Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Staff

Multiboxing Restrictions Now Cover ALL Software AND Hardware Input Mirroring

Recommended Posts

53127-most-popular-dps-classes-and-specs
 

Some huge news for the multiboxing community, as Blizzard have updated their policy to include all software and hardware input mirroring being forbidden and actionable! 

Blizzard LogoMultiboxing Restrictions (source)

On November 3, 2020, we posted an update to our policy for input broadcasting software, and soon thereafter, we began taking action against accounts found to be using third party software to automatically mirror keystrokes to multiple game clients. We find that, like full automation of play, multiple-account mirroring disturbs the gameplay experience for the vast majority of players who control a single account at a time.

We will now additionally prohibit the use of all software and hardware mechanisms to mirror commands to multiple World of Warcraft accounts at the same time, or to automate or streamline multi-boxing in any way. Players found to be in violation of this policy are subject to account actions. These actions can include warnings, account suspensions and, if necessary, permanent closure of the player’s World of Warcraft account(s), as activities which effectively replicate automated gameplay are contrary to the terms and conditions of the Blizzard End-User License Agreement (EULA).

We urge all players to cease using any means of mirroring gameplay across multiple WoW accounts immediately, in order to maintain uninterrupted access to World of Warcraft.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Babel said:

Question is, are they going to reinforce it? The bot plague is quite severe.

The bot sweeps, like all multiplayer bannable activity, happens in waves. Partly to investigate to make sure someone isn't being wrongly targeted, and partly swooping it all at once in order to disrupt as much gold distribution as possible. Unfortunately the same tools that allow people to hide from tyrannical governments online, also make it easy to change up your IP location, because legitimate players could be playing via proxy, Blizzard can't really do something permanent like ban the IP aggregates coming from proxy servers. It also takes people actually reporting them when they see them, because its a lot easier for the human eye to spot automated movement than it is for software to, currently. Semi-related, this is why Blizzard doesn't permanently ban IPs involved in DDOS attacks, they just blackhole the IPs and/or subnets they're coming from until the traffic dies off. Reason being, again, innocent people whether players or just compromised computers.

Edited by SidonisAntares
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly, it still have no effect on packs of druids. You still can use /follow macro and just run around, clicking each herb. The first update made difference, cause now they can't instantly gather the whole node, but this one will hurt only dudes, who plays dungeons and doing other stuff, that not affecting economy in a big way.

The only way to deal witch packs - return to old node system, imo

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the glass half full. This is a HUGE step into the right direction! This isn't the ONLY issue - it's just one of the BIGGEST issues!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i mean how r they going to detect hardware mirroring with a QMK powered kb i could set up mirroring thru macros and key binds completely undetectable by any software

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, elmurufdd said:

i mean how r they going to detect hardware mirroring with a QMK powered kb i could set up mirroring thru macros and key binds completely undetectable by any software

Detection isnt the only way, thats why player reports are important to bring a GM's attention to them, sometimes they are so obvious that all you need is observation, WoW isnt a court of law, you don't need to prove anything, just be suspicious enough.

Edited by Corpsefury
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well quite easy since any form of multiboxing is now against tos

you can see by ingame behaivor if someone is a multi or not

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, SidonisAntares said:

The bot sweeps, like all multiplayer bannable activity, happens in waves. Partly to investigate to make sure someone isn't being wrongly targeted, and partly swooping it all at once in order to disrupt as much gold distribution as possible. Unfortunately the same tools that allow people to hide from tyrannical governments online, also make it easy to change up your IP location, because legitimate players could be playing via proxy, Blizzard can't really do something permanent like ban the IP aggregates coming from proxy servers. It also takes people actually reporting them when they see them, because its a lot easier for the human eye to spot automated movement than it is for software to, currently. Semi-related, this is why Blizzard doesn't permanently ban IPs involved in DDOS attacks, they just blackhole the IPs and/or subnets they're coming from until the traffic dies off. Reason being, again, innocent people whether players or just compromised computers.

I sometimes use a vpn myself and quite a lot of services and sites ban the ips associated with vpn services. I think that is absolutely ok since many people use it for shady business. For example I found that if I forget to turn off my vpn I sometimes can't pay with my credit card. I wonder why that is... Same goes for games like WoW. They gotta ban the ips in order to prevent criminal or in the case of the game "criminal" activity. It sucks for the few people who need vpn to play at all but not doing so would negatively impact so many more people that it's worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, hirlix said:

I sometimes use a vpn myself and quite a lot of services and sites ban the ips associated with vpn services. I think that is absolutely ok since many people use it for shady business. For example I found that if I forget to turn off my vpn I sometimes can't pay with my credit card. I wonder why that is... Same goes for games like WoW. They gotta ban the ips in order to prevent criminal or in the case of the game "criminal" activity. It sucks for the few people who need vpn to play at all but not doing so would negatively impact so many more people that it's worth it.

