Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Stan

d3 Patch 2.4.2 Hotfixes, End-Game Group Meta & Forthcoming Changes

1 post in this topic

NMXHFO0RB4271463175988883.jpg

A new patch has hit the Public Test Realm. It brings not only hotfixes but also mechanic tweaks. Wyatt Cheng made a post about incoming meta changes.

Patch 2.4.2 Hotfixes

A new patch was deployed on PTRs recently and it brings the following changes.

Blizzard LogoBlizzard Entertainment

Below you will find a list of hotfixes recently applied or coming soon to the PTR that address various bugs or mechanic tweaks.

These hotfixes should not require you to download a new patch. Some of the hotfixes below will go live the moment they are implemented while others may require restarting the game to go into effect. Please keep in mind that some issues cannot be addressed without a client-side patch. Also note that changes to certain abilities will not be reflected in its tooltip until a patch is issued.

Last updated June 24. Hotfixes are denoted by the date they were applied to the PTR servers.

[LIVE HOTFIXES]
Monk
  • Epiphany
    • Soothing Mist healing reduced by 60%
  • Blinding Flash
    • Crippling Light damage reduction reduced from 40% to 25%
  • Starfire
    • The benefit to lightning damage is now capped at 40 yards
Note: Many of these changes play into a larger development effort onto which we've gone into detail here.

Items
  • Fixed an issue that caused Girdle of Giants to increase the damage of all skills by the percentage it applied to Earthquake damage
  • Fixed an issue that caused Scarbringer to grant a damage bonus of 200%. It has been increased to 300% to match the tooltip.
  • Fixed an issue that caused Lashing Tail Kick (Vulture Claw Kick) DoT to not benefit from the bonus damage granted by Scarbringer

(Source)

Upcoming Meta Changes

Wyatt Cheng has shared some developer insight in some recent gameplay mechanics that are bugging the team. Just to mention a few; devs aren't satisfied with the efficiency of grouping up large packs of mobs, not even having to move while fighting, because grouping up mobs, standing and absorbing damage is more efficient than being on the move while dealing damage. That's why they are planning to drastically reduce the amount of healing available. He describes some changes as "drastic" and claims a lot of players may be very well surprised.

Blizzard LogoWyatt Cheng

Hey folks,

Many concerns have been brought up regarding "the meta" - the current group composition perceived to be the best at high levels of play. From a design standpoint, our job as a development team is to give players tools and leave room for players to combine these tools and perform optimizations to reach the highest greater rift that they can. The top-performing 4-player group composition is not something we rigidly design. Indeed, we feel that if we designed in such a rigid manner so as to know what the best composition is beforehand, we likely haven't created a rich enough space for players to explore. 

Over time, the community settles on a small set of ways to combine these tools. Every so often, a discovery is made that shakes up "the meta," but these discoveries become more rare as the game matures. In reaction to this some players would like us to change the balance of the game just for the sake of change. I want to be clear—"the meta" being stale is not a good enough reason for us to take action. As Diablo matures the "meta" is not going to change every season. With that in mind, there are three criteria we use to decide whether change is warranted:

1. Does the current best composition represent a variety of classes? For example, we have taken action in the past when 3 Demon Hunters was the best answer, or 2 Monks and 2 Barbarians. 

2. How far ahead is the top tier vs. the next best composition? If the top composition was 2 greater rift tiers ahead there might be a sense that there's still room for alternate specs, or people could make a playstyle choice at the sacrifice of some efficiency. When the top composition is 10 greater rift tiers ahead, then even farming groups or casual community pickup groups start to organize into this composition.

3. Most importantly, how interesting is the gameplay? As much as we'd all love to see a variety of classes and gameplay styles, it's actually the most critical that when you are playing these high-end group compositions that the gameplay is interesting and engaging.
 

How do we define interesting and engaging? 

  • It's more interesting and engaging if you are moving occasionally than highly stationary
  • It's more interesting and engaging if you have to adapt to the type of monster you're fighting
  • It's more interesting and engaging when you are playing the monster mechanics
  • It's more interesting and engaging when a group has to coordinate for maximum benefit

Currently there are many suggestions on how to shake up "the meta". There have been a LOT of really great suggestions. We've reviewed many of them through the lens of the three criteria I've outlined. Most specifically many people have called for a straight up nerf of the Twisted Sword. While we are going to nerf Twisted Sword, I also want to explain why we are going to do more than that.

