positiv2

The most "cancerous" decks

36 posts in this topic

Hi,

I would like to ask you, what decks do you think are the most cancerous (as in irritating to play against)?

For me it would be Secret Paladin and Zoo. Secret Paladin and its Dr. 6, sometimes followed by Dr. 7 and/or Tirion. MC is one of the strongest cards in the game, as he can be worth up to 11 mana of cards for just 6 mana. There is Get Down! and Avenge combo in the paladin secrets, but they get played at the same time! 

Then there is zoo with its pesky minion buffing and flooding the board. There is also the Egg+Buff combo, which can ruin your day. Fearlessly tapping, they never fully run out of steam. 

Now, what are the decks you despise and why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like playing against Reno decks - I get them down to lethal range and then they play Reno and I'm all "I have to do that again? Dammit."

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I kind-of dread aggro Druids. You know what the game is from the start, they just start relentlessly hitting your face and you know you haven't really got 30 health to play with. Any time from turn 7 onwards they can burst 14 damage or more on you. Sometimes they suffer with the card draw even before they are able to get an AoL out (if they have one) which is nice, but when they don't they're trouble.

Worse though is the Freeze Mage. Fist-chewingly, screaming into a pillow, cat-kickingly frustrating.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Secret paladin is by far the most disgusting deck in the game right now. Not only is it an auto pilot deck that allows people who belong at rank 10 to get to legend(maybe it is an exageration, but i'm not sure it is too far off), it can also destroy anything else in the game when it gets a good draw, even the so called "counter" decks. I have recently been playing face shaman a lot to counter them, but even though I win most games I still hate playing against them. But I do believe they will eventually be nerfed.

 

Midrange druid comes at second place for me as I consider the deck very easy to play, and it is easily one of the best decks over the whole lifespan of the game. If you put those two things together you have cancer. Not to mention they have shredder as a one drop every other game against me.

Edited by batanete

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, good news everyone! Thanks to the current Tavern Brawl we now have Freeze Mages that can armour up!

Deep, deep joy.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very few things make me salty, but I guess I can come up with some that do.

 

  • Tempo/Casino/Cancer/Whateveritscalled mage: Because losing to a bunch of spammed RNG is annoying as hell.
  • Freeze mage: Does this even need explaining? Spend about 15 turns faffing about trying to think of a way to win only to still end up losing exactly as you expected to 20min earlier, when the game began. Interaction is nice.
  • Any other mage using secrests. Mage secrets are stoopid mkay.
  • Any combo druid (ramp, token, deathrattle, ..) because being able to predict your death 1 or 2 turns in advance and knowing that there's sweet fuck all you can do about it with your current hand is annoying.
  • Mill rogue. I'm not even going to explain this one. Please stop existing.
  • Secret paladin because secrets, secrest and OMFG SECRETS
  • Combowarlock (the facelessPO kind) because I never expect it and then BOOM. Dreams shattered. Souls crushed.
  • Faceshaman for just having too much unstoppable BS going on. One lucky hero power spellpower roll and you can watch the fireworks go off on your face. Throw in a couple lucky RNG rolls as well with the damage for extra salt.
  • Facehunter because the tactic of only going face is mindnumbingly boring to play against.
  • Murlock anythings because frogs are Fernch and nobody likes those. Right? Oui!

 

That should cover it. Sort of.

Edited by PaasKonijn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, good news everyone! Thanks to the current Tavern Brawl we now have Freeze Mages that can armour up!

Deep, deep joy.

I just used Secret Paladin. But with Majordomo. Majordomo makes everything fun. This brawl was fun, but as long as meta decks win more than "fun decks", the brawl effect was just too weak.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about cancerous, but roulette mage tilts me to no end.  I have fairly bad luck in this game, like last game i played a patient assassin popped out of the shredder I killed with geddon's effect and earlier tonight the mech mage I was playing against deathlorded an Andonitas on turn 4 and had the stealth spare part on hand (also I have only played like 10 games tonight), and just some of the stupid stuff that happens with casino mage makes me froth at the mouth.  Aside from that, as a connoisseur of oil rogue and freeze mage, Reno decks make me cry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very few things make me salty, but I guess I can come up with some that do.

