Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Odinn

Live Q&A with Ion "Watcher" Hazzikostas - #WarlordsQA

Recommended Posts

12629-live-qa-with-ion-watcher-hazzikost

 

Icy Veins will be providing complete coverage of today's live Q&A with World of Warcraft Lead Game Designer Ion "Watcher" Hazzikostas. Details of the Q&A will be added to this post throughout the Q&A, and available for review afterwards.

 

You can watch the event live at http://www.twitch.tv/wow beginning at 2:00 p.m. PDT today (Saturday, June 13). Questions and answers will be added to this post as the event progresses!

 

The Q&A is now over - an approximate transcript follows. Please note: This is not an official transcript. Some answers may be abridged.

 


 

Q&A

 

Q. Curious about the 6.2.x implementation of the flying achievement. Is it scheduled for after 6.2 for development reasons, or to allow the world to be seen without flying?

 

A. Draenor is largely flyable - people with ability_priest_angelicfeather.jpgAviana's Feather, etc. can attest to that. You can get around in three dimensions just fine. There were bugs we wanted to fix to give players a smooth experience, and we put off fixing them when we decided not to allow flying initially. We need to do that work now.

 

 

 

Q. Now that flying is coming back, how long will the rep grinds take and can they be done all at once?

 

A. There is one core reputation per faction, one for the Arrakoa in Tanaan, and one for the Sabreon. All of them can be done in parallel using daily/weekly quests. The "most gated" is the faction reputation, which should take 2.5-3 weeks of daily quests.

 

 

 

Q. If the Pathfinder achievement model for flying access goes well, do you see this being the plan for unlocking flight going forward?

 

A. We see this as a blueprint that could be used going forward, where you're tied to the ground initially. Being able to fly once you've explored thoroughly makes sense.

 

 

 

Q. Why add flying at the last moment? Personally, I like the game without it. Why the change of heart?

 

A. This was a hard decision. There's a certain amount of cynicism about the decision, as if we had always planned to add flying back. WoW has a large team, and the decision was made by the team as a whole. When we saw the feedback on "never flying again" versus not flying in Draenor, we realized that it felt like we were taking something very valuable away from players. We're satisfied with the way that the compromise has been received.

 

 

 

Q. Why are current reputations all mob grinds? Can we get a more modern reputation system?

 

A. We're not going to defend them - they're completely mob grinds. They were added late in the development process. We weren't going to have reputations at all, but we used them for the Trading Post, etc. It's unfortunate that it set the perception of reputations back as a whole many years. The 6.2 reps in Tanaan represent a more modern system.

 

 

 

Q. Apexis dailies feel like they take forever and I just skip them. Any plans to bring back normal dailies?

 

A. Dailies definitely have a place. We did that thing we so often do where we overreact and swing too far in the other direction - "World of Dailycraft" in Mists of Pandaria, for example. We approached Warlords development wanting to find a different direction. The way we looked at it was it offered more flexibility - instead of being asked to kill a set number of cannons, you get to an area and just need to deal with the enemy through choice and freedom. Two places where we failed were removing quests entirely, losing story and context, and secondly the reward structure was a complete miss.

 

 

 

Q. Draenor was a blast, but the end-game lacks world content. What's your philosophy on this moving ahead?

 

A. We're very proud of the level of questing in Draenor. We would have structured things like Apexis/dailies differently if we could go back and do it again. Some of it flows from the Garrison system - we approached Garrisons wanting to make sure we were rewarding the system adequately. A variety of playstyles should benefit from Garrisons, followers, etc. A lot of systems tied into the Garrison, and a lot of those things were served by the Garrison - gathering professions, for example.

 

 

 

Q. I feel WoD has been geared towards one character play, and players with alts are burning out.

 

A. Burning you out is not designed. Alts have become increasingly popular as World of Warcraft has evolved and leveling has gotten smoother. Where we come down on the general issue is that it's awesome, but we want alts to serve themselves (e.g. second character for PvP, etc.). Where it becomes more concerning is where people feel multiple alts should exist to serve one character (e.g. multiple garrisons to manage for one "main" character's benefit). On missions, we're looking into some diminishing returns on an account-wide level (like gold missions). That should help to alleviate the pressure from six times as much gold from six times as many garrisons (no nerf to a single character's garrison).

 

 

 

Q. What have you learned about what didn't work with Garrisons and why no one leaves it?

 

A. A lot of it has to do with the rewards. Garrisons are the path of least resistance to things you want. You can log on for five or ten minutes and feel like you're doing something, and that's fine.

 

 

 

Q. There has been criticism of the point-click-wait Garrison gameplay. How is the Shipyard content differently?

 

A. It's more condensed, and there is less micromanagement. We didn't increase item levels for followers, etc., because we didn't want people to re-do that work. Shipyard missions have more individually impactful rewards.

 

 

 

Q. Will future expansions have something like Garrisons too?

 

A. The Garrison as you know it in Draenor is something that is rooted and tied to Draenor. That is going to stay in Draenor. We might use the system again in a new form in a future expansion.

 

 

 

Q. There has been a truly massive decline in raiding guilds. Do you feel that changing the raiding paradigm was a good idea?

 

A. Fixed-size Mythic was a challenging transition. Many of them merged or recruited, some have struggled along the way. There are a number of high-profile guilds that have disbanded, but that has happened in every expansion/patch (e.g. Death and Taxes in Sunwell). The glue that keeps guilds together tend to be a small number of raid leaders and officers, and when those people move on, guilds break up. 10-30 player scaling is a huge success, and has tons more participation - on the other end of the spectrum, the Mythic raiders have gotten a better experience out of a fixed size, rather than us failing to balance 10 and 25 equally.

 

 

 

Q. Is Mythic raid difficulty justified when such a small percentage of players even attempt it?

 

A. It is something for people to aspire to, and something for the best players to differentiate themselves with. It's useful to be able to answer the question, "Who is the best?" At the same time, Mythic consumes a very small percentage of the resources that go into making a given raid. If we cut Mythic, it would reduce the amount of time that goes into making raid zones by 5-10%. People doing normal, LFR, etc. are the reason we're developing raids.

 

 

 

Q. Why limit Timewalking to certain bonus time periods?

 

A. The structure of rotating bonus events isn't to force people to do certain types of content. It focuses some of the purpose of Timewalking. It makes it a more condensed activity that is there to help gear up alts, but also makes it fit in better with other new dungeons.

 

 

 

Q. Why are dungeons becoming irrelevant?

 

A. There was no reason to go back to them. Mythic dungeons represents a way to some extent of salvaging that and giving players a reason to go back to running dungeons. They keep dungeons relevant. That works for 6.2, for dungeons going forward we need something else. We didn't keep Valor because running the same dungeons for progressively better rewards felt wrong.

 

 

 

Q. No new dungeons, but Timewalking, Adventure Journal, etc. - is this the plan going forward?

 

A. It would be terrible if we said we weren't going to add new dungeons. That's also not a reason not to add Timewalking or the Adventure Journal. They're not in direct competition.

 

 

 

Q. Why are you nerfing Demonology into the ground?

 

A. Because we don't want you to play Demonology. We have some concerns with how Demonology plays as a spec, and what's required to play the spec well. If you look at a guide like Icy Veins, it's an incredibly complicated heirarchy. Warlocks who preferred Affliction or Destro gravitated to Demo. It's all Demonology Warlocks at the highest level. We didn't want Warlocks to feel like that was the spec they were forced to play.

 

 

 

Q. Do you feel that ability pruning went too far?

 

A. Honestly, I don't. In some cases, I think that you can argue ability pruning didn't go far enough (Shaman, for example). We're not designing rotations to be complicated when you're fighting a target dummy. A lot of the changes we want to make are about improving the fantasy of the class - being a 'Fire Mage', for example. Rogues suffer as much as anybody from lacking distinct animations. We think we can do better than that.

 

 

 

Q. How do you see throughput healers enjoying the game in a world dominated by absorbs?

 

A. It's less dominated by absorbs than it was in Mists. There's less healing where people are either "full or dead". The niche of absorb-centric healing is one that we need to scale back going forward. It's not something that's changing in 6.2, but if you have any raid comp, you probably should have one Disc Priest plus something else. I think Holy Priests are in a great place, but the problem is if you only have one Priest, they should be Discipline. Disc Priest provides a unique benefit that often comes actively at the fun and enjoyment of other healers.

 

 

 

Q. Professions are really boring and constrained in Warlords.

 

A. The mixture of Garrison-centric gathering professions and time-limited cooldowns took away from the feel of being a craftsman. In 6.2, we're massively increasing the yield of people's personal cooldowns to make it more impactful relative to your Garrison. In general, when it comes to professions, things that make you go out into the world are better.

 

 

 

Q. What's the ideal Mythic fight length? Were some too long?

 

A. There's no one answer to this. We see fight length as determined by the nature of the fight and mechanics. Fights with consistent mechanics shouldn't be longer than 5-6m unless it's an endurance fight. If it's cyclical, you can probably stretch it out longer. For a classic, three-phase, multiple ability encounter, that's where you see it stretch out to 10+ minute lengths. Brackenspore was an endurance fight; keeping the moss in check, keeping up with adds, etc., it was a long fight. Mythic Mar'gok was just too long - that's the product of the extra phase after what was already a pretty full and thorough fight. Once we get to the 15m fight length, that's more than it should be. Seeing a brand new phase that you're going to wipe to and have to learn at 13 minutes is rough.

 

 

 

Q. Why do you keep making everything so convenient? Do you feel the game is becoming too convenient?

 

A. We don't want inconvenience and nuisance to be the things that stop you from doing something, while being mindful of the downsides of convenience. If we offer teleportation too freely, that tends to shrink the feeling of the world. A risk of something like LFD is that it reduces some of the social interaction of using trade chat for 90 minutes. The premade group finder is a strict improvement over spamming trade chat for 90 minutes. In general, we want to identify things that are preventing people from enjoying the game in a way they would like, but there is something to be said for removing too many barriers.

 

 

 

Q. Do you feel artistic integrity arguments carry any weight after the Twitter/S.E.L.F.I.E. patch?

 

A. Twitter integration isn't something that came away from the creation of outdoor content. It was something a couple of programmers worked on to integrate the API into the game. It's a convenience for players who already use Twitter. It's optional, and if you don't care about Twitter, you don't even know it exists. The S.E.L.F.I.E. cam was a fun side project from one designer and one programmer who came in and did it on a couple of weekends. A lot of the things that have come into the game were the product of an individual's initiative. We should have called 6.1 something like 6.0.5 instead, to soften the expectations. There's a reason the patch didn't have a formal name, like Landfall, because it wasn't advancing the story at all.

 

 

 

Q. Why are Tier 18 PvE and PvP gear sets recolours of each other? Doesn't really help player identity.

 

A. The only thing that differentiated players in MoP in terms of skill or difficulty was colour. It wasn't reasonable to expect people to have colour as the signifier of that. We moved to a world where there is one set of armor for 'average' accomplishment, and one set for 'extreme' accomplishment, and colour distinguishes content (PvE/PvP).

 

 

 

Q. Why are there no agility weapons that drop off Archimonde? All of the agility classes don't get 735 weapons.

 

A. We looked at how itemization worked out in Highmaul and BRF and realized that the kills later in zones become progressively less and less meaningful, because they already have items of that level. Plenty of guilds skipped end bosses entirely - e.g. skip Imperator and go straight to BRF. We want risk and reward to be somewhat commensurate. Itemization overall would be less interesting if we felt forced to have complete coverage of every weapon slot on Archimonde and Mannoroth.

 


 

Thanks for following along live if you did! The complete Q&A recap will be edited slightly and left online here for your review.

