Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Staff

The State of Burning Crusade Classic Server Populations

Recommended Posts

62017-upcoming-burning-crusade-classic-r

 

The Burning Crusade Classic side of the Community Council has received a lengthy response on the topic of server populations (relating to low pop and faction balance issues), where Blizzard discuss some potential solutions, why they should and shouldn't be implemented, talk about the topic in general, and ask for player ideas for potential solutions.

Blizzard LogoServer Balance (Source)

Hello!

First off, big thanks to Sixxfury and Basîl for taking the time to write up your thoughts on this. Second, apologies for taking so long to reply. No great reason or excuse other than “I had to think about this post a lot before making it” :stuck_out_tongue:

In any case, this is definitely a top issue for both us and for players, and it’s a topic we are basically always talking about as a team internally. I’d like to preface what I’m about to say with this: player distribution across realms is one of the most complex, if not the most complex issue that WoW Classic faces, and I’m not going to provide a silver bullet answer today. There’s no single-right answer for this issue, because different people want different things, and lots of apparently obvious solutions have non-obvious consequences.

I think to start, it might be appropriate for us to touch on what we’ve done so far and what the actual intent of that is.

In November, we opened a multitude of Free Character Moves (FCMs) between many realms.
The intent of this was to respond to the feedback that some players wanted to play on realms with a higher population. We aren’t trying to stop smaller servers from becoming even smaller, and we aren’t trying to prevent so-called “megaservers” from forming. We are simply trying to give players who want to move an easy option to do so. It’s not perfect or complete, but it’s a relief valve.

I’ll also be the first to acknowledge that we probably should have done this sooner. This isn’t meant to be an excuse, but the main reason we waited as long as we did (and a big driver to being very slow and methodical when making changes that affect server populations in general) is because in our attempts to “fix” things for specific groups, we could unintentionally damage the experience of other groups, and this is something that always gives us pause. Here’s an example:

Imagine a medium-population PvP realm that is 60% Horde and 40% Alliance, and a majority of people on this realm are happy with the state of the realm. However, half of the current Alliance population (20% of the total server population) is unhappy at the feeling of being disadvantaged in world PvP, having a harder time leveling without getting ganked, and having a perceived weaker factional economy. If we open FCMs off this realm, this unhappy 20% of players might be delighted to be able to easily leave for greener pastures. Let’s assume that they all go from unhappy to happy. But now what’s left is a smaller realm that is 75% Horde and 25% Alliance. It’s not hard to imagine that now Alliance players who were previously content with a 60/40 split now become unhappy at being 3:1 underdogs and at having their own economy and community shrink by 50%, and now they’re unhappy. And on the other hand, some % of Horde players who value world PvP and were happy being on a 60/40 PvP realm are now also unhappy because their faction is now so dominant that the only world PvP available feels lopsided and unsporting.

In the above example, doing something well-intentioned to benefit the unhappy 20% would have actually hurt more people than it helped. This is part of the dilemma and what causes us to take a lot of time to analyze things before taking actions that affects realm populations and faction balance. Ultimately, we did end up opening FCMs to and from a variety of destinations, and we will continue to monitor and modify the source and destination realms as time passes. We could have done a lot better here however, or at least been more communicative and I do sincerely apologize for that.

Next I want to drill into a common suggestion we’ve seen that was alluded to in both posts above, as well as talk about how we’ve approached this issue as we’ve debated it internally.

My server is 90% horde, and this other server is 90% alliance. Merge them and make a perfectly balanced server.
This idea is, on its face, a great one, and we can see why such a suggestion could be a quick one to make. There are a few things that have given us pause about this in the past, however.

  • “Merging” servers is actually something that WoW has almost never done, and the reason for this is simple; we don’t like the idea of someone losing their unique name on a realm, and this is doubly true for classic where your identity in the community is a major aspect of the game.

  • We’ve somewhat worked around this in modern versions of World of Warcraft with the concept of “connecting” realms. With this process, we do allow you to keep your name (and guild affiliations), it’s not seamless and is an intrusive change to the players’ chosen gameplay environment. When the connection is completed, players on the new connected realms will then have a realm name appended to the end of their nameplate such as “Aggrend-Grobbulus” or “Kaivax-Pagle”.

  • As a result of this being entirely new territory to WoW Classic, this also leads to more Classic-specific questions and conundrums such as:

    • Is this appropriate for WoW Classic? In doing this, we are essentially overriding your realm identity and forcibly causing you to merge with another, wholly unknown (to you) realm and community.
    • What if you don’t want to be on a balanced realm and at some point, specifically elected to move to a realm where your faction is in the majority? We have years of data that suggests that, on a long enough timeline, the population for most PvP realms will tend to skew towards one faction or the other and that this skew often starts as the result of more incoming players joining the majority faction, rather than players leaving the minority faction.
    • What if merging two realms like this forces layers to be enabled at all times, when they were not enabled previously? Layers are a useful tool and something that we feel most players understand they will have to deal with when choosing to move to a “High” or “Full” population realm, but if your realm has existed without layers for months or years and they are suddenly forced upon you, is that okay?
    • What happens in several months when the population of this new more-balanced realm starts to again (and likely inevitably) skew towards one faction or the other? Do we then connect the already connected realms to yet another realm with the inverse population skew? In such a scenario, you could easily see a never-ending cycle of continuously connecting realms to “chase” that balance, and of course, each time we connect a set of realms, it further dilutes the original realms’ ecosystem and communities.
  • Overall, the data we have suggests that, broadly, players don’t seem to want an even playing field and/or they care more about having their faction be heavily populated and lively than they care about their realm being balanced. Our concern is that the more we try to directly intervene, the more likely we may be to destroy the communities or individual play experiences that players have created organically. Does this mean we won’t ever connect realms in WoW Classic? No, and that is an active discussion we’ve been having for quite some time.

