Zadina

Interview with Patrick Magruder and Ray Cobo on Tides of Vengeance & More

Sign in to follow this  

6 posts in this topic

BbYptS9.jpg

Oxygen sat down with Lead Gameplay Engineer Patrick Magruder and Lead Producer Ray Cobo to ask them some burning questions in regards to Battle for Azeroth and the team's plans for Tides of Vengeance.

If you want to see more of our BlizzCon 2018 coverage, check out our BlizzCon News Hub.

Blizzard LogoPatrick Magruder & Ray Cobo

- Given that you are open to introducing Heroic Warfronts, will there potentially be Mythic ones added in the future (or even PvP), or will they stay strictly as a PvE event?

Magruder: I don't want to ever say never to anything, it is definitely something to consider.

Cobo: We want features that engage all types of players. It is relatively early to say something about this issue on Warfronts. The format we have for them is working for now. The Darkshore Warfront, which is coming in Tides of Vengeance, is very different compared to Stromgarde and has a unique thematic.

- With the community expressing worry towards the lack of communication from Blizzard, is there any chance of returning to the old “Dev Watercooler” series from Ghostcrawler, which gave detailed information on the thought processes behind changes and what it was supposed to mean for the classes for every patch?

We have a lot of plans .

- How important is sharding for maintaining server stability? Players have continually quoted it as a reason for issues with immersion and enjoyment of the game.

Magruder: There are a lot of types of sharding. Some say it's phasing, CRZ, etc. Sharding is different technologies and it is essential. For example, is important because it allows people to not have queues.  There's still a sense of community with CRZ because we try to put you with the people from the same server(s)/battlegroups.

- Will players with War Mode on or off be able to see each other outside of instances? This can and does cause issues with trying to summon raid and party members.

Magruder: No because you are in a different world. We understand it can be weird, but there can be exploits, for example, healing a party member that's PvPing someone without actually being there with him/her.

- With tools such as Raider.io being so hugely important in the decision-making process for forming groups, will Blizzard eventually introduce their own tools for tracking stats, such as Mythic+ dungeons completed? This would potentially allow for much more information to be tracked, rather than just the Top X number of clears.

Magruder: We provide a lot of data in the game and external sites use it in varying ways. We try not to share data directly with third-party sites.

- The Mythic+ vendor in Tides of Vengeance is a step in a better direction but does the team feel that the presence of titanforging can ruin the sense of character progression that is vital to an RPG? In previous expansions, you would have a goal and grind towards it, with your “best” item in sight. This is no longer the case, with the potential for Titanforging, sockets, and tertiary stats.

Magruder: Personally I think it's a positive thing, although I understand where these concerns are coming from. A good titanforge can be the source of excitement for a player: it's still an upgrade and something cool. I like that if you see a high item level upgrade, you can just instantly equip it without having to sim it and go through the process of determining if it's good or not.

We also don't allow titanforging for Azerite gear. In Tides of Vengeance, we are getting rid of bad traits and buffing traits for Azerite Gear piece, there's also a fifth ring. A higher item level Azerite piece should be better than anything else, no matter the traits.

- Are there any plans to improve upon the current state of professions in Battle for Azeroth? With how expensive it is to craft “necessary” items for raiding, it currently is unsustainable for a typical guild to manage their expenses without being forced into either pooling gold, farming huge amounts of materials or selling boost runs.

Magruder: I hear you; I've had to turn off guild repairs and ban people without flasks. In Tides of Vengeance and beyond, we are paying attention to that. There are significant improvements, with awesome signature key items for each profession.

Cobo: We are calling them Tools of the Trade, every profession has its own max level thing. For example, there's a Blacksmith hammer that instantly repairs gear and can potentially craft indestructible items.

- Will Expulsom eventually be tradeable?

Magruder: This is more of a designer decision. that needs to be made based on the economy. As far as I know, there are no plans for this.

