Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

Commonly Reported Classic Issues that Are Not Bugs

Recommended Posts

HMznIk0.jpg
 

It seems some Vanilla features that weren't that logical but were kept in for Classic are confusing some beta players, as there's a whole lot of issues being reported that aren't actually bugs or issues at all!

Things like Tauren melee reach being bigger, which is something I experienced going away live during Black Temple Illidan progression (at least for that particular encounter), is confusing to players as it's a significant advantage over other races in some instances. No quest tracking is another apparently confusing issue, as many Mankirk's WIfe seekers well know, and there's a whole lot more where that came from:

Blizzard LogoNot Bugs (source)

As we’ve discussed before, the nature of WoW Classic sometimes invokes different memories for different players, and this leads to certain misconceptions for some about what is or isn’t working as intended.

The following is a list of commonly-reported gameplay in WoW Classic that is not actually a bug, and is working as we expect it to:

  • Tauren’s hitboxes and their melee reach is slightly larger than other races.
  • Being critically struck while using /sit to sit does not cause abilities like Enrage, Blood Craze, and Reckoning to activate.
  • Using the “Automatic Quest Tracking” option does not auto-track newly accepted quests. (It instead will start to track an existing quest once progress towards an objective is started.)
  • Warrior health Regeneration is working at the expected rate.
  • Quests objectives and points of interests are not tracked on the map or minimap.
  • Completed quests are marked on the minimap with a dot. (and not a “?”)
  • Feared players and NPCs run fast.
  • Standing on top of other players while facing away allows spells and attacks to be used.
  • Creature respawn rates are much slower than in Battle for Azeroth.
  • NPCs which offer multiple quests may inconsistently display them as a dot or a “!” on the available quests list. They were inconsistent in 1.12, and we’ve reproduced the exact inconsistency they had back then.
  • Quests that are too low level for do not show up as a “!” in the game world.
  • Available quests do not display a “!” on the minimap.
  • On level up, the message: “Your skill in Protection increased to 15” was added in 1.12.1, and we’re intending to keep that.

We appreciate all of your feedback!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to report a bug: I have too many abilities in muh spellbook, dunno what do I do with them.

Edited by Undeath

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Amastrasza said:

I feel like people have forgotten what vanilla was actually LIKE in their nostalgic beautification. The struggle was real. 

That's what it feels like. People want to make those memories of playing a new game in an evolving genre, when everyone was learning how to make and play these kinds of games. That genie is out of the bottle, and you can't get your youth back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah yes, a few of the glaring issues that marred Classic that needed to change in the coming years are starting to show. Guess the nostalgia glasses can't make everything look as perfect as some people think they were.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Lampanelli said:

Ah yes, a few of the glaring issues that marred Classic that needed to change in the coming years are starting to show. Guess the nostalgia glasses can't make everything look as perfect as some people think they were.

Over my Addon Making corpse! ?

Jokes aside you´re right! ? Some changes later down the line, like the tauren hitbox, was good for the game but some changes or additions werent, like LFR or the Dungeon Finder we know and hate from Wraths ICC patch. Vanilla is harder without all the convenience we got in later expansions. And I love it

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People seem to mistake the convenience of modern WoW (group finder, quest tracking, etc) as making the game "easy." If you wanted a "hard mode" for WoW, the answer isn't stripping down 15 years of progressive game design. The answer is making enemies harder to kill and making it easier for them to kill you, something that people complained about them doing when they scaled enemies based on your level and item level. The intricate level of combat mechanics and spell book synergy require a far more skilled player today than the snail's pace combat of yesteryear. The old players, clamoring for Classic because the game is "too easy", have simply ignored their own personal skill progression over a decade and a half. The game has a higher skill cap today, we just don't notice it because of how long we've been playing and how articulate we are within the core game design.

Having to sit in Stormwind for a half hour making a group doesn't make the game harder, it makes it more frustrating and less accessible to play on a daily basis. Classic WoW is a really long and drawn out way of Blizzard showing us how far the game has really come for the better. Ultimately, they are pandering to a vocal minority in an attempt to maintain the subscriptions of aging WoW players. Meanwhile, BfA isn't nearly as bad as panned (seriously, it's skeleton is Legion, widely considered to be one of the best expansions) and 8.2 looks to be one of the greatest patches the game has seen.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Hoods said:

Jokes aside you´re right! ? Some changes later down the line, like the tauren hitbox, was good for the game but some changes or additions werent, like LFR or the Dungeon Finder we know and hate from Wraths ICC patch. Vanilla is harder without all the convenience we got in later expansions. And I love it

LFR didn't exist until Cataclysm's last raid with Deathwing. ICC patch only brought dungeon finder. I would say vanilla is harder in a different way, that it is slower. In current WoW you can easily see all content, but for stuff like mythic raids and mythic+ you still need to assemble your own groups and this is where currently challenge is (in many ways harder than vanilla), and most people aren't doing it (or only the lower keystones in case of mythic+). 

