Stan

Battle for Azeroth Live Developer Q/A Roundup: Apr 26

17 posts in this topic

HCqs0Qq.jpg

We bring you a roundup of the latest World of Warcraft Q/A with Game Director Ion Hazzikostas!

Visit our Battle for Azeroth Content Hub for more information about the upcoming expansion!

Roundup

Allied Races

  • No plans to add High Elves in the near future as an Allied Race.
  • No Allied Races in Battle for Azeroth will be Hero Classes (Death Knights / Demon Hunters), but they're open to the idea in the future.

Artifacts

  • Demon Hunter Artifacts have been fundamentally intertwined with their playstyle in Legion.

Azerite Armor & Traits

  • The goal of Class balance is to build a fundament for external systems (Azerite traits in Battle of Azeroth, Artifact traits in Legion) that can be left behind in future expansions.
  • A respec system for Azerite Armor is coming soon. The goal here for respeccing is that you should not be locked into a set of choices, but they don't want you to switch them too often.
    • The initial cost of changing Azerite traits will be negligible, but it will ramp up quite rapidly, so if you want to change your talents around several times a week, it will be super expensive. The cost will decay over time (or reset every week).
  • Azerite traits from more lucrative sources will have a higher power level. Some of them will affect your playstyle. Not all will be boring passives; we should also see some Core spec modifiers.

Global Cooldowns [Learn More]

Quote

Why would we ever make a change that doesn't feel good?

  • Blizzard knows that the change to GCDs would be negatively received, but it is healthy for the game in the long term. Ion compares it to the convenience of teleports back in Cataclysm, where there were portals to capitals in all major cities. They will continue tuning Class abilities to accommodate the changes:
    • In one of the upcoming builds, Heroic Leap / Disengage will be off GCD.
    • Some Warrior abilities will receive an upfront damage increase.
  • GCD changes in Battle for Azeroth are primarily aimed at offensive cooldowns. *Fury Warriors*
  • All specializations have rotational adjustments that are on the table.
  • They see WoW as a fast-paced game (a series of rapid-fire decisions), and GCD sets the pace for the game.
  • World of Warcraft should be about planning your actions in short time frames, not blowing all your cooldowns at the same time.
  • Charge/Dash are on a GCD, but Sub Rogue's Shadowstep is off GCD right now. It adds flavor to the Rogue "ninja-esque" Class fantasy.

Island Expeditions

  • Island Expeditions primarily reward Artifact power.

Lore

  • A Twitter user asked about the Horde turning evil in Battle for Azeroth (the question is based on the latest Battle for Lordaeron Intro Scenario). Ion answered that evil is a matter of perspective, and there's more to the story, but they don't want to spoil it.

Personal Loot

  • Personal Loot will be the only loot option in Battle for Azeroth. There's more control as an individual over your fate. The change hasn't been implemented to address split-raiding.
  • Trading restrictions are the same as in Legion.

PvP

  • Predictive gearing is coming in Battle for Azeroth on top of Legion's random reward structure. Throughout a week, there will be a Conquest progression. Every week, you will get a different piece of your set.
    • PvP Season Week #1: You get a Chest armor
    • PvP Season Week #2: Insert another piece of armor here
  • Big battlegrounds will have a separate "Epic Battlegrounds" queue in Battle for Azeroth. Currently, the plan is to pull out the two 40v40 battleground from the regular queue and remove blacklisting.
  • Ashran will be retired in Battle for Azeroth, but it could return as an epic battleground in the future.
  • Gear only matters a bit in the outdoor world. Players with an item level of higher than you have will be stronger by approximately 10%.

Racials

  • Racials exist for depth and flavor. The point is to get them to a point where they still feel relevant, but are not outliers.

Sets in Battle for Azeroth

  • With the removal of Class sets, there will be just one appearance per armor type per raid.
  • Uldir has its own unique art sets.
  • More sets from Warfronts and so forth are coming. The goal is to offer different takes on expressions. What is Titan cloth? What is Troll cloth?
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really unhappy that we can only have personal loot in bfa. It totally negates guild raiding, it takes away choice, and it takes away incentive to raid with your guild.

Worst change in a long time imo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Disappointed in the GCD changes, and the comparison.    "It feels bad, but remember how those portals to everywhere were TOO convenient?    We don't want that back!"  (said no player ever)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Stan said:

A respec system for Azerite Armor is coming soon. The goal here for respeccing is that you should not be locked into a set of choices, but they don't want you to switch them too often.