If all we do is nerf Twisted Sword, we believe what will happen is most groups will simply swap out the current top Wizard build and go to the next highest DPS build. You'll still see a grouper/tank (usually a Monk), a puller (usually a Barbarian), a DPS buffer (a Witch Doctor) and then whoever outputs the highest DPS in the game (currently a Wizard). Only going after the Wizard is going to do very little for addressing criteria #2 and criteria #3.

There are three major problems and three corresponding major changes we are looking to make. 

PROBLEM #1: Bringing damage support buffers is more effective than bringing a second damage dealer. Why bring damage dealer #2 when you can bring a damage support who increases the damage of damage dealer #1 by 300%?
CHANGE #1: We are going to be reviewing the party-based damage buffs provided by all the classes. The degree to which some classes can buff party damage is a huge contributor to the 1 DPS - 3 Support meta.

PROBLEM #2: It is too easy to group monsters together. This is bad because:

  • It disproportionately increases the damage of the group compared to adding a 2nd damage dealer. If you have twice as many monsters grouped, not only are you dealing twice as much total damage - you're also scaling Area Damage upwards.
  • On top of this, many of the grouping mechanics encourages stationary combat. If you're chain-pulling monsters to a point, you're fighting in one location for extended periods of time.
  • In addition to being stationary, you’re also casting spells at a single location – it’s more engaging when you have to adjust dynamically to a changing battlefield.
  • The grouping mechanics also act as a soft crowd-control, disabling monsters from attacking players, causing combat to feel stagnant and non-interactive.
  • Grouping increases visual noise, which makes discerning (and hence responding to) monster mechanics difficult.
  • Finally, it can cause server issues. While we are always working on server performance optimizations, we also need to recognize that the current game design rewards players for bringing as many monsters as possible onto the screen at once.

CHANGE #2: We are going to make adjustments to crowd control and pull effects to make it harder to perpetually pull monsters onto a single point.

PROBLEM #3: Extremely high rates of healing favor standing still to do more damage instead of respecting and avoiding monster mechanics . 
 

CHANGE #3: One of the reasons you can ignore most monster mechanics is the amount of healing available. Expect to see a drastic reduction in available healing.

Will this affect solo play? Yes - some solo builds will be affected. For the most part we are trying to target the changes so they affect groups more than solo play. Weighing the needs of solo players vs. group players is a never ending and difficult task and in this case we feel that the quality of improvement to group play warrants the changes. It is an ongoing goal to make more builds viable, and the classes closer together in competitiveness. The requests for buffs to particular class sets or legendary items have been heard, we just feel making meaningful changes to group play is more important at this time.

Will this cause the highest rift tier to go down? To be frank - probably. We've never really done this before - nerfing the top performing builds. There are open questions ahead of us. How will this make the season feel? How will this affect non-seasonal play? In the past we've always had a philosophy to adjust the balance of the game by buffing what's low, but in this case that's not really an option. Take a look at the problems and solutions being proposed - these are problems that can't be solved with larger damage numbers. These are problems with group-based damage multipliers, healing, and combat utility. 

Finally - I want to circle back to a statement from the start of this post - as developers we do not know what the new optimal group composition will be. We're making some significant changes here and the game is intentionally too complex for us to figure out optimal strategies on our own. The collective wisdom of the player base is far more resourceful and capable than us. As a result - we really need people to jump on the PTR and try this stuff out! Particularly 4-player groups. If some highly competitive group discovers a composition of 4 Crusaders that is the most effective but deliberately "hides" it from the rest of the community, then there's not much we, the development team, can do. While we are ultimately responsible for the quality of Diablo III, we can't improve this game without your help.

There will be specific changes available to peruse in the next PTR patch. 
Fair warning: The reduction to group buffs is severe. People will be shell shocked.

If the goal is that 2 DPS can do more damage than 1 DPS + 1 support then it means no single class can bring > 100% worth of damage multipliers to the party. A support Witchdoctor in particular increases the effectiveness of party DPS by 300%+.

(Source)