- With the graphics and system of WoW becoming more demanding as each expansion passes, are Blizzard working on new methods to optimise the load GPUs and CPUs have to keep up with? Even with top-tier equipment, people are experiencing issues in some areas of the game, despite not being in a 40-man raid (where you would expect it).

Magruder: In Tides of Vengeance, we are doing some significant strides forward when it comes to the game engine. We are multi-threading the engine based on the varying GPUs and CPUs that players have, we see the statistics. There are also advancements with DirectX 12. In short, we are doing a lot of stuff on that regard and it's extremely important to us. The more people who have good FPS, the more to enjoy. And it's good that historically WoW never required the latest hardware stuff. Increased view distance is a great example of that. Lastly, in Tides of Vengeance there will be artistic upgrades on battlegrounds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Zadina said:

I like that if you see a high item level upgrade, you can just instantly equip it without having to sim it and go through the process of determining if it's good or not.

The only reason you can do that is because you did the simming beforehand and punched the numbers into Pawn. And even then, people who care about this kinda stuff are gonna do another run of sims anyway. What a garbage argument...

8 minutes ago, Zadina said:

A higher item level Azerite piece should be better than anything else, no matter the traits.

Then what's the point of traits if they don't matter? This is the whole reason why I think azerite gear as a concept is a failure. You either make the traits matter like Legion leggos and thus mandatory to have certain ones, or you make them boring and insignificant. Right now you are trying to combine the worst parts of both of those directions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, about a million miles better questions, than what was asked on the Q&A panel, even though the guy dodged some of them.
 

2 hours ago, jinsu2301 said:

Then what's the point of traits if they don't matter? This is the whole reason why I think azerite gear as a concept is a failure. You either make the traits matter like Legion leggos and thus mandatory to have certain ones, or you make them boring and insignificant. Right now you are trying to combine the worst parts of both of those directions.

Just because they don't matter from an item level/performance standpoint, doesn't means, they shouldn't have a bunch of different effects on the gameplay or rotation. I think ideally, you should be able to pick like Eye Beam traits as a DH, and do the same damage as someone, who picks a Fel Rush trait. It should change the way you play (Eye Beam traited DH should be less mobile) and on some bosses, you may even fare differently, but in general those choices should be balanced out to be equal on the long run.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I like that if you see a high item level upgrade, you can just instantly equip it without having to sim it and go through the process of determining if it's good or not.

Oh, really? Dear blizzard, please tell me how it work with the rings, it's you who deleted main stats from them.
I really don't get why they are thinking that simplification of itemization is a good thing - it's just boring. When i saw appearance of passives on items in Legion i hoped to see even more of them in BfA... Except they forgot about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, MrOger said:

Oh, really? Dear blizzard, please tell me how it work with the rings, it's you who deleted main stats from them.
I really don't get why they are thinking that simplification of itemization is a good thing - it's just boring. When i saw appearance of passives on items in Legion i hoped to see even more of them in BfA... Except they forgot about it.

The Problem is that they are keeping the really exciting stuff for future dungeons. Right now, there is just the Waycrest set. But they already announced interesting and unique stuff on items in Mechagon. Maybe several items like the drape of shame from Karazhan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, MrOger said:

Oh, really? Dear blizzard, please tell me how it work with the rings, it's you who deleted main stats from them.
I really don't get why they are thinking that simplification of itemization is a good thing - it's just boring. When i saw appearance of passives on items in Legion i hoped to see even more of them in BfA... Except they forgot about it.

