Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
L0rinda

hearthstone Brode on Community Feedback. Hints at Arena Changes

1 post in this topic

44Pk4lw.jpg

Lead Designer Ben Brode has replied to an open question on Reddit regarding the views of the development team on Reddit.

In a recent thread, Redditor alcxander asked:

How do you guys and gals feel when we critique the game after each release or on an on-going basis? Does this subreddit provide you a place of positive/useful critiquing?

Ben Brode took the opportunity to reply:

Blizzard LogoBen Brode

I know pretty much everyone on the (now 70+ person!) dev team reads this subreddit pretty frequently. Personally I check it several times a day.

I love it. I love reading stories about people having fun with Hearthstone or exploring new decks. I also love finding opportunities to make the game better. I send every bug report and suggestion to the different teams responsible to make sure we are tracking them. They assure me it's redundant because they are also reading Reddit daily (and most reported bugs have already been caught by QA) but I don't want to miss anything.

Sometimes we disagree with a particular post, and one of the biggest pitfalls is believing that one person's perspective (or even a couple thousand people, in the case of a highly upvoted thread) is representative of everyone. I think it sometimes inspires fervor when people believe that everyone thinks the same thing, so how can we be deciding something different? Reddit is especially powerful at drowning out dissenters through up and down votes. And certain categories of player are just not represented here at all. That's usually irrelevant, because the feedback is helpful either way, but it can amplify a feeling of "community vs developers" which has always felt strange to me. When we go home, we play Hearthstone. We're part of the community, too. I like to feel like we're working together to make the game more awesome.

I also notice that sometimes when people don't have access to the whole picture, it can inspire an angry position. It doesn't always happen, but it comes out as: "I can't imagine any reason for you to do this. The only possible reason I can come up with is that you are bad developers, therefor that must be what is true." This is the hardest feedback for me personally to read. I'm lucky to be able to see the whole picture, so I can see the reasons behind these decisions. This phenomenon is the biggest reason I love interacting with players. I think just hearing the other side of things can take it out of that zone of "you must be idiots" to "oh they actually had reasons for this". Important to note that people often still disagree with those reasons, but it becomes an informed conversation at that point, which is awesome.

Arena Balance is one thing that has received a lot of attention recently, and has spawned a lot of discussion internally. We had plans for tools that would let us make changes in the medium-long term, but the online discussion has made us stop and rethink our timelines and options. That's honestly great. Hoping to have something to share on this in a couple weeks.

Yeah, sometimes there is negativity. But there is always something for us to learn in that, and so we come back every day, hopefully with a curious mind, hoping to find ideas that we can take back to keep making Hearthstone better.

Also who doesn't love Day9 highlights. (Source)

This is another reminder that the Hearthstone development team pay more attention to the community than they often get credit for. It is also a reminder how much Brode loves this game. It is exciting to see that community feedback has hurried up the Arena change process, and of course we'll let you know what that change is as soon as we know ourselves!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Budget Aggro Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Aggro Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Reno Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck.
    • By positiv2
      We decided to use Paracel's suggestion and make it into a weekly round-up thread. 
      Druid
      Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Jade Druid No Giants Gadgetzan Standard Deck (fixed) Budget Jade Druid Gadgetzan Standard Deck Hunter
      Midrange Beast Hunter Gadgetzan Standard Deck Mage
      Nothing yet :( Paladin
      Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck (actually contains murlocs this time :P ) Budget Murloc Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Aggro Paladin Gadgetzan Standard Deck Priest
      Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Priest No Cleric Gadgetzan Standard Deck Budget Dragon Priest Gadgetzan Standard Deck Rogue
      Questing Miracle Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Aggro Rogue Gadgetzan Standard Deck Shaman
      N'Zoth Control Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Kobold Midrange Shaman Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warlock
      Reno Combo Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Reno Warlock Gadgetzan Standard Deck Warrior
      Pirate Aggro Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck N'Zoth Control Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck Dragon Warrior Gadgetzan Standard Deck If you have any suggestions or questions, feel free to leave them in the comments.
    • By L0rinda
      The new meta is still forming, but even at this early stage it seems that Kazakus will be a large part of it. This article shows all of the available potions, and explains how the ordering of the spells when cast is likely to change.
      The first trick to remembering all of the options is to realise that  in the potion creation stage, nearly all of the choices are fundamentally the same no matter whether the spell costs 1, 5, or 10 mana. The cost of the spell simply powers up the effect. There are ten different effects to choose from, which are outlined below. The spells are remembered more easily when you group the effects by numbers.
      1, 2, 3 effects:
      Icecap: Freezes 1, 2, or 3 enemy minions.
      Ichor of Undeath: Summons 1, 2, or 3 friendly minions that died this game.
      Kingsblood: Draws 1, 2, or 3 cards.
      Shadow Oil: Adds 1, 2, or 3 random Demons to your hand.

      Other effects in number order:
      Felbloom: Deals 2, 4, or 6 damage to all minions. 
      Goldthorn: Gives your minions 2, 4, or 6 extra health. 
      Netherbloom: Summons a 2/2, 5/5, or 8/8 demon.
      Heart of Fire: Deals 3, 5, or 8 damage.
      Stonescale Oil: Gives 4, 7, or 10 Armor.
      Mystic Wool: This card is unique in that it has no effect for 1 mana. It either turns a random enemy minion into a 1/1 Sheep, or all enemy minions into 1/1 Sheep.

      At the moment, many of the pairings work according to the game engine, rather than in the best order, which means that Kazakus is not working as intended. An example of this would be minions that are getting killed by damage are then getting frozen before leaving play. This is correct in terms of how the game works, as deaths are always processed last, but the spells are going to be made to work outside of the regular game engine. This will make them more powerful and intuitive.
      Mike Donais
      We are already working on this. Feel free to post stuff like this on our bug forums. (source) This reply on Reddit confirms that the idea of the custom Spell is that it will resolve in an order beneficial to the caster, and that it will likely be changed very soon.