Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

A Misunderstanding May Have Been the Cause of Activision Blizzard Games Not Being Available in China

Recommended Posts

70168-us-federal-trade-commission-files-
 

The break in Activision Blizzard's partnership with NetEase in China which happened in January this year cost many Chinese players the ability to play Blizzard games, and today the New York Times may have some insight as to how the relationship between the two gaming giants might have gone wrong.

While tensions had been building for years before the final negotiations last year, ranging from NetEase's investment in Western studios Activision wasn't happy with (former Activision-owned studio Bungie being one), in the end the fate of Chinese players' Blizzard accounts may have come down to a misunderstanding. The Zoom call in question happened last October, between Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick and NetEase chief executive William Ding, and involved translators at certain points in the conversation.

As reported by the New York Times, based on accounts from 4 people familiar with the talks and a document they reviewed, the call was part of the standard re-negotiation of licensing rights between the two companies. The discussion arrived at the topic of the merger between Activision Blizzard and Microsoft and the scrutiny it had come under all around the world, but particularly in China. According to two people familiar with the call and the document reviewed by the New York Times,  Activision executives recalled that at a certain point Mr. Ding said NetEase "could sway the [Chinese] government either to block or support that deal depending on the outcome of the licensing discussion." Reportedly the Activision executives felt that the statement was meant as a threat, but NetEase executives claim they did not intend to make any threat. They stated that they were just trying to be conciliatory towards Activision, meaning to simply point out that Microsoft would have the same issues Activision now had with the Chinese regulators, and that the new deal NetEase was proposing would help in both situations. A NetEase spokesman flatly denied that there were any threats as well, saying that Activision was continuing to "harass and taunt companies and regulators worldwide."

Clipboard01.jpg
NetEase employees tearing down the Gorehowl statue in China.
Source: chaijingNDS on TikTok, via Dexerto.

After the call Activision reportedly made a completely different licensing offer, for approximately $500 million upfront, as opposed to the previous smaller payments throughout the course of the deal, which NetEase rejected. There was also a quite literal last ditch effort on the part of Activision later on, asking to extend the existing deal for 6 months as it looked for a new Chinese partner, but that was also rejected by NetEase. Finally, on January 23rd 2023, most of Activision Blizzard's games were shut down in China, with players not being able to access their characters, which some had spent over a decade and a half building. And while their data has been saved, it is still unclear when or even if they will be able to use those accounts and characters again.
 

The New York Times article has many more details about the two companies' dealings, so make sure to check it out over here, as it is very eye-opening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also have taken it as "if you dont give us a good deal we will make our govmt block your microsoft deal".

Goodbye "partner".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Chinese government wouldn’t want anything more than to see a U.S. based company destroyed. I believe 100% NetEase said that, and as big as they are guarantee the Chinese Government is involved heavily in their dealings…that’s how communist countries work!

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ArthasStormrage87 said:

The Chinese government wouldn’t want anything more than to see a U.S. based company destroyed. I believe 100% NetEase said that, and as big as they are guarantee the Chinese Government is involved heavily in their dealings…that’s how communist countries work!

This is just state capitalism. Also, this is how capitalist countries work as well. US intervenes on behalf of their major companies all the time (so they can pay lower taxes in other countries for example). You don't need freedom to have capitalism. Besides, in this case it was Netease who wanted to sway Chinese government in their favor.

To be fair, both sides come off as bad here. Activision didn't want their partner working with their former devs and studios, so they tried to force them out of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, ArthasStormrage87 said:

The Chinese government wouldn’t want anything more than to see a U.S. based company destroyed. I believe 100% NetEase said that, and as big as they are guarantee the Chinese Government is involved heavily in their dealings…that’s how communist countries work!

100%

When you deal with Chinese companies you deal with the Chinese government by proxy and sometimes there's not even a proxy.

There is absolutely no misunderstanding here lol.

Edited by Prophet001

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here come all the edgelords with their hot takes on capitalism vs communism, as if the two were independent and the Freedumb Eagle does no such thing for its own companies.

Go look up how many questionable rulings there have been regarding exporting software and 15 CFR § 742 that were supposedly done in the name of national security.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, SidonisAntares said:

Here come all the edgelords with their hot takes on capitalism vs communism, as if the two were independent and the Freedumb Eagle does no such thing for its own companies.

Exactly as I mentioned in my previous post. I live in one of these countries where American companies don't pay much tax due to US government interference. They also rely on public infrastructure and funding to an extent. So much for "muh free market".

