Damien

The Dreamweavers

6 posts in this topic

Do you get the reputation from dungeons when you do them "normal" or "heroic"?

Because I went in both Black Rook Hold and Darkheart Thicket (normal and heroic) and didn't get any Reputation. It also didn't matter if I selected the dungeons specifically through the tool or got random in there.

Am I doing something wrong?? :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I run the dungeons yesterday and got the reputation. Are you sure you didn't get any or maybe just didn't get a notification?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/25/2016 at 10:41 AM, Guest Druid said:

Am I doing something wrong?? :(

I'll test this again today, but you should be getting the reputation. Enable a reputation experience bar and check what reputation you have at the start of the run. When the last boss dies, see if it has increased.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On September 25, 2016 at 2:41 AM, Guest Druid said:

Do you get the reputation from dungeons when you do them "normal" or "heroic"?

Because I went in both Black Rook Hold and Darkheart Thicket (normal and heroic) and didn't get any Reputation. It also didn't matter if I selected the dungeons specifically through the tool or got random in there.

Am I doing something wrong?? :(

Confirmed, I'm 15 rep off Revered and out of everything else, so I ran reg BRH, reg DHT, H BRH, and H DHT trying to get that last 15 rep, none of them worked. I have to wait until more world quests show up to get 15 rep >.<

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Guest Amon said:

Confirmed, I'm 15 rep off Revered and out of everything else, so I ran reg BRH, reg DHT, H BRH, and H DHT trying to get that last 15 rep, none of them worked. I have to wait until more world quests show up to get 15 rep >.<

This seems to be cropping up more and more. I need to double check what impact the different rep levels might have on the reputation gain. Thanks for letting me know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Your content will need to be approved by a moderator

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   You have pasted content with formatting.   Remove formatting

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      Elisande and Gul'dan are available for testing on December 13. Another set of blues is up dealing with MM Hunters, Rogues and Destruction Warlocks.
      Gul'dan PTR Testing
      Elisande and Gul'dan  will be tested out on Public Test Realms for the first time on Heroic difficulty. You can preview all encounter abilities in the in-game journal. Gul'dan's encounter has a Mythic-only phase, where Khadgar returns Illidan to his dormant body, but he will be somehow possessed. This phase information was removed from the journal lately.
      Watcher
      On Tuesday, December 13, we will be conducting focused raid tests of Heroic Nighthold bosses.
      Remember that Heroic difficulty scales for groups between 10 and 30 players, so feel free to assemble and bring a group of any size within that range. 

      Tuesday, December 13

      Elisande – Heroic Nighthold
      13:30 PST (16:30 EST, 22:30 CET)

      Gul'dan – Heroic Nighthold
      15:00 PST (18:00 EST, 24:00 CET)

      As always, this testing schedule is very fluid and subject to the realities of a PTR environment. We might have to change the time of a testing session, change the bosses being tested, or cancel a test entirely, due to bugs, server hardware issues, etc. Keep an eye on this forum for the latest information, and thank you in advance for testing and providing feedback.
      (Source)
      Following yesterday's blue posts from feedback threads on the official forums, we got a few updates specifically for MM hunters, Destruction Warlocks & Rogues.
      Marksmanship Hunters
      Sigma
      We definitely understand that Marksmanship Hunters were used to a version of Vulnerable on live that was, for all practical purposes, full uptime (i.e. it could be up for every or virtually every Aimed Shot). Skilled players will still be able to have a great majority of their Aimed Shots affected by Vulnerable even in 7.1.5, albeit with a higher demand on focus management and good use of Windburst. That is intended, even if it involves losing a degree of comfort in essentially never being without a Vulnerable when you want it. The debuff is less diluted and has more significance when it requires that sort of attention, and it is not without payoff: the damage of an Aimed Shot with Vulnerable is significantly higher than in 7.1, and can be further increased with the new Patient Sniper. The ability to use Piercing Shot with Vulnerable (and potentially Patient Sniper) is an example of a new option allowing a very strong burst.

      While the fundamental mechanic driving it is a proc, the proc rate is quite high, and our goal is to make sure it is the sort of randomness that provides variation to a rotation while allowing responsive gameplay and room for mastery. The ability to wait on a Hunter's Mark while pooling focus to get full value from the Vulnerable will be more important than before. Windburst, as well as the talent options Sidewinders and Sentinel, allow on-demand Vulnerables as a resource to deal with situations where you have focus but not a Mark (or simply to make sure you have one for a key burst moment without having to react to a proc). Finally, removing the Vulnerable requirement for Marked Shot to do strong damage removes a reliance on multiple rapid procs and/or Sidewinders in order to use consistent buffed Marked Shots.

      As the PTR goes on, we welcome feedback on what problems turn up when you try to put this into practice, but I wanted to explain a bit more what our expectation was.
      (Source)
      Rogues
      Sigma
      Cheat Death at 6 minutes is ridiculous... At the very least they need to make it reset on death, or no one is going to use it.
      It does.

      To say a bit more on the 7.1.5 changes to various “cheat death” effects, including Cheat Death, Cauterize, Purgatory, and Last Resort: firstly, the cooldown increase is not the only change—the cooldowns (specifically, the cooldown-enforcing debuffs) will now clear on death. So if you Cheat Death early in a dungeon, yes, you should avoid dying again for the next 6 minutes. However, in the event you do die (or the group wipes), you will return to combat with Cheat Death once again available.

      More broadly, we examined the value of these effects as a whole and concluded they are too easily available. When Cheat Death was first added as a deep Subtlety talent (before the change to modern talent rows), its power and cooldown reflected the significant investment into that tree. In the current game, not only is its opportunity cost much lower, but, taking a look at the gameplay of healing and survivability challenges, the power level of such a frequent extra life is very high. For example, Rebirth has a 10 minute cooldown, and is a distinctively powerful ability that significantly contributes to a class’s perceived power in dungeons. Reincarnation has a 30 minute cooldown, and is far from being meaningless or forgotten. If we were adding Cheat Death and its ilk today and evaluating its power, there would be little justification for a cooldown as short as 2 minutes. Preventing a death that might otherwise have scuttled the entire current attempt at a dungeon or raid boss has more value than that.

      On Last Resort in particular, we are aware that Vengeance Demon Hunters felt somewhat reliant on this to avoid deaths to unexpected burst damage, and we will be monitoring whether they need other changes to compensate (for example, they have increased health on PTR, increased baseline damage reduction, and a stronger Metamorphosis effect). And on Purgatory, its cooldown was increased the least because it conditional, and it was also made more reliable: the effect will now always last for 3 seconds regardless of whether you momentarily go above 0 HP during that window.
      (Source)
      Destruction Warlocks
      Sigma
      One problem that Destruction Warlock had was a number of talent rows with very obvious "single-target" vs. "AoE" talent picks. This has clear downsides--a requirement to swap talents often (and as a corollary, a feeling of being significantly crippled when not using the ideal talent loadout for a given situation). Clearly, it's a DPS loss single-target to say you can no longer have both Eradication and Reverse Entropy, and a DPS loss in some AoE situations to say you can no longer have both Cataclysm and Fire and Brimstone. But making that swap, and then making sure throughout PTR that Destruction DPS remains reasonably consistent with live, will leave the spec more well-rounded and not as pigeonholed by talent choices in a given situation. PTR already has buffs to Doomguard and Imp damage that help with numbers in all situations, as well as buffs to various talents to help futher improve flexibility.
      (Source)
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Kun Malygos Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Kun Malygos OTK Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Kun C'Thun OTK Druid Anti-Aggro Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Kun C'Thun OTK Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck.