Jump to content
FORUMS
Damien

Restoration Druid 7.3

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Guest Spush said:

Now that   Sephuz's Secret  procs off dispels is it still irrelevant? 

It is not bad at all and very relevant for raid fights with adds and/or dispels and definitely for M+.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Pandacho said:

It is not bad at all and very relevant for raid fights with adds and/or dispels and definitely for M+.

Thanks Panda! Getting a similar vibe from the writer, so I'm sure we'll see an update confirming this soon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cultic

Hello druid community!

Thank you Icy-Veins for your brilliant support of the community and your ongoing efforts to provide such a valuable resource!

Along that same vein (lol) I would like to humbly submit a few macros I regularly use in my healing that could potentially serve to provide an update to the macros I see in this guide:

 

#showtooltip
/cast [@mouseover,help,exists][@target,help,exists][@player] Rejuvenation

(This is a priority mouseover macro you can use with all your healing spells. It attempts to cast at your mouseover target, then your target, then you.)

#showtooltip [mod]Innervate;Wild Growth
/run SetCVar("Sound_EnableErrorSpeech",0)
/cast [@player]Innervate
/script UIErrorsFrame:Clear{}
/run SetCVar("Sound_EnableErrorSpeech",1)
/cast [@mouseover,help,exists][@target,help,exists][@player] Wild Growth

(This is a priority mouseover macro for Wild Growth that works the same way as the one above, but it also attempts to cast Innervate on yourself every time you cast Wild Growth. The macro automatically disables the error voice and the red-letter-messaging that appears in the center of the screen when you attempt to use an ability that is on cooldown.)

#showtooltip
/cast [@mouseover,help,exists,combat][@target,help,exists,combat]Rebirth;[@mouseover,help,exists][@target,help,exists][@player,spec:1/2/3]Revive;Revitalize

(This is a priority mouseover macro for Rezzing. If you're in combat it will attempt to cast BREZ first on your mouseover target, then your target. if you aren't in combat and not in resto spec it will try to cast Revive with the same priority system. If you're not in combat and in resto spec it will just cast our mass rez spell.)

#showtooltip
/castsequence reset=10 Displacer Beast,Dash

(Simple cast sequence macro with a 10 sec reset timer; the macro will automatically cycle back to Displacer Beast if you cast Dash or 10 seconds after the last time you attempted to use the macro, whichever comes first.)

#showtooltip
/castsequence reset=10 Flourish,Essence of G'Hanir

(Same thing as above.)

#showtooltip
/cast [combat,form:2][indoors,form:2]Treant Form;[combat][indoors][form:3/6]Cat form;Travel Form

(Lazy form changing macro that attempts to put you in the fastest form available for the environment.)

 

Sorry if there's some corner of the forum for macro posting, I only came for the guide and happened to look at the macro section.~

Good luck! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Guest Cultic said:

Sorry if there's some corner of the forum for macro posting, I only came for the guide and happened to look at the macro section.~

Good luck! :)

I'm sure these will come in handy for anyone that comes looking at the same section. Thanks for contributing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Dudu

Is there any pawn string or any value table for M+?

All pawn strings I found are with crit>mastery

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/20/2017 at 0:30 AM, Guest Dudu said:

Is there any pawn string or any value table for M+?

All pawn strings I found are with crit>mastery

There are no valuable Pawn strings for healers.

If you want to see the 'numbers', use RDSW or Twig It Spreadsheet to generate your own statweights. Otherwise just use a common sense: stats prio for M+ are Int>Haste>Mastery>Crit. There are no caps or breakpoints (at least not meanwhile) so you can just stick to "this should be a bit higher than that".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Guest Dudu said:

Is there any pawn string or any value table for M+?