Reading this list is quite interesting, didn't remember about tauren having larger hitboxes and melee back then. This looks like huge balance issue that won't be fixed!

Edited by Arcling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Borgoff33 said:

lol looks like we got a lot of BFA "convenience" babies crying

Classic just took more mindless endurance. That's the challenge. It's for people who want to gain respect in a community that respects that. Not skill or intelligence. It's great for what it is. 

Edited by greatCraft

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Borgoff33 said:

lol looks like we got a lot of BFA "convenience" babies crying

or maybe people are just reporting things they think are bugs because they either misremember or have never played vanilla?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Arcling said:

I would say vanilla is harder in a different way

First i´d like to say you´re 100% right about vanilla being harder in a different way, I just want to list a few things that was harder / different back then. Raiding and Dungeons are harder in current wow, obviously ?

(Btw, in my earlier post I said " LFR "or" the dungeon finder from ICC, not saying both are from that patch when LFR is from patch 4.3 and was abused with the tier set and trinkets)

The journey to max lvl that spanned both continents, having a Mount was amazing, making connections with people (no Cross-Realm), Actually chatting with people thats going to be in the same BG as you, having Alts were a challange not what its like today where im sitting on like 10 max lvl characters without any true effort on the leveling part, Proffesions mattered, ask anyone who did pvp back in the day and they will say Engineering was a must for the bombs and other gadgets. Attunements, an annoyance for some and a epic journey for others, (Onyxia for example). Guilds, I feel, had more meaning then they do now. Class Quests, Warriors getting their Fury Stance on the pirate island or getting the Whirlwind Axe, druids had quests for their forms, for example the Aquatic Form that took you across the world, Shaman totems, Priests had the Anathema/Benediction quests, Hunters with the Rok´delar and so on. Dungeons like BRD or Upper + Lower Spire was AMAZING, took hours to finish and I still have strong memories from both.

Raiding was not actually that hard in vanilla, getting a stable 40man raid was.

There were so many good and bad things about Vanilla.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, Hoods said:

The journey to max lvl that spanned both continents, having a Mount was amazing, making connections with people (no Cross-Realm),

There were so many good and bad things about Vanilla.

On some points I can agree, back then I wasn't bothered about slow leveling, enjoyed those quests (never was into making alts, so that has been mostly a one time journey). But getting people for dungeons certainly wasn't fun, never finished BRD back then, due to groups never sticking around for that long. Elitists, including many fakes ones, were already a problem several months into vanilla, so that wasn't a pleasant experience. You are right that assembling a raiding group was hard, never managed that. When I've gotten into raiding, it was TBC, and while there was some sense of community, recruitment and looking for replacements for those who disappeared/left/failed, certainly wasn't fun on mid-population server (by the end of WotLK, it was basically a dead server, when I still had a character there, it felt like playing single player).

Edited by Arcling
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if I'm going to be the sucker sinking 800+ hours to get to level cap, only to find that there is no one else to play with at level 60 because they all got cold feet way back in Northshire. But I for sure will play Classic when I don't feel like playing the loot casino on my max level BFA toons, just to remind me that sometimes a game is just a game, not a race.

Edited by Tarazet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, durdyenglish said:

People seem to mistake the convenience of modern WoW (group finder, quest tracking, etc) as making the game "easy." If you wanted a "hard mode" for WoW, the answer isn't stripping down 15 years of progressive game design. The answer is making enemies harder to kill and making it easier for them to kill you, something that people complained about them doing when they scaled enemies based on your level and item level. The intricate level of combat mechanics and spell book synergy require a far more skilled player today than the snail's pace combat of yesteryear. The old players, clamoring for Classic because the game is "too easy", have simply ignored their own personal skill progression over a decade and a half. The game has a higher skill cap today, we just don't notice it because of how long we've been playing and how articulate we are within the core game design.

