Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Zadina

hearthstone Hearthstone's Best 2015 Moments

1 post in this topic

14978-hearthstones-best-2015-moments.jpg

With the end of 2015 being around the corner, this is the best time to reminisce Hearthstone's top 8 moments for this year.

 

 

8. Hearthstone available on mobile phones (April 14, 2015)

 

HFVRX3M6X10H1428616926500.jpg

 

Attending a boring university lecture? Have some time to kill while commuting to work? Can’t reach your PC from your bed? All these problems were solved when Hearthstone finally launched on iPhones and Android phones back in April. It was a pretty smart move and it definitely brought more players to the game. Lately, whenever I go out, I see young people everywhere playing Hearthstone on their phones and I feel like a hipster: “I knew that game waaaaay before you, kiddo”! Still, Hearthstone hasn’t yet been released on Windows phones. The app size in the other two operating systems is also quite big and every time there are updates, you basically have to re-install the whole game app. Here’s to hoping that all these issues will be fixed in 2016.

 

 

7. Highest Rank Bonus (August 24, 2015)

 

coffre-legende-hearthstone.jpg

 

Ranked mode finally started feeling more rewarding with the release of the patch for The Grand Tournament. Along with the usual card back, players are now rewarded at the end of each month with a special Ranked chest for progressing beyond rank 20. The rewards are better the higher rank you achieve; in general, they involve a specific amount of dust, as well as a number of golden cards.  A new chest is available every 5 ranks, with Legend rank rewards being slightly better than the rewards for ranks 1-5.

 

 

6. The Grand Tournament release (August 24, 2015)

 

 

The Grand Tournament is Hearthstone’s second expansion. Its major features were 132 new cards, the Inspire keyword and the Joust mechanic. The Grand Tournament enhanced the arsenal of some already existing decks like Midrange Beasts Hunter and Control Priest.  Other notable examples are Twilight Guardian for Dragon Priest, Darnassus Aspirant for Ramp/Midrange Druid and Spellslinger springing a variation of Tempo Mage, the Casino Mage. Justicar Trueheart proved to be a powerful card for Priests and Warriors. TGT managed to make one of the weakest classes in constructed play into one of the strongest ones: Paladin received all the love with Murloc Knight and, more importantly, Mysterious Challenger completely changing the meta. Hearthstone devs have admitted ever since that they didn’t expect that Mysterious Challenger would be that powerful. To sum up, though, we should point out that, apart from the Secrets Paladin deck, The Grand Tournament was perhaps the least impactful of all the Hearthstone expansions or adventures. At least in constructed mode, it merely provided some single card additions in already existing strong decks. However, it did provide some pretty good cards for Arena.

 

 

5. Tavern Brawl arrives (June 16, 2015)

 

hearthstone.jpg

 

A new game mode was introduced in June: Tavern Brawl! Each week, from Wednesday to Monday, there is a set of different, unique rules and interesting mechanics. It awards a Classic pack for your first victory. Tavern Brawl has a casual and fun tone, overall. Some players have been wishing for more competitive new game modes, but Tavern Brawl is still entertaining and innovative. It certainly makes us look forward to every Wednesday!

 

 

4. Blackrock Mountain Adventure (April 2015)

 

 

Blackrock Mountain is Hearthstone’s second Adventure; it was split into five wings that were released weekly and added 31 new cards to the game. Blackrock Mountain re-introduced an already existing minion tribe: Dragons. Surprisingly, Dragons didn’t immediately catch on and it was actually a couple of months after this adventure’s conclusion that Dragon decks started showing up: Dragon Priest, Dragon Mage, Dragon/Malygos Warlock… Even though The Grand Tournament introduced 100 more cards than Blackrock Mountain, the Blackrock cards were far more impactful and overall stronger. Dragon Priest mostly and Malygos Warlock are still strong decks, Emperor Thaurissan is an invaluable card for control decks, and Hunters, Shamans and Warlocks gained some good class cards. In addition, three new decks became popular: Mill Rogue, Tempo Mage and the king of them all, Patron Warrior. The only fault we can find in Blackrock Mountain is that the PvE Adventure itself wasn’t as fun and memorable as Naxxramas or The League of Explorers.

 

 

3. Biggest Nerfs of 2015: Undertaker and Warsong Commander

 

o7yjCNx.jpg

 

The Undertaker nerf happened so early in 2015 (January 29) that it already feels a long time ago and it’s easy to mistakenly assume that it happened the previous year. Previously, the original card’s text read: “Whenever you summon a minion with Deathrattle, gain +1/+1”. Undertaker was overpowered in the hands of Zoolocks and Hunters, promoting a very aggro-oriented meta. It was nerfed to increasing only attack by +1 each time a minion with Deathrattle is summoned, thus rendering the card useless. The other big nerf of the year is more recent and received way more attention: Warsong Commander was nerfed on October 20, 2015. As we already mentioned, Grim Patron Warrior was dominating the scene in constructed play ever since Grim Patron was introduced in Blackrock Mountain. Warsong Commander's ability to give Charge to minions with 3 or less attack synergised too well with Grim Patron and Frothing Berserker. Consequently, it was changed to provide +1 attack to minions with Charge. What the dev team may not have guessed is that Grim Patron Warrior kept being a very powerful deck even after the Warsong nerf. That’s why, in my opinion, the Undertaker change may not have been as talked about but it was definitely the bigger one out of the two: just think about the potential of that card with more recent decks like Feign Death Hunter or Raptor Rogue; Zoolocks and Hunters are as popular as ever, even without Undertaker in their arsenal. RIP to both cards.

 

 

2. The League of Explorers announcement and launch (November-December 2015)

 

 

The League of Explorers is the third Hearthstone Adventure. It had four wings, and it introduced 45 new cards and the Discover keyword. Its announcement was pretty memorable: it was announced at the Blizzcon 2015 opening ceremony (November 6) and the first wing went live less than a week after. That was a very pleasant surprise they had for us, don’t you agree? The boss fights of this Adventure were pretty fun and unique. More importantly, the cards introduced with LoE have caused the biggest stir in the meta after Naxxramas. We have discussed here in Icy Veins how much The League of Explorers has affected the game so far. Very good job overall!

 

 

1.  Ostkaka vs. Thijs World Championship semi-final, Ostkaka is the 2015 World Champion (November 7, 2015)

 

 

Out of all the amazing games we saw this year in tournaments or in streams, I believe the game of Ostkaka versus Thijs during Blizzcon 2015 is the most memorable and significant one. The semi-final between them lasted quite a while, but it’s not tiring at all; on the contrary, you get to admire the players' skill, strategical thinking and sometimes – yeah, we admit it – their luck. Thijs was on a winning streak and was the absolute favourite, but it was Ostkaka who snatched the victory and then proceeded to win an easy final against Hotform. Congratulations to Ostkaka for being the winner of the biggest Hearthstone tournament for 2015!

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)
    • By Zadina
      Ben Brode was active on the official forums and on social media these past few days and he had a lot of interesting things to say about various hot topics. Most notably, he noted that it's possible that additional Basic and Classic set cards may be nerfed or rotated out of Standard in the future.
      You probably remember that with the release of the Standard format, something less than a year ago, 12 Basic and Classic cards were nerfed. Now, Game Director Ben Brode revealed that more Basic & Classic card nerfs can happen or at least they may be rotated out of Standard. The reasoning behind this is that the team wants to keep a fresh feeling in Standard and they don't want to see the same core cards appear too frequently. That's why they are also not considering buffing underused vanilla cards, since Basic and Classic cards are already being used a lot and they want new sets to be more impactful.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide The goal with Standard is to keep the meta fresh for each yearly rotation. There are some benefits to keeping Basic and Classic cards in Standard: Returning players have an entry-point to the new format, and new players experience classics like "Hogger" and "Arcane Missiles" that are iconic and great introductions to the game. People take breaks from Hearthstone, and being able to jump right back in with a few cards you already own and understand makes that experience a lot better. That upside has a real downside in working directly against the big goal for Standard. It needs to feel different each year, and if Basic and Classic cards are still appearing in large densities year after year, we will not be achieving our goals for Standard.
      We knew we weren't going to get there when the Year of the Kraken began, so we nerfed 12 basic/classic cards, to put more of the weight of the meta into the rotating sets. We always knew we'd have to watch the meta to see if any future changes would be needed when we got ready for the next year of Standard. If things are looking like they are going to be too same-y for that next year, we could see more nerfs, or we might rotate some additional classic cards to Wild, like we did with Old Murk Eye. No matter what, we're committed to making Standard fresh and exciting each new year. (source)
       