 

Coverage of the live #WarlordsQA event! Come see all the details here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Starym
      A long-running fan discussion/theory has been confirmed in the upcoming "World of Warcraft: Folk & Fairy Tales of Azeroth" book, as the female Gnome's original dragon form is actually male.
      In a story from the book, Chromie and Kalecgos are talking about her choice of humanoid form during the "Visage Day" ceremony, and during it confirm a long-standing theory that Chromie is in fact originally a male dragon:

      Source: Spichora.
      Her dragon name, Chronormu, has long been a matter of speculation, even producing a (now somewhat confusing) voice line for her in Heroes of the Storm, where she remarks "No, it is not a male name. You clearly don't understand the intricacies of dragon culture." The line can now be seen as a joke or even Chromie just not wanting to talk about the matter at the time, or just attributed to the Nexus' general weirdness. In any case, HotS isn't canon for the Warcraft universe anyway, but at least we now have the definitive answer to the naming question!
      There's plenty of interesting (and surprisingly non-toxic, for the most part) discussions on the subject over in the reddit thread, from dragon naming conventions to representation, so head on over there for more. And of course, big thanks to Spichora for sharing that excerpt from the story!
    • By Staff
      Soul Ash drop rates in Torghast will be increased by 50% in Patch 9.1 and repeated runs will still give you some Soul Ash.
      In the Morgan Day interview with Sloot, we learned some interesting Torghast improvements that are planned for Chains of Domination.
      It's not planned to allow characters to level up from 50 to 60 by just doing Torghast, but Morgan is excited about such a feature and he would like to see it implemented in the game in a future update. Soul Ash drop rates will be increased by 50% in Patch 9.1. With new Torghast Layers (9-12), it should be fairly easy to farm Soul Ash for your alts & mains. You can buy an item from Torghast brokers for 1,500 Soul Ash that grants your alt 1,300 Soul Ash in Chains of Domination. Soul Ash can be farmed repeatedly in Chains of Domination. You will receive a portion of Soul Ash from repeated farming. You can find a full recap of the interview here.
    • By Stan
      A new faction called The Archivist's Codex can be found in Korthia and its quartermaster sells Conduit upgrades and Sockets for Season 2 gear in Patch 9.1.
      The Archivist's Codex quartermaster is Archivist Roh-Suir. He can be found at 62 / 22 in Korthia (Reliquary of Remembrance).
      The new Korthian currency is called Cataloged Research: "As you bring the Archivist Relics he will catalog it which will allow you to start Field Studies to learn more about them or identify relics in his care that you can use in the field."
      You collect Archivist Relics in Korthia that you turn in for Cataloged Research.
      Roh-Suir sells Codex of Untapped Soulbinding - PH for 3,000 Catalogue Research that can be used to discover an upgrade to a random Conduit from among your lowest item level Conduits, up to Item Level 252.
      For 5,000 Catalogue Research, you can buy a Spatial Realignment Apparatus mk2 NYI that allows you to put sockets into Season 2 items. 

      Both items are time-gated and require Tier 6 research level with the Archivist's Codex, so Stygia will be only good for buying Item Level 200 catchup gear in Chains of Domination.

    • By Stan
      A recap of the latest Paladin changes from the 9.1 PTR Build 38627.
      Paladin
      Blizzard documented a 10% damage reduction to Ashen Hallow and Hammer of Wrath in the latest 9.1 update notes, but the changes didn't go live in Build 38627.
      Baseline
      Crusader Strike now costs 11% of Base Mana (was 9% of Base Mana). Flash of Light - Expends a large amount of mana to quickly heal a friendly target for [ 168% 202% of Spell Power ]. Holy
      Infusion of Light - Your critical Holy Shocks reduce the cost of your next Flash of Light by 30% or increase the healing of cause your next Holy Light by 30%. to generate 1 Holy Power. Holy Paladin (Spec Aura) // Damage of All Abilities reduced by 8%. Decreases damage/healing by 8%: Blessed Hammer, Consecration, Crusader Strike, Eye for an Eye, Final Reckoning, Glimmer of Light, Holy Prism, Holy Shield, Holy Shock, Judgment, Light's Hammer, Sanctified Wrath, Shield of the Righteous, Zeal Decreases damage/healing by 10%: Judgment Crusader's Might (Level 15 Talent) - Crusader Strike reduces the cooldown of Holy Shock by 1.5 1.0 sec. Protection
      Protection Paladin (Spec Aura) - Increases damage/healing by 67% 39%: Flash of Light Retribution
      Retribution Paladin (Spec Aura) - Increases damage/healing by 67% 39%: Flash of Light
    • By Staff
      Here comes the official megadungeon preview, as the Broker city of Tazavesh gets a detailed look, including everyone's favorite (and only) Infinite pirate dragon.
      Take a Day Trip to Tazavesh, the Veiled Market (source)
      Gather your party and discover exotic wares and strange creatures in the new eight-boss Mythic mega-dungeon; Tazavesh: the Veiled Market. Set in a bazaar of the mysterious brokers, you’ll face off against dastardly assassins, four-armed broker guards, an infinite pirate dragon, and other enemies as you chase down a wayward broker before she can unleash the might of a stolen artifact to realize her own designs.
      This Mythic-only instance can reward players with loot coveted by broker society—including a dazzling assortment of weaponry, otherworldly pets, and a mount.
      Meet Your Guide: Al’dalil
      To gain access to Tazavesh, the Veiled Market you’ll complete a short series of quests beginning with the Innkeeper, Host Ta’rela, in The Idyllia section of Oribos. In “The All’ey Cat of Oribos” you’ll be asked to meet up with a mysterious contact named Al’dalil who will introduce you to the world of the cartels, their complicated relationships, and their propensity for ingenious wordplay. He’ll act as your guide from time to time as you make your way through the dungeon.
      Bosses: 8
      Difficulty: Mythic
      Players: 5
      The ruthless cartel boss So’leah means to conduct a heist that spans the realms in order to claim Progenitor secrets. Her only opposition is the disgraced broker Al’dalil and his ragtag crew who must navigate the mysterious Veiled Market and stop So’leah before she claims this forbidden power.
      Zo’phex the Sentinel- To gain entry into the cosmic wonders hidden beyond the gilded gates of Tazavesh, all must pass the sentinel, Zo’phex.  Obsessed with security, Zo’phex ensures any contraband is immediately incinerated along with anyone holding the offending items.
      The Menagerie- The Xy cartel “acquire” rare and valuable items to sell within their menagerie. Nothing is off-limits, exotic beasts, forbidden technology, even cursed artifacts are all on display. They guarantee to have your heart’s desire, as long as you can pay the price.
      Mailroom Mayhem- Something has gone wrong at the Primary Office for Sending Things (P.O.S.T.), Dimensional portals are scattering deliveries and the automation that runs the office is malfunctioning. If the chaos is not sorted soon, the city could go postal.
      Au’myza’s Oasis- The drinks are ethereal, the ambiance intoxicating, and the live performers may not leave that way if they fail to please the crowd. Within Tazavesh, this is the only neutral space where brokers from every cartel gather to deal in the shadows.
      So’azmi- Among brokers who live by the blade, none match So’azmi’s skill. Cartel So’s lethal assassin, So’azmi is always perfecting his technique. As such, it gives him great pleasure to instruct his enemies in the art of fighting before delivering his final stroke.
      Hylbrande- Left to guard an ancient Titan artifact, its recent theft has awoken, Hylbrande, Sword of the keepers. The only hope of escape is to dismantle the myriad of security protocols at Hylbrande’s command or become permanent residents of the tomb.
      Timecap’n Hooktail -Months of planning went down the latrine when So’leah appeared in the middle of Timecap’n Hooktail’s heist and stole her prize. Consumed by rage, the pirate queen unleashes her true form and rampages over anyone caught in her path.
      So’leah- So’leah’s thirst for power culminates in this final battle. Unleashing a force she does not fully understand, the cartel boss is transformed into a creature of unbridled ferocity. As rampant energy spills from the artifact, So’leah must be stopped before her actions tear down Tazavesh’s foundations.
      Are you ready to test your bartering skills against the best? We'll see you in the market.
×
×
  • Create New...