Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

hearthstone Card Collection Cost: Hearthstone

9 posts in this topic


Many Blizzard fans have had access to Hearthstone for a long time, back to the collection wipe during the closed beta in October 2013. For those players, who have had over a year to build their collections up, things may seem pretty okay - but just how high is the barrier to entry for a new player?


Hearthstone currently has 535 collectible cards, broken down as follows:


Rarity Quantity
Free 59
Common 226
Rare 122
Epic 66
Legendary 62


The math has been done quite extensively elsewhere, but briefly:


- An average of 512 packs are required to complete the Classic Hearthstone collection.

- An average of 212 packs are required to complete the Goblins vs. Gnomes collection.

- All of the Naxxramas cards are rewarded for completion of the adventure content.


At the optimal discounted volume prices for all three of these sets, assuming you need exactly the average number of packs in all cases, the combined cost of a complete collection is currently $881 USD.


Obviously the vast majority of Hearthstone players do not have complete collections, nor is a complete collection required to enjoy the game or play it at a casual level. However, to outside appearances, that kind of cost could be seen as either a barrier to entry if you intend to complete the collection over time (regardless of how much your in-game gold might defray this by - you're looking at almost five years of daily quests total), or as a deterrent to players whose interest might be in playing the game to be competitive (which is somewhat inherent to its design!).


(Unrelated - this cost is often cited as the reason for many players running inexpensive, low-cost aggro decks, like Zoo or Hunter.)


As the game gets progressively larger in scope, this is a problem that will only continue to become more prevalent. If another 1-2 major collection updates are in the works for Hearthstone this year - for sake of argument, similar in size and value to Curse of Naxxramas and Goblins vs. Gnomes - the total cost of the game could be as much as $1,200 by the end of 2015.


Blizzard has yet to comment on long term plans for making older segments of the game baseline for new players, or on retiring cards or collections over time. The snowball effect of not only the cost for complete collections for high level players, but just having sufficient basic cards as a newer player to be able to enjoy the game would only continue to be exacerbated.


What would you like to see Blizzard do? Add existing cards from the Classic collection to the Basic set? Implement some kind of season or feature that disallows older cards? Retire older sets over time?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ben Brode recently pointed out you only need 30 cards to make a deck. That probably means they're not going to do anything to lower the barrier to entry unless it's hurting their bottom line. There's also the point that they will pursue the strategy that will make them the most money, which is not necessarily the strategy that attracts the largest number of players. They'd get a lot more players if they greatly increased the rate you acquire gold, but then, how would Blizzard make money?


I do think it'd be interesting to have formats similar to what MTG has. In MTG, you can play Vintage, which allows all the cards in the game (aside from a tiny handful that are not in the spirit of modern MTG), Standard, which only allows cards from the most recent sets, and Pauper, which is Vintage except only cards of common rarity are allowed. MTG has other formats, too, but these three seem the most applicable to Hearthstone.


I think it's a few years before Hearthstone will be big enough to require a separate format that bans older sets, though, unless the rate they release new cards increases dramatically, which, sadly, it probably won't. A pauper format could be done much sooner -- there are already plenty of people at rank 20 who are tired of running into legendaries all the time -- but I think the classes are not well balanced for it yet and Mage would be too dominant.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a newer player: I think it's fine. Sure it's a bit difficult to get started, but like furrykef said: you only need 30 cards to make a deck. Competitive players can set goals for a deck, make it, set goals for their next deck ect. Sure those first few will take a long time to get, but who goes into a card game without expecting to invest time/money? Also, as you go on, dust will be more and more common, making deck building easier and easier.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Making some of the useless Vanilla common cards... basic cards. 

The problem that comes to a new player is that he does not know what he needs, GvG packs or Vanilla packs. Then he realise that Naxx is a must, and he needs some of that cards for the actual decks, then he really needs to spend money for Naxx, because 700g for each wing it is really too much.

1 person likes this

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be nice if Blizzard made older rare, epic, and legendary cards easier to acquire as they introduce new cards. Perhaps by making these cards appear more frequently in card packs or by providing some other way to acquire individual cards not yet in your collection.


It also seems like the game would be friendlier to newer players if the ladder rankings were less goal-oriented and more of a system merely for matching players of similar skill level and collection quality. More like a golf handicap or the chess community's ELO rating. No class E chess player would expect to advance quickly to the rank of expert or above. If, instead of a simple "win you go up, lose you go down" dynamic the player's ranking was based in part on the rank of the player's opposition and the completeness of the player's collection, the goal of moving aggressively up the ladder would be removed and newer players could focus more on honing their skills against similar talents and gradually building their collections. It might also be nice if the rankings weren't reset seasonally so new players didn't have to periodically face players with vastly superior collections fielding multiple epic and legendary minions.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was actually thinking about this the other day. One thing I think Blizzard could do would be to "fix" the amount of dust you recieve when disenchanting common and rare cards to the proper 1/4 ratio of Epics and legendaries (this would give 10 dust and 25 dust per DE of each).  10 dust per common seems like a lot though - so maybe just make common cards cost 20 dust to craft instead (and leave them at 5 per de). 


