Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Staff

WoW Classic Character Cloning Price Reduced to $15

Recommended Posts

58310-brief-ad-popup-on-battle-net-seems
 

Blizzard is lowering the price of the WoW Classic cloning service from $35 to $15, in response to some fairly heavy community criticism on the decision.

Blizzard Logo(Source)

Salutations, WoW Classic players! We’d like to inform you about a course correction we’re making.

When you log in to WoW Classic after the patch next week, each of your Classic characters will choose between staying in Classic Era (version 1.13) and progressing to Burning Crusade Classic (version 2.5). For those who want to play a character in both versions, we’re offering a service to purchase a character clone in the other version of the game.

This service – providing a player with a second copy of a character in a different game – is new for us. Our original concept of the value of this service was largely based on how we price other optional items and services. We want players who choose Classic Era realms to feel as though their choice comes with the possibility that they’ll be able to build relationships and guilds with other players they can count on.

However, over the last week or so, we’ve gotten a very large amount of feedback from the community, and we’ve decided to lower the price. A lower price will likely still accomplish our goals with the new service, while allowing many more players to explore the option of playing characters on both Classic Era and Burning Crusade Classic realms.

After careful consideration, we’ve decided to lower the price of a cloned character in WoW Classic to $15.00 USD ($20.00 CAD, $20.00 AUD, $24.00 NZD). You’ll see the lower price in-game when the service becomes available next week.

As always, we deeply appreciate the passion and thoughtfulness of the WoW community. We play WoW alongside you, and we can’t wait to join you next week on Classic Era realms, in the Burning Crusade Classic pre-patch, and as we step through the Dark Portal with you in June.

Thank you very much,

– The World of Warcraft Development Team

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good course correction, let's see some more positive responses in the comments. Whether you like $15 or not, they dropped $20 off the price because they were asked to make an adjustment. Give credit where credit is due.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blizz takes a lot of heat from people that don't like that they don't cater to their every demand, but they really should get some credit here. They listened to the public and they brought the price down by a ton. Some people still won't be happy with this, but seeing as you don't even have to buy classic games, they need to make some money somewhere to keep being able to make and support this content.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still not acceptable for me. This service requires no overhead and should be free imo.

I am betting they priced it high at first on purpose for this specific reason, so they can pretend to be the good guys by lowering the price at the last minute. 

Sorry to be that guy. Hope you guys have fun with Classic. It's not for me with their current business model.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can people please move along and stop whining about this now? Let's have high hopes for TBC and enjoy the damn game!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Devylknyght said:

Still not acceptable for me. This service requires no overhead and should be free imo.

I am betting they priced it high at first on purpose for this specific reason, so they can pretend to be the good guys by lowering the price at the last minute. 

Sorry to be that guy. Hope you guys have fun with Classic. It's not for me with their current business model.

It has a price because it cost Blizzard to maintain the BC and classic world servers. If every one could go to BC and stay in Classic, that would double the overhead for Blizzard. Applying a prohibitive cost prevents cloning for being the default, and causes people to think about how like they are to play both, how valuable the cost would be.

 

The cost at 35 was to high, and punished dedicated players that want to play multiple characters across the expands. Lowering it by over 50% keeps its utility to discourage cloning as a default, but is not as our punishing to players planning to transfer multiple toons.

At the same time they can't offer a "transfer all my charectrs for X$"  because they don't want to maintain all those servers, so they only want the charectrs most likely to be active players so you end with 4-5 high population servers with high user activity, not 8-10 servers with above average population and average to low activity.

 

Because unlike in modern all existing charectrs just come along, the clones require new servers exist on, and thus maintain.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Novax73 said:

It has a price because it cost Blizzard to maintain the BC and classic world servers. If every one could go to BC and stay in Classic, that would double the overhead for Blizzard. Applying a prohibitive cost prevents cloning for being the default, and causes people to think about how like they are to play both, how valuable the cost would be.