I had actually added a question about rings, but unfortunately it was the last on our list and there was no time to ask it! I agree, it's an issue - they should really consider adding back main stats to them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      In the next World of Warcraft content update, you will be able to hide everything except for pants at the Transmogrifier.
      In the latest Live Developer Q&A it was revealed that a "Hide Chest" function is coming in Rise of Azshara. Today, we learned that you'll be able to hide not only your chest armor, but every slot except for pants.
      Blizzard (Source)
      They said in the Q&A that we will be getting a “Hide Chest” option soon!
      Once this change hits we will be able to hide cloaks, helms, belts, shoulders, chests, and shoes! (If you have Griftah’s authentic Troll shoes)
      So why not let us hide EVERYTHING!
      Id be fine with just hide gloves and bracers since those are the two pieces that annoy me the most whenever i am trying to make an elegant transmog. Also we can basically already “Hide” our pants on most classes anyway thanks to loincloths and other skimpy leggings.
      Okay! Done.
      Except for the pants.
      I spoke to the development team just now, and they are determined to make this a set of changes that give players ways to hide every slot.
      Except pants.
      We’ll let you know as soon as we have details on how that’s going to come about in a future update to the game.
      The "Hide Chest" option is probably the most exciting one, because you will be able to show off tattoos and fel marks on your character. This applies to Demon Hunters, Lightforged Draenei, Mag'har Orcs, Nightborne, and Zandalari Trolls.
    • By Stan
      Loot trading, introduced back in Wrath, will be preserved in WoW Classic. Back in the day, you would open a ticket and it could take days for the item to reach the intended recipient, so Blizzard decided to keep it.
      The two-hour loot trading system in Classic will only apply to soulbound raid gear. Dungeon gear, however, will not be tradable by any means.
      TL;DR: Loot trading will be available in Classic content with a raid lock.
      Blizzard (Source)
      At BlizzCon 2018, we talked about how we plan to keep loot trading in World of Warcraft Classic. We added loot trading in Wrath of the Lich King to solve a common problem: a player could accidentally loot an item meant for another player or give it to the wrong person using Master Loot. They would then have to contact Blizzard to get the item moved to the intended recipient, which might take days. We wanted to keep loot trading in WoW Classic because the end result is the same – the correct person gets the item – and it’ll save everyone time.
      But we heard your concerns about the potential for abuse of the loot trading system in parties of five. It’s possible that abusive play could take the form of a group of four players colluding to deny loot to a stranger who joined their party as a pick-up. Raid groups, being much larger, come with more understanding on the part of solo players that loot distribution can depend on the whims of the many players and raid leaders who know each other.
      Taking that into consideration, we’ve decided that the two-hour loot trading system in WoW Classic will only apply to soulbound gear that drops in raids. Soulbound loot that drops in five-person content will not be tradeable at any time. What we hope to do is to strike a balance between saving players time and minimizing the potential for abuse of the system. We think this approach better addresses the concerns we’ve heard from players on the subject.
      Awesome solution! However, I must ask.
      Will UBRS/LBRS be counted as a 5 man dungeon in this situation (as in no loot trading)? I would hope so since normally guilds would run their own 40 and 20 man raids.
      The answer to the UBRS question is: loot trading will be available in content that has a raid lock. UBRS will not have a raid lock.
      A big part of loot trading (in a 2-hour window) as a solution to a concern is that raid locks require you to wait a week (or 3 days) before you can try again for the loot that was accidentally given to the wrong person.
    • By Stan
      Players recently abused a bug related to the Draught of Ten Lands potion. Separating the potion into multiple stacks resulted in more Draught of Ten Lands applications than intended. Everyone who exploited the bug have had their account suspended.
      Draught of Ten Lands was added in Patch 8.1. The elixir can be purchased for 5 Warfront Service Medals from Warfront vendors. Splitting the elixir into individual stacks caused players to receive multiple 10% Draught of Ten Lands applications and abnormal Experience gains.