 

  • Tempo/Casino/Cancer/Whateveritscalled mage: Because losing to a bunch of spammed RNG is annoying as hell.
  • Freeze mage: Does this even need explaining? Spend about 15 turns faffing about trying to think of a way to win only to still end up losing exactly as you expected to 20min earlier, when the game began. Interaction is nice.
  • Any other mage using secrests. Mage secrets are stoopid mkay.
  • Any combo druid (ramp, token, deathrattle, ..) because being able to predict your death 1 or 2 turns in advance and knowing that there's sweet fuck all you can do about it with your current hand is annoying.
  • Mill rogue. I'm not even going to explain this one. Please stop existing.
  • Secret paladin because secrets, secrest and OMFG SECRETS
  • Combowarlock (the facelessPO kind) because I never expect it and then BOOM. Dreams shattered. Souls crushed.
  • Faceshaman for just having too much unstoppable BS going on. One lucky hero power spellpower roll and you can watch the fireworks go off on your face. Throw in a couple lucky RNG rolls as well with the damage for extra salt.
  • Facehunter because the tactic of only going face is mindnumbingly boring to play against.
  • Murlock anythings because frogs are Fernch and nobody likes those. Right? Oui!

 

That should cover it. Sort of.

Which deck do you think is NOT cancerous lol... 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know people say Mill rogue is cancerous but I personally did not think so. You know pretty early on that you are against a mill rogue and you can sort of begin to play accordingly. LAst time I played against one it ended in a pretty fun draw. I brought him down to 7 health or 3 health. HE used Brann BRonzebeard and started using coldlights. Milled himself and me to death.

 

I find secrets generally to be a bit annoying at times. So yes having to deal with a whole portrait full of shiny yellow dots which will buff something the second you attack is annoying. 

 

I used to find priests annoying before face roll paladin, but my face shaman can deal with them fine. The other annoying deck is Warrior after he has Justicar true hearted!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Which deck do you think is NOT cancerous lol... 

 

 

I don't mind losing to more midrange/control style decks. Sometimes. tongue.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Hey, good news everyone! Thanks to the current Tavern Brawl we now have Freeze Mages that can armour up!

Deep, deep joy.

I just used Secret Paladin. But with Majordomo. Majordomo makes everything fun. This brawl was fun, but as long as meta decks win more than "fun decks", the brawl effect was just too weak.

 

Interesting.

 

I did play Freeze Mage in this Tavern Brawl, but mostly because I had both the 'Win 5 Tavern Brawls' and the 'Win 5 times with Mage' quest. And, well, because I like to play Freeze Mage. smile.png

 

All I met were death rattlers and one murloc shaman. Well, sample size was only 7 matches.

 

------

 

Oh, and back to topic:

 

Since, as I said above, Freeze Mage is my favorite constructed deck, the most cancerous deck in the game obviously is Control Warrior. 

Edited by Kobal
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Which deck do you think is NOT cancerous lol... 

 

 

I don't mind losing to more midrange/control style decks. Sometimes. tongue.png

 

If you believe midrange decks are inherently any less cancerous than aggro or combo, you represent everything that is wrong with this game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I don't mind losing to more midrange/control style decks. Sometimes. tongue.png

If you believe midrange decks are inherently any less cancerous than aggro or combo, you represent everything that is wrong with this game.

 

So you have bigger problems with decks such as Midrange shaman than with Secret Pally or Freeze mage? You have bigger problems with dragon priest (the midrange builds) than with tempo mage or SMOrc? Midrange decks fight for board control and if you are able to limit their board control, you win. On the other hand, you have face hunter who just goes face and you can only win by healing enough health, dropping taunts or killing them earlier. Combo decks just survive into the late-game, drop the combo and kill you the same or the next turn. Not really fun to be honest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I don't mind losing to more midrange/control style decks. Sometimes. tongue.png

If you believe midrange decks are inherently any less cancerous than aggro or combo, you represent everything that is wrong with this game.