       
      Are you guys considering, besides nerfs, implementing buffs for underused vanilla cards?
      Given the goal of Standard is to keep the game fresh each year, it's important to keep a lot of the power of the cards in the expansions, and not in the basic and classic sets. It's not clear what that balance of power should look like (is it ~10 cards from the basic and classic sets on average?), but we're currently skewed so high towards basic and classic cards in decks, that we are at high risk for 'samey-ness' as the years change in Standard. Buffing Basic/Classic cards *increases* that risk. If the goal is to get more cool cards into the meta, just releasing awesome new cards in expansions should make an impact there, and still keep Standard fresh. (source)
      Obviously, this comment caused a lot of reactions and Ben took to Reddit (specifically this thread) and Twitter, where he answered various questions. A brief summary of his responses is that the Basic set is currently the most powerful in the game (source), while the team intends to keep the vanilla set unchanged (the term used was 'evergreen' - source). Ben repeated that the team's intention behind any future Basic and Classic card nerfs or changes is to keep Standard format fresh and "less same-y". A difficult question was posed to the community: would they prefer the affected vanilla cards to be nerfed, rotated out of Standard format or remain as they are, even if it results in a staler meta?
      On the same Reddit thread, Brode also talked about why the Charge nerf was necessary due to the Grimy Goons synergy and how new/F2P players are currently still able to reach Legend rank - something that he expects to keep happening in the future as well.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We nerfed Charge (the spell) because we knew the upcoming Grimy Goons mechanic in combination with Enraged Worgen and Charge was not really fair or fun. There have always been F2P players at Legend, and there have continued to be since that change. (source) Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide We did this in 2016 when we nerfed 12 classic cards and it made a huge difference in how much the meta was able to change with the release of Old Gods (instead of just continuing to be Druid Combo). New players were able to reach legend without spending money after that change, and I expect that will be continue to be true if we change a few more cards in 2017. (source) On a somewhat relevant topic, with the end of the Year of the Kraken the end of Reno Jackson is also approaching. Ben excluded the possibility of this game-changing card making it into the Classic set - once again the reason being "keeping the meta fresh".
      Placeholder for tweet 817625802116214784 For consistency's sake, I've also included two Brode blue posts from last week. In the first one, he talks about the new player experience and how it still needs more work. For example. the climb from the introductory quests to actually playing the game feels steep, while getting into Ranked is also difficult. However, for their first games new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool designed to match new players with each other. There has also been a 15% increase in new player winrates on Casual.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide Hey there! We agree that the new player experience needs more work. We've been tweaking it for years and have seen significant increases in retention among new players since launch. Most new players start playing against the AI and then take on other players in Casual. The Casual matchmaker has gone through a lot of iteration and new player winrates have increased by ~15%.
      Ranked is a different story. Ranked is becoming more difficult for new players over time. I spoke about some of the challenges we are currently facing with our ladder system before I left for paternity leave here: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/58pxgt/ben_brode_confirms_the_2_game_win_streak_is_not/
      Something you may not realize is that new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool for their first several sessions. In Casual, we match them entirely against other brand new players with similarly-sized collections.
      That all said, we think the introductory missions up through Illidan feel pretty good, and after that it still feels like a bit of a cliff. It's definitely something we're aware of. Thanks for your feedback, and for the feedback of everyone else who's been chiming in on this over the last few months.
      (source) Lastly, Ben made an interesting post about another community hot topic: the ladder system.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently - we're not 100% happy with it.
      Here are some things we are currently discussing:
      Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn't make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that's a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it'd be better if expectations and reality matched here.
      We've received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn't feel all that great.
      We've received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.
      We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.
      We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when "3-star master" was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.
      Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn't necessarily any one player's individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as "good", at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.
      (source)
    • By Pogsz
      Since I talk like an ogre I can as well practice my 3D skills and play around with the hearthstone logo.  Here is a quick render I made this morning.  Maybe I will do some more, wallpaper, t-shirt print or other stuff... I don't know

      I will probably also just play some Hearthstone for myself.  If I am better I will maybe do a "silent" stream tonight! :-D Or at least keep the conversation to a minimum.

      See you around guys and have a good day!