      Fun fact, the ban wave comes just in time for the Welcome Back Weekend which lasts through March 24. We're still waiting on Blizzard for an official statement regarding the ban wave. The suspensions are somewhat inconsistent according to Reddit, ranging from 7 days up to 1 month.
      (Source)
    • By Starym
      Here come more hotfixes, today focused on the Brawler's Guild issues, Wintergrasp Honor gains have been buffed, Paladins get a reduction in haste gains for Light of the protector and there's more quest and achievement fixes as well.
      March 21 (source)
      Achievements
      The Dinner Impossible is now again possible to achieve in Arathi Basin. Allied Races
      Brawler’s Guild
      · Players who purchase a Rumble Card should now be automatically added to the queue for the upcoming rumble.
      · Fixed an issue that prevented players from receiving credit for "Solving the Mystery " after killing a mystery boss.
      · Fixed an issue that prevented Mindbreaker Gzzaj from dealing damage to Alliance players when casting Mind Break.
      · Fixed a bug that prevented players from being awarded victory if a player defeated Ro-Shambo playing the Rock, Paper, Scissors game.
      Classes
      · Paladin
      Fixed an issue that allowed Light of the Protector ’s global cooldown to be reduced more than intended by haste.  
      Player versus Player
      · Honor gained within Battle for Wintergrasp has been increased, putting it in line with other Epic Battlegrounds.
      · The Ivory Feather can be used once again in battlegrounds to gain Mark of Prey .
       
      Quests
      · Players will no longer be trapped in the combat phase for "The Darnassus Mission ".
      · Fixed a bug that caused spider NPCs to evade and prevent players from completing "The Council Has Spoken ".
      Previous hotfixes.
    • By Stan
      Game Director Ion Hazzikostas today answered your Battle for Azeroth questions and here are the highlights! The WoW dev team is internally discussing a level squish and no Allied Races are planned for Patch 8.2.
      Q&A Highlights
      They're not ready to talk about Rise of Azshara just yet, but the big info dump is coming very soon. They are working on ways to lessen the RNG of the Weekly Mythic Cache. In the past, they've experimented with different ilvl gaps and found that 15 item level gaps between difficulties work best for rewards to feal meaningful. The WoW development team has no incentive to make something that makes people spend more time in the short term, but isn't fun and it's burning them out, that's a terrible design. All they want to do is to make a game that is as engaging and fun as possible. Secondary stats are more important than primary stats in some instances and that's a problem they're trying to address. They're going to add a Caverns of Time portal in the next content update to Portal Rooms. There's a UI improvement in the works that will help players with path finding when the quest takes place on a different continent. The "Hide Chest" function is coming in the next content update. The team is also working to loosen transmog restrictions and make them more consistent across the board. They want to increase character customization, but not at the level of sliders. Adding eye color options is a possibility, but the way how the engine derives data from the game and how characters are built does not allow for simple height adjustments. Allied Races serve as a tool of deepening their storytelling and they're excited to add new ones where it make sense. Rise of Azshara is not going to have a new set of Allied Races. Repeatable Allied Race unlock questlines are a cool suggestion, they're going to discuss it with the dev team. 120 is a very large number when it comes to levels. It would be too overwhelming and not fun to reward players for each earned level. They're internally discussing a level squish, to make levels feel meaningful again. WoW Classic will have a dedicated RP realm. RPPVP is not planned right now. From a technical perspective, they shifted the infrastructure for how groups are built from Guilds to Communities (something that is consistent and tied in to the Battle.net platform more broadly). They've lost some things in the transition. They've readded the ability to have guild ranks that couldn't speak in chat. Two Sides to Every Tale was added to recognize two very distinct narratives in Battle for Azeroth, it's not a beginning trend of playing both factions. It's very similar to Double Agent. Legion was an awkward place for the game's economy. After BfA launched, they increased Gold gain from various sources to help players support repairs. Guilds can earn Gold by selling BoE items and they also want motivate Gold collectors by adding sinks. There are no plans to remove the Demon Hunter realm restriction in Battle for Azeroth. Reputations are tied to outdoor content. They don't plan to make dungeons award reputation. Hati was a beloved companion specific to Hunters so they brought him back. Thal'kiel may also return in the future, but they have nothing specific to announce at this time. Click here to watch the VOD.