Jump to content
FORUMS
Starym

Post-restriction Hardware Multiboxer "Solos" M+9 Waycrest Manor

Recommended Posts

5Uy2JBJ.jpg
 

The recent Blizzard decision to ban use of input mirroring software wasn't the end of multiboxing after all, as players dedicated to the practice find different ways to still do it. One of them has managed to solo Waycrest Manor +9 with his team of Druids, using hardware only (meaning 5 different PC setups).

In case you were wondering what exactly the difference between this "hardware" multiboxing and the banner type was, you can check out this video where MultiDayz explains:

There's a also this recent test with a Prot Paladin and 4 Elemental Shamans in +5 Freehold:

Source.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i will still report this scummy practice. If i see 5 Characters following and starting boradcasted/copied inputs, it's still banworthy i'd say. Just to run this *filtered* on 5 pcs now, is a workaround that doesn't excuse the fact that it's still automated characters and a pathetic thing to do.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Lawrenz said:

i will still report this scummy practice. If i see 5 Characters following and starting boradcasted/copied inputs, it's still banworthy i'd say. Just to run this *filtered* on 5 pcs now, is a workaround that doesn't excuse the fact that it's still automated characters and a pathetic thing to do.

I wish it were that simple. Blizzard specifically chose to use the term "software multiboxing" so as to exclude hardware multiboxing, which grants their implicit permission to continue this practice. If they wanted to end it altogether they'd've just used "multiboxing."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, CharlesF said:

I wish it were that simple. Blizzard specifically chose to use the term "software multiboxing" so as to exclude hardware multiboxing, which grants their implicit permission to continue this practice. If they wanted to end it altogether they'd've just used "multiboxing."

I'm not even sure how they could determine someone is hardware multiboxing, unless they analyzed the movements of accounts owned by the same person - but then you could just use unliked accounts - and they can't exactly constantly compare every keypress on to every keypress on every account at the same time.  That's massive data crunching, with probably loads of false positives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They could, based on community reports, observe someone actively hardware multiboxing. This would be labor intensive, but it wouldn't take very long to get the message across that all multiboxing is against their TOS - similar to software botting. That being said, they likely decided it's too labor intensive - especially at the start of a new expansion - so they've settled on software multiboxing as that is easy to automate the detection of as a first step. Investing in multibox hardware is the way forward presently, especially for non-US players who make money off the AH via gold, resources, and item sales.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, CharlesF said:

I wish it were that simple. Blizzard specifically chose to use the term "software multiboxing" so as to exclude hardware multiboxing, which grants their implicit permission to continue this practice. If they wanted to end it altogether they'd've just used "multiboxing."

i don't see any difference there, software or hardware. I think Blizzards choice of words was explicit as it is, to not accidently ban playing on two pcs at the same time (if you can manage it). It shows me a clear change in blizzards philosophy, regarding multiboxing, and i expect of them to ban "hardware multiboxers" as well.

This situation for seems like, let's say the government banned stealing. So thiefs were expected to stop stealing. But now thiefs began to take property and leave monopoly money to make it seem like they paid for it...

It's ridiculous. Hardware multiboxing is just "making it seem like they play on 5 pcs". Please Blizzard ban them. All of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Multiboxing on it's own, is not the problem. How people use it, is certainly an issue. I have a solo guild, had a hectic schedule, and trying to coordinate times with other players to get even the most basic achievements for the guild was an issue. That was it. That was my whole motivation for multiboxing. Before the level squish, it was helpful for leveling up my alts, but not without its own set of headaches. Main reason for the 2nd account was to invite alts into the guild on my main account. Ramble, ramble. None of this would be seen as game breaking, I don't think. The multiboxers that are farming and ruining the economy... Absolutely an issue. Boxers that are dungeon/raid farming for gear to slap onto a single toon for the purpose of pvp abuse, definitely an issue. Is it all a "unfair advantage"? That's up to Blizzard to decide. In reality, they already sidestepped their original wording when they realized that all the paid accounts getting canceled from multiboxing was a huge ding on the company revenue. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, aceaxe11 said:

Main reason for the 2nd account was to invite alts into the guild on my main account.  

Same here and I was delighted when Blizzard finally gave us the option to advertise our own personal guilds, login the alt, apply to join, log back in your other characters in the guild and accept the invite from your alt, log back in the alt and accept the guild invitation. Sorted.

 

More and worse damage is done to the economy by boosters and their scummy spamming communities , most of them involved directly in selling services for real money not just gold, along with running actual legions of farming bots, including the worst ones multiboxing with druids farming herbs etc.,

Spammy scumbag boosting communities and services ruin the economy and *filtered* off so many in the game yet little if anything is or has been done by Blizzard to stop them.

This guy hardware boxing, I don't see much wrong with it at all.

I'd rather Blizzard cracked down hard on all the spammers and boosters ruining the game for others.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, OxO said:
Same here and I was delighted when Blizzard finally gave us the option to advertise our own personal guilds, login the alt, apply to join, log back in your other characters in the guild and accept the invite from your alt, log back in the alt and accept the guild invitation. Sorted.