I also think once the next set of cards launches, Blizzard should combine the GvG cards and the Classic cards into an "old card" set. This would make it less likely to get repeats when you open packs for a while. (See below)


Since the GvG set has so few common cards - I've nearly got them all already, and waste a lot of my pack opens on measly dust. (And need tons of epics still, thanks 4 Quartermasters I've opened!) So I think future card sets they should work out a better ratio of commons/rares/epics/legendaries. Mainly shifting some of the weaker rares to commons, and weaker epics to rares.


I think the above would make it a little easier for new players/completionists to get into the game.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the idea of perhaps making a number of the "older" cards into basics to help new players feel they are getting more out of the early game.


This would then in turn make the other cards more common in packs.


I've been playing since the wipe and so my collection is pretty solid, so crafting the odd card here and there isn't that much of an issue, but I know a few friends that are starting out and they find it pretty tough to get anywhere.


I can see them reducing the price of Naxx fairly soon (a little with how they do with the WoW battle chest)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I read an interesting article on Kotaku a few weeks ago... one of the writers had basically amassed several thousand gold for GvG simply by doing quests, and getting pretty good at arena.Can't find it now but that approach can certainly help old players get the cards to be competitive at higher ranks from new expansions. I know people are somewhat afraid of arena, but you can easily boost your win rate just by looking at a few guides. I went from going 3 and 3 to about 6 and 3, and that's only after a few runs.


As far as newer players are concerned, I would think that an increase in the number of cards will actually make a more level playing field. Let's pretend that hearthstone had double the cards now. Wouldn't that make the meta more unstable? Meaning newer players would have a better chance? I could be wrong.


P.S. I kind of would be interested to know what would happen if there was NO ability to purchase cards for cash. As in you could only get card packs from the arena or quests. I feel like such a limitation might boost creativity.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does one actually need when buying packs? To play competitively do you need to have a fairly large set of legendaries or just a fairly large set of cards? Also, when Blizzard tries to entice people to buy packs of cards with real money, does it need the full allure of all the new cards or just the elusive legendaries?


In my opinion, there are only 6 legendaries which cannot be dealt with without extremely basic cards. Rag, Dr Boom, Sylvanas, Tirion, Sneeds and Cairne - and these can usually be dealt with if you've made efficient trades and have a hex/poly lying around. While most other legendaries are potent, all other cards (besides those 6 legendaries) take a knock out of their stats in exchange for their effect. All other cards are essentially equal in my regard.


You'll need at least one of those cards to progress beyond rank 10  (probablysmile.png ), to  merely enjoy competitive play though, you just need to expand your set of common cards and shift your play style as your collection grows.


At the moment, there are not too many cards for this to be an issue. If 2 more full sized expansions are released though, players should be given a faster method for building up their variety of common cards. I believe these two pack mechanics would fix that future issue:

1) If you open a pack of cards which contains commons which you already have 2 of, you should be allowed to reroll a single one of those commons and be guaranteed to get a common you do not own 2 of - from that set. 

2)If you own all the commons of a card pack set and you open a pack of cards which contains rares which you already own two of, you should be allowed to reroll a single rare from that pack and be guaranteed to get a rare which you do not have 2 of - from that set.

3)This would not extend to epic or legendary cards.


This idea would ensure that players increased the size of their collection at a rate of at least 1 card per pack - a large gain, especially when you have looted over half the cards in a set. This would also cut the potential profit that Blizzard would likely make off any given Hearthstone player - which would be a serious deterrent to implementing it.


Two other ideas would be to limit the legend count of decks to 3 or (if you into dark humor or mind games) add three cheaply craftable 4/4 4 mana minions, each with one of the following 3 abilities:

1) Battlecry: Immediately activate the deathrattle of a random enemy legendary on your behalf.

2) Battlecry: Copy the battlecry of a random enemy legendary.

3) Battlecry: Destroy a random enemy legendary and deal damage to this minion equal to that legendary's power.

