Jump to content
FORUMS
Starym

Auction House Changes to Stop 1 Item Listing Spam

Recommended Posts

eFb9kOg.jpg
 

Blizzard is finally taking on the long, long standing issue of 1 item stack postings on the Auction House, that make players go through dozens and dozens of pages of listings if they want to buy something in slightly larger quantities. The change was supposed to come to the PTR first, but it's going live with server restarts, and is probably only temporary, to help out short-term while Blizzard work on a more significant overhaul to the Auction House and we'll be getting a list of items that will be affected.

The actual way they are approaching the issue is through deposit fees for profession materials such as ore, herbs leather etc., as they didn't want to limit stack counts or the max number of listings a player can make. What they've settled on is significantly increasing the cost of deposits for smaller stack sizes for profession materials, affecting unsuccessful sales only. In short, if you're selling 200 of a profession mat for 200 gold total, you'll pay a 2 gold deposit if you put all 200 in one stack/listing, but if you put 200 listings of 1 up, you'll be paying 402 gold! Check out the full details below:

Blizzard LogoAuction House (source)

To address some issues related to the Auction House, we’re reconsidering how deposits—the refundable fees you pay to list your auctions—are calculated. This fee is based on the item’s vendor price, and for profession materials in particular, vendors offer very low prices, so these mats have a low deposit cost. Deposits are substantial on items such as BoE uncommon gear, gems, and so forth, but not trade skill materials (trade goods such as cloth, ore, leather, etc.).

One thing we’ve identified as particularly troublesome is a large volume of trade skill materials being auctioned off in stacks of 1. Some addons make posting quantities of this size trivial to do, resulting in dozens, if not hundreds, of pages of auctions for a single item. As we looked at ways to change this behavior and improve the overall Auction House experience, we found that we prefer to avoid inflexible solutions such as caps on the number of listings a player can make, or increased minimum stack counts, which might interfere with many players' common gameplay habits.

Our current plan is to increase the deposit cost of some profession materials on a per-stack basis, which should provide incentive for players to post items in larger stacks.

Here's an example:

• Let’s say that a player is trying to sell 200 Tidespray Linen for 10g (gold) each. Today, each item has the normal deposit cost of 1c (copper), with a 1s (silver) minimum deposit, so 1 auction of 200 linen requires a deposit of 1s, and 200 auctions of 1 linen each adds up to a total deposit of 2g.

• Now imagine an additional 20% deposit added to the listing fee per auction. With an asking price of 10g each, that raises the deposit by 2g per stack. In the case of 1 stack of 200 linen, the total buyout price is 2000g, and the new deposit is 2g1s. In the case of 200 individual stacks, the new deposit of an additional 2g per stack brings the total deposit up to 402g.

In either case, the deposit is returned to the seller if the item sells. Successful auctions aren’t affected by this change.

Our goal is to give players some forewarning on this change, and to gather feedback. We’re putting together a list of the items that would be affected by this deposit change, which we expect to be limited to high-quantity trade goods. Furthermore, we’re deploying the change to the PTR first, so that addon authors can work through the change while we test it thoroughly.

This change will likely be a temporary measure, as we’re also working to broadly improve the default Auction House in the future. It’s clear to us that many players use addons because they find the default Auction House interface inadequate. A temporary change to deposit fees will help with this in the short term, and we’ll continue to work on overall improvements to the Auction House for a future patch.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it won't. Just ban the add-ons that allow the single posting to be easy. It wouldn't happen if players had to post each auction manually.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why won't they just add an option "stack of more than X"

You just set it to "more than 1", problem solved.

Edited by Skayan
Clarification

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not like you can post all those single item auctions manually using set max stack size as 1 without any addons, right?

Oh, wait, you can!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Hedonismbot said:

Get rid of the auction house add-ons period please

Not until they make a proper overhaul of the entire system.

The auctionhouse in its current form has barely changed since vanilla (I think? I started in TBC). It's borderline usable even without the massive slowdowns right now. Sifting through pages and pages of 1-stacks would be an absolute nightmare without addons like AuctionMaster, and half of the items aren't even in their proper categories (why is Obliterum listed in Weapon enchants???).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe change the UI to show me how many auctions from each stack size/price are? Make them like an accordion of stacks of one and if you do click it you see all the postings in that size

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Starym said:

• Now imagine an additional 20% deposit added to the listing fee per auction. With an asking price of 10g each, that raises the deposit by 2g per stack. In the case of 1 stack of 200 linen, the total buyout price is 2000g, and the new deposit is 2g1s. In the case of 200 individual stacks, the new deposit of an additional 2g per stack brings the total deposit up to 402g.

When players get roughly 20g from a single quest and around 100ish gold per world quest, how is a 20% increase in cost going to even matter to anyone.  In Legion on average from questing alone I made 15k - 20k when going from 100-110, BFA was about the same for 110-120.  This isn't going to deter anyone.