I'm sure there are worst case offenders where the only traffic they get coming from a proxy address is bots and they ban it, but again, they'll just be back on a different proxy server tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

back in the days when i played ultima online i had to proof that i shared a computer with my brother since having more then 1 account wasnt allowed but we had no character limit on the accounts. but those were simpler days

Edited by ResoWho
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, ResoWho said:

back in the days when i played ultima online i had to proof that i shared a computer with my brother since having more then 1 account wasnt allowed but we had no character limit on the accounts. but those were simpler days

WoW originally had that in Vanilla, but abandoned it due to playerbase size and the amount of admin work that created for Blizz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused!

Using Software or/and Hardware to broadcast keystrokes to multiple wow instances, automate and streamline Multiboxing (Using following methods meaning softwares and hardwares) is now against the EULA

but using simple /follow macro and give each command to each window manually ( looting a corpse with each open window separately one by one 1:1) is still fine? So this change now targets hardware Multiboxing too?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncommon Patron
On 5/5/2021 at 11:02 PM, Nayrusa said:

well quite easy since any form of multiboxing is now against tos

Multi Boxing is not against TOS, there are just restrictions on broadcasting and mirroring input.

I multibox with a pocket healer much of the time while leveling alts and the ban on broadcasting makes it more cumbersome where I now need to swap windows to toss a heal or buff, or hit my follow macro rather than being able to just hit alt-f on my main window to have my other toon(s) follow or have a click through region on the screen so when I clicked on that area it clicked on the screen of a character in another window where I have my healing mod Vuhdo placed instead of the screen that is currently active.  

I was not thrilled that Blizzard banned broadcasting between clients but I can understand the need to if they want to address some people running around with 5 shaman that all cast chain lightning at the exact same time and just deleting people in pvp and such.

Also it seems that some people think multi-boxing and botting are the same thing which seems to have a unfair backlash on those that just multi-box and don't bother anyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Reichsadler said:

 Also it seems that some people think multi-boxing and botting are the same thing which seems to have a unfair backlash on those that just multi-box and don't bother anyone.

Depends honestly on the scenario.  In PvP it serves as an unfair advantage when people do Multibox but I want to say a lot of reporting on what seems like bot behavior is being triggered for a series of reports in open world content.  And when it comes to mob killing in a specific zone or material gathering it becomes an issue specially if there is a World Quest involved.  When the average player sees an 'x' amount of the same class following around 1 character compared to multiple of the same class killing everything in sight and on a set path that average player will most likely report what they are seeing.  Unfair and unjust?  Not necessarily imo.  But then again I have yet heard of a justifable cause of where Multiboxing should be allowed and how it benefits the server/community.  I'm willing to bend an ear if you know of a justified reason.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/7/2021 at 3:37 PM, Ragingwolf said:

Depends honestly on the scenario.  In PvP it serves as an unfair advantage when people do Multibox but I want to say a lot of reporting on what seems like bot behavior is being triggered for a series of reports in open world content.  And when it comes to mob killing in a specific zone or material gathering it becomes an issue specially if there is a World Quest involved.  When the average player sees an 'x' amount of the same class following around 1 character compared to multiple of the same class killing everything in sight and on a set path that average player will most likely report what they are seeing.  Unfair and unjust?  Not necessarily imo.  But then again I have yet heard of a justifable cause of where Multiboxing should be allowed and how it benefits the server/community.  I'm willing to bend an ear if you know of a justified reason.

 

I used to multibox a Pally and 4 Shamen. I mostly did dungeons for shits and giggles. No one was getting hurt by that.

There is no reason to set the rule "benefits the server/community". When I solo I don't benefit the server or community, so why should multiboxing benefit anyone?
The rule here is that it shouldn't *hurt* the server or community and most multiboxing doesn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Croga said:

I used to multibox a Pally and 4 Shamen. I mostly did dungeons for shits and giggles. No one was getting hurt by that.

There is no reason to set the rule "benefits the server/community". When I solo I don't benefit the server or community, so why should multiboxing benefit anyone?
The rule here is that it shouldn't *hurt* the server or community and most multiboxing doesn't.

So why do you believe that a lot of the playerbase is against multiboxing in general?  There is no harm in running content like Dungeons and old Raids that I can agree on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So just to clarify, this was sent to a player apparently a day after the TOS update that had put in a ticket asking about the issue. https://i.imgur.com/ZBaLnaM.png They are looking from what it appears to be keystroke and command mirroring via software or hardware. If you can control multiple accounts with 1 key press per window at one time and no funny business with broadcasting aka mirroring commands to multiple wow accounts, you're fine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/9/2021 at 8:50 PM, Ragingwolf said:

So why do you believe that a lot of the playerbase is against multiboxing in general?  There is no harm in running content like Dungeons and old Raids that I can agree on.

