Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
L0rinda

hearthstone Hearthstone Designers Discuss Creating the "Discover" Mechanic

1 post in this topic

15441-hearthstone-designers-discuss-crea

IGN have conducted a fascinating interview with Lead Designer Ben Brode, and Associate Designer Dean Ayala, about the conception and evolution of the Discover mechanic. Reading through the article, I noticed that it also unveils some other things about the design team's plans and ideas, which I thought I'd share.


The first thing I noticed, was that they tested various places to put the card that you discover. They mention that they tested putting it on top of the deck, but that was a problem with cards like Forgotten Torch which shuffle the deck. This has big implications for the future, as it means that the deck has an order, and Blizzard can put things in various places in the deck. These are mechanics that we have seen in other card games, but not as of yet in Hearthstone. To know the deck is ordered, and that cards are actually shuffled in when they say they are, means that the top and the bottom of the deck can be used in future card texts. As the game stands currently, we would be unable to tell if a card was just randomly selected from the remaining pool of cards in a deck.

I also found it interesting that Ayala said they found, through playtesting, that discover and "draw a card" were roughly equal in value. This enabled them to use stats from similar cards, (he gives Gnomish Inventor as an example). It should be reasonably clear that the smaller the pool that you draw from, the better the card is relative to a card drawn from your deck. Given that they used this metric, it tells us what we already know; Museum Curator, Ethereal Conjurer, Dark Peddler, and Raven Idol are good cards. Those cards draw from a small pool and are still costed for "Draw a card".

The fact that the designers admit that it is frustrating to lose to cards from another class is also interesting. Brode says this is now referred to as Class Bleed, and that they don't want too much of this. I suspect that means we'll see fewer cards like Unstable Portal in the future.

Another thing I thought was interesting was that the last tweak was still a matter of weeks before a set was locked down. Brode considers that "towards the very end". This shows just how far in advance they plan things.

Finally is the comment that card draw is dangerous because it sets up consistency, and consistency is boring. I feel that tells us the minimum levels of randomness they have in store for the future of Hearthstone. This doesn't have to be a bad thing, as they've decided that Class Bleed is to be avoided. This seems to imply they're intending to walk a very narrow tightrope of randomness, but it does mean we probably won't be seeing consistent combo decks like Patron Warrior again any time soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By L0rinda

      For the past few days, top players have been discussing the pros and cons of the new MMR change at Legend Ranks. The only problem being, that Game Designer, Iksar, isn't aware of a change.
      There are far fewer Legendary players than usual this season, and as such things might feel a little different to the players, but the sample size across many streams and thousands of games of Hearthstone seems to point to the changing of the matchmaking system. It has been accepted by most that the system has changed so that you only play opponents in a very narrow band, rather than the previous system where you could be matched with someone with a wildly different Legend Rank.
      That alone might not have been enough evidence, but players are also queuing into the same opponent multiple times, to the point that they are having to play mind games on which deck to queue.

      Hoej independently witnessed the same thing, and went to Twitter to check that he was not alone. Several Legendary players agreed that the system has been changed, and people began to discuss what they thought of the changes.
      Placeholder for tweet 834430686325067776 The majority of players like the new matchmaking, although several did voice concerns that the new system heavily favours the players who reach Legend Rank early in the season. Just as the debate was getting interesting, Iksar dropped his bombshell:
        At this point there are several options, and all seem unlikely. Either the entire community is suffering from some kind of huge matchmaking fluctuation, Blizzard have made a major change without informing Iksar, or there is a bug which most people preferred to the actual game. Whatever happens, the reply when Iksar has investigated is sure to be interesting!
    • By L0rinda

      Blizzard have announced that the next update will contain big changes to the way Arena works.
      The newly announced changes will come into force at the same time as the nerfs to Small-Time Buccaneer and Spirit Claws, which we discussed previously.
      The most important change will be that Arena will change from Wild format to Standard. This will help to keep Arena feeling fresh, as well as make sure that card synergies can be drafted more easily.
      Changes have also been made to the distribution of cards. Common and Basic cards will show up less often, and the frequency of spells and class cards being offered has been raised. The full discussion can be found in the announcement link above, but the main reasoning is to allow players to have more opportunities to outdraft and outplay their opponents, rather than just playing the game on curve.
      This philosophy will have some implications in Standard too. If Blizzard are actively trying to reduce the impact of playing on curve in Arena, this could mean that they will carry over the same thoughts into constructed play. I feel that moving away from the style, unaffectionately known as Curvestone, would be good for the game. The changes will almost certainly be welcomed in the Arena community, and it is good to see Blizzard making them now, rather than waiting for the next set to launch.
    • By FreezedIce
      Im making a telegram bot that can send you new decks and news from https://www.icy-veins.com/hearthstone.
      It already can send some decks and filter them by class and deck format.
      Im going to open bot for all users in next few weeks. 
      Any suggestions?
      Pic1 Pic2 Pic3 Pic4


    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Kazakus Zoo Warlock Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By Vlad
      This thread is for comments about our OTK Djinni Priest Standard deck.