What do you think about these changes? Will they improve the overall QoL of the game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      In December, Nevalistis did a live Q/A on Facebook with Senior Game Designer Joe Shely. Some follow-up questions were received for questions answered and after reading all feedback, the team decided to dig deeper into some of the topics.
      Blizzard Entertainment
      In December 2016, we had a short Facebook Live Q&A where we answered questions from players all around the globe. Some of these questions came from our social media or community forums, and they spanned many different interests.
      We received some follow-up questions for a few answers we provided. After reading through your feedback, we’ve looked at the top three most discussed topics from that Q&A and dug into them a little deeper.
      Question 1: Are we satisfied with the Paragon system and do we intend to make any changes to it?
      We’re generally satisfied with the Paragon system. It accomplishes two main goals:
      First, Paragon levels allow players to continue gaining experience after reaching level 70 and to devote that experience to offensive and defensive specialties for that character (for the first 800 levels). It is core to Diablo design philosophy that time played translates to character advancement, even if you don't get a new drop in a given play session. As your gear improves and item upgrades become less frequent, this becomes especially important. This is why Paragon is (essentially) uncapped. Even when you miss the 15-minute threshold on a Greater Rift, you're still rewarded with experience toward your next Paragon level. And each Paragon level earned makes that next rift just a little bit easier.
      Second, Paragon experience is shared across all your characters in the same play mode, encouraging you to try all the different builds and play styles Diablo has to offer while progressing your current main character. This also allows for some progress to be maintained when a powerful Hardcore character dies, taking a little of the sting out of that loss.
      We believe that the purpose of the Paragon system aligns well with the goals it’s accomplishing, so we have no plans to make further changes to the Paragon system at this time.
      Question 2: Do we have any plans to create new systems to compete with Greater Rifts as end-game activities?
      While we don’t have plans to add a new system that occupies the same design space as Greater Rifts, we do have some new features coming in the future that should offer alternative challenges or improve your existing gameplay experiences.
      For players looking to compete on a completely level playing field, Challenge Rifts will offer new builds and layouts to master on a frequent basis. They support leaderboards, so you can compare your time with your friends and players across the region. Challenge Rifts will be coming to PC, Xbox One, and PS4, and we’ll have more information for you once this feature is closer to release.
      We're also dedicated to improving the experience of Greater Rifts, as illustrated by the recent changes to density, tile sets, monsters, and populations (See the 2.4.3 Patch Notes for full details). Among the many changes, you will no longer encounter large areas devoid of monsters, get jumped by Elite packs at the entrance of a floor, or die to that Lacuni you killed in midair.
      Question 3: Why is it that changes we make do not heavily impact the meta game? Do we have the meta game in mind when designing new items or powers?
      Community Manager’s note: This question wasn’t explicitly asked in the FAQ, but it embodies a lot of the feedback questions we received after the Q&A.
      When introducing new Legendary items such as The Barber or increasing the damage output of the Barbarian's Wrath of the Wastes set in a patch, our goal is to increase the variety of builds and play styles seeing use in the live game. If we simply buffed Wrath of the Wastes to outperform the other Barbarian sets, or left The Barber in the dominant place it occupied for much of the 2.4.3 PTR cycle , we would simply be creating a new dominant set or item that players would feel pressured to use.
      By instead improving some of the lowest performing sets and introducing new legendary items, we aim to encourage new builds or rediscover the nuances of a classic set. This may or may not change the state of the meta; that decision is largely up to what the community decides is best—whether in practice, by theorycrafting, or some combination of the two. Our design choices aren’t made with the intention to determine the meta, and we strive to avoid making new additions feel too good to pass up.
      As always, we’ll be observing these changes in the wild environment of the live game and making adjustments as needed in future patches.
      (Source)
       
    • By Stan
      A new round of hotfixes was deployed to live servers.
      The list is periodically updated with latest changes and hotfixes are denoted by the date they were deployed to live servers.
      Nevalistis
      Below you will find a list of hotfixes recently applied or coming soon that address various bugs or mechanic tweaks.

      These hotfixes should not require you to download a new patch. Some of the hotfixes below will go live the moment they are implemented while others may require restarting the game to go into effect. Please keep in mind that some issues cannot be addressed without a client-side patch. Also note that changes to certain abilities will not be reflected in its tooltip until a patch is issued.

      Last updated January 18. Hotfixes are denoted by the date they were applied to live servers.

      Previous Hotfixes: [2.3.0] [2.4.0] [2.4.1] [2.4.2]

      [LIVE HOTFIXES]