  • The initial cost of changing Azerite traits will be negligible but it will ramp up quite rapidly, so if you want to change your talents around several times a week, it will be super expensive. The cost will decay over time (or reset every week).

 

It is nice that we can respec our traits/talents but terrible idea increasing its cost, specially for those specs that need to swap talents two or three times on a raid. 

4 hours ago, Stan said:

Blizzard knows that the change to GCDs would be negatively received, but it is healthy for the game in the long term.

No, it isn't.

4 hours ago, Stan said:

They see WoW as a fast-paced game (a series of rapid-fire decisions) and GCD sets the pace for the game.

And WE like to play the game just like that, I still don't see a problem with a fast-paced gameplay, it is FUN.

 

4 hours ago, Stan said:

Personal Loot will be the only loot option in Battle for Azeroth. There's more control as an individual over your fate. The change hasn't been implemented to address split-raiding.

I can live with that, I hate ML, but I can see why other people are upset with this (specially Mythic Guilds).

4 hours ago, Stan said:

Trading restrictions are the same as in Legion.

And here lies the problem with restricting loot to Personal and only Personal. They should let us trade whatever item we want to trade. It will suck to see some people get a trinket or a ring that they won't use (bad stats or bad proc, idk) and they can't trade because it is 1 ilvl higher then the item they're using. fml

 

4 hours ago, Stan said:

With the removal of Class sets, there will be just one appearance per armor type per raid.

Less options for transmogs, I see. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Foxie12 said:

Really unhappy that we can only have personal loot in bfa. It totally negates guild raiding, it takes away choice, and it takes away incentive to raid with your guild.

Worst change in a long time imo. 

Imho master loot was always a tool of item redistribution, not a goal. Sure, lots of raiding communities going to miss the system, because it's been around for ten-something years, but think of it as free time that the guild leadership won't have to spend with managing the good old DKP spreadsheet. There are two very good reasons why it has to go:

1) With the addition of artifacts, M+ and new open-world activities, raid items became only a part of your high-end gear. I'm not saying lesser part, since they are still important, but they are not the only source of your character's outfit. If you can obtain equally powerful gear through personal loot, the incentive to do to master loot content might not be the same. Some (who feel favoured by the system) would be more likely to do raiding, but some (who think they have no chance to get loot) might be not.

2) Drama queens caused an awful lot of extra work for the support team (and some raid leaders). There were those occasions when they felt that the loot master was unjust with them, or that the loot sharing worked in a tyrannical way. Many-many guilds have disbanded over the years due to problems originating from loot sharing - hence it ruined even friendships. There might be a social side to the game, but even in the most chill communities there are debates over this thing once a few years.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Personal Loot

  • Personal Loot will be the only loot option in Battle for Azeroth. There's more control as an individual over your fate. The change hasn't been implemented to address split-raiding.
  • Trading restrictions are the same as in Legion.

I'm disappointed to see this change. Ultimately, it's going to be OK. But, it creates an environment where guilds can require people turn their earned personal loot over when they're eligible to trade it. In this particular situation, it's a LOT worse than what they seem to be trying to solve. Obviously it isn't going to affect a lot of progression loot drops, but in the situations where it does people are going to be pretty salty.

Maybe I'm wrong. I hope someone explains it away for me so I can stop being bothered. If they actually do as good a job at balancing gear as they say they will, it won't be an issue. But... You know.

I've done a fantastic job at both distributing loot fairly and assembling a team that isn't salty about loot distribution. Back to the drawing board for my attendance policy going forward.

Edited by Leucie
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Stan said:

Trading restrictions are the same as in Legion.

Thats half the fucking reason people dont like personal in the first place. If the gear i got is only 5ilvl higher with shitty stats i should be able to trade it because i obviously wont use it.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blizzard is always right. No matter the feedback you bring, you might as well just shove it up where the sun doesn't shine.

Looks like Legion was the last expansion of WoW for me.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Weltenfeind said:

Looks like Legion was the last expansion of WoW for me.

I'm sad to say this, but I have to agree. BfA just screams WoD 2.0 for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was already frightened at first presentation on Blizzcon, but now.. forced PL, no GCD and so much idiot changes. This expansion gonna be huge backstep after Legion and I'll be skip it that sure. 

