Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Starym

wow Update on Vanilla/Classic Server Status

16 posts in this topic

G2ZMqmo.jpg

J. Allen Brack gives us an update on the Classic Server situation.

 

It would seem that among all the great news coming with patch 7.1, some bad news snuck in as well (at least for some players). After the big recent uproar over Classic Servers and whether Blizzard will ever make them available to players, it seems we'll have to wait for any news regarding their eventual availability (or lack thereof) until after Blizzcon.

Blizzard LogoJ. Allen Brack


Hey everyone,

We’ve seen some talk among the community that you might be expecting to hear some news on legacy servers at BlizzCon, and we just wanted to take a moment to let you know that while we’re still discussing the possibility, we won’t have any updates to share on that until after the show.

These past few months we’ve been laser-focused on the launch of Legion and getting Patch 7.1: Return to Karazhan ready to go (it’s almost here!), as well as prepping for BlizzCon—which is always a huge undertaking itself. You’ve heard us say that the launch of Legion was just the beginning of the story we want to tell in this expansion. What we will focus on at BlizzCon is how the team is committed to making sure we bring you a steady stream of content going forward, and we can’t wait to share what’s next for Legion.

Thanks for your patience, and we’ll see you at BlizzCon.

-J. Allen Brack and the World of Warcraft development team

In case you missed the whole story behind why this topic has been around so much recently, here's a quick summary:

It all started with Blizzard shutting down the Nostalrius "Private" server since it was illegal, but because it and others like it are the only way players can play in Vanilla conditions, there was an outcry from its fans.  Blizzard decided to meet with the Nostalrius team and talk about the issue, after a pretty large petition was signed in favor of Vanilla/Classic servers being made official options for WoW. Then former Wow lead developer Mark Kern also got involved, drafting a letter and personally delivering the printed out petition to Mike Morhaime and had a meeting on the subject.

The end result of all of that was a "we will see/we are looking into it" message from Blizzard, and more specifically a lot of mentions of "pristine" servers, aka servers with all the XP buffs that have accumulated throughout the expansions removed.  So, we'll have to wait a bit longer for any resolution on the matter, but the subject is always a controversial one, as any mention of "how good Vanilla was" gets interpreted as an attack on the game as it is now, camps form up and it starts getting ugly.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Starym said:

as any mention of "how good Vanilla was" gets interpreted as an attack on the game as it is now, camps form up and it starts getting ugly.

This is the pure and only reason I feel this article would get zero comments. People are horrified to discuss this topic simply because I have seen zero conversations that didn't turn into pissing matches and shouting competitions. If nothing else we can say it is a testament to blizzards work, that they created something that were over a decade and half later people still revere it and praise it. So, i applaud blizzard. While I myself would certainly play on the vanilla servers to derp around, I feel nostalgia would claim to many people and it wouldn't scratch that itch they have. I'll give an example as to why.

The original pokemon game for me was an adventure in ways I can't describe. A huge unknown world full of strange and amazing creatures with discoveries everywhere. It was amazing. However, going back and replaying the games its never the same, it can't be, the game may be as it was but i've changed and grown, plus I know where everything is. While I can play the game again in its original form, I can't experience it again in a pure form. I've already done it. You only taste cotton candy the first time once. Replciations of experiences are never as good as the first. So, while I think players would be happy to see the servers launched, in the end i'm not sure they would be happy with what they received, it wouldn't be the same, its impossible for it to be. There is an old saying

You can't go home again.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nostralius wasn't popular because it was Classic it was popular because it was free. Make classic servers of any kind in the real game and everyone will play for maybe a week or two max before dropping off and it will leave a very very small population playing the old game. There is no way it would ever make financial sense. And if they did something like it was 1-60 with the current versions of classic zones only and the current spell and talent systems it would be no fun for anyone. There isn't any possible outcome where classic servers are a good idea.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, demonardvark said:

 People are horrified to discuss this topic simply because I have seen zero conversations that didn't turn into pissing matches and shouting competitions.

You're 100% right, and I honestly don't know why it has to be like that.  Why does the love for the old game foster animosity in people that prefer the new content?  In my opinion its comparing apples and extremely hostile oranges.  Having an opinion in this matter shouldn't be seen as an insult by someone on the other side.  Both current content and "pristine" servers can exist!  Everquest did it. EVERQUEST!!  I honestly loved the way they implemented it too.  I think that there would be a dedicated group of people that would definitely play on classic servers and pay for it.  They would probably be happy with the improved quality of life considering they would have actual Blizz support and security.  As for the rest of the player base its just business as usual.  Stop getting so bent out of shape guys :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, gurupak said:

Move forward guys.

I feel like this is one of those things where I don't mind looking back, as long as it's not "moving forward is bad, we need to go back". I'm fine with both happening!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, ghostdeini said:

Why does the love for the old game foster animosity in people that prefer the new content? 

It happens on both sides, for sure. The entire discussion is so marred with animosity that you could never see an actual discussion by most of the community. It's basically just, let's see how much we can shout and swear!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Mistmoore said:

Nostralius wasn't popular because it was Classic it was popular because it was free. Make classic servers of any kind in the real game and everyone will play for maybe a week or two max before dropping off and it will leave a very very small population playing the old game. There is no way it would ever make financial sense. And if they did something like it was 1-60 with the current versions of classic zones only and the current spell and talent systems it would be no fun for anyone. There isn't any possible outcome where classic servers are a good idea.

I believe the main "possibility" that people are hoping for currently is basically, start at Vanilla, play through the game as you would have 10 years ago. Remove the content drought and release things as required. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Blainie said:

I believe the main "possibility" that people are hoping for currently is basically, start at Vanilla, play through the game as you would have 10 years ago. Remove the content drought and release things as required. 

Classic and TBC are NOT fun by 2016 standards. They're grindy grindy grinds. I get the rose colored glasses about the first run through MC or fighting Kael'thas for the first time or when you got Thunderfury and were god tank for your guild but the reality is each class had one viable spec. Bosses dropped a very low amount of loot and everything was itemized like shit. Would they still follow the same buff and nerf patterns? Would you unlock each patch over time or just drop it at the final patch and let it sit for 6mo and then add the next expansion? It wouldn't work, it wouldn't be fun, the playerbase for that server would be pitifully small with maybe a small spike at each expansion release. How fun is it going to be when say it gets to Wrath and you LOOOOOOVE wrath and you're farming for your arp and shit trying to min max for ulduar and toc and then icc drops and it all goes bananas and then its Cata and the game you liked is gone again? Would they have individual servers for each expansion? Each patch?

 

The whole idea is really dumb and Blizzard knows it. They remember the reality of the situation. Also it would cost them a lot of money, having to go back and make the classic build work on their modern equipment would take so much time. It's akin to asking a modern website to support IE6.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Mistmoore said:

Classic and TBC are NOT fun by 2016 standards. They're grindy grindy grinds. I get the rose colored glasses about the first run through MC or fighting Kael'thas for the first time or when you got Thunderfury and were god tank for your guild but the reality is each class had one viable spec. Bosses dropped a very low amount of loot and everything was itemized like shit. Would they still follow the same buff and nerf patterns? Would you unlock each patch over time or just drop it at the final patch and let it sit for 6mo and then add the next expansion? It wouldn't work, it wouldn't be fun, the playerbase for that server would be pitifully small with maybe a small spike at each expansion release. How fun is it going to be when say it gets to Wrath and you LOOOOOOVE wrath and you're farming for your arp and shit trying to min max for ulduar and toc and then icc drops and it all goes bananas and then its Cata and the game you liked is gone again? Would they have individual servers for each expansion? Each patch?

 

The whole idea is really dumb and Blizzard knows it. They remember the reality of the situation. Also it would cost them a lot of money, having to go back and make the classic build work on their modern equipment would take so much time. It's akin to asking a modern website to support IE6.

You're overlooking one thing here, and its that this has been done before.  Everquest started two servers back on the release version of the game and people that had paid subscriptions were allowed to play on them.  Every so many months, they put out npc's in the capital city and for 2 weeks to a month you are able to interact with them.  Their purpose is a voting system on whether the server wants to move to the next expansion.  It is left up to the majority of the community to decide if they are ready to progress to the next version of the game or not.  In fact at one point in time the two legacy servers were on completely different expansions because of the voting community.  I understand that you don't think this would be fun, but tons of people flocked to these servers and absolutely love this setup.  Their subscription base went back up significantly with this new type of server.

So this sort of thing actually does work.  It can be done.  I personally wouldn't want to do it with WoW, but I can assure you that with the size of WoW's player base there will be plenty of people willing to pay for this.  If Everquest, one of the oldest and grindiest MMOs, can do this then I guarantee that Blizzard can do it as well.  They would even manage to make a profit from it more than likely.

This does unfortunately bring back what I said in my earlier post.  This topic creates such a huge argument, because for some reason people can't seem to fathom someone else liking or disliking this idea relative to their own position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Mistmoore said:

Classic and TBC are NOT fun by 2016 standards. They're grindy grindy grinds. I get the rose colored glasses about the first run through MC or fighting Kael'thas for the first time or when you got Thunderfury and were god tank for your guild but the reality is each class had one viable spec. Bosses dropped a very low amount of loot and everything was itemized like shit. Would they still follow the same buff and nerf patterns? Would you unlock each patch over time or just drop it at the final patch and let it sit for 6mo and then add the next expansion? It wouldn't work, it wouldn't be fun, the playerbase for that server would be pitifully small with maybe a small spike at each expansion release. How fun is it going to be when say it gets to Wrath and you LOOOOOOVE wrath and you're farming for your arp and shit trying to min max for ulduar and toc and then icc drops and it all goes bananas and then its Cata and the game you liked is gone again? Would they have individual servers for each expansion? Each patch?

 

The whole idea is really dumb and Blizzard knows it. They remember the reality of the situation. Also it would cost them a lot of money, having to go back and make the classic build work on their modern equipment would take so much time. It's akin to asking a modern website to support IE6.

Opinions, everyone thinks they're facts. For me, for example, playing Vanilla again would be fun for a couple days then I'd instaquit. But I know people that have played on some of these Vanilla servers (and no, it's NOT because they're free, they were also paying for regular WoW at the time) and they enjoyed it and played for months. Shockingly, different people like different things, but I guess that's really not something that everyone can accept.

Oh and your theory about Nost only being popular cos it's free also falls apart when you consider that there are plenty of other private servers that are free and run later expansions as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/25/2016 at 10:12 PM, Blainie said:

I believe the main "possibility" that people are hoping for currently is basically, start at Vanilla, play through the game as you would have 10 years ago. Remove the content drought and release things as required. 

kind of like the way Everquest and Everquest 2 handled it. Both have legacy servers, you can only access them if you have a subscription. The servers start off as the base game as it originally launched, after certain milestones are met the players on each server get to vote on if they want their server to stay classic or  implement the first expansion, If they vote no it stays classic untill more milestones are met then they get to vote again, until eventually they are voting every month or they implement the first expansion, then they repeat the process for each expansion until the server is up to date with the most current version of the game, also they get none of the special perks subscribers have gotten over the years, no special goodies from collector's editions and no QoL changes.

 Btw most of those servers are dead with everyone that cried for them going back to private servers or returning to the regular servers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, ghostdeini said:

You're overlooking one thing here, and its that this has been done before.  Everquest started two servers back on the release version of the game and people that had paid subscriptions were allowed to play on them.  Every so many months, they put out npc's in the capital city and for 2 weeks to a month you are able to interact with them.  Their purpose is a voting system on whether the server wants to move to the next expansion.  It is left up to the majority of the community to decide if they are ready to progress to the next version of the game or not.  In fact at one point in time the two legacy servers were on completely different expansions because of the voting community.  I understand that you don't think this would be fun, but tons of people flocked to these servers and absolutely love this setup.  Their subscription base went back up significantly with this new type of server.

So this sort of thing actually does work.  It can be done.  I personally wouldn't want to do it with WoW, but I can assure you that with the size of WoW's player base there will be plenty of people willing to pay for this.  If Everquest, one of the oldest and grindiest MMOs, can do this then I guarantee that Blizzard can do it as well.  They would even manage to make a profit from it more than likely.

This does unfortunately bring back what I said in my earlier post.  This topic creates such a huge argument, because for some reason people can't seem to fathom someone else liking or disliking this idea relative to their own position.

i was playing on one of thoe EQ and EQ 2 legacy servers, they had about 5 going when it launched, and most of them pretty much became empty after about 4 months when i was playing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Darsch said:

Both have legacy servers, you can only access them if you have a subscription. 

That's the only way it would ever financially work. There's no way they could separate the two, because putting a price on it would just be too tough. There's no income from expansion sales etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/27/2016 at 4:24 AM, Darsch said:

i was playing on one of thoe EQ and EQ 2 legacy servers, they had about 5 going when it launched, and most of them pretty much became empty after about 4 months when i was playing.

That's interesting to know.  When I started playing on them there were only two, but had decent sized populations.  I think this definitely shows that its a niche style of play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/3/2016 at 11:13 AM, ghostdeini said:

That's interesting to know.  When I started playing on them there were only two, but had decent sized populations.  I think this definitely shows that its a niche style of play.

it definitely is, though I could be mistaken on the number of servers , it has been a while and it is possible I mistakenly counted temporary event servers as legacy. They are still supporting them though and it is still popular enough for them to actively be working on it, but, day break is also desperate enough to do anything to keep players good will and a steady supply of money after the stunt they pulled with H1Z1 and EQ Next being cancelled.

Edited by Darsch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan

      Farseer's Raging Tempest is Shaman's Class Mount in 7.2. You're sent to the Throne of Four Winds to assist Thunderaan in the new Gathering of the Storms Scenario. 
      Gathering of the Storms
      Thunderaan has asked me to send you to the Throne of the Four Winds to assist him with a situation.

      Speak with me again when you're ready to leave, Farseer. The quest is quite short. Three color tints are available for the mount and in the recent build Elemental / Enhancement tints were swapped. Elementals have the fiery appearance now and Enhancement Shamans get the airy mount. The Restoration spec's appearance should be more watery, but what's weird is that it has more thunders than the Enhancement spec for now.
      Shamans get one of the coolest class mounts, because the vast majority uses existing animations of past mounts.
    • By Babblet
      Location: Horde – US Connected Realms: The Venture Co - Maelstrom - Lightninghoof
      About us:
      Converge has been around since WoW Vanilla and has been raiding together since Molten Core; most of our members have been playing together for years. In its older days, when most of us where young, we were more raid focused and demanded a lot from our members. Over the years we had to adjust our playtime and priorities with a growing list of RL responsibilities and are now, for all intents and purposes, a two day raiding guild. We had to cut our total hours spent playing WoW but we still remain just as competitive and result oriented.
      Mandatory reading.
      Basics: ilvl 885+; 40+ points in MS Artifact Weapon; DMG Dealers 400k+ DPS ST.
      Raiding 101: ability to execute/avoid fight mechanics; communicate in English and use a microphone.
      We raid twice a week, a total of 8 hours; attendance of 90% is mandatory. We require you to function at 100% from the second the raid starts all the way to its end; if you cannot commit to a raiding schedule and be online on time this is not a guild for you.
      GRepairs and flasks are provided by GBank; members pitch in mats and/or gold to help out. Guilds preparedness to raid and supply its members with enchants/etc is a team effort. If you are accepted as a member be prepared to do your part.
      Raid Times: 8:00 PM – 12:00 AM Eastern Time – Monday/Tuesday.
      Recruitment: Currently we are only accepting Ranged DPS / Heals.
       
      Legion Progression:
      EN 7/7 Normal - 7/7 Heroic
      ToV 3/3 Normal - 3/3 Heroic
      NH 10/10 Normal - 7/10 Heroic
       
      Contacts:
      Battle.net BTag: Sodium#11394
    • By Stan

      Ion conducted a Q/A yesterday and Lore came to the forums to answer additional questions about Legendary items, revolving around bad luck protection and Relinquished items.
      It deals with bad luck protection for every spec and how the system handles Legendary items that can drop for more than a single spec. The unidentified Legendary items we reported about earlier were just a developer idea with the intent to fix loot specialization and Legendaries. It won't be implemented now as bad luck protection will now function for every spec individually. Legendary items targetting was also confirmed via Relinquished items.
      Lore (Source)
      1) How does the above work in regards to Non-spec-based Legendaries (like Shard of the Exodar for mages, who works for all 3 specs. Does it account for ALL specs, or just the one that it was dropped on?
      If a Legendary can drop for your spec, it counts. An easy way to check this is to open the Adventure Guide ingame (Shift-J by default) and click the "Loot" tab without having a dungeon or raid selected. That'll show you which Legendaries are counted for your spec.
      2) Very similar to the above, how do items like Prydaz, Xavaric's Magnum Opus/Sephuz's Secret/Kil'jaeden's Burning Wish etc work under this system? Does it count for the spec it dropped on, or for all specs?
      Same as above.
      3) The PTR has had "Unidentified <Class> Legendary" items in its database for a while, and it's been speculated that these were a 'failsafe' for people accidentally getting a legendary in the 'wrong spec' and blowing their accrued Bad Luck Protection -- are these unidentified items still going live, are they going to be scrapped in light of the spec-based droprate/BLP ? If they are going live, is it intended behavior that people could play offspecs with low number of legendaries, or none, get these items quickly (since the first 2 legendaries drop faster), and then swap to their 'main spec' as a way to get a few more legendaries 'quickly' (in comparison to the norm) ?
      These were part of an experimental concept that we've since decided not to go ahead with, at least for now. The idea wasn't exactly what you're speculating, but our concerns were similar.
      4) How does BLP 'acquisition' work under this new spec-based system? Do I 'build up' BLP for all specs as I play, or only for the one currently set as my Loot Specialization? If it builds for all of them, this has possible unintended consequences, where once I get an item in 1 spec, I know I should swap to the others and get items 'relatively fast' since the BLP is built up a fair bit (assuming it wasn't RNGesus giving you an item very very early on)
      This one I'm actually not certain on the answer, but I'll look into it.
      So basically if you have utility legendaries you are even more screwed than before because you already have that many legendaries for every spec.
      I can see where you're coming from, but I'd make the argument that if you have cross-spec Legendaries and play multiple specs, you're already at an advantage in that they're functional for your other specs. I have the Leggings of The Black Flame and Unison Spaulders on my Mistweaver; neither of them do anything at all when I play Brewmaster.
      I feel like this comes back to a lot of the utility legendaries are still just "bad" some like Prydaz, Xavaric's Magnum Opus and Sephuz's Secret are better. But there are other's like Acherus Drapes and Uther's Guard that remain disappointing as ever to receive. I leveled a DK as a fun alt, got Acherus Drapes as its first legendary, i am tempted to just delete the character and try again if I had gotten Prydaz i wouldn't have felt this way as it has far more value. Or i have been considering leveling my warrior and just hoping for better luck. You mentioned this in the QA but please take a close look at all the legendarys (including healer ones). To make sure there aren't so many egregious outliers, i should emphasize this is a much larger problem for healers right now than DPS.
      Yep, this is the important point to remember: if a legendary just sucks, then that's the problem we need to fix. Similarly, if your spec sucks without a particular legendary, then that legendary also needs to be fixed to not be so impactful.

      Regarding Prydaz, specifically: It's maybe not the most exciting legendary right now, but it's certainly strong. The stats make it a solid, reliable throughput upgrade, and in the immortal words of Sebudai: "It's pretty easy to figure out how much DPS you're doing as a corpse on the ground."

      As for Sephuz: it has a weird, but temporary, issue. When you only have one or two legendaries, it sucks that it does nothing on the fights where you can't proc it. No argument there. Eventually, though, you'll have a third legendary, and it opens up for some interesting gameplay, where you swap it on for fights with a lot of dispels, interrupts, or controllable targets, and swap it out for the ones that don't. It's not always useful, but it's really good when it is. That's not a bad thing.

      Those seem to be the two that most commonly come up as "bad," but we'll keep discussing the other options as well. I know there's a few tweaks planned to some that haven't yet hit the PTR.

      Overall, though, I just wanted to drive home the point that if you're upset at how long it might take you to get your next Legendary because the ones you have are bad, we want to fix that by making the ones you have better.
      We.Want.A.Way.To.Target.Spec.Specific.Slot.Specific. BEST IN SLOT.
      A) I think your spacebar is broken.

      B) You'll be able to do exactly that through the Relinquished gear tokens in Patch 7.2.
      Wait, was this a confirmation that we can actually target slots?
      Correct. The current plan is that if you purchase a Relinquished token for, say, shoulders, and it gives you a legendary, it gives you legendary shoulders.

      Massive wall of caveats here just because I don't want to over-promise:
      This is PTR. Anything can change at any moment. Many things already have. We don't have a solid handle yet on how long it will take to earn these things, or what the chance of them becoming a legendary will be. We need to be confident that the Broken Shore content itself is stabilized before we can start figuring out things like how quickly you earn Nethershards or how much these tokens cost. Their primary purpose is still as catch-up gear, similar to what was available on the Timeless Isle or Hellfire Peninsula. We don't consider this a "silver bullet" solve to all legendary-related issues, and aren't trying to make it be one. Still, if you just desperately want that one specific legendary, this might be an option worth considering.
    • By Stan

      Blizzard's trying to fix the issue of Legendary items and loot specialization with unidentified Legendaries. Every time a Legendary item drops, you'll be able to switch between specs and then discover a Legendary appropriate for your specialization.
      Update: Lore confirmed in a blue post that these were part of a concept that they won't go live with at least for now.
      Lore (Source)
      These were part of an experimental concept that we've since decided not to go ahead with, at least for now. The idea wasn't exactly what you're speculating, but our concerns were similar. It's interesting that the items are bound to Battle.net Account, so you might end up mailing them to your alt (must be the same class) on a different realm.
      Unidentified Death Knight Legendary Unidentified Demon Hunter Legendary Unidentified Druid Legendary Unidentified Hunter Legendary Unidentified Mage Legendary Unidentified Monk Legendary Unidentified Paladin Legendary Unidentified Priest Legendary Unidentified Rogue Legendary Unidentified Shaman Legendary Unidentified Warlock Legendary Unidentified Warrior Legendary Don't forget that crafted Legendary items are coming in 7.2 and the latest build added affixes and made them BoE.
      Celumbra, the Night's Dichotomy Rethu's Incessant Courage The Sentinel's Eternal Refuge Vigilance Perch Please note the nature of PTR. Anything may change before Patch 7.2 goes live.
    • By Stan

      Further fixes for Legendary items underway. Relinquished items were introduced in the latest build of 7.2 (#23623). The items are unique per slot and have a chance to contain Legendary items.
      Relinquished Items
      The persisting problem with Legendaries is that you don't get the one you want or need. Not anymore though. Relinquished items discover an item appropriate for your loot specialization and not only that, they have a chance to contain a Legendary item, most likely on a slot-per-slot basis.
      Relinquished Bracers Relinquished Choker Relinquished Cloak Relinquished Gauntlets Relinquished Girdle Relinquished Hood Relinquished Leggings Relinquished Ring Relinquished Spaulders Relinquished Treads Relinquished Trinket Relinquished Tunic Example: Relinquished Hood may contain only Head slot Legendary items, such as Darckli's Dragonfire Diadem or Uncertain Reminder. Such slot restrictions increase the chances of getting the Legendary item you want. The question is what's the probability of getting a Legendary item?
      Unidentified Legendary Items
      Update: Unidentified Legendary items were considered, but they won't go live as bad luck protection for individual specializations will be implemented.
      The previous build (#23578) added items that create Legendaries based on your set loot spec. This may represent an overall fix for loot spec problems. I think unidentified Legendaries will drop by default and we won't need to worry about loot spec.
      Unidentified Death Knight Legendary Unidentified Demon Hunter Legendary Unidentified Druid Legendary Unidentified Hunter Legendary Unidentified Mage Legendary Unidentified Monk Legendary Unidentified Paladin Legendary Unidentified Priest Legendary Unidentified Rogue Legendary Unidentified Shaman Legendary Unidentified Warlock Legendary Unidentified Warrior Legendary Taken from here.
      What do you think about the latest changes?