Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

hearthstone Sottle's Weekly Meta Analysis - Week of 08/02/2015 - 15/02/2015

2 posts in this topic



Sottle's Weekly Meta Analysis - Week of 08/02/2015 - 15/02/2015


Hello again friends! Welcome back to a weekly article where I discuss what's hot, what's not and how you should be building decks to fight back against the meta.


Common Decks & Cards


Since we last visited the Meta, one deck has emerged as a serious contender, namely Oil Rogue. Oil Rogue is a deck that built on the early groundwork laid by the initial Control Rogue deck that emerged soon after the release of GvG. Using combinations of cards like Tinker's Sharpsword Oil and Blade Flurry to create huge burst damage and clear even the biggest of boards, Oil Rogue is a deck that has very few losing matchups and completely dominates certain decks like Midrange Paladin and Ramp Druid. The emergence of this new Rogue deck has led to a few significant shifts. Firstly, the Druids that were previously running Ramp builds, are now switching to Fast Druid decks in order to create enough pressure on the Rogue players. Secondly, Control Warrior has re-emerged in the meta, since that deck is one of the few hard counters to Rogue available, usually Warrior can simply armour up throughout the match and outlast the amount of damage in the Rogue's deck. Thirdly, Mech Mage has taken a small hit in popularity, since Rogue is able to quite comfortably deal with their fast starts with cards like Backstab and SI:7 Agent.


In terms of card choices, both Harrison Jones and Loatheb have increased in popularity this week due to their strength against Rogue. Since Ramp Druid has decreased in popularity, The Black Knight is being included less often, while the decrease in Aggro decks like Mech Mage has led to less Zombie Chow's being played.


The arms race between Big Game Hunter (BGH) and cards with 7 or more attack has stabilised this week. Previously, deck builders were in a state of turbulence, with some people including two copies of BGH in their decks in order to counter the frequencey of Dr. Boom and other high priority targets, which led to others cutting BGH targets from their decks entirely. However, this game of tug of war has settled down to the point where a single BGH is the norm in many decks, and Dr. Boom is very often the only BGH target to be found.


The other new deck to emerge this week is Aggro Mech Shaman. This deck shares a lot of cards, and good and bad matchups, with Mech Mage, but has its own unique strengths and weaknesses. Time will tell if this deck is a new contender, or just a flash in the pan deck, but for the past week it has been posting some impressive results with many people achieving high Legend ranks.


Class Power Rankings



1. Rogue





Rogue takes the number 1 spot this week. It is extremely well rounded, with only Control Warrior offering a hard counter currently. As the deck that people are having to consider when building their own decks, it is fully deserving of the number 1 spot.



2. Mage




Although Mech Mage has taken a small hit this week due to the strength of Oil Rogue, it is still a high power deck, capable of winning any matchup with the right draw. Freeze Mage has also emerged as a significant contender due to the drop in Aggro. Aside from Fast Druid and Warrior, which are both very poor matchups, Freeze Mage is very well placed to deal with everything else in the Meta, including Oil Rogue.


3. Druid




Druid continues to be a consistently strong performer. Although the two most viable archetypes, Ramp and Fast Druid, are quite similar in terms of card choice, the drastic difference in matchups between the two usually means that one or the other will be well positioned in any given meta. In this case, it is Fast Druid that is well positioned, with strong matchups against Warrior and Oil Rogue, and the ability to blow any deck out of the water with the right draw.


4. Warrior




Warrior comes in at a healthy 4th this week, mainly due to its powerful winrate against the most dominant deck in the meta. The strong matchup against Oil Rogue is enough to cement it as a decent choice, despite its weaker winrate against Fast Druid. It also offers a few other nice perks, such as a complete shutout win vs. Freeze Mage and strong matchups against most Aggro decks.


