Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

Layering Returns - Population Concerns in Classic Detailed

Recommended Posts

7Sb4ZP4.jpg
 

Blizzard have decided to indeed bring back the layering system from Classic's launch to alleviate population problems and queues on some servers, that have happened as a result of the Corona pandemic. Below we get a very detailed explanation of why this decision was made, what some of the alternatives were and whether this is just a short term solution with longer term ones being worked on. As we recall the layering system has been refined quite a bit since it's first implementation on Classic's launch, so there will definitely be fewer issues with it this time around.

Update: the list of affected servers and character transfer/creation limit has arrived.

Blizzard LogoPopulation Concerns (source)

Hello!

First and foremost, thank you to everyone who posted in the discussion thread about this difficult challenge. We’re going to use layering to address the most severe queues. There have been thoughtful posts there and elsewhere on all sides of this issue, and I want to take some time to talk about the most prominent concerns that were raised.

Considering the current population issue, both players and our co-workers on the WoW team have wanted to try many different solutions before layering. Some of these can be implemented in days, while others are more radical and come with unknowns, but the global pandemic is happening now, so we don’t have the time necessary for new technology to be developed, tested, and deployed. We have to use the tools we already have to address the overpopulation.

Free Character Migration

Our first efforts were to offer Free Character Moves off queuing realms. After all, if fewer people are trying to log into a single realm, then there won’t be a queue for that realm. This additionally carries the hope of adding players to realms with fewer players. Unfortunately, this service isn’t as predictable as we’d like it to be, so we can’t rely on it to do the job.

We’d like to be able to use Free Character Moves as a relief valve for players who just want to play, and aren’t concerned with which realm they’re on, but in practice, most players value their social connections with their guild. This means Free Character Moves aren’t as effective as we wish they’d be, and we’re trying to use these less frequently.

Character Creation Restrictions

A fairly straightforward solution is to prevent you from creating a character on a realm (unless you already have one there) or to prevent Paid Character Transfers to high population realms. The downside, of course, is that if you’re an established player on a realm, this prevents you from inviting a friend to come play with you on that realm. If you’re introducing a friend to WoW Classic, you have to choose a lower-population realm to play with them.

It also doesn’t solve the problem. At best, it prevents it from getting worse. We’ve been using character creation restrictions recently, but Paid Character Transfers represent a very small number of players. Most of the current population increase is due to returning players as well as all players playing more often. So while we’re currently closing Paid Character Transfers where necessary, that isn’t enough on its own.

New Realms

Another solution would be to open new realms. Nowadays, a World of Warcraft realm isn’t limited by hardware as it would have been in the past. We could open one or five or ten new realms in each region if we believed that players would move to them from the overpopulated realms. However, the data we have suggests that wouldn’t happen.

In part, that’s because there’s sufficient space on the currently existing realms for all of the players who want to play. The social bonds that players make in game causes them to stick with the realm they’re on. We don’t believe that making more realms available would change that.

Adjusting Population Caps

Another immediate solution is to allow more players onto the realms, but this is more complicated than it sounds. While it’s true that we can raise the realm capacity, there are negative technical and design consequences, and those issues inform what we set the population cap to in the first place.

When players are all clustered into one area, the message traffic between them grows exponentially. This is a fundamental problem in computer science that has been thoroughly discussed elsewhere, and while it’s a problem we’re always working to improve, it’s not the kind of problem that you can just throw hardware at.

There are also, as many have pointed out, game-economy concerns. It’s true that we allow more simultaneous players onto a Classic realm than were allowed in 2005, thanks to both hardware and software improvements, but this means that Black Lotus is more rare on a per-capita basis than it was 15 years ago. Merely increasing realm caps would only exacerbate that problem.

Could we increase realm caps? Yes, but only if we also added something like layering.

Focusing on the Cities

Some have suggested layering only capital cities, a technology in WoW we call “sharding,” like we use in Battle for Azeroth. Each zone has as many copies as its population demands, and there’s no guaranteed coherence across zone boundaries. With sharding, the enemies and objects that you interact with in WoW aren’t allowed to cross those zone boundaries, so this is not a solution for WoW Classic. WoW Classic has many things that are intended to cross zone boundaries, such as NPCs like Rexxar or the Forsaken Courier, and this is what caused us to develop layering in the first place.

Using Layering Today

To start, we’re not talking about all realms. We feel very strongly about thinking long term and avoiding using layering as anything more than a temporary solution for the most challenging queues. In the open discussion, we saw a ton of players from a handful of realms asking for layering. We believe it’s important to preserve as many servers as we can that reached a single layer last year, and we’re committed to returning to a single layer on all realms in this region as soon as possible.

We’re very sensitive to player concerns about the potential impact of layering. This is why we made many updates and improvements to it in September/October of last year when it was last active. Those improvements, such as an exponentially-increasing cooldown when a player repeatedly changes layers, addressed a lot of the downsides to the system.

Nonetheless, if the layered realms swell to fill this new capacity and stay that way, it will be very difficult to return to one layer later, so any layered realms must remain closed to transfers and new accounts. Ultimately, layering allows us to raise realm caps to address queues, but it won’t necessarily remove the queues entirely, and it’s a temporary solution. Still it’s the option we’re taking because our goal is to let more of the people who want to play WoW, play WoW.