Edited by Hypersonic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Syktris said:

BfA just screams WoD 2.0 for me

WoD at least was a good stories and not this mess. 

Edited by Hypersonic
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Hypersonic said:

WoD at least was a good stories and not this mess. 

Hahahha yes, and at least classes were fun to play imo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems there were a lot of complaints about BfA following this Q&A....

Just wanted to add my two cents/comments.

1. GCD: As a Fury Warrior, I have seen the stresses of things being on GCD which has resulted in a lot of sadness but this shouldn't really be that new to Warriors. Fury has had its moments throughout the game as a GCD class. For other classes, a lot of people that are raging over the changes, I saw a few begging for Classic now because they think that's the better alternative. As a long time player and Veteran to the Vanilla Warcraft...You will be in for a rude awakening...Vanilla was Talent Specific/GCD galore. The Classes and game style was a different pace than what is it now, which is exactly why Ion stated, the GCD sets the pace of the game. I took this as the devs want to make the pace of the game more critical thinking / slower versus lets burst everything down and kill to move on to the next thing. I strongly believe this change is a "don't knock it before you try it" change...or you can wait until Classic and realize they are trying to duplicate that play style. Ion isn't a bad Dev, he is just trying to find ways to keep the game running...The game has been going for 13.5 years now...things need to be tweaked...tuned or shaken up to make it interesting.

 

2. High Elves: I think the amount of High Elves in the game...is supposed to speak volume to the amounts that left the Blood Elves following Burning Crusade. As Ion has stated numerous times, the Blood Elves are High Elves and there would be no point in duplicating a race for the sake to make Alliance players happy to have a similar elf. Let us not forget in Lore, a large chunk of High Elves left the Alliance when the Alliance did not provide aid in Warcraft II or in Warcraft III when the Undead attacked. When the Elves decided to aide the Alliance, they were met with extreme racism and felt enslaved by the remaining Lordaeron forces, which caused Kael'thas to abandon them and seek the aid of Illidan (other than a new source of magic). Also, the fel side of Blood Elves didn't last long after the Sunwell was cleansed, so the golden eyes thing makes sense. I think people being stuck on the eye colors for High Elves and Blood Elves, aren't making a strong argument. In this regard, I also agree with Ion, if you want to play a High Elf...make a Blood Elf. I feel for the Alliance in the fact Void Elves seemed like a rushed idea...just to even the scales on Elves...

 

3. Personal Loot: Its not a bad concept but I will miss Master Loot. PL isn't a bad idea overall though...if you get something you don't like, then you have the freedom to give it or set up a roll to someone who does. This concept works well with team building in Mythic +, in raids it just takes away the power from a loot council. I can't really say this is a hard dumb idea or a solid good idea..I think this will be a change we all grow accustomed to and generally think its fine. With Tier being gone in the game...that necessity for a loot council goes away because alot of the Loot methods focused around evenly distributing Tier. From early DKP to Big Dumb Loot Council. I think as the raid aside from Mythic, hit around 12-15 people...the need to master loot 2-3 loot pieces is just redundant but for 20 players it has its benefits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 30.4.2018 at 2:02 PM, Nazamber said:

1. GCD: As a Fury Warrior, I have seen the stresses of things being on GCD which has resulted in a lot of sadness but this shouldn't really be that new to Warriors.

As another Fury player, I think the changes to GCDs aren't bad as long as they keep adding damage to cooldowns when you press them, so you're not doing "nothing" when using a CD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 27/04/2018 at 12:08 AM, Badadada said:

Imho master loot was always a tool of item redistribution, not a goal. Sure, lots of raiding communities going to miss the system, because it's been around for ten-something years, but think of it as free time that the guild leadership won't have to spend with managing the good old DKP spreadsheet. There are two very good reasons why it has to go:

1) With the addition of artifacts, M+ and new open-world activities, raid items became only a part of your high-end gear. I'm not saying lesser part, since they are still important, but they are not the only source of your character's outfit. If you can obtain equally powerful gear through personal loot, the incentive to do to master loot content might not be the same. Some (who feel favoured by the system) would be more likely to do raiding, but some (who think they have no chance to get loot) might be not.

2) Drama queens caused an awful lot of extra work for the support team (and some raid leaders). There were those occasions when they felt that the loot master was unjust with them, or that the loot sharing worked in a tyrannical way. Many-many guilds have disbanded over the years due to problems originating from loot sharing - hence it ruined even friendships. There might be a social side to the game, but even in the most chill communities there are debates over this thing once a few years.