5. Priest




I'll hold my hands up on this one. My experience with Priest still echoes my recent sentiments in previous meta reports. I find the class to be uninspiring, and generally just underpowered in relation to what other classes are doing. However, two players, Zetalot and Pavel have held Rank 1 Legend with Priest this week, with the latter holding it for almost an entire week. That sort of dominance doesn't happen without the deck being appropriate, so I have to accept that I may be wrong on my evaluation and give Priest a reasonable 5th.


6. Paladin




Paladin take a huge hit this week, due mostly to the horrible matchup the deck has against Oil Rogue. Rogue is able to pick apart the early game of the Paladin far too efficiently, with clean answers like Fan of Knives and Blade Flurry to the Paladin's usually intimidating board states involving Muster for Battle. Although the deck is relatively well positioned against other decks still, the inefficiencies against Rogue are far too severe to overlook.


7. Hunter




Oh how the mighty have fallen! What was once the absolute terror of the ladder has now been relegated almost to a sideshow deck. With the destructive power of Undertaker gone, most Hunter decks now have too many answers to be a dominant deck. Face Hunter loses outright to Control Warrior and struggles to keep up with the damage output of Oil Rogue. Midrange Hunter is picked apart by Rogue's efficient removal, and is outpaced by Mech Mage. While there is a new version of Control Hunter that is starting to make a splash in tournament, it is yet to prove any significant impact on the ladder meta.


8. Shaman




Shaman is a relative non-mover this week. Although Mech Shaman has come along and made a splash on the ladder, it still struggles to show any particular benefits over Mech Mage. It has strong matchups against Druid, and is perhaps more favoured against Oil Rogue than the Mage version is, but overall, the strength of the Mage cards like Snowchugger and Goblin Blastmage make it a vastly superior choice.


9. Warlock




I promise this is as shocking to me as it might be to you, but I think Warlock may actually be the weakest ladder class right now. Zoo is still struggling to find a foothold. Without the oppressive Undertaker openings at its disposable, it gets picked apart by Oil Rogue, or outpaced by the starts of Mech Mage and Mech Shaman. Handlock on the other hand is struggling to combat the amount of speed, burst, and Big Game Hunter in the meta, leaving Warlock in a poor place overall. Perhaps the most successful Warlock deck currently is a hybrid Demonlock deck, that plays a large amount of Zoo style early game cards, but piles in additional late-game. Even this deck however, is struggling to make a significant impact on the meta.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would explain why my mid-range hunter has dropped a few ranks! How would you recommend altering the mid-range hunter deck that you've listed on the constructed hunter page to handle the current meta? should i turn it into a control hunter? has anybody tried using a mech hunter to keep it aggressive?

Edited by KevinGarnett

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda
      The Hearthstone Championship Tour enters the final phase today, October 26, with the Hearthstone World Championship.
      After a long year of qualifying events, the World Championship is finally here. The sixteen qualifiers will be playing for their share of a million dollar prize pool, with $250,000 going to first place.  There will be four groups of four players, and the top two from each group will advance to the single elimination knockout stage. Each match will be played as the best of seven Conquest. The groups and players' deck archetypes are listed below.

        Cydonia: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior
        Thijs: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Questing Rogue, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock
        Handsomeguy: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Malygos Rogue, Mid Shaman, Control Warrior
        Jasonzhou: Malygos Druid, Miracle Rogue, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock, Nzoth Warrior

        Bbgungun: Token Druid, Secret Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock
        Naiman: Malygos Druid, Tempo Mage, Face Hunter, Mid Shaman, Yogg Warrior, 
        Che0nsu: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock, Dragon Warrior
        Hamster: Token Druid, N'Zoth Murloc Paladin, N'Zoth Preist, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior

        Amnesiac: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Control Warrior
         DrHippi: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Yogg Warrior, Mid Shaman
        Yulsic: Malygos Druid, Mid Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Zoo Warlock
        Breath: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Yogg Warrior