Most of the playerbase is against multiboxing because it's being misused in ways that *harm* the server.

But that was not my argument. My argument was against the statement that multiboxing should be banned because it didn't *benefit* the server/community and I said that there are a lot of things that don't *benefit* anything. Multiboxing has been banned because sometimes it hurts the community/server, not because it doesn't benefit anything.

Edited by Croga

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Croga said:

Most of the playerbase is against multiboxing because it's being misused in ways that *harm* the server.

But that was not my argument. My argument was against the statement that multiboxing should be banned because it didn't *benefit* the server/community and I said that there are a lot of things that don't *benefit* anything. Multiboxing has been banned because sometimes it hurts the community/server, not because it doesn't benefit anything.

Then how does it sometimes hurt the community/server in general?  I'm not trying to be provokive with the statement just learning the difference and wanting to see all sides of the arguement.  For a time multiboxing was fine untill the last year and now.  What would drive Blizzard in deciding that this action needed to be carry out and hit a portion/fraction of the playerbase that have been utilizing multiboxing.  Is there another underlying issue that has yet come to light?  Was there a few 'bad apples' that were abusing the ability to multibox for RMT or fraudlent services in WoW or other?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/12/2021 at 2:59 PM, Ragingwolf said:

Then how does it sometimes hurt the community/server in general?  I'm not trying to be provokive with the statement just learning the difference and wanting to see all sides of the arguement.  For a time multiboxing was fine untill the last year and now.  What would drive Blizzard in deciding that this action needed to be carry out and hit a portion/fraction of the playerbase that have been utilizing multiboxing.  Is there another underlying issue that has yet come to light?  Was there a few 'bad apples' that were abusing the ability to multibox for RMT or fraudlent services in WoW or other?  

As an example;

Set up however many accounts you want and go farm ore/plants.

That wasn't a problem in the past. The first character walks to the ore, mines it, the rest gets nothing.
Now the ore/herb doesn't despawn right after farming it. It stays there for a bit so others who were running to it aren't disappointed. That brings the problem with it that if someone uses 25 characters multiboxed to get the same ore, he gets 25 ore instead of just one.

The result is that those who don't multibox get only a fraction of the ore/herbs and thus don't get the economic benefit of the harvesting profession.

I don't pretend to know all the motivations of Blizzard but having been the victim of such I can understand that they don't want this to happen. It's almost as bad as botting. (which brings us to another thing; multibox software can make botting easier by not hooking into the game but using graphical scraping, then sending keystrokes to the multiboxing software....)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      Season 4 has partially started on NA servers, as players are noticing elements of the new season popping up. This is actually planned and was announced by Blizzard, as you can see below, but players were not expecting this much to change before the reset. 
      Season 4 (Source)
      Dragonflight Season 3 will be ending April 22 at 10:00 p.m. PDT, the night before the regularly scheduled maintenance, with Dragonflight Season 4 beginning immediately following on April 23. The blue post indicated that the season should start soon after, on the 23rd, which presumably means after the weekly reset. Here are some of the things that have already changed.
      Players have been reporting various aspects of the season being in-game, starting with Season 3 items now being marked as legacy, with a grey tooltip, as spotted by Strosts:

      Source. 
      Crests and Flightstones have also been reset, with new ones dropping from World Quests.
      Catalyst charges are also now in Season 4 mode, as spotted by lemoncocoapuff.
    • By Staff
      We have four new zones coming in the War Within, but just how large are they, all told? We have a few community members showing their relative sizes off, comparing to various other expansion landmasses, which we'll be taking a look at today.
      First of all, the new expansion has one above-ground zone and three below, as the Isle of Dorn is our gateway into the three underground zones. This is best showcased by Sturtime2, who broke the Dragonflight and War Within zones down (with Zaralek, Emerald Dream and Forbidden Reach all being post-expansion launch zones):

      Source. 
      Now that we have a better idea of the War Within zone structure, we have a more visually direct comparison by CygnetFR, who also added Kul Tiras in there for comparison:

      Source.
      And finally we have another Dragon Isles comparison, only this time with the Easern Kingdoms thrown in, courtesy of keyboardturn:
    • By Staff
      Blizzard have offered some feedback on player comments on the Priest Hero talents on the War Within Alpha, as our own guide writer, Publik, pointed out some issues with Voidreaver.
      Priest Feedback (Source)
      Hello!
      Thanks for this well-written post on the state of Voidweaver for Shadow.
        First, to clarify the functionality of the rift: There are not current plans for there to be a pull-in effect. We’re closely watching the power level of utility coming from hero talent trees. Given the frequency of the rift, a pull-in would surpass the power level aiming for.
        We appreciate the feedback that the slow effect from the slow effect from No Escape may not be utilized as often as we’re hoping especially compared to Dark Energy. As far as gameplay goes, the Entropic Rift window feeling tough to manage is something we aim to improve on during our next pass of the tree. Beyond that, there’s a lot of great bugs and feedback points here that we’ll bring back to the team and discuss.
       
