Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

Warcraft Ripoff Game Sued by Blizzard and Shut Down

Recommended Posts

LxBAsJw.jpg
 

We've all seen plenty of games, especially in the mobile space, that use Blizzard and more specifically Warcraft imagery, either in their promotional material or even in the game itself. Glorious Saga (called Glorious World in the West, and even listed under a different developer, but still carrying the Glorious Saga name in-game and on its store page) goes several steps further as it uses Warcraft images, sound cues, characters and more - and Blizzard has had enough of it, suing the developer Sina Games for copyright infringement.

iXTSRV9MiwiXrkxNrb2rnN2s0WSzZ64SKmZAVMPz   nPv7gvhSLXxBDxCZtWZei5bXWhB2dFrbQ16RUQzX
See anything familiar?

You can get a pretty good idea of just what kind of game this is from it's Google Play description alone, with some very subtle references:

Quote

Glorious World is a serious of free rpg game developed by instantfuns. It is always in the forefront of the fantasy game rankings with dark soul effects. It is also called saga online game which has 6 legendary heroes within each of the two Factions and each hero has unique skills, including mutually countering Captain Skill. Players can obtain rewards with final fantasy brave and then improve heroes’ stats, which is the glory of general in the game. Each hero has its own unique target without the limitation of turn-based battles. Therefore changing formation can quickly affect the battle results and it.

 

Blizzard is seeking $150,000 per infringement (plus attorney's fees), which will add up pretty quickly considering the entire game is littered with not only art and sound copies, but the devs also didn't even deign to change the character's names or their relationships (in Glorious Saga the character Malfurion is married to Whisperwind). Blizzard are also suing for a permanent injunction, but Sina Games apparently made that part much easier as they've shut down the game today with this message on the game's facebook page:

Quote

Stop Operating

Dear players,

Thanks for your support and love of our game. We had a great and happy time in the game.

But due to some irresistible reasons, we decided to announce that the game will stop operating at 06:00 on 29th of Aug. (EDT), and all the servers will be closed. Players can't login any longer.

We are very sorry and we will do our best to guide and provide best service for all the players during the server closure process.

Operation Team

As you'd expect from a "game" like this, the developer is Chinese and this isn't the first franchise they've ripped off, with Naruto and Yu-Gi-Oh getting a similar treatment. Glorious Saga is also available in the West, which may be why Blizzard went for the lawsuit, as these types of Chinese market-only ripoffs are usually left to exist. Here's the relevant part of the suit:

Quote

Defendants did not just copy a few discrete elements from Blizzard’s Warcraft games; they created a game whose content is almost entirely copied from the Warcraft games and related products. Every character in the Infringing Game was copied from a character from the Warcraft
games, and many even bear the names of popular characters from the Warcraft games such as “Jaina Proudmoore,” “Gul’dan,” and “Malfurion.” Every monster, creature, animal and vehicle in the Infringing Game was copied from the Warcraft Games. Weapons, amulets, and other objects were taken straight from the Warcraft games, without pretense. Audio cues and sound effects from the Warcraft  games were reproduced for the Infringing Game. Defendants even
 created an icon for their game that plainly is intended to look like the cover of Blizzard’s most recent World of Warcraft expansion, Battle for Azeroth:

9v0X8DX.png

If you want to read the whole lawsuit, head on over to Polygon, who initially broke the news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah... thank you Blizzard. I've seen this ad so many times and I was wondering when Blizzard tries to shut it down. I hope that those other infringement games get shut down, too. It just saddens me as a game designer that a) people don't care about their games, b) people apparently fall for this.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Enryu said:

lol, what did they expect

To get away with it ofc - and quite frankly, they probably will nonetheless. They may have to shut down activities in the US but I'm almost certain they won't do so in China. If they lose the lawsuit - which is quite possible as Blizzard filed in California - they will probably throw away the companies that got sued and let them go bankrupt. That way they won't have to pay too much as the companies that got condemned to pay the damages won't have any assets anymore. After that, the people behind the companies will probably relocate, set up another company under a different name and republish a "different" game - which will be the same game, maybe with another name. So I guess shutting them down in the US and probably western Europe is the best Blizzard can hope for, maybe they get some minor compensation for damages, but I would guess not too much.

4 hours ago, Starym said:

Glorious Saga is also available in the West, which may be why Blizzard went for the lawsuit, as these types of Chinese market-only ripoffs are usually left to exist.