4) --- and watch the meta descend into brooding, darkness and endless paranoia.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our N'Zoth Resurrect Priest Wild deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Velen OTK Priest Wild deck.
    • By Stan
      Ben Brode confirmed the 2 game win streak to be unintentional and explained why he's not satisfied with the Ranked Ladder System.
      The developer team listened to the community and they will be making adjustments based on simulation systems that help predict changes that would do to the population curve. Here's what Brode had to say.
      Ben Brode
      Seeing some comments here about how people are enjoying easier laddering due to this bug, and hoping we leave it unfixed. I thought I might chime in and talk about the ladder a bit, and hopefully get some feedback! We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently - we're not 100% happy with it.
      Here are some things we are currently discussing:
      Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn't make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that's a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it'd be better if expectations and reality matched here.
      We've received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn't feel all that great.
      We've received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.
      We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.
      We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when "3-star master" was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.
      Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn't necessarily any one player's individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as "good", at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.
      Have you considered not making the fall in rank so severe in the start of the new season? When I was a new player at rank 21 it didn't feel good to lose against a wicked good deck all the time with my inferior cards.
      Yes, that's what I meant by this: We are reanalyzing [...] the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season.
      We think it's a reasonable direction to explore in, but in general it's hard to predict the results on the population distribution among the ranks. Hoping to do some simulation there and make sure there aren't other, better options, too.
      Is this really that bad considering legend has its own internal ranking system?
      Yes, I think so. Imagine just one bucket and we sort by MMR. There aren't breakpoints with rewards as you increase in skill. There isn't an obvious way to communicate with others about how good you are. It's also difficult to know if you are bad or good. (Is Legend 135003 good? What about Legend 27809?)
      The way we communicate our skill or progress is important. Ever heard a friend say "dude! I got to rank 5 this month!"? What is that achievement in a world where everyone is in the same bucket? Watching discreet rank buckets go by (and feeling that progression) and feeling the thrill of reaching a new rank that you've never hit before... those are pretty important, I think.
    • By Zadina
      The four groups for the group stage of the Hearthstone Championship Tour Finals have been announced. You can also win free The Grand Tournament packs by cheering on your favourite contestant.
      The HCT regional and last call champions were split evenly into four groups of four, with each region being represented in each group. Out of all the groups, Group A looks like it's going to be the most interestings. The BlizzCon opening week will begin on October 26 with the Group Stage.
      Meanwhile, you can vote for who you think is going to be the 2016 Hearthstone champion and win free TGT packs. The first voting period has already begun and it will last until October 25 at 11:59 p.m. PDT. You will win a single TGT pack just for participating in each voting period. Afterwards, you will receive one additional card pack from The Grand Tournament for every best-of-seven match your champion wins once chosen. You can earn up to 6 free packs if you participate from the first voting period and up to 4 packs, if you participate in the second voting period (beginning after the group stage and ending on November 3).
      It’s time to crown a World Champion, as well as time for you to choose your champion and reap some rewards! The culmination of the 2016 Hearthstone Championship Tour is nearly upon us! One player will emerge as the 2016 Hearthstone World Champion at BlizzCon and walk away with the quarter-million USD first place prize from the million-dollar prize pool. Now you can join in on the fun by choosing one of the sixteen competitors to root for, watching as they compete in the Hearthstone World Championship, and receiving in-game rewards for every best-of-seven match they win! Everyone will get a pack just for picking their champion, so don’t miss out!
      Click the button below to choose a champion, or read on for additional details. Just remember that you can’t change your champion after you’ve chosen!