Totally disagree.

I believe guild raid groups should have the choice of how they distribute loot. Taking away another choice is too much babysitting.

I firmly believe and the majority of guild posts I've seen a agree, that this is a kick in the crotch to guilds and gives another reason not to be in one. 

Edited by Foxie12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Foxie12 said:

Totally disagree.

I believe guild raid groups should have the choice of how they distribute loot. Taking away another choice is too much babysitting.

I firmly believe and the majority of guild posts I've seen a agree, that this is a kick in the crotch to guilds and gives another reason not to be in one. 

Someone mentioned it above and I agree completely with Preach's point on it.

Personal Loot? I get a piece of gear, have it in my bags, can equip it, but am told by Loot Council to give it away.

Master Loot? I never had it, they make the decision. I don't lose anything, I just don't gain anything.

I know which one I prefer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      Blizzard is giving away 4 thousand Battle for Azeroth Beta spots to players who have accounts in European realms.
      Blizzard is giving away access in the Beta to 4,000 European players in this official giveaway!
      Head over to this page on the official European website, answer a simple question and you will be eligible to win one of the 4,000 Battle for Azeroth Beta places that are up for grabs!  Once your entry is correctly submitted, you will be automatically redirected to the Battle for Azeroth website.
      As already stated, this giveaway is available to players on European realms only and you should check out the rules to see if your country is eligible. The giveaway will expire on June 2.
      The timing is perfect to enter the Beta, as most of the questlines and class basics have been fleshed out. Therefore, it's an excellent opportunity to plan ahead your leveling route or simply pick the class and specialisation you will be maining in Battle for Azeroth. We have everything you need to know about the new expansion in our BfA hub, while a new Beta build was just launched last night with highlights like M+ seasons!
      If it's still not clear enough, this is a giveaway officially hosted by Blizzard, NOT by Icy Veins.
      UPDATE - Blizzard has clarified that there will be no codes/keys in this giveaway. Instead, if you win, your account will be immediately flagged for access. So, make sure to check your Battle.net App after June 2 to see if you got in.
      Aerythlea
      Hi everyone.

      The text of the blog has been updated to clarify that you have a chance to win access to the World of Warcraft: Battle for Azeroth Beta. No Beta keys will be issued, winners of the giveaway will instead have their Blizzard Battle.net Account flagged for access to the Beta with no need to redeem any key or code.

      We apologise for any confusion caused.
    • By Starym
      We have some more class changes on the beta in the new build, with the focus moving o to Fury Warriors, who are getting some really huge changes. The big ones come to Enrage (moving to a Haste and movement buff), Execute getting a cooldown and generating rage, there's also tweaks to Rage generation, Raging Blow, Furious Slash and a lot more.

      We also get some more info on Discipline Priest talents, with the new one mentioned yesterday, Sins of the Many, not currently working, as well as even more tweaks to the spec.
      Fury (source)
      This week's beta build caught the Fury Warrior changes mid-flight, and is an incomplete picture of the overall changes. Work is still underway – the spec is currently being iterated on. To give some more information on the overall direction of the spec, here are some points we are looking to address:
      More tightly adjust/control Enrage uptime and Rage income (both of which heavily impact pacing, flow, and the feel of the spec) throughout the expansion, rather than letting both scale up dramatically as gearing happens. Reduce the amount of stacking damage bonuses on the spec that are available simultaneously, which reduces the desire/need to stack multiple at once, which now feels much worse to do now that virtually all of them are on the global cooldown. Figure out Furious Slash’s place on the spec.
      Enrage
      Getting mad and being better and stronger is definitely still the fantasy of Fury, and Enrage is staying as the spec’s core base mechanic and Mastery. However, Enrage is changing a bit into 25% Haste (still being adjusted) and 10% Movement speed. It’s currently 100% melee attack speed on live, and was 50% melee attack speed previously on Beta. Haste is something that’s much more felt in terms of pacing (button presses, cooldowns compressing) compared to auto attack speed, which mostly gets covered up by ability animations anyways.
      The 20% increased damage taken during Enrage is being removed. Along with this, the 15% passive increased maximum health the spec had is also going away – this was largely added to counteract the increased damage drawback that Enrage had. Now, Fury will simply have the bonus of ~8% more health than other non-tanks in the same gear level, due to being able to dual-wield a pair of 2-handed weapons.
      In terms of Enrage uptime, our current thought is we’d like to try targeting Enrage uptime to around ~60%, and not growing wildly throughout the expansion as gear improves. I think there exists a sweet spot for Enrage uptime where it’s not up so often that it’s taken for granted and you don’t have to think at all about playing around it, but also not so rare that it feels bad.
      Because Enrage uptime is a function of Enrage duration and Rage generation (which is directly proportional to the time in between Rampages), Enrage duration going up means uptime can get too high, which means time in between Rampages can get too high, which then feels bad. Currently, Enrage duration is back to 4 sec, but Rage generation has increased significantly since this round of Fury changes, so the spec should feel much faster now and the uptime on Enrage shouldn’t feel low.
      Raging Blow
      Raging Blow now Generates 12 Rage, has 2 charges, 7.5 sec recharge (reduced by Haste), has a 20% chance to instantly reset its own cooldown, and no longer requires being Enraged to be usable. It’s more similar to the Inner Rage version than the live baseline version, where it has no cooldown but requires Enrage to be usable. Raging Blow is doing a lot of things for the spec here:
      Raging Blow was changed to fit together into Rampage and Bloodthirst, both of which we thought were good and didn’t need any notable changes. Being usable only while Enraged, meant you very frequently pushed it multiple times in a row for 5 Rage each time, which didn’t feel super engaging. Having 2 charges baseline felt better, as a version with either a 6 or 7.5 sec cooldown but no charges meant it collided with Bloodthirst’s cooldown very frequently, which did not feel good. Additionally, charges on Raging Blow is sort of the only actual resource you manage on the spec, since Rage is technically a resource but only spent on Rampage and nothing else. Having a 20% chance to reset itself is the random proc on the baseline spec that adds an amount of unpredictability to the rotation.
      Furious Slash
      Furious Slash didn’t really found its place on the spec. it’s a no-cooldown free filler that didn’t feel great to press, largely as a direct result of being the lowest priority/impact ability by design. The version of Furious Slash you’re seeing this week is a first iteration, where we tried giving it more tie-ins to your core rotation/mechanics: Generates 3 Rage, has 10% chance to trigger Enrage.
      Playing this version some more internally, we thought the button felt better, but still didn’t feel great to press. Additionally, it overlaps some with Whirlwind, which is also a baseline no-cooldown free filler. So we’re going to try removing Furious Slash baseline and making Whirlwind the baseline filler in single-target. Whirlwind has the benefit of having better audio/visual feedback, and generally feeling better to press. It also just fits the fantasy of a whirling blademaster/berserker pretty well. It will generate 3 Rage + 1 additional per target hit, up to a maximum of 8 Rage (this is intended to also speed up the AOE rotation). Furious Slash is being merged together with Frenzy (talent) and becoming a talent in that slot, without the new experimental 10% chance to trigger Enrage mechanic.
      Whirlwind's Meat Cleaver effect
      Whirlwind will now cause your next 2 single-target attacks to gain the effect of striking up to 4 additional targets for 40% damage. With the changes to Raging Blow, it made sense to add Raging Blow to this effect, but at that point the only thing not included was Execute and Furious Slash, so we've added them too.
      Execute
      Execute being a Rage spender caused it replace Rampage entirely during execute range (against enemies below 20% health). We are trying a version of Execute where it has a short 6-sec cooldown, and generates 20 Rage instead of spending it, so that it adds to your rotation and helps fuel your Rampages, rather than replacing one of your core buttons. In the current design of the spec, it feels more correct for Rampage to remain the almighty and only Rage spender, and Execute to be a more support role (rather than the spammed Rage spender), even if it deals similar damage to Rampage on paper (because Execute is available less frequently and Rampage Enrages you).
      Recklessness
      With Enrage no longer coming from Bloodthirst critical strikes and instead coming from Bloodthirst at a consistent 30% rate, the spec no longer has a core critical strike mechanic, and it made less sense to have 100% critical strike chance as Fury’s baseline cooldown. Thinking about it more, 100% critical strike chance would make more sense as Arm’s cooldown, because that spec is slower-paced and more about setting up for fewer, larger hits. Fury is currently much more about flurries of many smaller hits, speed/haste, and Rage generation. To that end, Fury’s cooldown turning into double Rage generation from all sources (and some critical strike chance for flavor) made more sense, both in terms of feel, theme, and gameplay.
      As a side note, one of the upsides of Fury’s resource model is that it can support a huge amount of burst/temporarily increased resource income in a way that feels great (something many other specs can’t do as well), because Rampage spends 85% of the Rage bar – we’re consciously leaning into this more with the Recklessness mechanics changes.
      As always, thanks for all of the feedback.
       
      Discipline (source)
      Quick clarifications (all still subject to ongoing change), since this build was in a slightly intermediate state.
      --Sins isn't correctly working in this build. The buff appears, but isn't increasing damage or Atonement.
      --Tuning is pretty preliminary, but for context on the 75 row, Contrition is likely too strong, because it skews the choice between the modes of Penance too much. Contrition's heal should be weaker than a Penance Atonement, so that it's still a choice about doing more group healing vs. focusing on one target.
      --Also on the 75 row--we're currently planning to replace Orison with Shadow Covenant.
      --Luminous Barrier is still intended to replace Power Word: Barrier, as before.
      --Current plan is to buff Shadow Mend a bit, as mentioned yesterday. Less sure about Power Word: Shield after reviewing more. Shadow Mend was more strongly propped up by Mastery: Reverence.
      We're seeing all the feedback on relative balance of talents within a row, but I don't want to make any claims or promises on which talents might eventually land higher/lower. We just rearranged a lot, and whatever I say will probably be proven wrong once we give a more thorough look and heavier testing happens on beta.
    • By Stan
      A Seasonal affix has been added to the game along with achievements hinting at Mythic Keystone Seasons in Battle for Azeroth.
      From Slootbag's PAX East 2018 interview it's clear that Blizzard wants to add Seasonal affixes to the game in Battle for Azeroth and make achievements more in line with Ahead of the Curve / Cutting Edge achievements.
      Seasonal Affixes
      Inspired by Uldir's final boss G'huun, we found an interesting new affix called Infested.
      Affix Description Infested Non-Boss enemies have been infested with a Spawn of G'huun. Seasonal Achievements
      In the latest Beta Build 26707, they've added the following achievements related to Mythic+ Seasons.
      Battle for Azeroth Keystone Conqueror: Season One - Complete all Battle for Azeroth Mythic dungeons at Level 10 or higher within the time limit, before the end of the first Mythic Keystone season. Battle for Azeroth Keystone Master: Season One - Complete all Battle for Azeroth Mythic dungeons at Level 15 or higher within the time limit, before the end of the first Mythic Keystone season. What are your thoughts on Mythic+ Seasons? Let us know in the comments!
    • By Stan
      Battle for Azeroth Pathfinder, Part One has been updated with yet another requirement in this week's Beta Build 26707 and you will need to complete your faction's War Campaign in order to unlock flying.
      Battle for Azeroth Pathfinder, Part One (Beta Build 26707 Update)

      New requirements have been added in this week's Beta patch. Both factions need to complete their respective War Campaigns to complete the Pathfinder achievement. Additionally, Exalted reputation standing with your War Campaign faction is required to unlock Dark Iron Dwarves and Mag'har Orcs.
      Ready for War (Alliance) Ready for War (Horde) Battle for Azeroth Pathfinder, Part One (Alliance)
      Battle for Azeroth Explorer (Explore new continents) Explore Drustvar Explore Nazmir Explore Stormsong Valley Explore Tiragarde Sound Explore Vol'dun Explore Zuldazar Kul Tiras Diplomat (Earn Revered with all of the Kul Tiras reputations) Kul Tourist (Complete the main story of Kul Tiras) A Sound Plan Drust Do It. Stormsong and Dance Ready for War (Complete the Alliance War Campaign) *NEW* Battle for Azeroth Pathfinder, Part One (Horde)
      Battle for Azeroth Explorer (Explore new continents) Explore Drustvar Explore Nazmir Explore Stormsong Valley Explore Tiragarde Sound Explore Vol'dun Explore Zuldazar Zandalar Diplomat (Earn Revered with all of the Zandalar reputations) Zandalar Forever! (Complete the story of Zandalar, including the Zandalar Forever scenario) A Bargain of Blood Secrets in the Sands The Dark Heart of Nazmir The Final Seal The Throne of Zuldazar Ready for War (Complete the Horde War Campaign) *NEW* Completing the first part of the Pathfinder unlocks increased mount speed in Kul Tiras and Zandalar.
      Learn more about how to unlock flying in Battle for Azeroth here.