Damien

Legendary Warrior Grim Patron Midrange Standard

34 posts in this topic

Hell there mr Sottle!

 

On the card swaps section you mention about the combination of the 4 drops being 3, but in the deck you have 4.

If i remember correctly yesterday on stream you played one wild pyromancer.

Was that meant to be in place on one kokron elite?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah grim still alive and well so far. Almost never lose a match turn 6 patrons usually then save one for 9 if you can. Last game he drops 12 CT with me having one 3\3 next turn full bord took 2 damage lol feels good.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Taskmaster? It always was huge tempo swing, when you not only draw/gain armor from something like Acolyte/Armorsmith, but also kill something with it thanks to buff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No Taskmaster? It always was huge tempo swing, when you not only draw/gain armor from something like Acolyte/Armorsmith, but also kill something with it thanks to buff.

 

Blood to Ichor is just better in most situations, you lose the buff option, but the 1 Mana reduction in most relevant situations is far superior overall.

Code: Yes, the list is wrong, I'll get it fixed. One Pyromancer over one Kor'kron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I ask me if we can change grom by an oher card because I don't have the money for him

Thank you and sorry for my bad english because I'm French tongue.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be good replacements for Sir Finley and Grom for more budgeted options?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be good replacements for Sir Finley and Grom for more budgeted options?

Grommash is supreme finisher, without it try some hybrid patron/worgen version, but it's weaker (harder) imho, before old gods I got 6 rank with patron.

 

Sir Finley is only good (imho again) against midrange/control decks like warrior, control priest or renolock, and because it's legendary you're not using it very often. It's more easy to get, than grommash, "only" 2100 gold for 3 wings of LoE.

Edited by AptypR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be good replacements for Sir Finley and Grom for more budgeted options?

Sir finley is not that  much needed in the deck, it helps a lot though, especially if you can get the warlock or mage hero power.

You can replace him with with w/e you feel will fit the deck. I would go for a second korkron elite maybe.

 

As for grommash he is essential, one of the best finishers in the game. If you don't have him either try the worgen hybrid version as AptypR mentioned above, or replace him with another late game threat like ragnaros the firelord.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I replaced finley with a tentacle fo n'zoth as an extra whirlwind effect and i replaced grom with a leeroy. I do agree that grom is really good but i dont have him sadly. biggrin.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used a gorehowl instead of Grom, it's only a loss of 3 HP as a finisher  but you gain the versatility of being able to remove opposing threats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

is this deck better than pirate warrior? btw i would love to see a guide for pirate warrior <3 @sottle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've used a gorehowl instead of Grom, it's only a loss of 3 HP as a finisher  but you gain the versatility of being able to remove opposing threats.

Grommash can attack minions as well, you don't have to use him as a finisher. Also, when you go face with Gorehowl, you lose it. If you go face with Grommash, you still have a considerable body on the board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guys dunno, either im extremely unlucky or you cannot climb with this deck (or i cant play it to its potential which up to a point may be true, but dont think this is the main reason). It almost always loses to every control deck, or decks with massive clears.

Board clear shamans, cthun priests, control cthun warriors or any kind of freeze mage can easily win you, hell even midrange or deathrattle hunters have better drops on the 5-8 mana range where you want to fill board with patrons. It is good vs zoolocks and in general aggro decks but still its really hard to win in the current meta i think. i have to note here that i dont play finley but wild pyromancer and i change 2nd kor'kron to black knight.

So any kind of suggestion on how to handle control decks? i tried to include black knight to break some taunts, but still i cant say it is enough. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've used a gorehowl instead of Grom, it's only a loss of 3 HP as a finisher  but you gain the versatility of being able to remove opposing threats.

Grommash can attack minions as well, you don't have to use him as a finisher. Also, when you go face with Gorehowl, you lose it. If you go face with Grommash, you still have a considerable body on the board.

 

 

Yeah not saying it's better or equivalent but it has its merits I think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What would be good replacements for Sir Finley and Grom for more budgeted options?

It's obviously worse but I guess North Sea Kraken is kind of like a Grom that you can't proc until next turn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

guys dunno, either im extremely unlucky or you cannot climb with this deck (or i cant play it to its potential which up to a point may be true, but dont think this is the main reason). It almost always loses to every control deck, or decks with massive clears.