Ohhhhh, Thank you!  FOllowed what you said and now have my 3 alts in with my main.

 

 

 

Edited by roo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      Blizzard have detailed what's been going on in relation to server stability and the long queues some servers are experiencing:
      (source)
      Since shortly after the launch of Shadowlands, we’ve experienced some service issues that are negatively impacting gameplay on a small number of realms. In this region, we’ve been monitoring and working around the clock to solve these issues for:
      Area 52 Frostmourne Illidan Stormrage Tichondrius We increased realm capacity to let more players than ever before into a single realm, but extreme demand on a few realms has exceeded even that capacity, so we have dialed down some of our earlier changes. We are trying to carefully balance service stability and accessibility, and exploring multiple avenues to get everyone online and playing smoothly.
      This issue is our number one priority. We will continue to work to solve this as quickly as possible, and we will provide further updates as necessary.
      Thank you very much for your patience.
    • By Starym
      The most controversial issues of the Shadowlands has begun creating real problems already. Many players are having huge issues when switching Covenants, as there's either bugs in the way or, much worse, actual intended consequences of the switch. We will be looking at only a few of the many reports of problems/badly designed switching systems from reddit.
      The biggest issue reported so far is for players who chose a Covenant, only to find out they don't really like it and, since it was explained that switching them was NOT a big deal, while switching back was, they swapped early and are now screwed for an entire week's worth of progression and story content.
      We don't know if this is unintended, a bug, or exactly how it's supposed to work, so there may be hotfixes incoming (hopefully).
      What seems to be happening with all of the above is that they "spent" their currency on their previous Covenant or it was "locked" by default because it was earned pre-switch, and the souls needed to progress the campaign are now VERY hard to come by (only possible through World Quest drop) because of the weekly limitations.
      So if you're not liking your Covenant, either wait until late in the week to switch, or maybe if you haven't done ANYTHING in it, it could be safe to do so, but we can't be sure. Let's hope there's hotfixes coming soon and this isn't the way it's intended.
    • By Starym
      The Shadowlands really look incredible, and the visuals really are one of the strongest aspects of the new expansion, but there's even more to them (or less, in this case)! Players have been exploring the afterlife, and after many, MANY "Bastion is really bright" memes, it seems players have taken to dimming things down, and the Inky Black Potion from the Darkmoon Faire makes the Shadowlands really true to their name!
      Let's start with Oribos, as the contrast really pops:

      Source: cjschnyder.
      And the infinitely bright Bastion:

      Source: Hakizu.

      Source: Trunkins.
      We even got a comparison shot for Maldraxxus!

      Source: JehnSnow.
      But truly, Ardenweald is the star of this Inky Black show:

      Source: Azeda_.

      Source: opticaltuna.
      While Revendreth just looks more Revendrethy:


      Source: Azeda_.
      The Maw, however, sort of loses some of its uniqueness:

      Source: thadakism.
      We even get a clearer view of Torghast back in Icecrown with the potion!

      Source: tiniestjazzhands.
       
      In any case, if you have some potions handy, definitely take a look around each zone while you're in there, or if not, don't forget to stock up the next time the Darkmoon Faire is in town!
    • By Starym
      Source.
      Did you always get slightly upset when Pelagos and Kleia would mount up on those cool flying lion-looking mounts in the Bastion quests and you couldn't? Well now you can! The Silverwind Larion has been found, or rather the way to get him has, as you'll "just" need to collect 50 tiny Anima Shards in Bastion.

      Image by Warcraft Mounts.
      As Belivious677 pointed out, the WoW secret finding community has recently found the final 50th one, and you can find all their locations (and details on the hunt itself) in this google document, or they may have already been uploaded to the HandyNotes: Shadowlands addon as well (the creator put together the google doc as well), or they will be soon.

      These aren't all of them so definitely check out the google doc for the full guide.
      So once again, thanks to Belivious677 for pointing out the secret has been solved, to HandyNotes maker Zarillion for putting the search together and to the WoW secret finding discord for, well, finding the secret!
    • By Starym
      We have a very useful list/visual made by TempusSimian today, as they've taken a look at all the Covenant-related mounts you can acquire, and you don't even need to be in that specific Covenant for all of them (although you might need help from someone who is)! This isn't a definitive and final list, as TempusSimian has just researched the matter and the expansion is 2 days old, but it's very useful nonetheless! It's also a giant image so zoom in for the best results!

      In terms of actually being able to ride the mounts when not in that specific Covenant, the non-Covenant specific section SHOULD be usable regardless of affiliation. Another thing to note: it's likely that after Shadowlands, all of the Covenant exclusive mounts will become available to everyone, as you won't be in your Covenant for the next expansion's content (presumably, at least). We can't be sure on that last one, but it's a safe/reasonable bet. Also, don't forget, you can swap Covenants if you're just after the mounts for your collection and mounts collected total number (so maybe one of your alts will be the Covenant traitor and go around collecting mounts)!

      Source.
      So thanks a lot to TempusSimian for assembling this and hopefully it will aid you in your mount collecting journey!
×
×
  • Create New...