Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

Parry, Dodge, Miss, Block and Crit Issues in Classic Beta

Recommended Posts

Y5PdZCx.jpg
 

After all the "not a bug" issues that have been reported on the Classic beta, we thought it would be nice to take a look at a more serious report that actually takes some time to take a look at the issues discussed and present some proper evidence and data. Mirayne over on the official forums took time to detail some possible major discrepancies for parry, dodge, block, miss and crit values when facing higher level enemies.

Quote

Conventional wisdom about vanilla hit table mechanics includes the following:

  1. Mobs and players of equal level (more precisely, equal weapon skill and defense) have a base 5% chance to dodge, parry, block, miss (non- dual wielding).

  2. Mobs have (5 * Level) weapon skill and defense values.

  3. Each point of difference between defense and weapon skill changes those percentages by 0.04% per point (except miss, see below). For example, a player hitting a +3 mob (such as a raid boss) from the front without dual wielding will experience 5.6% chance for their attacks to be dodged, parried, and blocked by the mob. For the purposes of this discussion let’s stick to white attacks.

A guide on the old Evil Empire site claimed the source of the knowledge about 0.04% per point of difference between weapon skill and defense, and other information, came from the following three blue posts:

https://web.archive.org/web/20070105001622/http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-blizzard-archive-en&t=7

https://web.archive.org/web/20070105001622/http://forums-en.wow-europe.com/thread.aspx?fn=wow-blizzard-archive-en&t=15

https://web.archive.org/web/20070105001622/http://forums.worldofwarcraft.com/thread.aspx?ForumName=wow-bugs&ThreadID=62388

Unfortunately these are no longer accessible, at least not that I could find so I can’t see the wording.

A few of us from one of the classic warrior discords have been doing some testing on beta to verify the hit tables and other mechanics work the way we think. The testing is slow going but we have some preliminary results. Good news is certain things like glancing blow chance and penalties seem to be consistent with previous understanding, at least for +5 wep skill and +0 wep skill. Some testing will need to wait until later beta stages (presuming level cap is raised).

However we have found some strange results for other parts of the hit tables. For each result we also report 95% confidence intervals. Admittedly sample size is lower than we would like but testing is tedious and time consuming to do manually. However, even at these sample sizes some important information can be gleaned.

  1. Parry appears to be much too high (13.61% +/- 1.18%) for +3 mobs (no extra weapon skill) and is more consistent with parry values from later expansions. This conflicts with the 0.04% from old blue posts.

  2. Dodge (6.73% +/- 0.86%) appears to match later expansion values (wrath, see below). This conflicts with the 0.04% from old blue posts.

  3. Block (4.52% +/- 0.71%) appears slightly lower than expected. This conflicts with the 0.04% from old blue posts.

  4. Miss (8.41% +/- 0.95%) unfortunately isn’t enough samples to resolve between three prevailing theories on base miss chance for +3 mobs (8%, 8.6%, and 9%), but it’s encouraging that there isn’t a huge surprise here.

  5. Based on the base crit (4.49%) for the “Antlered Courser” test, there appears to be an additional crit suppression happening for +3 mobs beyond the expected 0.04% factor. For that test we are seeing a crit of 1.34% +/- 0.6%. Similar results were obtained for the Giant Yeti test, though slightly different due to different paper doll crit. ~3% crit suppression for +3 I believe was a feature of later expansions but was apparently not seen in vanilla according to any old sources.

Combat logs and summaries can be found here:

https://github.com/magey/classic-warrior/issues/5

Additional references:

This site claimed parry was changed to 14% for +3 in cata pre-patch:

https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Attack_table?diff=2413116&oldid=2412483

This site claimed dodge of 6.5% for +3 mobs (wrath):

https://wowwiki.fandom.com/wiki/Expertise?diff=1923754&oldid=1918454

This site claimed 5.6% for dodge/parry/block/miss for +3 (5% for +0), perhaps based on the blue posts linked above

http://web.archive.org/web/20061115223930/http://forums.wow-europe.com/thread.html?topicId=14381707&sid=1

All of this leads us to the following questions:

Is it possible that the creation of the 1.13 client led to some accidental setting of parameters from later expansions?

Would it be possible to verify that the beta is behaving as intended, or misbehaving, by devs comparing to their 1.12 reference client?

Blizzard responded, but still don't have a direct answer:

Blizzard Logo Parry, Dodge, Miss, etc. (source)

Hi Mirayne,

First off, the QA team wanted to thank you for the exceptionally detailed report. This is a great example of a professional report that utilizes data to support a hypothesis. Well done!

Regarding the potential issue itself, the team is going to take a look at this tomorrow in the reference client and verify that the current functionality is consistent with 1.12. Thanks again for the diligent, detailed analysis!