 

The cost at 35 was to high, and punished dedicated players that want to play multiple characters across the expands. Lowering it by over 50% keeps its utility to discourage cloning as a default, but is not as our punishing to players planning to transfer multiple toons.

At the same time they can't offer a "transfer all my charectrs for X$"  because they don't want to maintain all those servers, so they only want the charectrs most likely to be active players so you end with 4-5 high population servers with high user activity, not 8-10 servers with above average population and average to low activity.

 

Because unlike in modern all existing charectrs just come along, the clones require new servers exist on, and thus maintain.

They are already cloning the characters, whether you pay or not. They just lock the character on the option you don't choose until you decide to pay for it. So it is actually costing them more in development time/money to implement this pay to unlock system. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Devylknyght said:

They are already cloning the characters, whether you pay or not. They just lock the character on the option you don't choose until you decide to pay for it. So it is actually costing them more in development time/money to implement this pay to unlock system. 

The cost does not come from the cloning that is obviously free. The cost is mating the server  now that it exists in BC and Classic. That could potentially double their servers, and the cost is in maintaining them. Not the cloning it's self, the downstream effects.

Once you select the version you want if you don't pay for the clone, it gets deleted. And then in a year then will condensed servers based on population.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Novax73 said:

The cost does not come from the cloning that is obviously free. The cost is mating the server  now that it exists in BC and Classic. That could potentially double their servers, and the cost is in maintaining them. Not the cloning it's self, the downstream effects.

Once you select the version you want if you don't pay for the clone, it gets deleted. And then in a year then will condensed servers based on population.

cloning... mating... Let's do it like they do it on the Discovery channel?

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Yridaa said:

cloning... mating... Let's do it like they do it on the Discovery channel?

Getting woody now!

Will we get new HD machinimas? Bring back Nymh!

 

side note, I did not expect this to happen, I didn't think they'd cave on this. Glad for the players that they have. Here's hoping they think about readdressing some other service fees. Overall they're just too high for what they are imo. Good steps so far, and well done community that did complain.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets make a super high price for a no-cost feature, then, after they complain, we lower it to high price, and they will be happy - Market, 1800.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It should have been this way from the beginning. They don't deserve to be praised for this. This was a strategy to get the community to be okay paying a cost for cloning at all. Of course let's not forget the disgusting pricing on the "collector's edition" that many people are going to forget due to this "win" distraction. It took an entire community of complete outrage to get them to do the semi-right thing. They wanted to test how greedy they could be, now suddenly they're the good guys because they decided to not screw us nearly as hard. Some people... Ah but poor blizzard won't be able to afford to maintain their servers without more money than a $15 subscription from the players that would be actively playing on them, because somehow in some magical fantasy world that alone isn't going to net them a profit.

Edited by Meril
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree that this feels pre-planned and scam like.    We already pay $15 a month, Millions of us, which should (and is) ridiculously above the needs for supporting servers and such.     They also make bank on pets, server transfers, character boosts, wow tokens, books, and all the other merchandise including expansions.    Making something a ridiculous price and then "seeing the light" and lowering it to a less poisonous level is old school sham marketing.

Remember back in the day when our $15 subscription paid for in game (not books) lore that made sense, actual people and not automation in customer service, and so on?    

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Migol said:

Remember back in the day when our $15 subscription paid for in game (not books) lore that made sense, actual people and not automation in customer service, and so on?    

This is fair, except:

  • Monthly subscription is still the only requirement for access to now three different games and all the collectables within (minus expansion cost and the occasionally shop-exclusive mount). These days, you can even convert game gold into game time, thus essentially eliminating even the monthly subscription fee.
  • Character cloning was not a service originally offered when expansions rolled over, as such it cannot be compared to other traditionally included services.
  • The cost of a service has two goals: to make money for the game, yes - but also to discourage people from bogging down customer support staff with an endless string of consequence-free decisions to race change, server transfer, etc. Free cloning would just mean everyone would do it when only a small percentage of the people would actually need or want to maintain their character in both eras. A price tag both drives profit and ensures that time/server space/resources are not wasted giving away a free item that people will essentially disregard afterwards without any investment.
  • The subscription model that WoW helped perpetuate to great success is the reason that monotonizing exists in the first place. We paid for the game, then we paid to play it, then we paid for expansions to play more, then we paid for extra cool stuff in the game and for our real world. It's our fault, we bought in from the beginning and now we're upset when we look around to see what happens when you vote with your dollars. This is like faulting Disney for putting out another Star Wars show or release a new Iron Man toy. Plain and simple: cash grabs like this exist because they work, because people either expect to or have no issue spending money for a "better" experience.
Edited by durdyenglish
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Devylknyght said:

Still not acceptable for me. This service requires no overhead and should be free imo.

I am betting they priced it high at first on purpose for this specific reason, so they can pretend to be the good guys by lowering the price at the last minute. 

Sorry to be that guy. Hope you guys have fun with Classic. It's not for me with their current business model.

They have to maintain a dedicated server to keep up the classic era and you "think" it should be free? Does the maintaining cost comes out of your pocket? Don't start with "cloning is free in ptr". They are not taking money for cloning, they are taking money just once to keep your character which you might never touch again in a dedicated server. And it requires maintainance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Elevendk said:

They have to maintain a dedicated server to keep up the classic era and you "think" it should be free? Does the maintaining cost comes out of your pocket? Don't start with "cloning is free in ptr". They are not taking money for cloning, they are taking money just once to keep your character which you might never touch again in a dedicated server. And it requires maintainance. 

"just once" per character. and on top of the subscription we already pay for them to "maintain their servers". It's all good. Like I said, I hope you have fun. I am going to sit this one out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, durdyenglish said:

Monthly subscription is still the only requirement for access to now three different games and all the collectables within (minus expansion cost and the occasionally shop-exclusive mount).

I'm confused, but what are those games?

 

I only see world of warcraft shadowlands, and 2 semi-abandonware's version of world of warcraft that are more than 15 years old with 0 new things.

 

I feel it should be acceptable to 'pay a monthly fee' to play the overall games, if they're worth my money and time, but all this monetization, for the simplest things, feels for me 'lets fix the problems we just did made to get some money on people who already invested a lot on us to feel bad for not doing it'.

Edited by Elfomal
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wanna make a 15 dollar fleecing seem like a good idea,  do the Blizz approach and say it's gonna be $35 they reduced it later and watch everyone praise you.  It's still a rip-off yet now cause it's less of a rip-off all the sheep are happy and going "yay Blizz cares"

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fascinating that this trick worked so well. I applaud you, Brack. I didn't think he had it in him to do something as risky as this. How to make people defend you sucking money from them 101. It is quite an interesting thing to see.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2021 at 5:28 PM, Migol said:

We already pay $15 a month, Millions of us, which should (and is) ridiculously above the needs for supporting servers and such. 