      The sixteen players that are competing in the World Championship have qualified from one of the Season Championships or Last Call Invitationals and will be representing the Americas, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and China. They travelled a long road and faced some of the best players in the world along the way, but now they’ve arrived at the pinnacle of Hearthstone competition. The players have been divided into four groups and will play out the group stage during BlizzCon Opening Week. From there, two players from each group will advance to participate in the single-elimination bracket at BlizzCon. 
      Cydonia, ThijsNL, Handsomeguy, Jasonzhou
      Bbgungun, Naiman, Che0nsu, Hamster
      Amnesiac, DrHippi, Yulsic, Breath
      HotMEOWTH, Pavel, DDaHyoNi, OmegaZero
      Full Groups and Bracket
      How to Participate
      To participate in Choose Your Champion, simply click on the “Choose Now!” button above and select the champion of your choice. Then, during Opening Week and BlizzCon, you can cheer your champion on and be rewarded with card packs based on how well they perform! Just for participating, you will receive one card pack from The Grand Tournament. Additionally, you will receive one additional card pack from The Grand Tournament for every best-of-seven match your champion wins once chosen. All card packs will be delivered to you in-game the week after BlizzCon.*
      Be very careful when making your choice, as once you choose your champion, you will not be able to change your selection.
      *Gnomish Homing Chickens used to deliver card packs may take a few days to arrive.
      Where to Watch
      You can catch all of the exciting action on the official Hearthstone Twitch channel! The Opening Week and BlizzCon schedules can be found below.
      Opening Week (Group Stage):
      Day 1 (October 26) – Match 1 Day 2 (October 27) – Match 2 Day 3 (October 28) – Winner’s Match Day 4 (October 29) – Elimination Match Day 5 (October 30) – Decider Match BlizzCon (Bracket Stage):
      Day 1 (November 4) – Quarterfinals Day 2 (November 5) – Semifinals and Grand Finals
      Voting Periods
      You may cast your vote starting now until October 25 at 11:59 p.m. PDT, when Opening Week begins. Voting will then be closed during Opening Week. If you happen to miss the first voting period, don’t fret! We’ll re-open voting after Opening Week has concluded and let anyone that missed out vote for a champion before BlizzCon begins. The second voting period will close at 11:59 p.m. on November 3, prior to the start of the BlizzCon bracket stage.
      If you have already voted during the first voting period, you will not be able to vote again during the second voting period as your vote will have already been locked in. You are only eligible to receive additional packs for any matches your champion wins after you have chosen them. If you vote during the first voting period, you can earn up to 6 total packs (including your participation pack) depending on how well your champion performs. If you vote during the second voting period, you can earn up to 4 total packs (including your participation pack).
      Choose your champion carefully!
      Once you’ve selected your champion, be sure to tune in to all of the action on our official Hearthstone Twitch channel, and discuss the tournament using the #HCT hashtag on Twitter and Facebook.
      (source) Cast your vote here and let us know in the comment section who you think is going to win this year! If you need any "scholarly" advice, this year's casters (including Sottle) have shared their predictions here.
    • By Zadina
      The new build adds 35 new dailies, buffs to Murlocs, bug fixes and preparations for future content!
      A new patch has hit the Hearthstone servers, preparing the ground for the upcoming Heroic Tavern Brawl and bringing new dailies, changes to Murloc cards, achievements and more!
      As we've already said, this build added some textures for the Heroic Tavern Brawl (which were datamined by Hearthpwn) and it also adds  the BlizzCon 2016 card back. Moreover, Murloc cards that affected ALL Murlocs now only affect friendly ones. There are also several bug fixes. Here are the patch notes:
      Blizzard Entertainment
      In this Hearthstone update, we're making balance changes to several cards and fixing several bugs. Read on for details!
      Ethereal Peddler now reads “Battlecry: If you’re holding any non-Rogue class cards, reduce their Cost by (2).” This was done to make it more clear, especially with upcoming releases. The following Murlocs that affected ALL Murlocs now only affect friendly ones, to improve the Murloc mirror-match. These cards are not eligible for a full dust refund. Grimscale Oracle now reads “Your other Murlocs have +1 Attack.” Coldlight Seer now reads “Battlecry: Give your other Murlocs +2 Health.” Murloc Tidecaller now reads “Whenever you summon a Murloc, gain +1 Attack.” Murloc Warleader now reads “Your other Murlocs have +2/+1.” One Night in Karazhan cards will now show up with the same frequency as other card sets in the Arena The following bugs have been squashed: Yogg-Saron, Hope’s End now properly applies the Overload effect when it casts a spell with Overload. Sir Finley Mrrgglton no longer offers Lesser Heal as an option of Hero Powers to Discover when played by Tyrande. Casting Entomb on a transformed minion will no longer reveal the minion’s identity if it gets drawn again. Gladiator’s Longbow now properly prevents damage caused by Explosive Trap. The following card back has been added: Welcome Inn – Acquired by attending BlizzCon 2016 or purchasing a Virtual Ticket for BlizzCon 2016. Many new daily quests have been added. For more information, including a more comprehensive list of bug fixes, please visit our Forums.
      (source) What are these new daily quests? Well, they were datamined (along with a lot of other stuff) by Hearthpwn. In total, the new dailies are around 35 in number! The 40 Gold ones involve playing 30 class cards for each class. There is a variety of new 50 Gold quests;  their concept involves around playing a specific amount of a particular archetype or kind of cards, like Play 20 Beasts, Play 10 Weapons or Play 15 Overload Minions. The 60 Gold quests require you to play 50 class cards. Lastly, there are two new 100 Gold quests: Murlocalypse - Play 75 Murlocs and Cry Havoc - Play 75 Battlecry minions.
      Other datamined data include three new achievements that award three Classic card packs each:
      Return of the Hero - Defeat the 3 challengers! Ready for Action - Play 30 cards in Play mode Back in the Game! - Deal 100 damage to enemy heroes There are also six achievements, awarding The Grand Tournament packs, that are tied to the BlizzCon promotion - we will discuss this in another article!
      Ultimately, a returning player challenge with three missions has appeared, as well as a possible Innkeeper challenge.