So, will this one make it to the "not a bug" list or is there really something fishy going on with those combat stats? Place your bets!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well I can definitely say that dodges, parries, misses, blocks, glancing blows, spell resists and partial resists definitely happened hell of a lot more in classic than they do in modern WoW but it is entirely possible that the values are too high pending what the dev team finds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncommon Patron

I think it's amazing that a Classic player is taking the time and putting in the effort to glean these numbers from such tedious work. Someone give that human a medal, or a hug, or a medal with a hug on it. Something. Give them something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      The Darkshore Warfront is available now on Heroic difficulty for Alliance players, meaning it's time to get your piece of gear that is equivalent to Heroic Ny'alotha loot (item level 460).
      Alliance players have access to the Warfront: The Battle for Darkshore quest in Boralus that rewards 15 7th Legion Service Medals, one item level 460 gear piece, and Artifact Power.
      You can purchase the Sandy Nightsaber mount if you completed the Battle for Darkshore on Heroic difficulty (Heroic: War for the Shore) and have spare  350 7th Legion Service Medals.
      "A rare color for a nightsaber, and rarely seen, they are prized amongst huntresses."

      You can find out more information on all mounts by visiting our 8.3 Mounts Compendium.
    • By Stan
      The beta opt-in support page has been recently updated and now would be a good time to opt in for Shadowlands Beta if you haven't done that already.
      Blizzard (Source)
      To put your name into the pool of candidates interested in beta testing for Shadowlands, sign up on the Shadowlands home page using the Beta Opt-In link at the top of the page.

      Signing up for beta does not guarantee you will be chosen to participate, but players who have not signed up to indicate interest cannot be chosen. Customer Support is not able to provide access to beta. Blizzard has released the first encrypted Shadowlands Alpha build earlier this week and added the forthcoming expansion to the Battle.net App Catalog, suggesting that Friends & Family Alpha is really close. Opt in for Shadowlands Beta by visiting the link below!

    • By Starym
      A big batch has arrived after a few smaller ones, with some Monk, Karazhan and Ny'alotha fixes, as well as item tweaks and PvP Servant of N'Zoth issues.
      February 20 (source)
      Classes
      Monk Windwalker Resolved an issue that prevented Spinning Crane Kick from tracking the correct number of targets with your Mark of the Crane active. Dungeons and Raids
      Return to Karazhan Players should now appear in the instance’s entrance after zoning in. Ny’alotha, the Waking City N'Zoth the Corruptor Azeroth's Radiance now properly restores Sanity to players who are under the effects of an Immunity spell on all difficulties. Horrific Visions Fixed a rare issue where more than 2 Torn Page of "Fear and Flesh" could drop in a Horrific Vision. Items and Rewards Ashjra'kamas, Shroud of Resolve ’s active ability now resets its cooldown when a boss encounter ends. Corrupted Items Fixed a bug which prevented Void Ritual from scaling down to the level of the content in Timewalking. Heart of Azeroth Resolved an issue that prevented the correct visual effects of Worldvein Resonance Rank 4 from displaying. Player versus Player
      Resolved an issue that allowed characters to remain as a Servant of N'Zoth while not in War Mode. The Alliance mount Vicious White Warsaber now correctly changes to Vicious White Bonesteed for Horde characters.
      Previous Hotfixes
      February 19th February 18th February 14th
    • By Stan
      Blizzard has shipped an encrypted build for Shadowlands Alpha, meaning it cannot be datamined just yet, but we're getting really close to the F&F Alpha announcement. 
      Earlier today, Blizzard added Shadowlands to the Battle.net App Catalog and now the first build has been shipped. Unfortunately, it is still encrypted, so it cannot be datamined at this time. You can learn more about Shadowlands in our overview in the meantime and stay tuned for Shadowlands Friends & Family Alpha!
      us/Region
      us us/BuildConfig e6185c20749d6b15dfd3aaf4110f3045 us/CDNConfig c6886e4b3a41892f6ba6974dfbe66960 us/KeyRing   us/BuildId 33411 us/VersionsName
      9.0.1.33411 us/ProductConfig f1d8d2af9fdcb8c8be95a80e6b30c0eb
      eu/Region
      eu eu/BuildConfig e6185c20749d6b15dfd3aaf4110f3045 eu/CDNConfig
      c6886e4b3a41892f6ba6974dfbe66960 eu/KeyRing
        eu/BuildId 33411 eu/VersionsName 9.0.1.33411 eu/ProductConfig f1d8d2af9fdcb8c8be95a80e6b30c0eb kr/Region
      kr kr/BuildConfig
      e6185c20749d6b15dfd3aaf4110f3045 kr/CDNConfig c6886e4b3a41892f6ba6974dfbe66960
      kr/KeyRing
        kr/BuildId
      33411 kr/VersionsName
      9.0.1.33411 kr/ProductConfig
      f1d8d2af9fdcb8c8be95a80e6b30c0eb tw/Region tw tw/BuildConfig
      e6185c20749d6b15dfd3aaf4110f3045 tw/CDNConfig
      c6886e4b3a41892f6ba6974dfbe66960 tw/KeyRing
        tw/BuildId
      33411 tw/VersionsName
      9.0.1.33411 tw/ProductConfig f1d8d2af9fdcb8c8be95a80e6b30c0eb
    • By Starym
      We've had small hotfixes before, but these may just be a contender for shortest ever!
      February 19 (source)
      February 19, 2020
      Player versus Player
      Resolved an issue that could prevent a character from gaining progress towards earning the Season 4 seasonal mount and Vicious Saddles.
      Previous Hotfixes
      February 19th February 14th February 13th
×
×
  • Create New...