All pawn strings I found are with crit>mastery

Just also to add to what Panda has said above:

For M+, you are the only healer there. You don't have to make any adjustments based on what another healer might be doing, so simply test and play as you wish. Use the stat priority above that she has listed and basically find the level of Haste that works for you. As you go up in M+ levels it might change, you might find yourself needing more/less.  Mana means basically nothing there since you can drink while your tank pulls, so huge Haste levels won't ruin your mana pool.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mazra
Quote

 We consider Cultivation Icon Cultivation to be the best talent choice in practically all situations, and this should be your default option. 

Can't help but notice that the argument for choosing Cultivation over the other two is somewhat vague.

Without doing the math (it seems extensive), it seems pretty simple to conclude that Soul of the Forest wins out if your healing targets rarely drop below 60% health. In such a scenario, Cultivation adds 0 value to Rejuvenation while Soul of the Forest still gives you an on-demand empowered Rejuvenation or Wild Growth.

No?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Myrkva

I agree and i cant get it in my head that Cultivation seems to be the talent to pick right now. Maybe I am wrong but the other druid in my raid grp used to pick that talent and never really reached my healing done in the raid. After he decided to go for Soul of the Forerst plus Prosperity he improved his healing alot. So i wonder if Cultivation is really that usefull when there is so much other heal incoming from other raid healers so nobody is really dropping that hard, especially with raid cd's.

Hope anyone can explain the reason to go for Cultivation in a raid-grp :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Guest Mazra said:

Can't help but notice that the argument for choosing Cultivation over the other two is somewhat vague.

Without doing the math (it seems extensive), it seems pretty simple to conclude that Soul of the Forest wins out if your healing targets rarely drop below 60% health. In such a scenario, Cultivation adds 0 value to Rejuvenation while Soul of the Forest still gives you an on-demand empowered Rejuvenation or Wild Growth.

No?

Not exactly, I'd say :)

You would be right in scenario when SW and Wild Growth wouldn't have a CD, but their combo has a 30 sec. cooldown and 6 targets max restriction. You can reduce the CD a bit with Prosperity, but CW is such a strong choice in current progress raiding that you'll just reduce your overall throughput.

Don't forget that guides on IV are aimed to raiding and especially to progress raiding, where people drop lower than 60% a lot. In addition, Cultivation is a passive healing that doesn't require mana while SW+WG combo is extremely mana demanding.

One more thing, if you have Legendary wrists that extend HoTs duration on target, you will never go for SW+WG because SW now extend CW and other HoTs on tank.

TL;DR: CW and Cultivation is better choice in progress raiding and high M+ due to better healing of many low health targets and less mana demanding (and don't forget the Legendary^^). SoTF or Prosperity+SoTF is fine to use on farm and in low M+: they are not bad, just the other combo is better for high damage fights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Guest Myrkva said:

I agree and i cant get it in my head that Cultivation seems to be the talent to pick right now. Maybe I am wrong but the other druid in my raid grp used to pick that talent and never really reached my healing done in the raid. After he decided to go for Soul of the Forerst plus Prosperity he improved his healing alot. So i wonder if Cultivation is really that usefull when there is so much other heal incoming from other raid healers so nobody is really dropping that hard, especially with raid cd's.

Hope anyone can explain the reason to go for Cultivation in a raid-grp :)

If you wish to provide the logs, we'd be able to figure out where was the problem of the other druid. As a bunch of wild guesses, 1) you are overhealing the content and people are not dropping low 2) he doesn't cast enough Rejuws to trigger Cultivation on the right targets 3) he has a legendary that makes him cast Rejuws more on a full HP targets... and so on

Unfortunately without logs it's impossible to associate someone's low healing with specific spells or talent choices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Sliwu

Hi :)

Thank you for this guide who helped me out after stoping wow after Wotlk.