1. Change minimum stack size for stackable items to say 5 or 10.

2. Put a search option in the AH to search for stack size and so all searches will be that number or higher,  i.e. Select search from stack size of 10, only stacks of 10 or more items will display.

3. make the deposit on tradeskill items that are stacks of 1 non-refundable. if you put in multiple stacks of 1 then you're just throwing away money.

 

Can't think of anything else atm.

Edited by DeathsDesign
added levels for clarification
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're on a populated server, the stacks of 1 just break the whole process and take way too long to filter/search.

People posting stacks of 1 broke this. It wasn't Blizzard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These changes aren't enough. If a player wants to post 200 items in stack of 1 they should lose more money than just half of what they would potentially get.  Increase the percentage from 20 to 50%. At least for white items.

Alternatively a stack limit could also be set. Say 20 minimum for White items and 3-5 for green.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Tupi said:

No, it won't. Just ban the add-ons that allow the single posting to be easy. It wouldn't happen if players had to post each auction manually.

THIS, exactly what i thoght. Just make it so annoying that noone will do it. Well and of course, delete the possibility to automatically create 1 auctions out of a stack. 

Edited by Allseye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Tupi said:

No, it won't. Just ban the add-ons that allow the single posting to be easy. It wouldn't happen if players had to post each auction manually.

The problem is not the addons, but those who don't know how to use them. And the main goal of the change is likely not to make the listings more convenient and easy to read, but to reduce the CPU usage on Blizzard servers. I mean if you have 130 pages of mats, which could be reduced to ~30, with a restriction on single-postings, whenever a player or addon queries the listings it has to download 80% less data. That's huge.
 

4 hours ago, Hedonismbot said:

Get rid of the auction house add-ons period please

It would be like rolling back the stock market to the age when brokers got together with pen and paper and started yelling and shouting with the purpose of buying and selling. Market makers in WoW use powerful addons, because they help a lot in making pricing accurate. And from accurate pricing, everyone benefits.
The only scenario in this it could work (kind of) if they would also hugely reduce the number of mats and items the game throws at your character. Like you would loot a green BoE only every few hours, and profession materials should be a lot rarer as well. If the number of goods circulating in the game would be reduced, maybe we wouldn't need so complex tools to process their market either.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldn't it be simpler to allow say no more than 5 single items (limiting the entire Battlenet account to this every 48 hours), the go to 5, 10 etc . There are some items that people only want one of, not 5 or 10, so we do need a few single items listed, just not pages and pages. Last night I spent hours going thru pages of single items, just to get to the lists of stacks of 5 to 20 on several mats I wanted. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Auction Addons like TradeSkillMaster are also part of the solution.

I'm an Engineer and an Enchanter which means I buy my Ore.  Without an Addon it is not feasable to but 400 Ore 1 at a time.  With TSM or Auctionator I can buy up hundreds of 1 Item Auctions which helps clear up the problem in a way you cannot without such an addon.

You CAN easily post 200 items in single stacks on the Auction House without an addon but you cannot easily buy those 200 items without one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this is kind of bullcrap! I understand stopping the chowder heads that list 400 single stacks of 1 but raising the listing fee is gonna cost a lot of us serious sellers a ton of gold! if it does not sell right away before all the underlisters jump in and we get underlisted, auction ends with no buyer, and have to eat the new higher listing fee!

what you really need to do is just program in a restriction on single stack listings a player can have in auction house per 24 hour period. actually 1-4 stack cause if you limit singles then then idiots will just list 200 stacks of 2,3,4.

 

there's always gonna be some players that need 1 to 3 of something and have no need to buy a stack of 200 because they are not a hardcore mega crafter that wants to craft 50 of something! They are just a casual player looking to craft 1 item cause that's all they can afford! I don't every get to crazy with my single stack auctions, but they sell just as much as my larger stacks, so anyone that says singles don't sell, they do sell!

 

thYWPPFHG6.thumb.jpg.e1512e8252087c01813342850db1835f.jpg

Edited by multiboxing
more info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After viewing prices for select cooking mats yesterday (on Thrall Server) looks like I'll be back to farming/fishing the mats again.  The one rare fish that is needed to make food for raiding has gone up in price by 300%+.  I like to buy in bulk to have adequate stock of materials in our Guild Bank.  The buying 1 item listing at a time is a bit of a nuisance and after flipping through 25 pages of 1 listers I feel as if I wasted time looking when I could of had that time to farm it to begin with.  But in all honesty the Auction House system is by far the most outdated feature that I've used in this MMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, multiboxing said:

this is kind of bullcrap! I understand stopping the chowder heads that list 400 single stacks of 1 but raising the listing fee is gonna cost a lot of us serious sellers a ton of gold! if it does not sell right away before all the underlisters jump in and we get underlisted, auction ends with no buyer, and have to eat the new higher listing fee!

what you really need to do is just program in a restriction on single stack listings a player can have in auction house per 24 hour period. actually 1-4 stack cause if you limit singles then then idiots will just list 200 stacks of 2,3,4.