Having to sit in Stormwind for a half hour making a group doesn't make the game harder, it makes it more frustrating and less accessible to play on a daily basis. Classic WoW is a really long and drawn out way of Blizzard showing us how far the game has really come for the better. Ultimately, they are pandering to a vocal minority in an attempt to maintain the subscriptions of aging WoW players. Meanwhile, BfA isn't nearly as bad as panned (seriously, it's skeleton is Legion, widely considered to be one of the best expansions) and 8.2 looks to be one of the greatest patches the game has seen.

I disagree. The game is actually more difficult in certain aspects. BFA is a very easy game because they of the player base that they have to appeal to. The game feels like a chore where classic honestly does not. I started just before BC so I wasn’t even there for much of vanilla and I can tell you that it was a very different game. A lot more frustrating sure, but a lot more satisfying to complete certain goals that you set for yourself. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncommon Patron

I feel like this entire site (read: posters) is super anti-Classic and that's disappointing. I come here for information and to hear from like-minded people, but the only people who comment on classic stuff are those who love sh*ting on the parade. It's like if you're a vegetarian and spending all your time at McDonald's just being a butthole to people who eat burgers; it's pretty annoying. 

Edited by OldManKrypton

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncommon Patron
 
 
1
3 hours ago, durdyenglish said:

People seem to mistake the convenience of modern WoW (group finder, quest tracking, etc) as making the game "easy." If you wanted a "hard mode" for WoW, the answer isn't stripping down 15 years of progressive game design. The answer is making enemies harder to kill and making it easier for them to kill you, something that people complained about them doing when they scaled enemies based on your level and item level. The intricate level of combat mechanics and spell book synergy require a far more skilled player today than the snail's pace combat of yesteryear. The old players, clamoring for Classic because the game is "too easy", have simply ignored their own personal skill progression over a decade and a half. The game has a higher skill cap today, we just don't notice it because of how long we've been playing and how articulate we are within the core game design.

Having to sit in Stormwind for a half hour making a group doesn't make the game harder, it makes it more frustrating and less accessible to play on a daily basis. Classic WoW is a really long and drawn out way of Blizzard showing us how far the game has really come for the better. Ultimately, they are pandering to a vocal minority in an attempt to maintain the subscriptions of aging WoW players. Meanwhile, BfA isn't nearly as bad as panned (seriously, it's skeleton is Legion, widely considered to be one of the best expansions) and 8.2 looks to be one of the greatest patches the game has seen.

I personally disagree with literally everything you said. And Blizzard-Activision financials also disagree with everything you've said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, OldManKrypton said:

I feel like this entire site (read: posters) is super anti-Classic and that's disappointing. I come here for information and to hear from like-minded people, but the only people who comment on classic stuff are those who love sh*ting on the parade. It's like if you're a vegetarian and spending all your time at McDonald's just being a butthole to people who eat burgers; it's pretty annoying. 

Well, nothing is stopping those hyped for classic from posting. Most posts have been rational so far, people tend to idealise old memories, they just pointed things like confusing difficulty with slow pace. I'm sure there isn't even an agreement between classic fans. Some would like playing earlier patch, rather than the last one, some original bugs remaining etc.

Edited by Arcling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncommon Patron
20 minutes ago, Arcling said:

Well, nothing is stopping those hyped for classic from posting. Most posts have been rational so far, people tend to idealise old memories, they just pointed things like confusing difficulty with slow pace. I'm sure there isn't even an agreement between classic fans. Some would like playing earlier patch, rather than the last one, some original bugs remaining etc.

I personally avoid sharing my excitement a lot of times because of the negativity of others. So, I'm sure some people are avoiding talking as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm kinda puzzled to see this vanilla bashing with "you mistake hard for inconvenient". I wonder how convenient is BfA aka loot casino? It's better to have "inconvenient" mmo with good reward structure rather than BfA that is so random that you don't wanna touch it because there is absolutely 0 guarantee that it will worth your time. What did you say? "good luck splitting 3 items between 40 ppl"? Oh, good luck not having dkp/epgp in your raid, surely your raid leader has fun times figuring out how to gear you up.

I don't say that classic is better in pure gameplay than BfA, i pretty enjoyed legion and BfA raiding (tho i still firmly believe that mythic mistress is a disgusting shitfest of a boss) and i know that until Naxx it will probably be target practice in it's core, but i'm saying that classic is better mmo and game overall. I'm still not sure if i would stuck in the end with classic or (i hope it will come) tBC, but in either way them both will be more pleasant than BfA to play.