I'm totally taking those talents, only one thing that i changed is on the first talents i chose Abundance, because with the talent germination, you can have easely 10 rejuvenations up, so your healing touch cast time is instant, and everybody knows that we druids are craving for mana economy, so with this low cost spell you'll easely save mana and do powerfull healing ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Guest Sliwu said:

I'm totally taking those talents, only one thing that i changed is on the first talents i chose Abundance, because with the talent germination, you can have easely 10 rejuvenations up, so your healing touch cast time is instant, and everybody knows that we druids are craving for mana economy, so with this low cost spell you'll easely save mana and do powerfull healing ;)

The issue is, given general GCD timers, even if you spam Rejuv to put it on 5 targets twice and casting no other spells at all, you'll still barely have any time to make use of those instant HTs unless you continue spamming Rejuv on people.

I personally don't think it is worth it at all, but if it works for you then fair enough :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Guest Sliwu said:

Hi :)

Thank you for this guide who helped me out after stoping wow after Wotlk.

I'm totally taking those talents, only one thing that i changed is on the first talents i chose Abundance, because with the talent germination, you can have easely 10 rejuvenations up, so your healing touch cast time is instant, and everybody knows that we druids are craving for mana economy, so with this low cost spell you'll easely save mana and do powerfull healing ;)

I'm not sure that it's mana and time wise to spend 10 GCD and 100% of base mana specifically to take out one mediocre instant cast.

Average cast of Cenarion Ward heals for 800K HP for 9.8% of base mana and is already instant.

Average Healing Touch heals for 200K HP for 9% of base mana which is x4 less that CW and you have to spend 10x10% of base mana for Rejuws to achieve this instant Healing Touch.

I honestly can't see the advantage of playing around instant casts of a weak healing spell: 200K HP for 9% of base mana (Healing Touch) against 320K HP average Rejuw cast for 9.8% of base mana?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest fam

hi if i have eco, sephuz and tearstone of elune which two should i use?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Dispell

Why is Remove corruption macro mentioned in restro druid? and why no mention of Natures Cure?? its a fundamental restro druid spell :P unless I have missed something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a bit confused as to why two websites that I trust, Icy Veins and Mr Robot, give different stat priorites for Resto. IV gives Int/Haste/Crit for raid and Int/Haste/Mast for M+, with the corresponding suggestion to enchant for Haste, whearas Mr. Robot says Int/Mast/Crit for raid and  Mast/Int/Crit for M+, with the corresponding suggestion to enchant for Mastery and ranking haste quite lower in both situations.

Aren't stat priorities obtained through the same simulations? If so, then what within your method led you to recommend enchanting Haste? Could all these differences actually be merely marginal?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, evanbloom said:

I am a bit confused as to why two websites that I trust, Icy Veins and Mr Robot, give different stat priorites for Resto. IV gives Int/Haste/Crit for raid and Int/Haste/Mast for M+, with the corresponding suggestion to enchant for Haste, whearas Mr. Robot says Int/Mast/Crit for raid and  Mast/Int/Crit for M+, with the corresponding suggestion to enchant for Mastery and ranking haste quite lower in both situations.

Aren't stat priorities obtained through the same simulations? If so, then what within your method led you to recommend enchanting Haste? Could all these differences actually be merely marginal?

Simulations are useless for healers, as they do not accurately reflect in-game encounters at all.  If you want stat weights for Resto Druids, I encourage you to use Leaf's RSDW (Rest Druid Stat Weights) Weak Aura.  This will give you a live analysis of your healing during raid and M+ encounters/instances and give weights accordingly.  This is the most accurate way to get stat weights for healer specializations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Orthios said:

Simulations are useless for healers, as they do not accurately reflect in-game encounters at all.  If you want stat weights for Resto Druids, I encourage you to use Leaf's RSDW (Rest Druid Stat Weights) Weak Aura.  This will give you a live analysis of your healing during raid and M+ encounters/instances and give weights accordingly.  This is the most accurate way to get stat weights for healer specializations.

Thanks for the input. Then what exactly does IcyVeins base its stat recommendation priority on? I'm curious what the logical process was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/18/2017 at 3:41 PM, Guest fam said:

hi if i have eco, sephuz and tearstone of elune which two should i use?