I quickly scanned through Blizzards complaint and they seem to make a big point about Jurisdiction in CA. To me, that makes absolute sense. Mind you, I haven't been to court in China so what follows are assumptions. When you want to drag someone into court in western Jurisdictions, you usually have to do this in their Jurisdiction - there are exceptions of course.  Concerning domestic cases, this usually is not an issue – Courts in New York do not function fundamentally different than Courts in let's say DC. There usually are minor differences but those are subtle and easily handled by any Lawyer. On a global scope however it might just be a problem, as in the case at hand this would basically mean, Blizzard would have to sue in China. Going to court abroad always means taking a risk - which for a US-based company is bigger in China than say in the UK or Europe. In most if not all cases you need Lawyers from said foreign Jurisdiction. This is of course entirely possible, but it's expensive. It's basically a simple risk-reward calculation, with the risks in China usually deemed too high, especially if it's not even sure, if the Defendants will be able to actually pay should they be condemned to.

Now the Defendants might have screwed up, because they - allegedly - have directed their activities at the United States and at California. If true, this would create personal jurisdiction over the Defendants for the courts in California, allowing Blizzard to sue in the US and not in China. If you can create Jurisdiction "at home", you can calculate chances of success much better and in this case, things look much better for Blizzard in CA than in China. That of course goes hand in hand with the availability of the infringing game in the West. Apparently Blizzard deemed it worth a shot.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Kurosu said:

Meanwhile, blizzard completely copy- pasted a chinese game in order to create diablo immortal and nobody bats an eye .  ?

Netease did it from their other game, with Blizzard overseeing. Can't get sued if they have copied from themselves. ?‍♂️ 

So Vanessa is in the Alliance and Gul'dan in modern Horde. Actually, he's an "Orc Warlock" who became first orcish warlock. Not to mention the famous Warchief Azshara, Stormwind King and Hellstream's Warsong (it's good to know he reacted fast).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Same should go for mobile games "Raid" and that whole "Mobile Legends" thing. ? And many other sh*tgame garbage out there on mobile that are Warcraft copycats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Starym
      Valor Points are coming this week and are supposed to save/improve Mythic+ gearing but, as our own Seliathan goes into in-depth, it's not quite a good enough improvement on the already pretty messy Mythic+ loot system.
      Seliathan is an Icy Veins Rogue class guide writer, completed several World First Mythic+ clears, including the +20, and he wrote a big piece for Raider.IO, analyzing the M+ gear and the way the Valor Point system will affect it, the flaws in both, and how to improve them. And while Blizzard are removing the 1500 cap on Valor, exactly as the article suggests, there are many more problems and potential solutions presented there. He goes over many topics, including how M+ gearing compares to PvP and raiding, what the actual purpose of M+ is and where it fits in the overall gearing scheme, the lack of other rewards in M+, the need for higher Keystone Master-type achievement tiers and a lot more. Here are some highlights, but head straight on to the full (and huge) analysis post on Raider.IO if you want all the details:
      There's a LOT more to read over in the full article on Raider.IO, with many excellent points and insights into Mythic+ and how it could be improved, so make sure to read the whole thing!
    • By Staff
      We now have official confirmation that the 1500 held Valor cap has been removed! We recently had an in-depth look at the system and its flaws, and while this particular change will improve it significantly, there's still a lot of issues with Mythic+ gearing, so check out the full article here.
      Valor Cap (source)
      This is correct. There will not be a limit of 1500 Valor that can be held.
      I’ve put a strikethrough on that part of the OP.
    • By Stan
      Today, we’re looking at the most popular team compositions for Mythic+ in Shadowlands Season 1.
      Disclaimer
      The data used in this article comes from Benched.me, a website with a Composition Explorer function, which tells you the most-popular compositions for Mythic+. It has a search function that allows you to select specializations for each party slot and find compositions.
      The Most Popular Team Compositions for Mythic+ in Shadowlands Season 1
      Currently, the most popular team comp with 36,604 runs so far in Season 1 includes a Vengeance Demon Hunter (Tank), Restoration Shaman (Healer), Marksmanship Hunter (DPS), Balance Druid (DPS), and Fire Mage (DPS).
      In 2nd place, we have the exact same team composition, with just one change. The Restoration Shaman (Healer) is replaced with Holy Paladin. The composition has 21,852 runs.
      In 3rd place, we have the same composition, but the Healer got replaced with a Restoration Druid this time around. We've seen this composition in 17,546 runs.
      Based on the data, it is relatively safe to assume that the current Mythic+ meta revolves around a Vengeance Demon Hunter tank, Marksmanship Hunter + Balance Druid + Fire Mage (DPS), with healers rotating between Druid, Shaman, and Paladin.
      You can check out the table below for more information about the most popular comps, including Average/Max Keystone, cleared, and more. We encourage you to visit Benched.me for even more runs.
       