A Work in Progress

Bringing layering back to select realms in WoW Classic is a big step that we don’t take lightly. We’ve been especially careful over the last five weeks, as 100% of our engineers and game designers (and community managers) have been working from home. We’ve put a lot of thought and analysis into doing this right. We will let you know what changes we make, and which realms are affected, as soon as we can.

Thank you for reading this. We’re glad that we get to share this unique time and experience with such a passionate community, and as always, keep your feedback coming!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Black Lotus prices crashing already 😄

Probably a temporary measure, but it should do its job for now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      While retail players are waiting for the Shadowlands version of the Scourge invasion, it's arriving to the Classic PTR right now! 
      Scourge Invasion (source)
      A little while ago, we enabled the Scourge Invasion on the Public Test Realm (PTR).
      This event was first released with original WoW patch 1.11, and will happen in WoW Classic concurrent with the release of the Naxxramas raid.
      The basic structure of this event is that Necropoleis appear in six different zones, with crystals spawning beneath, and undead spawning around those. Killing the undead allows you to combat the crystals, which in turn allows you to clear the necropolis and defend the zone.
      You’ll find scourge invasions marked on the World Map with a purple skull in:
      Eastern Plaguelands
      Burning Steppes
      Blasted Lands
      Tanaris
      Winterspring
      Azshara
      See you there!
    • By Staff
      As the Phase 6 Classic PTR continues, we now have some Naxxramas raid testing scheduled! This Thursday we get to try out 3 bosses in the Military Quarter, including the legendary Four Horsemen!
      Raid Testing (source)
      Tomorrow, Thursday, October 15, we will be begin our raid tests in Naxxramas, starting with the Military Quarter.
      2:00 p.m. PDT (5:00 p.m. EDT) to 6:00 p.m. PDT (9:00 p.m. EDT)
      Available Bosses:
      Instructor Razuvious Gothik the Harvester The Four Horsemen Known Issues:
      Gothik the Harvester’s encounter may fail to clean up properly after a wipe. This testing schedule is very fluid and subject to the realities of a test environment. We might have to change the time of a testing session, change the bosses being tested, or cancel a test entirely, due to bugs, server hardware issues, etc. Keep an eye on this forum for the latest information, and thank you in advance for testing and providing feedback.
      Q: How do I get into the raid zone?
      A: To facilitate and expedite testing, there is an NPC named Johnny McWeaksauce that has taken up temporary residence at Light’s Hope Chapel in Eastern Plaguelands. He will provide players with Naxxramas attunement and instant teleportation into the Naxxramas raid. Johnny’s brother Jimmy, can be found within the raid and will provide access to consumables and reagents.
      Q: Can I test with less than a full, content-ready raid?
      A: There will be a zone aura present within the raid that will provide players with a significant health and damage boost to help them overcome the challenges of Naxxramas. The intent of these raid tests is not to provide a challenge that perfectly matches what we expect players to experience when the raid goes live. The intent is to exercise boss mechanics and give us additional confidence that the raid encounters are behaving as expected. The hope is that even if you cannot muster a full 40-person raid to test with, or wish to form a pick-up-group on the PTR, you can still participate and make considerable progress within the dungeon if you so desire.
      Please use the in-game bug reporter to send us any bug reports or issues that you encounter while playtesting on the PTR. We appreciate you taking the time to test this content, and we look forward to your feedback.
    • By Staff
      It seems the update to PvP pools that removed non-existent characters has been delayed, due to a lot of player feedback on the issue.
      PvP pools (source)
      Following further review, we’ve decided to wait to address this issue. The change announced for this week will not be implemented.
      We’ll let you know as soon as we’ve developed a solution to the issue of non-existent characters being counted, that conforms with the great deal of feedback we’ve received.
      Thank you!
       
    • By Starym
      We've seen some weird stuff lately, from Stockade speed runs, to DM Tribute solo speed runs, my personal favorite, the fastest death speed run, the 80 character multi-boxing max level speed run, and a lot more, but this one might just take the cake. However, it also might actually have some value to players, as the runs actually serve a very specific purpose: getting the right name for your Imp. Considering there are over 960 Imp name combinations and it's something that you'll be seeing a lot of in your entire playtime as a Warlock, many players have some preferred names.
      And so Dendo set out to perfect the fastest Imp name run in Classic, and may have just achieved that goal!
      There's also an interesting little tidbit from redditor PlayerSalt, in terms of unique Imp names:
      Source.
    • By Starym
      Most of us are probably used to Hunters pulling everything in sight (either from personal experience or the memes), but this one went and did the opposite! It seems to be the week of speed clears, from the AQ40 ones to the weird Stockade race that just spontaneously started , and now we have a pretty cool one as well. Zeroji has been trying to perfect the Dire Maul Tribute solo run, and is pretty close to it, if not done. There's also a really great moment at the end of the video when you realize he's apparently a Hunter in real life as well!
      In this 5 minute run he only kills 1 Wandering Eye that's patrolling and the 2 final bosses themselves, using some great tricks including an Invis potion, a lot of Feign Death, and some pet tricks on top of that, as well as knowing the layout perfectly. It's a really fun watch, even if you're not impressed by speed clears in general:

      Source.
×
×
  • Create New...