      The Darkening of Tristram The spawn rate of unique monsters have been increased inside The Darkening of Tristram event dungeon (1/18) General
      A fix has been deployed that should resolve many of the 64-bit client issues since the release of Patch 2.4.3 (1/9) Please note that this fix will require you to download a small patch If you have updated to the latest patch and are still experiencing issues, please detail your experience in our Bug Report or Technical Support forums and be sure to include your dxdiag report Items Firebird's Finery 4-piece Fixed an issue where skills would not apply this debuff until the power ended, causing some spells to potentially not proc the effect at all (1/18) Red Soul Shard Fixed an issue where the secondary effect of the gem would add time to its buff duration instead of refreshing it (1/11) The Barber Addressed an issue where having The Barber equipped on a Follower could repeatedly kill that Follower (1/9) Flail of the Ascended Fixed an issue where Shield Glare would only damage the last enemy hit by Shield Glare (1/9) (Source)
    • By Stan
      A new Facebook Live Q/A is scheduled for January 26 and Travis Day and Julian Love will be answering your questions about Necromancers!
      We'll be doing a recap as soon as the Q/A comes to a close.
      Nevalistis
      We have another Facebook Live Q&A coming up, and you’re invited! Join Senior Game Designer Travis Day and Lead VFX Artist Julian Love on Thursday, January 26 to find out more about what we’ve been up to in our development of the Necromancer class.
      Got a question for us? Submit any Diablo question by posting in this forum thread or via Twitter using the hashtag #D3QA.
      We’re hoping to answer as many questions as we can and can’t wait to see you Thursday at 5:00 p.m. PST. See you there!
      (Source)
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Wizard Manald Channeling Build.
    • By Stan
      Rainbow Portrait is coming to consoles with the patch that brings Seasons, The rest blue posts deal with The Barber, Juggernaut affix and the duration of the Darkening of Tristam event.
      Rainbow Portrait on Consoles
      The rainbow portrait isn't currently available on consoles. The implementation of portraits will come with the patch that brings Seasons to consoles (Season 10 maybe). Until then, you can earn portraits through the Darkening of Tristam event.
      Nevalistis
      So, with the 1.15/1.16 patch, will this portrait drop now on the consoles?
      Sorry for the delay in response, but I had to do some digging on this one. On console, Sir William does not currently drop the Whimsyshire portrait. The reason why is because full portrait integration isn't actually active yet for the Ultimate Evil Edition on PS4/XB1, though a couple of portraits can be earned through the Darkening of Tristram event (see here for more information on that). Full integration will be coming with the patch where Seasons become available on console.

      If this is something you guys would like to see in the future once portrait integration is in, I'll be happy to pass along that feedback to our console development team!
      (Source)
      The Darkening of Tristam Event Duration
      Another posts informs that the Darkening of Tristam event will last until the end of January and will return every January from here on out.
      Nevalistis
      When does the Darkening of Tristram event end?
      Just to confirm, The Darkening of Tristram event will last until the end of this month (January), and will return every January from here on out.
      (Source)
      The Barber Nerfs
      A player has submitted photographic evidence that The Barber has been nerfed. Here's a blue post related to it.
      Tyvalir
      I'm using it with a build I'm working on and I like it even though it's not doing insane amounts of godly damage like on the ptr.
      Glad you're liking the revamped Barber! As more people play with this item, there will doubtless be interesting new builds they create that are worth trying out.

      It's also worth noting that with the changes to certain items in patch 2.4.3, we've seen players talk about how these compare to the most powerful Legendary and Set items available in the game. 

      To clarify, our goal when updating Legendary items is to open up new build opportunities for players to explore. Along with this, it's important to note that not every item is designed to push the current best Greater Rift level. Some will be better for speed farming builds, and others will simply be a means to create fun novelty builds (like Manajuma's Way, for instance).

      There's more than one way to compare an item's relative worth, and more than one way to incorporate it into various builds. Even so, I'm glad to see people trying the new items out and sharing their experiences. It helps, for sure!
      Is it really not guaranteed elemental damage though?
      As for the weapon not rolling the additional damage modifier, that does seem buggy - I will pass this on, and thanks for reporting it!
      (Source)
      Juggernauts in Greater Rifts
      They now have lots of health and resistance to damage, intended? The information below was taken from the latest patch notes.
      2.4.3 Patch Notes - Juggernaut
      Juggernaut New enemy affix Juggernaut monsters are permanently immune to crowd control effects, but move more slowly than normal monsters Along with this change, enemies with this affix take 30% more damage from all sources Only a rare Elite enemy can be a Juggernaut (Source)
      There may even be a visual indicator for affixes on elites in the works!
      Tyvalir
      OK I got it - immunity to cc means a whole bunch of procs that raise damage or debuff won't work.
      Just wanted to clarify for those who haven't seen the new Juggernaut affix in-game or read our recent patch notes that this is correct. As with all enemy affixes, some will be easier for certain builds to handle while the inverse is true for others. 

      One of our goals when adding new enemy affixes is to broaden the types of enemy variety you see in the game and the kinds of challenges you'll face. This helps achieve both of those goals while (hopefully) encouraging you to think more tactically in certain cases as a CC-dependent character.
      Damn! Will have to actually look at affixes now - it would be nice to have a visual indicator on the elite.
      Totally fair feedback! I'm happy to pass this on and thanks for sharing it.
      (Source)