 

there's always gonna be some players that need 1 to 3 of something and have no need to buy a stack of 200 because they are not a hardcore mega crafter that wants to craft 50 of something! They are just a casual player looking to craft 1 item cause that's all they can afford! I don't every get to crazy with my single stack auctions, but they sell just as much as my larger stacks, so anyone that says singles don't sell, they do sell!

 

Nope. This system works though im all for raising the percentage from 20 to 50. People should be losing money by sending a lot of stuff 1 at a time. think of it as shipping price

If a player needs 200 of something then that something is not worth much and should be posted in stacks of 10 or 20 or 50. If you post it in stacks of 1 you should lose more money in total than you wouldve gotten if it sold because of the post fee.

If a player needs 1 or 3 of something then that something is worth a lot and should be sent in stacks of 1. You would gain more gold selling that item in a stack of one than you would lose from the post fee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Starym
      It seems we're getting a whole lot of Alterac Valley soon, as Classic is getting the 1.12 version in one of the latter content releases and we're getting the special 15th Anniversary edition on live servers in Patch 8.2.5 during the event! Today at midnight CEST there's another Play with the Blues event on the 8.2.5 PTR gathering all Valley enthusiasts and all you have to do is hop on to the PTR and use the Group Finder to jump in!

      You can get the high-rez versions of the two original mounts from the event, which you can check out here as well.
      Play with the Blues (source)
      Tomorrow 12:00 AM CEST, please join us on the 8.2.5 PTR for an old school Alterac Valley Play with the Blues.
      Starting promptly at 3:00 p.m. PDT, Blizzard employees will be testing our 15th Anniversary rendition of AV on the PTR, and you can join us for some strife in the Field of Strife.
      Please log into the PTR by that time and then open your Group Finder (default hotkey: i) and switch to the Player vs. Player tab. You’ll see Alterac Valley waiting for you to join.
      Afterward, please return to this thread with your feedback.
      Thank you!
    • By Stan
      The news image above is fan art created by Dogslug. You can find more of his work here.
      Blizzard mentioned multiple times that they would add Allied Races whenever they fit the story. The Horde's hottest candidates are currently the Vulpera of Vol'dun, even though their story doesn't make a whole lot of sense right now. Recent rumors suggest that Gilgoblins could be in the final pair of Horde Allied Races too.
      The Vulpera currently have too many unique animations, and they are a community-favorite. Pretty much every Horde player wants them to become playable. They're coming, and it's just a matter of when. We think the first set of Allied Races will be introduced in Patch 8.2.5 with the second one coming in Patch 8.3.5. Based on datamining, the Vulpera should be live on or before September 20th. You can find all their customization options here.

      On the other side of the spectrum, the Alliance will get Mechagnomes led by Prince Erazmin of Mechagon, but it's still not clear what the second race will be.

      Lightforged Forsaken led by Calia Menethil are a possibility based on the Before the Storm novel and Calia also received a new model in the initial Patch 8.2.5 build.
      Next up are Gilgoblins! We encounter them in zones like Vashj'ir and Nazjatar in Patch 8.2. They are a species of aquatic goblins created by Hobart Grapplehammer. Gilgoblins are very similar to traditional Goblins. They have various tattoos and fins on their arms to help them swim.

      Gilgoblins are currently not included in the game files as playable races as opposed to Mechagnomes and the Vulpera. They only exist as creatures.

      The female model has more customization options compared to the male model. Would you like to see them become playable in the future?