        HotMEOWTH: Malygos Druid, Face Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior
        Pavel: Malygos Druid, Tempo Mage, Malygos Rogue, Mid Shaman, C'Thun Warrior
       DDaHyoNi: Malygos Druid, Secret Hunter, Tempo Mage, Mid Shaman, Yogg Warrior
        OmegaZero: Token Druid, Tempo Mage, Totem Shaman, Zoo Warlock, Dragon Warrior
      There will be one match from each group per day, and the first match starts at 18:00 CEST on 26 October, live on Twitch.
    • By Zadina
      We are all expecting the announcement of the next Hearthstone expansion at BlizzCon 2016. And we might have just gotten the very first hint about it!
      Υesterday night, the @PlayHearthstone account on Twitter posted the following image. This may be nothing at all or it may be an actual clue about the upcoming Hearthstone expansion.
      Τhe disclaimer of the image reads:
      In World of Warcraft, Gadgetzan is a Goblin city situated in the desert of Tanaris, in the southeast corner of Kalimdor. Gadgeztan used to be a mainland city, but after the Cataclysm hit Azeroth it now enjoys a beach and the sea.
      Redditor BillHicksBoiii noticed three days ago that the domain has been taken by Blizzard. It's difficult to theorise what the expansion could be, though. The obvious link is Goblins, but we've already had the Goblins vs. Gnomes expansion. Unless we are getting a revamp...
      You can also notice a pirate ship in the background of the image, so perhaps a pirate themed expansion?! Moreover, as we've already said, Gadgetzan was one of the cities affected by the Cataclysm. Basically, once Deathwing was awakened, he caused the whole world of Azeroth to change dramatically with earthquakes, tsunamis, the invasion of his forces and just his very own presence. Since Deathwing was originally corrupted by the Old Gods, the first expansion we got this year, it is possible that this expansion may be about Deathwing, his following the Twilight's Hammer or the Cataclysm.
      Of course, all of this is still in the realm of speculation. The image might mean nothing at all! What do you think?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our N'Zoth Resurrect Priest Wild deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Velen OTK Priest Wild deck.
    • By Stan
      Ben Brode confirmed the 2 game win streak to be unintentional and explained why he's not satisfied with the Ranked Ladder System.
      The developer team listened to the community and they will be making adjustments based on simulation systems that help predict changes that would do to the population curve. Here's what Brode had to say.
      Ben Brode
      Seeing some comments here about how people are enjoying easier laddering due to this bug, and hoping we leave it unfixed. I thought I might chime in and talk about the ladder a bit, and hopefully get some feedback! We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently - we're not 100% happy with it.
      Here are some things we are currently discussing:
      Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn't make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that's a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it'd be better if expectations and reality matched here.
      We've received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn't feel all that great.
      We've received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.
      We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.
      We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when "3-star master" was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.
      Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn't necessarily any one player's individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as "good", at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.
      Have you considered not making the fall in rank so severe in the start of the new season? When I was a new player at rank 21 it didn't feel good to lose against a wicked good deck all the time with my inferior cards.
      Yes, that's what I meant by this: We are reanalyzing [...] the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season.
      We think it's a reasonable direction to explore in, but in general it's hard to predict the results on the population distribution among the ranks. Hoping to do some simulation there and make sure there aren't other, better options, too.
      Is this really that bad considering legend has its own internal ranking system?
      Yes, I think so. Imagine just one bucket and we sort by MMR. There aren't breakpoints with rewards as you increase in skill. There isn't an obvious way to communicate with others about how good you are. It's also difficult to know if you are bad or good. (Is Legend 135003 good? What about Legend 27809?)
      The way we communicate our skill or progress is important. Ever heard a friend say "dude! I got to rank 5 this month!"? What is that achievement in a world where everyone is in the same bucket? Watching discreet rank buckets go by (and feeling that progression) and feeling the thrill of reaching a new rank that you've never hit before... those are pretty important, I think.