Obviously, there are many, many other proposed solutions that we’ve seen from players as well as from our colleagues, but using just this one example you can likely see how difficult this is to work through, and how even a seemingly simple solution can be fraught with peril if not carefully considered. I mostly provide this to give insight into the types of discussions we have internally and how we arrive at the actions (or inactions) we take.

So, where do we go from here? Well, I think that’s where you come in. What we’d like to see now is some more suggestions from you with your ideas of how we could improve this situation and ideally, we can have some back and forth here to discuss them. One thing I will ask you to keep in mind however is that we generally prefer to avoid any solution that would force players to do anything they don’t want to do, or directly damages or diminishes their ability to log in and play the game, so please try and keep that in mind when suggesting things in this discussion. Obviously, that places a lot of restrictions on the scope of ideas, but that’s kind of the point, and part of the reason for the dilemma we face right now when thinking of ways to address this issue in a way that fits within the WoW Classic design space.

Lastly, we also wanted to float the idea and acknowledge that this issue might just be too big for forum discussion. To that end, we are working on plans to host some form of live chat with you soon, to discuss this and other aspects of WoW Classic. This is still in the planning phase and we hope to have more details about this in the coming weeks, but needless to say, I think we all want to get to the point where we have multiple avenues to have meaningful, conversational discussions about this and other topics affecting our community.

Please stay tuned for details on that. Thank you again for your time, and we hope that you will have a most excellent new year! Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda weird seeing them accept the non-aggression principle in this matter when what they did the last few expansions was stuff garbage down the throat of their playerbase and act the exact opposite.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Andser said:

Kinda weird seeing them accept the non-aggression principle in this matter when what they did the last few expansions was stuff garbage down the throat of their playerbase and act the exact opposite.

On this subject, they're aware that forcing something on us is garbage, and consider all the options. In your aggressive scenario, they believe their garbage is amazing and should be tasted by all, and that it is in fact, not garbage at all. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncommon Patron

I wonder if they'd consider the option to clone one of your characters to any realm you please? It's not much different than a transfer, except if it doesn't work out on the new server you can just go back to the one you cloned from.

Edited by Migeru71

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Opening server moves doesn't really change anything, no one wants to remain on a dead server, so very few are willing to risk moving to less populated one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Allow same name on horde and alliance on same server.

2. Transfer the horde population of a horde dominated realm to a new server.

3. Transfer the alliance population of an alliance dominated realm to that same server.

4. merge the low factions on one server and give them free transfers wherever they please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      We have an end date for BCC's Season 4, as well as some additional information about Arena points and their post-season conversion, and the pre-patch costs of S4 gear. 
      Season 3 (Source)
      On the eve of the Wrath Classic pre-expansion patch, we will end the final season of Burning Crusade Classic PvP at 10:00 p.m. in each region. In this region, Season 4 will end at 10:00 p.m. PDT on August 29.
      During maintenance on August 30, we will update the game, and all Arena points will be converted to Honor. Throughout the pre-patch, Arena Season 4 gear will be sold for Honor.
      Good luck fighting to the finish!
    • By Staff
      Blizzard announced realm consolidations for Burning Crusade Classic, merging multiple low-populated realms with Morgraine.
      (Source)
      Realm consolidations are underway and characters remaining on the following realms are being moved:
      Original Realm Destination Realm Celebras Hydraxian Waterlords Zandalar Tribe Hydraxian Waterlords Bloodfang Mograine Dragon’s Call Mograine Dragonfang Mograine Dreadmist Mograine Finkle Mograine Flamelash Mograine Gandling Mograine Harbinger of Doom Mograine Heartstriker Mograine Judgement Mograine Lucifron Mograine Noggenfogger Mograine Razorgore Mograine Rhok’delar Mograine Shazzrah Mograine Skullflame Mograine Stonespine Mograine Ten Storms Mograine Wyrmthalak Mograine
    • By Staff
      Update: it seems Blizzard have now fixed the bug and the season is back on.
      Season 4 (Source)
      Our fix for the bug has been tested and deployed. The season has just resumed.
      Have a good night!
      _____________________________________________
      Burning Crusade Classic Arena Season 4 abruptly and unexpectedly ended a short while ago, and Blizzard are confirming that it's a bug and is being looked into.
      Season 4 (Source)
      Looks like a bug. We’re investigating it.
    • By Starym
      Update: the buff is now live on NA and EU servers as well!
      It's time for joy on TBC Classic servers, as the Joyous Journeys 50% extra XO buff has gone live on Oceanic servers. It was late Monday morning for that region when it went up so we should be seeing the buff arrive shortly to EU and then NA, but it's definitely coming today (Monday).
      The buff was said to arrive "at least 6-8 weeks" before WotLK Classic's launch, and we've already seen a leaked release date from the official site for September 26th, which is 1 week later, but it's now safe to say September is the target month at least.
      In any case, now is the time to level up those classes you may have wanted to try out for WotLK Classic!
    • By Staff
      It's finally here! After an early launch on Oceanic realms the Joyous Journeys 50% XP buff has arrived to EU and NA servers! Now is the time to get those WotLK classes set up and ready for the new Classic, which also got its officialr release date today. 
      Prepare for #WrathClassic with a 50% XP boost.

      Live now. pic.twitter.com/UtYJFJChFM
×
×
  • Create New...