 

So you have bigger problems with decks such as Midrange shaman than with Secret Pally or Freeze mage? You have bigger problems with dragon priest (the midrange builds) than with tempo mage or SMOrc? Midrange decks fight for board control and if you are able to limit their board control, you win. On the other hand, you have face hunter who just goes face and you can only win by healing enough health, dropping taunts or killing them earlier. Combo decks just survive into the late-game, drop the combo and kill you the same or the next turn. Not really fun to be honest.

 

I said inherently more cancerous, which is to say I have no problem with many of the decks you have mentioned(and by the way, outside this weeks brawl I think freeze mage is perfectly fine as a deck). But as a whole, I do think decks like midrange druid, hunter and especially secret paladin are a lot more annoying than things like face hunter or aggro pally, as these decks take a lot more decision making to play well with and tend to be a lot more easy to counter too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@positiv2 I like playing with combo decks. I guess it reminds me of movies and cartoons as a kid, where the good guy is loosing and getting beat pretty badly and then gets one big power surge or emotional moment and lets it all out at once to turn the tide of battle and defeat the bad guy :)

 

Freeze mage feels more like someone just running away from you while slowing you down, as you're trying to chase them with a sword. Not THAT fun to play against I admit. But I don't hate it.

 

While having a powerful combo coming to deal burst damage may seem unfair I feel there is the downside attached to it of having to control, draw and survive long enough to grab all the pieces. Combo druid it seems does not have this downside since they need only two pieces to combo and the more they get the more powerful and inescapable the burst, and the rest of their cards that help them get to this point, are good on their own too.

 

 

Playing against a combo deck I like to pretend im in one of those episode where if the enemy collects all the parts of a puzzle they can end the world and I have to stop them from getting all the pieces. OFC I will never know how many pieces they have.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Face and aggro decks.

Omg these decks just makes me go mad.I am a player who keeps the board clear and controlled.But when I have so many minions these player just go my face and finish me.I dont know, I just dont wanna rush things and play late game.I dont mind losing to secret pallys or freeze mages.From time to time I can beat them.But sometimes playing against a mill rogue can be frustrating :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

any deck with Reno in it - no way should any one card (even a legendary) have that much power to swing the game from one end to the other, a card with no counter and no telltale signs that your opponent holds it in his hand (such as the play of other cards that might synergise with it)

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

any deck with Reno in it - no way should any one card (even a legendary) have that much power to swing the game from one end to the other, a card with no counter and no telltale signs that your opponent holds it in his hand (such as the play of other cards that might synergise with it)

 

While I understand where you are coming from, Reno becomes more of a problem when you are facing him with an aggro deck. 

If you have a strong board control, and you opponent has failed to respond to your threats before turn 6, Reno will only delay the inevitable. you can keep pushing for damage, take care of the 4/6 body, not giving him enough time to recover.

 

With enough practice and knowledge about enemy decks, you can at times tell if the opposing is using a reno deck. If the opponent is playing cards you normally wouldn't expect, or cards you know are mediocre because of a better version available, you can expect a reno. (e.g a mage uses arcane explosion instead of arcane missiles, chances are he is using Reno because he was bound by the 1 copy per card use and couldn't use two missiles. Warlock using sunfury protector instead of defender of argus.) If I notice the enemy using such offbeat cards and not using a second copy of anything, I get careful about using all my resources since I will have to take him down back from 30. The second i see him use a second copy of anything, I just go all out because chances are he either doesn't have reno, or wont be able to heal from it too soon.

 

Iceblock + Reno = grrrrrrrrrrrr!

Molten giant + Reno = grrrrrrr!