yeah servers are not that expensiv keeping blizz at a whole alife and running is very costy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      Hunters got some newly added tuning today, as Blizzard detail additional changes added to the already quite significant class tuning! 
      Hunter (Source)
      This morning with scheduled weekly maintenance, in addition to previously-planned adjustments to other classes, we deployed several changes to Hunters in Season of Discovery.
      Hunter
      Rapid Killing now reduces the cooldown of Rapid Fire by 80% (was a reduction of 2 minutes). Chimera Shot weapon damage percent increased to 135% (was 120%). Explosive Shot base damage before attack power increased by 50%. Sniper Training has an additional new effect: while Sniper Training is at 5 stacks, Aimed Shot is instant. Serpent Spread now causes Multi-shot to apply Serpent Sting to its targets for 12 seconds (was 6 seconds). Steady Shot now deals 100% weapon damage (was 75%). As we previously noted, there are more adjustments coming for Hunters and other classes. In general, we intend to improve the ranged playstyle and diminish the melee playstyle so that the two become more equivalent.
      We apologize for the confusion caused by the changes above going live earlier than intended, and we intend to post more about further adjustments soon.
      Thank you for your patience and understanding.
    • By Staff
      This weekend, a global damage reduction aura will be tested in PvP combat in Season of Discovery to balance the increased burst damage observed the latest phase.
      (Source)
      Hello, Classic PvPers!
      This coming weekend, we will test an adjustment to Player versus Player combat in Season of Discovery. We will implement a global damage reduction aura on PvP combat between players (and player controlled pets and other units).
      When we started Season of Discovery, we knew that PvP would become significantly more fast paced and bursty, with each class being capable of significantly more damage output, and this quickly proved to be true. We experimented with a damage reduction aura in battlegrounds during Phase 1, but it didn’t work as well as we hoped, mostly because healing was scaling more aggressively than damage at that point, causing healing classes to become significantly more oppressive in battlegrounds than they normally would be. Now that we’re in Phase 3, we’ve made many changes and added more runes, and burst damage has significantly outpaced healing output, so we feel that it’s a good time to try this again.
      Damage scaling and its impact on PvP has always been a concern in World of Warcraft, even since original WoW. Various systems have been introduced to counteract this to varying levels of success, but ultimately it always comes down to the fact that player damage outscales player health at a base level, and an adjustment is needed for combat between players to continue to feel satisfying as player power increases. We’ve been hesitant to introduce this as a permanent feature, and we prefer to give it a trial run this weekend to get an idea of how it feels before we take further steps. Please note: this aura will affect all areas of the game world, not just battlegrounds.
      We encourage you to get out into the world (or in battlegrounds) and PvP the weekend and let us know how it feels. We’re prepared to do some tuning to make it the most effective, so your feedback will be very helpful.
      We currently plan to enable the aura on all Season of Discovery realms on Friday, April 26 at approximately 19:00 CEST, and it will be disabled four days later, during scheduled weekly maintenance in each region.
      We look forward to your feedback. Thank you!
    • By Staff
      Blizzard have announced that there will be realm transfers coming from PvP to PvE realms over the next few weeks. These free transfers will be open for a short time and on multiple occasions. Blizzard also explain why these are opening now and also talk about faction balance, which is the reason the transfers will work in these short bursts on numerous occasions. 
      Transfers (Source)
      Good evening everyone,
      When we launched Season of Discovery, we made some bold decisions, one of those was the creation of Enforced Faction Balanced PvP Realms. When we did this, we did our best to communicate some caveats that this may not end up being the experience you want from World of Warcraft, as PvP realms can be an intensely challenging experience at times. While we are very happy with how the faction balance system has worked out, we know from player feedback internally and externally that the reality of a balanced presence of both factions on a single realm, and that individual layers will not always have equal factions, means that some folks have now decided they would instead prefer a PvE ruleset, but have characters locked to these PvP realms.
      To that end, we genuinely want everyone to have the best time they can in Season of Discovery, so over the next few weeks, we will be periodically opening Free Character Transfers from PvP realms to PvE realms. These transfer windows will open and close fairly rapidly, and we offer no guarantee that you will be able to transfer. The reasoning for this is simple; we need to ensure that one faction doesn’t disproportionally leave a realm, undoing months of hard work with realm faction balance.
      These transfer options will be periodically available starting Tuesday and will open and close throughout the rest of this week.
