in such a way that they are all played before the animation of the first one starts and prevents the Mage from doing anything else.

We needed about a dozen attempts, but that’s because we are very used to this kind of setup for our other challenges. We had a previous failed attempt where we had the right setup and Mamytwink misclicked when trying to change the sound volume for the stream and he conceded the game. We have a video that shows the entire setup process (it shows Mamytwink going back and forth between 2 PCs, but that’s because I had to leave after the good attempt where he mistakenly conceded, so he had to set the game again all by himself).

The main problem we faced with the setup was drawing an Arcane Missiles in the early turns. It made using Mind Vision much more complicated.

4. Which decklists did you use?

(Editor's note: We don’t have the deck lists yet, but were given the following comment.)

The idea is that, besides the required cards, the decks should be filled with 1 health minions that can easily trade against one another or be killed with the Mage’s Hero Power. Obviously, that excludes Clockwork Gnome, because of the Spare Part he gives.

5. The Guinness World Records logo, is that something official or just for laughs?

At the beginning, it was just for fun. We even made a fake Guinness logo by adding the Hearthstone logo in it. Mamytwink tried to get in touch with them to submit an application. I don’t know if this will lead to anything, though.

What kinds of challenges would you be interested in seeing in the future?


UPDATE: Mamytwink has provided us with links to the decks he used over on (note: These sites are in French):




And you thought Control Paladin mirror matches took a long time - read our interview with Mamytwink about the 45-hour Hearthstone turn.

1 person likes this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Love stuff like this - entirely pointless but fun none the less!


Trust the French eh Damien ;)

2 people like this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda
      The Hearthstone Championship Tour enters the final phase today, October 26, with the Hearthstone World Championship.
      After a long year of qualifying events, the World Championship is finally here. The sixteen qualifiers will be playing for their share of a million dollar prize pool, with $250,000 going to first place.  There will be four groups of four players, and the top two from each group will advance to the single elimination knockout stage. Each match will be played as the best of seven Conquest. The groups and players' deck archetypes are listed below.

        Cydonia: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior
        Thijs: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Questing Rogue, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock
        Handsomeguy: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Malygos Rogue, Mid Shaman, Control Warrior
        Jasonzhou: Malygos Druid, Miracle Rogue, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock, Nzoth Warrior

        Bbgungun: Token Druid, Secret Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock
        Naiman: Malygos Druid, Tempo Mage, Face Hunter, Mid Shaman, Yogg Warrior, 
        Che0nsu: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock, Dragon Warrior
        Hamster: Token Druid, N'Zoth Murloc Paladin, N'Zoth Preist, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior

        Amnesiac: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Control Warrior
         DrHippi: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Yogg Warrior, Mid Shaman
        Yulsic: Malygos Druid, Mid Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock
        Breath: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Yogg Warrior

        HotMEOWTH: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior
        Pavel: Malygos Druid, Tempo Mage, Malygos Rogue, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior
       DDaHyoNi: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Yogg Warrior
        OmegaZero: Token Druid, Tempo Mage, Totem Shaman, Zoo Warlock, Dragon Warrior
      There will be one match from each group per day, and the first match starts at 18:00 CEST on 26 October, live on Twitch.
    • By Zadina
      We are all expecting the announcement of the next Hearthstone expansion at BlizzCon 2016. And we might have just gotten the very first hint about it!
      Υesterday night, the @PlayHearthstone account on Twitter posted the following image. This may be nothing at all or it may be an actual clue about the upcoming Hearthstone expansion.
      Τhe disclaimer of the image reads:
      In World of Warcraft, Gadgetzan is a Goblin city situated in the desert of Tanaris, in the southeast corner of Kalimdor. Gadgeztan used to be a mainland city, but after the Cataclysm hit Azeroth it now enjoys a beach and the sea.
      Redditor BillHicksBoiii noticed three days ago that the domain has been taken by Blizzard. It's difficult to theorise what the expansion could be, though. The obvious link is Goblins, but we've already had the Goblins vs. Gnomes expansion. Unless we are getting a revamp...
      You can also notice a pirate ship in the background of the image, so perhaps a pirate themed expansion?! Moreover, as we've already said, Gadgetzan was one of the cities affected by the Cataclysm. Basically, once Deathwing was awakened, he caused the whole world of Azeroth to change dramatically with earthquakes, tsunamis, the invasion of his forces and just his very own presence. Since Deathwing was originally corrupted by the Old Gods, the first expansion we got this year, it is possible that this expansion may be about Deathwing, his following the Twilight's Hammer or the Cataclysm.
      Of course, all of this is still in the realm of speculation. The image might mean nothing at all! What do you think?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our N'Zoth Resurrect Priest Wild deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Velen OTK Priest Wild deck.
    • By Stan
      Ben Brode confirmed the 2 game win streak to be unintentional and explained why he's not satisfied with the Ranked Ladder System.
      The developer team listened to the community and they will be making adjustments based on simulation systems that help predict changes that would do to the population curve. Here's what Brode had to say.
      Ben Brode
      Seeing some comments here about how people are enjoying easier laddering due to this bug, and hoping we leave it unfixed. I thought I might chime in and talk about the ladder a bit, and hopefully get some feedback! We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently - we're not 100% happy with it.
      Here are some things we are currently discussing:
      Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn't make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that's a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it'd be better if expectations and reality matched here.
      We've received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn't feel all that great.
      We've received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.
      We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.
      We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when "3-star master" was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.
      Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn't necessarily any one player's individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as "good", at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.
      Have you considered not making the fall in rank so severe in the start of the new season? When I was a new player at rank 21 it didn't feel good to lose against a wicked good deck all the time with my inferior cards.
      Yes, that's what I meant by this: We are reanalyzing [...] the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season.
      We think it's a reasonable direction to explore in, but in general it's hard to predict the results on the population distribution among the ranks. Hoping to do some simulation there and make sure there aren't other, better options, too.
      Is this really that bad considering legend has its own internal ranking system?
      Yes, I think so. Imagine just one bucket and we sort by MMR. There aren't breakpoints with rewards as you increase in skill. There isn't an obvious way to communicate with others about how good you are. It's also difficult to know if you are bad or good. (Is Legend 135003 good? What about Legend 27809?)
      The way we communicate our skill or progress is important. Ever heard a friend say "dude! I got to rank 5 this month!"? What is that achievement in a world where everyone is in the same bucket? Watching discreet rank buckets go by (and feeling that progression) and feeling the thrill of reaching a new rank that you've never hit before... those are pretty important, I think.