Board clear shamans, cthun priests, control cthun warriors or any kind of freeze mage can easily win you, hell even midrange or deathrattle hunters have better drops on the 5-8 mana range where you want to fill board with patrons. It is good vs zoolocks and in general aggro decks but still its really hard to win in the current meta i think. i have to note here that i dont play finley but wild pyromancer and i change 2nd kor'kron to black knight.

So any kind of suggestion on how to handle control decks? i tried to include black knight to break some taunts, but still i cant say it is enough. 

 

First of all , pyromancer is in the deck, instead of the 2nd korkron elite, Sottle just forgot to change it.

Secondly, seems like you cannot get the feeling of the deck.

For example, versus freeze mages i rarely loose with this deck (basically only lost to a reno freeze, fast freeze mages are no match, they are just to easy to beat).

What do u wanna do versus freeze mage?

 

Things you want to consider :

 

- Don't overcommit to the board, unless you have a direct way of dealing with doomsayers (ex. execute or korkron elite + fiery war axe)

- Armor up whenever possible. Especially the fast freeze without antonidas and malygos will just not have enough damage to kill you.

- Key point : Think very wisely for the turn you will generate patrons. Patrons do not win you the game vs freeze mages. What you want to do is generate patrons when having at least one armorsmith. Use the armorsmith to gain a lot of armor. That way as mentioned above, the mage won't have enough damage and will eventually concede or die in fatigue.

 

Im pointing out this specific matchup, because it is considered to be borderline unwinnable for the freeze mage, unless she gets the best hand possible (meaning : turn 6 emperor with alex and a lot of burn in hand).

 

As for the rest of the matchups, shamans and hunters shouldn't be a problem.

Control warriors and priests on the other hand are really bad matchups for this deck, cause they can easily deal with your patron board (brawl / excavated evil).

Against priest you need to be aggressive and generate patrons early, hoping they haven't drawn their board clear.

Against control warriors, you need to be kinda lucky in order to win.

 

My advice is to watch pros play this deck. Sottle was playing this deck a lot in his last stream and explained really well the decisions he made in each situation. Plus, he has a very nice winrate.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've used a gorehowl instead of Grom, it's only a loss of 3 HP as a finisher  but you gain the versatility of being able to remove opposing threats.

Grommash can attack minions as well, you don't have to use him as a finisher. Also, when you go face with Gorehowl, you lose it. If you go face with Grommash, you still have a considerable body on the board.

 

 

It's a good way to lose though, unless you've already baited out the premium removal.. and this deck doesn't have too much bait to work with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I've used a gorehowl instead of Grom, it's only a loss of 3 HP as a finisher  but you gain the versatility of being able to remove opposing threats.

Grommash can attack minions as well, you don't have to use him as a finisher. Also, when you go face with Gorehowl, you lose it. If you go face with Grommash, you still have a considerable body on the board.

 

 

It's a good way to lose though, unless you've already baited out the premium removal.. and this deck doesn't have too much bait to work with.

 

Yeah, I agree that it can be risky and that is why it can be done only against certain decks, such as Zoo. Generally, it works better against decks, that would have problems against Gorehowl. But hey, if it works for you better, keep the change.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been having great success with this deck, moving from 19 to 14 with just 1 or 2 losses along the way. Dragon priest has been he only difficult matchup, made more difficult with a very poor opening hand.

I've been playing with the deck as posted, with 2 Koron elites. I look forward to playing the correct desk list.

I also have to agree that Grommash works great in this deck, either as a finisher or to remove a large minion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

guys dunno, either im extremely unlucky or you cannot climb with this deck (or i cant play it to its potential which up to a point may be true, but dont think this is the main reason). It almost always loses to every control deck, or decks with massive clears.

Board clear shamans, cthun priests, control cthun warriors or any kind of freeze mage can easily win you, hell even midrange or deathrattle hunters have better drops on the 5-8 mana range where you want to fill board with patrons. It is good vs zoolocks and in general aggro decks but still its really hard to win in the current meta i think. i have to note here that i dont play finley but wild pyromancer and i change 2nd kor'kron to black knight.

So any kind of suggestion on how to handle control decks? i tried to include black knight to break some taunts, but still i cant say it is enough. 

 

First of all , pyromancer is in the deck, instead of the 2nd korkron elite, Sottle just forgot to change it.

Secondly, seems like you cannot get the feeling of the deck.

For example, versus freeze mages i rarely loose with this deck (basically only lost to a reno freeze, fast freeze mages are no match, they are just to easy to beat).

What do u wanna do versus freeze mage?