      As always, thank for you joining us in Season of Discovery. We’ve experimented a lot and learned much that will ultimately lead to bigger and better things.
    • By Staff
      We have some more class tuning coming to Phase 3 of SoD, as Druids, Paladins, Priests, Rogues and Shamans get some solid changes.
      Class Tuning (Source)
      Tomorrow, during each region’s normal maintenance period, we will apply the following adjustments to classes in Season of Discovery.
      Druid
      The Natural Weapons talents now increases all damage done by druids in Season of Discovery, instead of just physical damage. The Gale Winds rune now reduces the mana cost of Hurricane by 60%. Swiftmend no longer consumes a Rejuvenation or Regrowth effect on the target when used. Developers’ notes: Please note that it does still require Rejuvenation or Regrowth to be on the target to be used. Paladin
      Seal of Righteousness damage can now be critical hits. Sacred Shield’s duration is extended to 60 seconds (was 30 seconds). Crusader Strike has now gained an additional effect: Crusader strike now refreshes all judgement effects active on the target to a 30 second remaining duration. Seal of Martyrdom can now “twist” with other seals, including Seal of Command. Developers’ notes: Seal “twisting” was an interesting emergent effect that became popular during the original Burning Crusade, that utilized the slower server messaging system used in early versions of WoW to slightly extend the duration of the Paladin’s active seal for a short time whenever a second seal was cast. This effectively allowed paladins to momentarily gain the benefit of two seals at once if they timed the application of a new seal to line up perfectly just before their weapon swing. This is something we would have considered a bug at the time, but for many players, it became a popular feature of the class, allowing skilled players to increase their output with precision gameplay.
      We recreated this playstyle in Burning Crusade Classic and since then it’s been a popular request in other versions of original WoW, including Season of Discovery. We had concerns about allowing Martyrdom and Command specifically to be twisted together in Season of Discovery for a variety of reasons, including the fact that the playstyle is highly mana inefficient, it largely requires addons such as a weapon swing timer to function properly, and twisting can be unintuitive for less experienced players. As the game matures and we continue to listen to player feedback however, we recognize that for some, this is part of the charm and uniqueness of playing a paladin during those early eras of WoW’s history. We consider this change to be experimental and we will watch the performance and behavior of Retribution closely after this change. Should it prove problematic, we may revert this change or apply additional adjustments later. We greatly appreciate the feedback we’ve received about this thus far.
      With this change to allow twisting, we do not expect to see a major change in the “optimal” way to play Retribution right away. Due to the interaction between Art of War, Martyrdom, and Exorcism, we’ll likely need a larger redesign and changes to that interaction to truly add more diversity to the Retribution playstyle. We’re evaluating options here for potential changes we can make either via hotfix during Phase 3 or as part of a larger effort for Phase 4. Priest
      Shadowform now increases all shadow damage done by 25% (was 15%). Rogue
      Saber Slash bleed now stacks up to 5 times. Saber Slash bleed now also increases the impact damage done by Sinister Strike and Saber Slash by 15% per stack for the rogue who applied the bleed. Saber Slash bleed now deals 3% of the rogue’s Attack Power in damage per tick (was 5%). Shaman
      Mental Dexterity now only triggers from dealing damage with Stormstrike and Lava Lash, and it now lasts 30 seconds (was 10 seconds). Burn now increases Flame Shock Damage by 100% and flame shock DoT duration by 6 seconds, and causes Flame Shock to strike up to 5 targets (was 3 targets). Developers’ notes: We’ve received a lot of feedback about the overall usability of mental dexterity, particularly for Elemental Shamans. This ability was not intended to be used by elemental, so the adjustments we’ve made are to help ensure its usage is a bit more enhancement-centric. To compensate, we’ve increased the output and usability of the Burn rune, with a slight quality-of-life improvement in the form of a Flame Shock duration increase which allows two Lava Burst casts to be used within a single Flame Shock duration. This is likely not going to be enough to overall bring elemental up to the level we want, so we intend to continue to make other tactical adjustments in future class adjustment updates as needed. In the Weeks to Come
      We’re carefully planning for more adjustments to Hunters, Mages, Shamans, and Warlocks in future updates. We really appreciate the feedback we’ve received since the start of Phase 3 and look forward to sharing more about our next round of adjustments with you soon.
    • By Staff
      Players have been noticing that Righteous Orbs were suddenly no longer dropping, and now Blizzard have confirmed that there was a hotfix, and that they were never intended to drop before Phase 4.
      Righteous Orbs (Source)
      With a hotfix that went live to all realms earlier today, Righteous Orbs no longer drop during Phase 3 of Season of Discovery.
      They’ll become available as intended in Phase 4.
×
×
  • Create New...