Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Staff

Feral Druid Energy Regeneration Rate Fix on PTR

Recommended Posts

58233-the-burning-crusade-classic-releas
 

Blizzard have addressed one of the most contentious gameplay issues in the Classic, with Feral Druids getting a new 2-second energy regeneration cycle which will be unaffected by regen rate changes. This has been implemented on the PTR now and Blizzard go into detail on why the change was neeed and how the situation got this far in the first place:

Blizzard LogoFeral Energy Regen (Source)

TLDR: We’re bringing back WoW Classic Feral Druid powershifting by moving Druid Energy regeneration to the constant 2-second slow tick loop. Cat Druids will receive 20 Energy every 2 seconds, their Energy will never get a partial tick outside of that 2-second loop, and with careful timing, they can receive their full 20 energy regeneration tick immediately after shifting.

We’ve been discussing Druid Energy regeneration a lot the last few weeks. There has been a great deal of community discussion about it on every channel and platform that we read and listen to, and that discussion started almost immediately after we implemented the Burning Crusade Classic power regeneration change first introduced in patch 2.2.0. At that point in the original Burning Crusade, the game would grant a partial tick of regeneration whenever any regeneration rates changed, and it would reset their regeneration clock, so the next tick would happen about 2 seconds later. While this improves some abilities like Evocation, it has the side effect of removing a Druid’s ability to time their shapeshift into Cat form immediately before a regeneration tick to order to quickly receive 20 Energy.

That playstyle, often called “powershifting”, was greatly missed by some players.

As we’ve worked on this, one of the people we spoke with was the original systems designer who requested the change to energy regeneration. Those conversations have made it clear that the patch 2.2.0 regeneration change in late 2007 was not intended as a nerf to Druids. It’s therefore a pretty solid case of change results not matching up with design intent. In a #somechanges world, we think it’s important to consider both the original intent and the original execution of changes, and this looks like an example where version 2.4.3 (the patch that Burning Crusade Classic 2.5.1 is based on) exhibits a behavior that was unintended at the time. We can see that both Druids and the energy regeneration system were changed again in patch 3.0.2.

Our implementation of the authentic regeneration behavior, combined with the removal of spell batching, has caused a persistent timing issue for Druids and we’d like to try a straightforward solution. With a hotfix that we’ve now deployed to our PTR environment, we’re testing moving Druid Energy regeneration back to a 2-second cycle that is unaffected by regeneration rate changes.

This should result in Cat Druids receiving Energy at a more constant rate, and additionally, Druids can once again powershift by timing their shapeshifts to optimize their Energy use. After this change, Druids should (almost) never receive less than 20 Energy in a single regen tick.

Thanks for reading, and thank you for all of your feedback on this.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      Blizzard are moving into the next phase of same-faction battleground testing in the Burning Crusade Classic, and also went ito a lot of detail into theit thinking behind it all, as well as the changes and features coming in thise second wave of testing.
      Same-Faction BGs (Source)
      Over the last few days, we’ve read thousands of pieces of feedback on the same-faction Battleground test, and we’ve been working through what we can do in Burning Crusade Classic to meet as many of our goals as possible.
      Some players literally asked for more understanding of our goals, so we’d like to list out the goals we think are most pertinent to the Battleground queue situation:
      Emulate the design pillars and intentions of original Burning Crusade game systems. Leverage modern tech and design to address modern issues. Make surgical changes to the game to improve the player experience. Address player concerns in ways that capture the spirit of the original design of the game. We’ve heard a clear majority of players telling us that they preferred same-faction Battlegrounds after our first test. During that test, we saw the benefits of drastically lowered queue times and less unavoidable ganking in the outdoor world. However, there were a significant number of concerns registered on other related topics.
      We noticed that players were dismayed when the system occasionally launched an Alliance vs. Alliance Battleground. We reduced the likelihood of that a couple of hours into the test, and we think we can do a little more there.
      The quick queues revealed that a noticeable number of players were doing BGs in organized raids. This makes sense; the time it takes to form a premade is time well-invested for those players. But for the large number of players who choose to queue alone, there’s essentially no hope of winning the BG. There are a couple of ways we can try addressing this, and in this next test, we’d like to try restricting groups to a maximum of 5 players in all Battlegrounds. This should have the added benefit of allowing players who are in groups to quest while waiting in queue for Battlegrounds.
      A major point of discussion was the perception that the faction a majority of players chose for their main character would see all players switch to it, unless we change the game to either reward the minority faction, punish the majority faction, or prevent players from choosing to play on the majority faction in the first place. As you can see (and has been discussed at great length here and elsewhere), most such changes that might come to mind would conflict with our stated goals above. Still, we’d like to see what happens when we place a reward for the minority faction into the game. Globally, the faction imbalance is small, but the trend over the last few months has been towards a lower BG participation rate among Alliance players.
      We’ll plan to run the next test for a week, starting with weekly maintenance (Wednesday 21 July in this region), by enabling all of the following:
      Same-faction Battlegrounds will be allowed by the matchmaker. The matchmaker will take a little more time to find an opposite-faction match than it did during the first test. Groups will be restricted to a maximum of 5 players when joining the queue. We’re adding an enlistment bonus for Alliance players who participate. The enlistment bonus will be a repeatable Level 70 quest offered by the Alliance Brigadier General in any Alliance capital city or Shattrath. The quest rewards a Battleground win with a box of loot that includes an appropriate amount of consumables, crafting materials, and currencies/tokens.
      We’re planning to end this test with scheduled weekly maintenance next week (28 July). We prefer having a clear beginning and end to it so that we can do more comparative analysis and take care as we decide what would be best for the game and players going forward.
      We think it’s worth noting upfront that the most impactful part of this test should be the restriction on premades, and we’re going to be highly sensitive to how Battleground PvP feels for both players who usually queue up alone and players who would have otherwise formed raids before queueing. As before, we’re going to open a new thread here when the test begins, and we’ll be looking there for your thoughts on how the test went after you’ve experienced it.
      And as always, thank you very much for all of your valuable feedback on the game!
    • By Starym
      Bots have been around for a long time and will be here after we're all dead and gone. Ok that turned dark really fast, but my point is bots = many. Today we're taking a look at one truly funny video of a player dealing with this ever present infestation, perhaps not in the most original or incredible way, but the video and execution of it was just top level, so I thought it was worth a look.
      First things first, a little backstory as a few days ago a post trended on the WoW Classic reddit, as a player spotted a stuck level 58 boosted bot near the Maraudon entrance:

      Apparently this gave (the honestly completely appropriately named) Sick_Nerd_Baller an idea, and it was executed brilliantly, so I won't spoil it (there's also a BIT of a message at the end). Make sure to enable the sound and play the video from the start (as it unfortunately autoplays).

    • By Starym
      Today's giant set of hotfixes included some for BCC as well, so we separate them out for better visibility.
      July 6 (Source)
      Burning Crusade Classic
      “Tear of the Earthmother”, “The Lexicon Demonica”, and “Underworld Loam” quests can now be completed on Heroic dungeon difficulty. The Shattered Halls Fixed an issue where Warchief Kargath Bladefist would not cast Blade Dance in certain situations.
    • By Staff
      Blizzard are looking to alleviate some long battleground queues in BCC by testing out regular queue same-faction conflicts! Tests begin tomorrow and Alterac Valley will not be included.
      Battlegrounds (Source)
      Hello, Battleground enthusiasts!
      As soon as we saw Battleground queue times go way up a few weeks ago, we got to work on our options for addressing the situation. They’ve all been discussed here and elsewhere, as you know, and in addition to following your discussions closely, we looked at game history and data. What was most evident from all of your feedback was: players want to continue to play on their chosen side of the faction conflict, players don’t want to wait in long queues for BGs, and players don’t want a highly convoluted mechanism for getting into a BG.
      To solve those issues as best we can, we’ve been internally testing a configuration where the War Games system is used to bring about Horde vs. Horde or Alliance vs. Alliance Battlegrounds from the regular queue, and we’re ready to test it in the live game. Here’s the plan:
      Starting tomorrow (Friday, July 2), we’re going to enable same-faction Battlegrounds. You’ll queue for BGs as usual, and the matchmaker will first try to make an opposite-faction match for you. If an opposite-faction match cannot be quickly made, you’ll be matched against a team from your faction. Rewards such as Honor and Reputation will be assigned as usual. We’ve been thinking of these like military training exercises, and to help get that feeling across in-game, we’re testing putting masks and tabards on the team playing out of the enemy faction’s base.
      Please note that same-faction play won’t be available for Alterac Valley, which was never hooked up for War Games and would be particularly awkward for the team that found themselves fighting alongside a great number of enemy NPCs.
      We’ll follow the action closely throughout the weekend, and with scheduled maintenance next week (July 6 in this region), we’re going to return the matchmaker to its regular configuration and analyze what happened.
      When same-faction play goes live tomorrow, we’ll open a new feedback thread in this forum. After you’ve played some BGs, please come to that new thread and let us know how it went.
      Thank you!
    • By Starym
      Here come some new BCC hotfixes.
      June 28 (Source)
      [With regional restarts] Feral Druids now receive 20 Energy every 2 seconds, and their Energy should never get a partial tick outside of that 2-second loop. Developers' note: With careful timing, Cat Druids should be able to receive their full 20 Energy regeneration tick immediately after shifting. [With regional restarts] Team ratings should now more closely follow personal rating changes on Arena teams.
×
×
  • Create New...