Tearstone + Eko, unless you can proc Sephuz. Then you use Sephuz + Tearstone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/19/2017 at 6:44 AM, Guest Dispell said:

Why is Remove corruption macro mentioned in restro druid? and why no mention of Natures Cure?? its a fundamental restro druid spell :P unless I have missed something.

Most likely an error when transferring a macro across. Will get it fixed :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, evanbloom said:

Anyone got an answer to my question above?

Essentially through testing - it's pretty much the only way to find stat priorities for healers outside of special WAs/Addons, like Orthios linked above. 

The best advice I can suggest is actually try healing without Haste as a Resto Druid. Given how many GCDs you have to blow through in order to efficiently place HoTs, you're going to find it extremely hard to keep up with higher damage. 

Let's just take an example of using a priority with Mastery:

  • It relies on you having multiple HoTs up on the target.
  • In order to place those HoTs on the target, you need to be able to efficiently keep up all of you HoTs on the tanks. 
  • In order to maintain them on more than just the tanks, you need enough Haste not only to fit in enough GCDs, but also to actually cast things like Wild Growth, Regrowth, etc.

Mastery is great, but you are just actively damaging the amount it helps you by not using Haste. More Haste means more HoTs, which means more benefit from Mastery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Testing how? If not simulations, then what do you test? In your bullet list example of Mastery prio, what data supports your logical argumentation framework? It looks sound from a theoretical standpoint and all those people using Haste (myself included) must be doing something right, but I've just got this itch that something is not completely rigorous from a statistical point of view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 02/03/2017 at 11:44 AM, Blainie said:

Most likely an error when transferring a macro across. Will get it fixed :)

 

 

your saying that no mention of druids dispelling and no mention of the spell natures cure an error when transferring a macro, its a fundamental part of being a druid healer. Dispelling  is not mentioned at all and the spell is not mentioned. Sorry if I sound harsh but that is not an error that is missing out an important part of restro druid. Also it took 2 weeks to have my post approved what about people reading the guide during this time? what about a new druid healer when no mention of dispel??  and wrong macro. Again sorry if sound harsh just icy veins guides are used by so many players for info and when the info not there and takes 2 weeks to even have posts approve, very poor imo, maybe get someone who plays a restro to do the guide and approve posts. Icy veins is better than this, sorry and I understand you are just one person and not paid but still, get someone who takes pride in these things and knows to do it or restro druids will go elsewhere.

Edited by Harry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      Savage Ebony Battle Turtle is an upcoming promotion mount coming in Patch 10.2.7.
      The mount will be available in some sort of Promotion in the future.
      "The cannons are powered by an unquenchable rage to seek out enemies and bring them to justice. Nothing can outrun a cannon."

    • By Staff
      The new War Within Allied Races was added to the Alpha today and we already have a full look at not only all their customization options, but their dances as well, courtesy of MrGM! You can check out the Earthen's racial abilities here if you missed them earlier. 
      Let's start with the more dynamic feature, with both male and female dances:
      And then there's big amount of customization options, as well as a size comparison with regular dwarves:

      So, are we liking the new Allied Race overall? More than actual dwarves?
    • By Staff
      Here's a really cool possibility for the War Within, as a very subtle and mildly mysterious comment from Executive Producer and Vice President for WoW, Holly Longdale, may be hinting at our Warband characters getting a lot more involved in our travels! 
      First spotted by UlthansWrath, Longdale came up to Taliesin & Evitel at the recent London War Within Alpha press event and had a short chat about the Warband screen, when she casually said "wouldn't it be cool if those were the characters you took as your followers in your Follower Dungeons?" After the obvious confirmation from Taliesin and Evitel that, yes, yes it would be cool, she just said "hm" and that was the end of the conversation.
      Obviously this isn't any sort of official confirmation, but considering this is a really awesome idea, it seems likely Blizzard are at the very least discussing it, if not already working on it.