      Some updates on the other Priest Hero Talent trees:
      We’ve updated Oracle’s design to be focused on healing instead of support mechanics and are looking for feedback about how it plays. There are a couple of talents that are not currently ready, and we’ll update those in the coming weeks, including a revision to the capstone. We’re also very excited about the visual effects for this tree and hope you are, too!
      The design for Archon is currently a work in progress. The core of the design revolves around Halo, and we’ll unveil its talents soon.
    • By Starym
      Here we are with the final week of Season 3! While Patch 10.2.6 will continue on until May 7th, the new season will change everything, as we moving on from Amirdrassil to Awakened raids! The final week has brought a lot of change all over the place, including the very top, so let's see where everyone ended up.
      Note: We are using Normalized scores instead of raw DPS for the Warcraft Logs rankings. The u.gg rankings at the bottom are raw DPS. Normalized scores take into account the outlier boss fights where certain specs could stack massive DPS (due to the nature of the fight, whether it's AoE spam or something else), which would then affect their overall score for the whole raid.
      Mythic
      Overall Damage 95th Percentile
      We have some big shifts at the top here at the end of Season 3, as Subtlety reclaims its throne once more! Frost DK proves its unstable nature and drops a huge 6 spots down into 7th, but Unholy represents the DK class a lot better and stays strong in 2nd. Outlaw joins the Rogue resurgence and moves 5 spots up into 3rd, as Retribution slots in to 4th after Elemental's big 5 spot fall. Arcane joins the big risers as it makes its way from 11th all the way up into 5th, followed by the only other stable  spec in the top 10, Fury. Arms moves two up into 8th, with Havoc closing out the patch strong, at the end of the top 10 after a giant 8-spot resurgence. The rest of the Mages huddle right outside, followed by Enhancement. The bottom 3 remains the same, as we see Feral and Beast Mastery finish at the end of the list at the end of the patch, with Augmentation still waiting for some proper calculations to find itself near the top where it belongs.

      95th percentile Mythic data by Warcraft Logs.
      Overall Damage All Percentiles
      We have a different No.1 at the end of the season in the generalist bracket, and it's a relatively unexpected one! Retribution uses all those gathered Fyr'alaths to grab the very top spot from Subtlety at the end of the line, as the rest of the top 5 is filled with axe-wielders as well! Fire moves 2 up in 6th, as Outlaw makes a big move in 7th, 7 up! Havoc and Arcane close out the top 10, both rising, as we see Devastation fall down into the bottom 3, joining Beast Mastery and Augmentation.
      All percentiles Mythic data by Warcraft Logs.
      Boss Only Damage All Percentiles
      Subtlety manages to take over in the direct damage charts as well, taking Unholy down a peg, with Retribution remaining stable in 3rd. Survival drops a few spots, down to the bottom of the top 10, as both Druids huddle up and grab 6th and 7th.
      All percentiles Mythic data by Warcraft Logs.
      Heroic
      Overall Damage All Percentiles
      Heroic remains very stable at the end of the season, with only Havoc and Demonology switching places in 5th, and Feral, Survival and Shadow moving into the top 10.

      All percentiles Heroic data by Warcraft Logs.

      U.GG Raw Mythic DPS Rankings
      U.gg's rankings are based on actual DPS taken from Warcraft Logs data, focusing on the top players and span the past two weeks. This chart is for Mythic only.
      Affliction retains its No.1 spot in the raw DPS rankings, as the rest of the top 3 remains stable as well. We see Subtlety actually drop down here, the opposite of the points-based charts, with Demonology and Arms moving past it. Frost and Unholy DKs move up together, gaining 3 and 2 spots, respectively. Fire closes out the top 10 1 spot down, and we see the two Druids remain in the bottom 3 at the end of the season.
      Mythic chart by u.gg.
       
      Meanwhile, if you're looking for more information you can check out our Dragonflight class guides, Amirdrassil boss guides, the raid DPS tier list, as well as more data from Warcraft Logs here.
    • By Stan
      Remember to use up any remaining Catalyst charges today before they reset tomorrow!
      Your Revival Catalyst charges will reset to zero at the start of Dragonflight Season 4. If you have any unused charges, make sure to spend them today to secure your class set bonuses.
      In Dragonflight Season 4, you'll earn Catalyst charges weekly, with the first one available tomorrow! Be sure to log in with all your alts tomorrow to claim this charge.
      For more information, visit our Revival Catalyst guide!
×
×
  • Create New...