    • By Stan
      Covenant Callings will reward Valor starting tomorrow, so make sure to save them until Patch 9.0.5 goes live in your region!

      Rare Covenant Callings in Patch 9.0.5 award 35 Valor. Epic Covenant Callings grant you 50 Valor.

      One character can hold up to 3 Covenant Callings at a time, which means you should wait until Tuesday (US) or Wednesday (EU) before you complete / turn in any Covenant Callings for extra Valor.
    • By Stan
      Blizzard is bringing back Valor in Patch 9.0.5, and the currency is used to upgrade Mythic Dungeon Gear, but what are the upgrade costs?
      The Red Rogue discovered the exact upgrade costs of gear with Valor in Patch 9.0.5 with a few missing slots, but before we go through them, let's talk about how the whole system works.
      Item Ranks and Upgrades
      Every item from dungeons in Patch 9.0.5 is given a rank based on their Item Level, as you can see on the tooltip.

      The items go from Rank 1 (Item Level 184) to Rank 12 (Item Level 220).
      This also applies to Great Vault loot. For example, if you receive Item Level 200 from the weekly chest, it will be of Rank 6/12.

      Base Mythic Gear (Item Level 184) can be upgraded to Item Level 200 without any requirements. All the higher rank upgrades are gated behind various achievements that require you to complete all Shadowlands Season 1 dungeons at Mythic Level 5, 10, and 15 within the time limit.
      In other words, if you want to upgrade Dungeon Gear to Item Level 220, you must complete all 8 Shadowlands Season 1 dungeons at Mythic 15 or above, within the time limit.
      We summarized everything explained above in the following table:
      Item Rank Item Level Requirements 1 184 No Requirements 2 187 No Requirements 3 190 No Requirements 4 194 No Requirements 5 197 No Requirements 6 200 No Requirements 7 203 Shadowlands Keystone Explorer: Season One 8 207 Shadowlands Keystone Explorer: Season One 9 210 Shadowlands Keystone Conqueror: Season One 10 213 Shadowlands Keystone Conqueror: Season One 11 216 Shadowlands Keystone Master: Season One 12 220 Shadowlands Keystone Master: Season One It's important to note that you can't upgrade gear obtained before Patch 9.0.5, which means you must re-farm everything when the patch goes live.
      Valor Caps
      You can have a maximum of 8,750 Valor, but the cap starts at 5,000 and increases by 750 each week. Blizzard also said one character could only hold 1,500 Valor at a time, but that may have been scrapped in the end.
      9.0.5 Week 1 Maximum Cap: 5,000 9.0.5 Week 2 Maximum Cap: 5,750 9.0.5 Week 3 Maximum Cap: 6,500 9.0.5 Week 4 Maximum Cap: 7,250 9.0.5 Week 5 Maximum Cap: 8,750 Weekly Cap: N/A Upgrade Costs
      Now that we know more about item ranks and caps, we are looking at how much Valor you will need for upgrades.
      All the data is provided by The Red Rogue, who also uploaded a handy video about the whole system. You can follow him on YouTube.
      You can upgrade gear by bringing it to Aggressor Zo'dash <Facilitator of Conflict> in Oribos, located in the Enclave of Oribos.
      The upgrade process is straightforward and works just like upgrading PvP or Covenant gear.
      The upgrade costs are different for each slot.
      Off-Hands, Rings, Cloaks, Bracers, Necks cost 250 Valor per upgrade. Shoulders, Gloves, Trinkets, Boots, Belts cost 400 Valor per upgrade. Helms, Chests, Legs cost 475 Valor per upgrade. 1-Handed Agility Weapon costs 500 Valor per upgrade 1-Handed Intellect Weapon costs 750 Valor per upgrade. 2-Handed Weapons cost 1,000 Valor per upgrade. The costs of 1-Handed Strength Weapons and Shields remain unknown for now, but based on PvP Upgrade costs, a 1H Weapon + Shield upgrades together should cost the same amount of Valor per upgrade just like a 2H weapon, so 500 Valor per item per upgrade (needs confirmation).
×
×
  • Create New...