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it's Renolock. They burn their life drawing cards and flooding the board and when you think you might him at lethal, Reno save the day. But I love the variety of construction now. It use to be you see a hero and knew from the start what you are facing. Now you have to feel it out for a few turns before you kind of have and Idea. There are a lot of cards that are being used that people aren't used to facing and it's winning them games. I like that. Me personally, I'm running a Midrange Beast Hunter. But I'm subbing Ram Wrangler for Ball of Spiders. I like it and I'm enjoying it. Isn't that what it's about? My point is the Meta is always changing. Yes SP can be a pain in the ass, and Renolock, and Face Shaman. But the only way to change this is to change your game up and make your own pain in the ass deck. The meta is Rock, Paper, Scissors. one deck does not rule all. Everything has a counter. 

 

P.S. 

       Always listen to Valkyr for he is Wise. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reno is everywhere now. I just played a Reno Priest and a Reno Hunter. I feel like a war vet because I have seen some shit. But that's what I was saying before, the meta is always changing. These people that I faced sat down and said, "Let me try this and see if it works." And hey, it beat me.But I didn't get salty and say, "F Reno he needs to be nerfed, he is too op," I said well played. Your attitude towards things can effect your game play. Good vibe leads to good laddering.

 

Sorry, I'm in a weird mood today. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only decks I would consider "cancerous" are:

- Tempo Mage

- Secret Paladin

- Aggro Druid

- Face Shaman

Face Hunter is NOT unfair because it has its drawbacks. Early game plays like zombie chow can often throw off their strategy, and boardclears like holy nova can turn the tide of the game. Healing cards like Reno, Bran/Healbot, and Justicar Truehart (for some) can put you out of their range of damage spells allowing for a win. Against hunter, the game can go either way.

Freeze Mage is also not unfair. If you can keep your minions out of the range of blizzard and flame strike, and keep an answer to doomsayer, then beating them should be fairly simple until the late game. Using a loatheb after they play alexstraza will save you a turn to attack, for they will only be able to play 1 spell the following turn. This should be adequate to finish the Mage off.

Warlock zoo/combo decks are not cancerous. If the board can be controlled or cleared before it is too late, then the game is already won (most of the time) Again, zombie chow is great, except against void walker. Board clears like consecration, fan of knives (with a drake), holy nova, light bomb, and hellfire can stifle their small minions, and the board might only have a spectral spider or two left over.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)
    • By Zadina
      Ben Brode was active on the official forums and on social media these past few days and he had a lot of interesting things to say about various hot topics. Most notably, he noted that it's possible that additional Basic and Classic set cards may be nerfed or rotated out of Standard in the future.
      You probably remember that with the release of the Standard format, something less than a year ago, 12 Basic and Classic cards were nerfed. Now, Game Director Ben Brode revealed that more Basic & Classic card nerfs can happen or at least they may be rotated out of Standard. The reasoning behind this is that the team wants to keep a fresh feeling in Standard and they don't want to see the same core cards appear too frequently. That's why they are also not considering buffing underused vanilla cards, since Basic and Classic cards are already being used a lot and they want new sets to be more impactful.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide The goal with Standard is to keep the meta fresh for each yearly rotation. There are some benefits to keeping Basic and Classic cards in Standard: Returning players have an entry-point to the new format, and new players experience classics like "Hogger" and "Arcane Missiles" that are iconic and great introductions to the game. People take breaks from Hearthstone, and being able to jump right back in with a few cards you already own and understand makes that experience a lot better. That upside has a real downside in working directly against the big goal for Standard. It needs to feel different each year, and if Basic and Classic cards are still appearing in large densities year after year, we will not be achieving our goals for Standard.
      We knew we weren't going to get there when the Year of the Kraken began, so we nerfed 12 basic/classic cards, to put more of the weight of the meta into the rotating sets. We always knew we'd have to watch the meta to see if any future changes would be needed when we got ready for the next year of Standard. If things are looking like they are going to be too same-y for that next year, we could see more nerfs, or we might rotate some additional classic cards to Wild, like we did with Old Murk Eye. No matter what, we're committed to making Standard fresh and exciting each new year. (source)
       