 

Things you want to consider :

 

- Don't overcommit to the board, unless you have a direct way of dealing with doomsayers (ex. execute or korkron elite + fiery war axe)

- Armor up whenever possible. Especially the fast freeze without antonidas and malygos will just not have enough damage to kill you.

- Key point : Think very wisely for the turn you will generate patrons. Patrons do not win you the game vs freeze mages. What you want to do is generate patrons when having at least one armorsmith. Use the armorsmith to gain a lot of armor. That way as mentioned above, the mage won't have enough damage and will eventually concede or die in fatigue.

 

Im pointing out this specific matchup, because it is considered to be borderline unwinnable for the freeze mage, unless she gets the best hand possible (meaning : turn 6 emperor with alex and a lot of burn in hand).

 

As for the rest of the matchups, shamans and hunters shouldn't be a problem.

Control warriors and priests on the other hand are really bad matchups for this deck, cause they can easily deal with your patron board (brawl / excavated evil).

Against priest you need to be aggressive and generate patrons early, hoping they haven't drawn their board clear.

Against control warriors, you need to be kinda lucky in order to win.

 

My advice is to watch pros play this deck. Sottle was playing this deck a lot in his last stream and explained really well the decisions he made in each situation. Plus, he has a very nice winrate.

 

Thanks really much for the answer, i guess i have to spam it more since i am still losing to mages. One of the mistakes i use to do is to try to get board as clear as possible, leading to kind of awkward positions sometimes. im also most of the times use armorsmiths for openings alongside acolyte's at 2/3 rounds. 

With hunters i feel it depends on draw. in general their highmane 6 drop is far stronger than your patron, unless you have inner rage+ww combo, and if they have kill commands or eaglehorns, they can also clear you quite well too, since their win condition right now is mid control with princess or late nzoth drop. Tho, it may still be me sucking at playing.

Finally i guess im unlucky when 2 out of 3 shamans i meet have both lightning storms pre 6 turn :/

Anyways, imma try catch sottle on stream and follow the advices you suggested. Thanks again :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lately I've been facing a good share of control decks. I was thinking about putting in Elise as an extra win condition but I'm not sure what to take out. My first idea was Pyromancer but that would weaken the deck vs. aggro quite a bit (plus it allowed me to actually win against C'thun priest before by creating a huge Berserker). Maybe Kor'kron? Or 1 Bloodhoof?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lately I've been facing a good share of control decks. I was thinking about putting in Elise as an extra win condition but I'm not sure what to take out. My first idea was Pyromancer but that would weaken the deck vs. aggro quite a bit (plus it allowed me to actually win against C'thun priest before by creating a huge Berserker). Maybe Kor'kron? Or 1 Bloodhoof?

Remove Bloodhoof. He is a strong anti-aggro tool, but if you say you want stronger cards against control, he should be removed since he is not needed that much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This deck just went 1-10 for me playing casual. It can't handle any control decks at all. It doesn't have enough juice to remove enemy minions, so by the time you can drop 4-5 patrons they just get wiped out by your opponents board.

The only person I beat resigned on turn 1. This deck frankly seems unplayable in this meta.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Gul'dan Strategy guide.
    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Wizard Manald Channeling Build.
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.
    • By Zadina
      Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala will answer all your questions on a live Q&A session on Twitch this Friday!
      The complaints about the lack of communication from the part of the Hearthstone team have been answered. This Friday the 13th (!) of January, Ben Brode and Dean Ayala will answer questions about some of the most heated topics that currently affect the playerbase. Ben has already made some posts about issues like the Classic card set and the possibility of some Classic cards rotating out of Standard.
      As always, we will try to have a recap of the Q&A as soon as it is finished.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      Pull up a chair by the hearth! Join Hearthstone Game Director Ben Brode and Game Designer Dean Ayala January 13 at 9:00am PST for a live Q&A session on Twitch. Our developers will be sharing some insight about the state of the game, the new player experience, the ranked play system, and answering your questions live.
       
      Have some questions for Ben and Dean? Here’s how you can be part of the conversation:
      - Tweet @PlayHearthstone with the hashtag #QA with your question
      - Post a question below in the blog comments
      - Join us live in Twitch chat and direct questions to us @PlayHearthstone
       
        Can’t make it? Don’t worry – we will be posting the full video on the PlayHearthstone YouTube after the Q&A has completed.
       
       
      Follow the official Hearthstone Twitch channel to be notified when the stream begins.
      We’ll see you there!
      (source)