Edited by MrOger
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, OldManKrypton said:

I personally disagree with literally everything you said. And Blizzard-Activision financials also disagree with everything you've said.

How can Blizzard- Activision financials disagree with "everything" I said when I said nothing regarding the financial situation of Blizzard-Activision?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncommon Patron
12 minutes ago, durdyenglish said:

How can Blizzard- Activision financials disagree with "everything" I said when I said nothing regarding the financial situation of Blizzard-Activision?

Making less money and having fewer subs would dictate that no, the game isn't as fun as it used to be for the vast majority. This would dictate that classic is needed for the majority to be happy and not a "minority" few.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, MrOger said:

I'm kinda puzzled to see this vanilla bashing with "you mistake hard for inconvenient". I wonder how convenient is BfA aka loot casino? It's better to have "inconvenient" mmo with good reward structure rather than BfA that is so random that you don't wanna touch it because there is absolutely 0 guarantee that it will worth your time. What did you say? "good luck splitting 3 items between 40 ppl"? Oh, good luck not having dkp/epgp in your raid, surely your raid leader has fun times figuring out how to gear you up.

I don't say that classic is better in pure gameplay than BfA, i pretty enjoyed legion and BfA raiding (tho i still firmly believe that mythic mistress is a disgusting shitfest of a boss) and i know that until Naxx it will probably be target practice in it's core, but i'm saying that classic is better mmo and game overall. I'm still not sure if i would stuck in the end with classic or (i hope it will come) tBC, but in either way them both will be more pleasant than BfA to play.

I just think it's unrealistic of Blizzard to not set and/or follow gaming industry trends. The general market has no interest in games with slow-paced combat and overly-methodical character building. People want accessibility, whether than means quick access to endgame content or the ability to maintain several classes/roles at a high level. Blizzard recognized a long time ago that to create a game that would last (and I'd argue their success as we approach the 15th anniversary with WoW still pulling respectable revenue), they had to shift the formula from a drawn-out single character experience to one that provided variety and efficiency. In today's world, few can carve out the time necessary to play a game like WoW with the original pacing. Many want to feel like we've progressed in layers instead of having a one dimensional path to do so.

I think the strongest (and most logical) reason for Blizzard to produce Classic is that they acknowledged this rift in the player base would always exist. It was taking more time and energy for them to unite the player base instead of just recognizing that a certain percentage of players would never accept the progressive game design required for market relevance. I'm not saying it's a bad idea or that people aren't entitled to request and enjoy the Classic experience, but it very much is a pacifier in the mouths of original (often aging) WoW players that are essentially conservatives in the gaming culture at large. To say that they have any other reason to do so seems short-sighted. It's not an attempt to recognize the "error of their ways", it's an attempt to quell the vocal minority, thus ending the negative feedback loop from that demographic that poisons every necessary effort they make to attract and maintain a modern player base.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, OldManKrypton said:

Making less money and having fewer subs would dictate that no, the game isn't as fun as it used to be for the vast majority. This would dictate that classic is needed for the majority to be happy and not a "minority" few.  

Do you think falling subs are only based on the viability of current content? I think you've conveniently excluded how the market has exploded over the past 15 years. Players are overly inundated with choice and every company is facing exponentially more market competition than they did when WoW released. The fact that the game has held this large share of the market for so long is a testament to how changes have generally yielded positive results. If WoW remained as it was 15 years ago, it wouldn't have made it this far.

See my previous post about how it costs more for Blizzard to put out the fires these conservative gamers cause than it did to produce Classic WoW. It's basically them quieting the dog barking at the moon so the rest of us can play in peace.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      For some odd reason, a player received a Corrupted Item from the Stockades while leveling, even though the system has been removed from the game in the Shadowlands pre-patch.
      Argoniek received a Corrupted Item (Standard Issue Prisoner Shoes) while leveling their character through a dungeon, which is weird, as Corrupted Items never dropped for low-level characters in the first place. Here's an image the player shared on Reddit.