       
      Are you guys considering, besides nerfs, implementing buffs for underused vanilla cards?
      Given the goal of Standard is to keep the game fresh each year, it's important to keep a lot of the power of the cards in the expansions, and not in the basic and classic sets. It's not clear what that balance of power should look like (is it ~10 cards from the basic and classic sets on average?), but we're currently skewed so high towards basic and classic cards in decks, that we are at high risk for 'samey-ness' as the years change in Standard. Buffing Basic/Classic cards *increases* that risk. If the goal is to get more cool cards into the meta, just releasing awesome new cards in expansions should make an impact there, and still keep Standard fresh. (source)
      Obviously, this comment caused a lot of reactions and Ben took to Reddit (specifically this thread) and Twitter, where he answered various questions. A brief summary of his responses is that the Basic set is currently the most powerful in the game (source), while the team intends to keep the vanilla set unchanged (the term used was 'evergreen' - source). Ben repeated that the team's intention behind any future Basic and Classic card nerfs or changes is to keep Standard format fresh and "less same-y". A difficult question was posed to the community: would they prefer the affected vanilla cards to be nerfed, rotated out of Standard format or remain as they are, even if it results in a staler meta?
      On the same Reddit thread, Brode also talked about why the Charge nerf was necessary due to the Grimy Goons synergy and how new/F2P players are currently still able to reach Legend rank - something that he expects to keep happening in the future as well.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We nerfed Charge (the spell) because we knew the upcoming Grimy Goons mechanic in combination with Enraged Worgen and Charge was not really fair or fun. There have always been F2P players at Legend, and there have continued to be since that change. (source) Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide We did this in 2016 when we nerfed 12 classic cards and it made a huge difference in how much the meta was able to change with the release of Old Gods (instead of just continuing to be Druid Combo). New players were able to reach legend without spending money after that change, and I expect that will be continue to be true if we change a few more cards in 2017. (source) On a somewhat relevant topic, with the end of the Year of the Kraken the end of Reno Jackson is also approaching. Ben excluded the possibility of this game-changing card making it into the Classic set - once again the reason being "keeping the meta fresh".
      Placeholder for tweet 817625802116214784 For consistency's sake, I've also included two Brode blue posts from last week. In the first one, he talks about the new player experience and how it still needs more work. For example. the climb from the introductory quests to actually playing the game feels steep, while getting into Ranked is also difficult. However, for their first games new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool designed to match new players with each other. There has also been a 15% increase in new player winrates on Casual.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide Hey there! We agree that the new player experience needs more work. We've been tweaking it for years and have seen significant increases in retention among new players since launch. Most new players start playing against the AI and then take on other players in Casual. The Casual matchmaker has gone through a lot of iteration and new player winrates have increased by ~15%.
      Ranked is a different story. Ranked is becoming more difficult for new players over time. I spoke about some of the challenges we are currently facing with our ladder system before I left for paternity leave here: https://www.reddit.com/r/hearthstone/comments/58pxgt/ben_brode_confirms_the_2_game_win_streak_is_not/
      Something you may not realize is that new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool for their first several sessions. In Casual, we match them entirely against other brand new players with similarly-sized collections.
      That all said, we think the introductory missions up through Illidan feel pretty good, and after that it still feels like a bit of a cliff. It's definitely something we're aware of. Thanks for your feedback, and for the feedback of everyone else who's been chiming in on this over the last few months.
      (source) Lastly, Ben made an interesting post about another community hot topic: the ladder system.
      Ben Brode
      + Show- Hide [...] We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently - we're not 100% happy with it.
      Here are some things we are currently discussing:
      Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn't make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that's a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it'd be better if expectations and reality matched here.
      We've received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn't feel all that great.
      We've received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.
      We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.
      We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when "3-star master" was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.
      Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn't necessarily any one player's individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as "good", at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.
      (source)
    • By Pogsz
      Since I talk like an ogre I can as well practice my 3D skills and play around with the hearthstone logo.  Here is a quick render I made this morning.  Maybe I will do some more, wallpaper, t-shirt print or other stuff... I don't know

      I will probably also just play some Hearthstone for myself.  If I am better I will maybe do a "silent" stream tonight! :-D Or at least keep the conversation to a minimum.

      See you around guys and have a good day!