      We know that Blizzard wants to add more customization options to World of Warcraft, and a recent leak suggests that all Allied Races will become customization options in Patch 9.0 except for the Nightborne and the Vulpera. Let's see what the first set of Allied Races is going to be now that Patch 8.2 should hit Public Test Realms reasonably soon!
      TL;DR
      The first set of Allied Races (Mechagnomes/Vulpera) coming in Patch 8.2.5 on or before September 20th. The final set of Allied Races will include Gilgoblins and Lightforged Forsaken (based on the Before the Storm novel) in Patch 8.3.5. We know that Mechagnomes and the Vulpera are coming, but what about the second set of Allied Races?
    • By Stan
      We're one week away from WoW Classic launch. This week, you can get a piece of Heroic Palace armor from the weekly quest.
      Highlights
      Artifact Knowledge will continue to increase until October 1. Queen Azshara nerfs are now live ahead of Classic launch. The Classic development team conducted a Reddit AMA and shared more details about the intended player cap for dungeons and cleared some layering misconceptions. Read our recap of the AMA for a full summary of highlights! Mythic Keystone Affixes
      Fortified Sanguine Quaking Beguiling Weekly Quests
      Collect 36,000 Azerite from Island Expeditions for Azerite for the Alliance & Azerite for the Horde to receive 3,500 Azerite and 1,500 reputation with Honorbound/7th Legion. Complete 4 Mythic BfA Dungeons for Emissary of War to receive a cache which contains a piece of Heroic Eternal Palace gear. Nazjatar World Boss
      Players can kill Wekemara this week for ilvl 415 loot.
      Tidal Lurker's Greathelm Naga Ritualist's Mantle Spitcharged Shoulderguards Chestguard of the Submerged Belt of Rising Guardians Deepcaller's Clasp Serpentskin Splashers Wekemara's Warboots Shockbiter's Fang World Events
      Battle for Azeroth Dungeon Event (August 20th - August 27th)
      Blizzard (Source)
      The Battle for Azeroth Dungeons Bonus Event is underway!
      THIS WEEK
      All week, open Group Finder (default hotkey: I) to queue for any Battle for Azeroth dungeon on Normal or Heroic difficulty.
      Alternatively, get a group of veteran dungeoneers together and travel to one of the Battle for Azeroth dungeons on Mythic difficulty:
      Atal’Dazar Temple of Sethraliss The Underrot The MOTHERLODE!! Freehold Shrine of the Storm Tol Dagor Waycrest Manor Look for the following all week long:
      Chronicler Shoopa in Zuldazar or Chronicler Toopa in Boralus has a quest for you – Emissary of War. Or, if you forget to pick it up there, you can start it within the Adventure Journal. Quest requirement: Complete 4 Battle for Azeroth dungeons on Mythic difficulty. Rewards: One loot box containing a piece of gear from Heroic difficulty The Eternal Palace. Passive bonus: The final boss in each dungeon drop additional loot on all difficulties (except Mythic Keystone difficulties.) EVERY WEEK
      The Bonus Events system consists of a rotating schedule of different activities, currently scheduled to run each week beginning on Tuesdays. Each Bonus Event grants a passive bonus to a particular game activity and offers a once-per-event quest with a noteworthy reward for accomplishing a related goal. The in-game calendar can serve as your one-stop reference for the event schedule. The Adventure Guide also offers a direct link to active Bonus Events, allowing you to easily accept any associated quests.
      PvP Brawl: Arathi Blizzard (August 20th -  August 27th)
      Blizzard (Source)

      Frozen Arathi Basin (Resource Race)
      Put away your bathing suit, pull out your parka, and enter a winter wonderland as the Arathi Basin you know and love gets a fresh coat of ice and snow. You'll be racing your way between the farm, stables, mine, lumberyard, and blacksmith through piles of snow and over a - mostly - frozen lake. One more thing: the weather forecast calls for a bit of fog of war. We hope you're prepared for the weather.
    • By Stan
      Today's hotfixes come with a lot of nerfs to Queen Azshara. Vitality Conduit now correctly transfers health from a target with absorb shields, and more.
      Blizzard (Source)
      Dungeons and Raids
      Azshara’s Eternal Palace Queen Azshara When either Aethenel or Cyranus is slain on Normal, Heroic, or Mythic difficulty, there is now a 3-second delay before the other one gains the Torment buff. Azshara's Indomitable is now summoned 10 seconds later than previously observed on Mythic difficulty. Tidemistresses have 5% less health on Mythic difficulty. Fixed an issue where casting either Moonfire or Regrowth twice in a row while affected by Repeat Performance was not triggering the silence. Fixed a bug on Mythic difficulty where the damage effect from Deferred Sentence could trigger the healing reduction from Obey or Suffer right as the decrees transitioned between each other. Siege of Boralus  Corrected an issue where players’ pets were unable to attack the tentacles during the Viq’Goth encounter. Items
      Heart of Azeroth Vitality Conduit (Essence) correctly transfers health from a target with absorb shields on them. Learning new ranks of Conflict and Strife (Essence) should now properly grant achievements such as Power Up.
    • By Stan
      Artifact Knowledge will continue to increase each week until the week of October 1, according to Blizzard, despite the fact that in previous Seasons, it ended around the twelve-week mark.
      Blizzard (Source)
      Is this being cut off soon? Or are you leaving it on indefinitely?
      It’s been 8 weeks now, and 8.2 kicked off with 4 weeks of AK already calculated into the game, so in theory, we’ve had 12 weeks of AK at this point. AK ended around the 12-week mark in the prior seasons.
      This is an inquiry, I’m not asking that it be cut off. I think they should leave it on, but that wouldn’t fit the prior seasons.
      No to both questions. 🙂
      As things currently stand, Artifact Knowledge will continue to increase each week until the week of October 1.
×
×
  • Create New...