      Fortunately, the item lacked any Corrupted Effects, according to the player. Just imagine the chaos that would ensue with Corruption Effects on leveling gear!
      Card
      Source: Reddit
    • By Starym
      With Mythic+ becoming much more relevant and presumably many more players heading in/returning to the dungeons next week with patch 9.0.5, this video going through some important interrupts for all the Shadowlands dungeons is especially useful!
      Interrupting is one of those anger and conflict-breeding things in dungeons, as fights often break out over a player or players (usually DPS) not doing enough of it, and then because of that there can be many spammed interrupts on 1 ability in response, so it's especially important to know what spells and abilities should be focused on. Tactyks goes through all 8 dungeons and said key interrupt targets:   If you want to prepare for next week's Valor Point system and new gear grind even more, you can also check out our Mythic+ dungeon rankings, weekly routes and specific class tips as well.
    • By Staff
      After some community outcry over the new changes coming to keystone next week, Blizzard have detailed a new addition to patch 9.0.5, aimed at improving the weekly Mythic+ keystone generated. Players will be getting their first weekly keystone at the same level of the highest completed key from the previous week! Check out the full and detailed explanation:
      Weekly Mythic Keystones (source)
      One of our goals in 9.0.5 has been to address a situation we introduced in Shadowlands with Mythic Keystones never de-leveling. We received a great deal of feedback on our planned adjustment, which is currently outlined in the 9.0.5 patch notes. With this proposed change, we would reintroduce an awkward dynamic where it wouldn’t be possible to sustain running a single Mythic Keystone dungeon per week, even if you always cleared the dungeon in time, because decay would necessitate re-leveling your keys every other week.
      When we created the original logic for Mythic Keystones in 2016, we wanted to make sure that players were getting Keystones that appropriately suited their proficiency in Mythic Keystone dungeons, and we wanted to reinforce the importance of clean and well-executed dungeon runs. Having Keystones decay from one week to the next accomplished both of those goals. However, in Shadowlands, we introduced the Great Vault and more Season-driven tracking of performance in Mythic Keystone dungeons, and we unintentionally disabled the logic for de-leveling Keystones, but the reasons for the original design still apply.
      We feel that the game should compensate players who consistently succeed at a certain difficulty by giving them keys that start at that level the following week, so we’re working on an update to 9.0.5 that should alleviate that concern while still satisfying the goals of the original system:
      In a given week, if you finish a Mythic Keystone dungeon in time, the next week’s Great Vault will contain a Keystone of that same level. So, for example, if your highest Mythic Keystone completion during week one is a +15 that you completed in time, you will get another +15 Keystone from the Great Vault to start week two. If you run that +15 during week two and fail to meet the timer, however, and complete no other +15 (or higher) Mythic Keystone dungeons the rest of week two, you will receive a +14 Keystone from the Great Vault to start week three.
      Thank you for your feedback and understanding.
    • By Starym
      With the announcement of patch 9.0.5 arriving next week many players have been asking how exactly the Mythic+ Valor Point system achievement requirements for item level caps will work in regard to alts, and if they'll have to re-do the achievements on each alt.
      Luckily we do have some fairly official information on the matter, as Blizzard did mention this in a group interview with Chinese sites, where Ion Hazzikostas, Ely Cannon and Frank Kowalkowski answered many questions, this one being particularly relevant:
      While we don't have an explicit blue post stating this, and it wasn't mentioned in any of the many other interviews, it does make a lot of sense. However, we can't take this as an absolute 100% confirmation and will have to wait a few more days until the actual patch arrives. But for now it's safe to at least assume alts will be able to upgrade their (newly dropped) Mythic+ gear without having to re-do the long process of getting the Season 1 KSM achievement.
      Here a couple of reddit threads where the matter is being discussed:
      Will I have to earn ksm on an alt to upgrade my items to 220 during 9.0.5? Are the upcoming m+ valor upgrade achievements account wide? And big thanks to Thanks to SoulAwaken for the translation, so we don't have to address alts as "trumpets", as google translate refers to them.
    • By Stan
      Blizzard / NetEase are reverting Hall of Fame / Cutting Edge Sire Denathrius kills and banning players that participated in real money boosting in the Chinese region.
      Yesterday, we reported about the Hall of Fame being tainted by boosts in the Chinese region. You can read the full article here.
      What happened is that the Alliance Mythic Hall of Fame has filled mostly thanks to real money trading, which is against the ToS, and so NetEase, who is in charge of WoW in the Chinese region, have sent quizzes about the Sire Denathrius fight to suspicious accounts, according to nemof.
      Here are some of the questions that they asked about the encounter:
      What causes the boss to phase? What is the number of cabalists in Phase 2? If there is a Blood Prince in Phase 3, and if so, how many? Placeholder for tweet 1367784617671991298 Placeholder for tweet 1367788267429457922 Apparently, some boosters have already been suspended.
      Placeholder for tweet 1367785164948926466 Source: Reddit + Twitter
       
×
×
  • Create New...