      The Warband system is already great, and this would add a lot to it for players that choose to go solo into dungeons, as it would give them even more motivation to get some great characters in their Warband - even if it was just a cosmetic option.
      So, what do you think, will we be seeing this feature when the War Within launches?
    • By Starym
      We have quite a few Season 4 fixes today, with the LFR item level requirement, many item-related fixes, as well as some Season of Discovery improvements, and more!
      April 25 (Source)
      Classes
      Fixed a bug with damage dealt by Rip and Tear, Internal Combustion, and Tear Open Wounds in Awakened raids. Dungeons and Raids
      Raid Finder now required item level 463 if the raid is Awakened. Brackenhide Hollow Addressed an issue where Stinkbreath can turn while casting Stinkbreath. Addressed an issue where Wilted Oak’s Necrotic Breath visual can be out of sync with the creature’s facing. Items
      Veteran track items or items obtained from Awakened Outdoor Activities should now properly be able to be converted into Class Set items at the Revival Catalyst. Resolved multiple issues with Dragonflight Season 4 tier set items not functioning after equipping certain Season 3 set items. Dreambound gear caches from the Dreamsurge Coalesence vendor will now correctly award Season 4 Explorer 1/8 (item level 454 gear) and tokens will properly display the correct item level of its contents. Fixed an issue that prevented Tiered Medallion Setting from functioning on Season 4 necklaces. Fixed an issue preventing Season 4 crests from properly converting to their lower-tier currency. Quests
      “A Multi-Front Battle” can now be completed. Season of Discovery
      Using an Unconscious Dig Rat no longer dismisses pets. Mage Displacement no longer functions if the most recent use of Blink was on a different continent or in a different instance.
    • By Staff
      Affliction is getting plenty of changes today as well, with Blizzard detailing the reasoning behind certain choices.
      Affliction (Source)
      Greetings Warlocks,
      Today, we have various Core and Affliction tree changes hitting the Alpha. We want to take a moment to go a bit more in depth as to what certain changes were made and why. As a refresher, here are the goals for our Core and Afflictions that we posted last week along with some additional goals that we can dig into here.
      Class
      Ensure each capstone is interesting and exciting. Reduce the amount of throughput talents, to free up utility choices. Reduce the number of ranks for talents that don’t warrant multiple ranks. Affliction
      Address the tuning of Malefic Rapture in single-target and multi-target situations. Reduce complexity and the amount of active buttons that contribute to it. Erase the need to choose between a single-target or multi-target profile by adding more adaptability and flexibility. While we cannot go over every change here, we’d like to get a bit more detailed than last week’s update and explain some of the bigger changes coming in this build.
      Class Tree Throughput
      We’re removing a lot of throughput talents from the class tree to allow warlocks to pick up more utility without feeling forced to take mandatory talents to be competitive. These talents aren’t compelling options when placed against utility as they will always be the right answer to have. This allows us to move that power into the specialization trees and tailor throughput-centric talents to be specific to that specialization’s gameplay.
      Malefic Rapture
      In addition to becoming baseline for Affliction, we are introducing new talents that will help Malefic Rapture become the go-to spender for both single-target and multi-target situations. This should also shift Seed of Corruption to being a means to apply Corruption to multiple targets rather than what you spam in dungeons. In addition, we are redesigning Siphon Life to be friendlier to Affliction’s rotation and expect that its new design will make it easier to optimize Malefic Rapture.
      Affliction’s Adaptability
