Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
L0rinda

hearthstone Hearthstone Designers Discuss Creating the "Discover" Mechanic

1 post in this topic

15441-hearthstone-designers-discuss-crea

IGN have conducted a fascinating interview with Lead Designer Ben Brode, and Associate Designer Dean Ayala, about the conception and evolution of the Discover mechanic. Reading through the article, I noticed that it also unveils some other things about the design team's plans and ideas, which I thought I'd share.


The first thing I noticed, was that they tested various places to put the card that you discover. They mention that they tested putting it on top of the deck, but that was a problem with cards like Forgotten Torch which shuffle the deck. This has big implications for the future, as it means that the deck has an order, and Blizzard can put things in various places in the deck. These are mechanics that we have seen in other card games, but not as of yet in Hearthstone. To know the deck is ordered, and that cards are actually shuffled in when they say they are, means that the top and the bottom of the deck can be used in future card texts. As the game stands currently, we would be unable to tell if a card was just randomly selected from the remaining pool of cards in a deck.

I also found it interesting that Ayala said they found, through playtesting, that discover and "draw a card" were roughly equal in value. This enabled them to use stats from similar cards, (he gives Gnomish Inventor as an example). It should be reasonably clear that the smaller the pool that you draw from, the better the card is relative to a card drawn from your deck. Given that they used this metric, it tells us what we already know; Museum Curator, Ethereal Conjurer, Dark Peddler, and Raven Idol are good cards. Those cards draw from a small pool and are still costed for "Draw a card".

The fact that the designers admit that it is frustrating to lose to cards from another class is also interesting. Brode says this is now referred to as Class Bleed, and that they don't want too much of this. I suspect that means we'll see fewer cards like Unstable Portal in the future.

Another thing I thought was interesting was that the last tweak was still a matter of weeks before a set was locked down. Brode considers that "towards the very end". This shows just how far in advance they plan things.

Finally is the comment that card draw is dangerous because it sets up consistency, and consistency is boring. I feel that tells us the minimum levels of randomness they have in store for the future of Hearthstone. This doesn't have to be a bad thing, as they've decided that Class Bleed is to be avoided. This seems to imply they're intending to walk a very narrow tightrope of randomness, but it does mean we probably won't be seeing consistent combo decks like Patron Warrior again any time soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda
      YouTuber, Disguised Toast, is never far from the front of Hearthstone science, and his latest video is spectacular. This video investigates the strange interactions caused by Weasel Tunneler's Deathrattle.
      Weasel Tunneler's Deathrattle seems simple enough, it reads: Shuffle this minion into your opponent's deck. However, when tested by Disguised Toast, it turns out that even this simple looking text can result in rather odd results. The ordering of other Deathrattles on the board, and effects by other cards on Deathrattles is what makes it so unpredictable. Take a look for yourself!
      The fact your deck displays as full, no matter how many cards left, is probably the strangest interaction of all. Even Toast doesn't  attempt to describe how that one happens.
    • By L0rinda
      Blizzard have updated the breakdown of the amount each gang's classes are being played.
      On their Gadgetzan page, there is an infographic showing who controls the town of Gadgetzan today. The percentages are worked out by how often each class is being used. Even with the huge amount of Pirate Warrior on ladder at the moment, the Grimy Goons are unable to control the city! That honour goes, currently, to the Kabal. With people having success with Reno Warlock AND Reno Priest, it will be fun to see if they hold that position in the coming days.

    • By etaeta
      So I got a lot of jade cards for druid and neutral in the 15-20 packs I've opened, and I wanted to make a jade druid deck, right? But I'm poor, so I look up "Jade Druid Budget Deck". I find one on this site with the following deck list:
       
      2x Innervate 2x Jade Idol MSG 2x Living Roots TGT 2x Raven Idol LoE 2x Wild Growth 2x Wrath 2x Feral Rage TOG 2x Jade Blossom MSG 2x Swipe 2x Nourish 2x Jade Behemoth MSG 2x Jade Spirit MSG 2x Azure Drake 2x Gadgetzan Auctioneer 2x Arcane Giant Kara But I don't have Raven Idol. Or nourish, though I can just craft that since it's in classic. So can anyone suggest an option for replacing the raven idols? I don't want to get all of League of Explorers just to play with it for a month then watch it turn to dust so I can craft other cards for decks in standard. I have one branch, but that's it. I was thinking maybe 1 jeweled scarab, though I know that card is frowned upon for reasons I've never been made aware of, for flexibility, and a loot hoarder for pure draw.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Aggro Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Aggro Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck.