Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

Buff Slot Clarifications and Upcoming Hotfixes

Recommended Posts

45757-wow-classic-tank-and-healer-rankin
 

There's been a lot of discussion in the Classic community recently about the 32 beneficial buff slots and specifically the fact that item enchantments were actually taking slots. Things like Crusader were obvious as they showed up on the buff tracker, but even something like a Greater Stats enchant was taking up a slot, without ever letting the player know, and knocking off some more powerful ones like world buffs or even a Power Word: Fortitude.

Players have been looking into this for a while, and found patch notes from 1.12.1, aka the next patch after the one Classic is based off, which fixed this issue, and Blizzard will be implementing it with a hotfix, making most item enchants passive. However, they also pointed out there is a cap to passive buffs as well (meaning things like +x% crit or hit chance on gear) and that despite the fact that the cap on passives is much higher and would only theoretically be reachable, they will still be increasing it due to the new item enchantments joining the passive table after the hotfix.

There is a third and very weird issue with set bonuses, as they will overwrite and not stack with existing item bonuses of the same type (+ hit, crit etc), but only if the item with the bonus was equipped before the set was. So if you first equip your set, then the regular item with +hit, everything is fine, but the bonuses will not stack if you do regular item>set. There will also be a hotfix coming for this issue.

Blizzard LogoBuff Slots (source)

Thank you for the report! Since you posted this, we’ve been investigating, and following the community discussion around buff limits and missing hit chance bonuses, so I wanted to take a few minutes to post about this, and clarify what’s going on. It turns out that there are three related issues here, which made it hard to track down exactly which reports are related to which issue.

To make sense of this, I first want to talk about auras. Auras are the system that tracks persistent effects on your character, such as changes to their stats, health, critical strike chance, etc. Auras are actually divided into three distinct categories: helpful, harmful, and passive. Players are most familiar with the “16 debuff limit” which refers to the 16 available harmful aura slots. There’s a similar bank of 32 “helpful” auras, which includes things like Power Word: Fortitude, Songflower Serenade, or Rallying Cry of the Dragonslayer. And lastly there are passive effects, which include things like racial skill bonuses, or benefits gained from gear.

One confusing distinction is on “benefits from gear.” If a benefit is built into the gear, such as Wyrmhide bracers having “Increases your chance to hit by 2%” then that counts as a Passive aura, and does not consume one of your “buff slots.” However currently gear enchantments like “Greater Stats” count as Helpful auras, and do consume one of your buff slots, even though they have no visible display in your buff frame. Some players have pointed out a suspicious patch note in 1.12.1 referring to making enchantments on gear count as passive, and that clue was incredibly helpful. We found an old entry in our bug-tracking system recording a designer fixing that behavior for Burning Crusade, but the subsequent notes on that bug show that the fix was pushed live in 1.12.1. We followed that lead and did find that change in our data archives, so we’ll develop a fix for that, and mark most of the item enchantments as passive in an upcoming hotfix.

That brings us to the second issue, which is that Passive auras can also reach a limit. The limit is much higher, and we don’t believe it will ever be reached in practice, but while we were investigating these issues, we did find that we were able to reach the Passive aura limit if we did some truly ridiculous behavior, including making the world’s worst talent build. Because of that discovery, and the fact that we’re about to classify item enchantments as passive, we’re going to increase the limit for passive auras. Some of you might be thinking that this limit on passive auras is why you weren’t getting all the +hit bonuses you were entitled to, and at first we thought so too, but the level of ridiculousness needed to actually trip the passive aura limit made us suspicious. It didn’t seem likely enough to explain the number of player reports we were seeing, so we kept digging.

The third issue we found, which actually explains your lost +hit bonuses, is actually a bug in Item Set bonuses. Set bonuses that have the same benefit as item effects are actually overwriting the identical item effect, but only if the set bonus is gained after the matching item is equipped. An example is the Wyrmhide Spaulders, and the Devilsaur Armor Set bonus, which each have an incredible +2% chance to hit. If you equip both pieces of Devilsaur Armor, and then equip the Wyrmhide Spaulders, everything works fine. On the other hand, if you were already wearing the Wyrmhide Spaulders, and then equip the Devilsaur Armor, its set bonus will overwrite the Wyrmhide shoulders bonus. At that point the 2% hit bonus from the Spaulders is gone, and even unequipping the Devilsaur Armor won’t give it back. Only un-equipping and re-equipping the Wyrmhide Spaulders will fix the issue. We think this is actually the source of the +hit bonus issues, and we’re also working on a hotfix for this issue.

I really want to thank everybody who provided detailed examples and evidence because it greatly helped us in tracking these issues down, and we’ll get them all fixed as soon as we can.

Thanks again!

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I, like many at the time, was dubious on the removal of the hit chance system, along with defence. On the one hand, it was an arbitrary stat that you needed to have to a limit, and then ignored it, however due to some ignoring it early, it also weeded out some of the idiots (not counting newbs who just didn't know better). 

That said, I wasn't aware of anything like the above at the time and although it was a few expansions late that they did it, it makes sense to remove it, one less issue to work with. 

Now if they could only find some magical 1.12.234784 patch where the debuff limit was lifted 😄

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      The final WoW Classic stage is starting with the release of Naxxramas and the Scourge Invasion on December 3. Blizzard is also changing the pacing of the event so that it does not feel rushed.
      (Source)
      Following the release of WoW Classic patch 1.13.6 on December 1, we’ll open Naxxramas and kick off the Scourge Invasion on December 3 at 2:00 p.m. PST (5:00 p.m. EST)(9:00 a.m. December 4 AEDT).
      The Scourge Invasions coming to WoW Classic next week have been adjusted in some ways that differ from how they were originally configured to operate in 2006. Here’s a look into the details behind that.
      Original WoW
      On June 20, 2006, Scourge Invasions began, including bonus dungeon bosses, vendors, quests, and a series of undead invasion outdoor events. The Invasion part of the event came in three stages. Necrotic Shards spawned in each zone being attacked and are surrounded by undead enemies which must be defeated to destroy the Shard. They most notably drop Necrotic Runes, which were used as quest objectives and as currency to purchase Consecrated Sharpening Stones and Blessed Weapon Oils.
      The stages progressed per-realm. The first stage ended when 50 zones were defended, the second at 100, and the third ended at 150 zones defended. At the end of each stage, any player on that realm could speak with NPCs in capital cities to receive an item with limited charges that provided a minor scaling stamina buff for 1 hour. Once a total of 150 zones were defended, the invasions portion of the event ended permanently.
      Regardless of the number of zones defended, the rest of the features of the Scourge Invasion event were configured to end after three weeks, taking away all bonus dungeon bosses, vendors, quest NPCs, and vendors.
      WoW Classic
      Given the number of endgame players per realm nowadays, as well as how much more knowledgeable players are when it comes to optimizing gameplay, we feel that it is pertinent to make several changes to the event. We calculated that it would be easy for some realms to be completely done with the invasion portion of the event in less than five days, so our primary goal is to allow more time for players to participate and not feel rushed.
      The number of zones needed to complete each stage has been increased to 100/200/300. The total duration for the bonus dungeon bosses, vendors, and quest givers has been increased from three to four weeks and will end on December 31. An additional one-week period has been added, beginning after 300 zones have successfully been defended on each realm. During this extra week, invasions will continue to spawn to allow players a final chance to participate and gather the rewards. This additional week cannot extend beyond the end date of December 31. These adjustments feel like a solid way to allow players more breathing room to enjoy Naxxramas and still participate in this one-time event.
      Thank you for reading, and we look forward to joining you in Naxxramas at 2:00 p.m. PST on December 3!
    • By Stan
      Ivan Kuzkin is back with a new Naxxramas movie teaser ahead of the raid's opening in WoW Classic.
      Naxxramas is scheduled for December 3 and Ivan Kuzkin has posted a movie teaser on his YouTube channel that you can watch below.
    • By Stan
      Dreamstate of Gehennas (EU-PvP) cleared the whole Temple of Ahn'Qiraj raid under 30 minutes. Congratulations!
      Source: Reddit
    • By Staff
      With Naxxramas coming on December 3rd, Blizzard have now enabled the attuenemtn process for players wanting to be ready immediately when the new raid and Phase 6 arrive! 
      Attunement (source)
      We have updated WoW Classic to make the NPC Archmage Angela Dosantos available at Light’s Hope Chapel.
      Now, if you wish to complete your attunement to Naxxramas in advance of the raid going live on December 3, you can visit the Archmage and take care of it.
      Light be with you!
    • By Starym
      That's... a lot of mobs. Korean player 아케인 has put in a whole lot of work and basically pulled, well Maraudon itself (as spotted by Dargut). It takes a lot of work, 21 minutes, in fact, to "pull" it off, but he managed to get just shy of 500 mobs, 490 to be exact, in the usual Maraudon AoE spot, after painstakingly gathering them all up and clearing any problem-mobs, like the plants that have a knockdown effect. He's actually split the usual 1-pull into two, the first one getting 195 mobs and then the rest soon after that. Maraudon is a popular mage spot for XP boosting in Classic, which is why there's plenty of mages out there looking for new and more optimal pull strategies.
      We've skipped to the interesting part in the below video, but you should definitely skip through the video as it's interesting to see how he carefully pulls and gets the mobs to low enough HP so that he can actually AoE them at the end:
      We've actually already seen an even bigger single pull, with 475 mobs by Pastouw, actually at once, but it's always nice to check in when the limits get pushed this far out!
      Source.
×
×
  • Create New...