      While we do want Affliction warlocks to have a preferred talent setup for single- versus multi-target situations, we don’t want it to feel like they are powerless if they are in the opposite situation. By focusing on Malefic Rapture being Affliction’s main spender and removing talents that are only valuable in multi-target situations (Soul Flame, Soul Swap, Doom Blossom, etc.), we’re hoping that the Affliction tree feels less punishing to fill out.
      Is This It?
      Not at all. We expect to make changes based on feedback and our own playtesting. We want to get the ball rolling on changes we knew we want to make, so we could start the discussion early on and make adjustments before The War Within launches.
      Thank you all for the continued discussions and we look forward to your feedback!
      And here are the full changes from the development notes:
      Affliction (Source)
      Affliction Malefic Rapture is now baseline and has been removed from the Affliction tree. Unstable Affliction has been moved to row 1. Writhe in Agony has been moved to row 2. Absolute Corruption and Siphon Life have been moved to row 3. New Talent: Cunning Cruelty - Malefic Rapture has a chance to trigger a Shadow Bolt Volley, dealing damage to 5 enemies within 10 yards of your current target. New Talent: Summoner’s Embrace – Increases the damage dealt by your spells and your demon by 3%. New Talent: Death’s Embrace – Increases Drain Life healing by 30% while your health is at or below 35% health. Damage done by your Agony, Corruption, Unstable Affliction, and Malefic Rapture is increased by 5% when your target is at or below 20% health. New Talent: Relinquished - Agony has 1.25 times the normal chance to generate a Soul Shard. New Talent: Improved Shadow Bolt - The cast time of Shadow Bolt is reduced by 15% and Shadow Bolt deals 20% increased damage. New Talent: Volatile Agony - Refreshing Agony with less than 10 seconds remaining deals Shadow damage to its target and enemies within 10 yards. New Talent: Summoner’s Embrace - Increases the damage dealt or life drained by your Shadow spells and your demon by 3%. New Talent: Malediction - The periodic critical strike chance of Agony, Corruption, and Unstable Affliction is increased by 10%. New Talent: Contagion - Critical strike damage dealt by Agony, Corruption, and Unstable Affliction is increased by 20%. New Talent: Cull the Weak - Malefic Rapture deals 5% increased damage for each enemy it hits. New Talent: Empowered Unstable Affliction - Reduces the cast time of Unstable Affliction by 10/20% and damage dealt by Unstable Affliction has a 5/10% chance to generate a Soul Shard. New Talent: Oblivion - Unleash wicked magic upon your target’s soul, dealing Shadow damage over 3 sec. Deals 10% increased damage, up to 30%, per damage over time effect you have active on the target. Costs 2 Soul Shards. 45 sec cooldown. Siphon Life has been redesigned - Corruption deals 20% increased damage and heals you for 5% of the damage dealt. Kindled Malice has been redesigned - Malefic Rapture damage increased by 4/8%. Corruption damage increased by 10/20%. Malevolent Visionary has been redesigned – Increases the damage of your Darkglare by 70%. When Darkglare extends damage over time effects it also sears the target for Shadow damage. Shadow Embrace has been redesigned - [Shadow Bolt/Drain Soul] apply Shadow Embrace, increasing your damage dealt to the target by [4.0%/2.0%] for 16 sec. Stacks up to [2/4] times. Pandemic Invocation has been removed. Sow the Seeds has been removed. Soul Swap has been removed. Doom Blossom has been removed. Dread Touch has been removed. Soul Flame has been removed. Agonizing Corruption has been removed. Seized Vitality has been removed. Soul-Eater’s Gluttony has been removed. Grand Warlock’s Design has been removed. Grim Reach has been removed. Xavius’ Gambit has been moved to row 6. Withering Bolt has been moved to row 8. Shadow Embrace has been moved to row 7. Inevitable Demise has been moved to row 6. Tormented Crescendo has been moved to row 7. Sacrolash’s Dark Strike has been moved to row 5. Grimoire of Sacrifice has been moved to column 4. Creeping Death has been moved to column 3. Dark Virtuosity has been moved to column 1. Malevolent Visionary has been moved to row 10. Summon Darkglare has been moved to row 9.
×
×
  • Create New...