Also, it's always funny to me when people think China isn't capitalist. But it has Communist Party of China! It's in the name so it can't be capitalist! By this "logic" Democratic People's Republic of Korea must be a democracy.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Arcling said:

Also, it's always funny to me when people think China isn't capitalist. But it has Communist Party of China! It's in the name so it can't be capitalist! By this "logic" Democratic People's Republic of Korea must be a democracy.

Lived in chn since 30 yrs ago. CHN isn’t capitalist, it’s autocratic.

I’m sorry you are wrong.

Your argument would be partially true if their leader is still Deng Xiao Ping, since he was quite open minded and never cling to CCP codex which demand their ppl to bring  “utterly destruction” to “western capitalism scums”.

But for now, not a chance. That country, it’s leadership, and even a large part of its population, are puffed up with the mindset that they are superior to any other country/civilization over the world.


You should really check those vulgar “memes” or bad jokes created by CHN netizen during Blizzard-NetEase drama. They just barge into your house then spit in everyone’s face if ppl doesn’t agree with their “by-refusing-our-proposal-blizzard-is-trying-to-destroy-our-great-country” conspiracy.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, SidonisAntares said:

Here come all the edgelords with their hot takes on capitalism vs communism, as if the two were independent and the Freedumb Eagle does no such thing for its own companies.

Go look up how many questionable rulings there have been regarding exporting software and 15 CFR § 742 that were supposedly done in the name of national security.

Zhou Changjian, Jack Ma, Bao Fan, Meng Hongwei, and countless others would like to open your eyes to your naivety and enlighten you on the differences between the two. If you can find them that is.

Edited by Prophet001

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, KYA said:

CHN isn’t capitalist, it’s autocratic.

It's both, those things aren't mutually exclusive. I think you assume that capitalism equals democracy, and it can't exist without it. As I wrote before, capitalism doesn't equal freedom. Autocratic countries have this too and the way their economy operates is basically state capitalism. The way Chinese economy operates, this is how state capitalism is often defined in political theory.

14 hours ago, KYA said:

Your argument would be partially true if their leader is still Deng Xiao Ping, since he was quite open minded and never cling to CCP codex which demand their ppl to bring  “utterly destruction” to “western capitalism scums”.

Again, this is just propaganda. Not how system actually works. Just like they are claiming that they are fighting for freedom from western oppression, doesn't mean they are some protectors of democracy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see how it may have played out as a NetEase flex gone wrong and taken the wrong way by Bobby Kotick Yacht Club.

NetEase executive bragged about their ability to persuade the Chinese regulatory body, and ensuring ActBlizz that even post MS merger the way would remain open if the deal is made.

ActBlizz possibly intepreted it as if they don’t sign then NetEase will actively move to disrupt their operation - Hence the perceived threat.

NetEase may as well start doing that now the cat is out of the bag. 

I’m sure the ability to influence the Chinese government regulatory body would be a significant leverage in China. I’d brag about it too lol.

Also smh at the derailing into omg Communists again… Cringe. Propaganda going both ways. Power and influence is used in every market of every governing model, be it capitalist free market or a state capitalism socialist market.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry double posting with added context:

For the past 14 years NE and AB were in a Joint Venture mandatory by law, just like any sizable foreign business operating in China.

Allegedly the “threat” came from NetEase proposing that AB switch model and fully licence their games instead to NetEase, so NetEase would have a easier time dealing with Chinese regulators as a influencial, domestic Chinese company because otherwise post merger Microsoft would again be under the mercy of the Chinese regulators, as a foreign business in a JV partnership.

Apparently Blizz was like “fine pay us big money upfront.” NetEase was like “lol, no.”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Prophet001 said:

Zhou Changjian, Jack Ma, Bao Fan, Meng Hongwei, and countless others would like to open your eyes to your naivety and enlighten you on the differences between the two. If you can find them that is.

We just have better PR. Many people don't even know the names those who disappeared through Homan Square in Chicago unless related to them, or as lawyers for said relatives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I quitted WoW 4-5 years ago but I still love the game. I still remember the countless hours of farming, spamming M+, friends, quests, gangs etc. I didn't know the "ban" case and oh boy I feel so sorry for every single chinese player. At least for the honest ones playing for the sake of the game not the hackers, AH farmer. If at my most addicted days when I literally was living so I can get back home and start playing I was "banned" form the game I love...my soul was gonna be empty. I know how nervous I was getting when my internet connection was down. Boy...the melt down was gonna be real. I really hope they will resolve the issue as soon as possible because WoW may be dying from what was years ago but there are still players who love the game and truly enjoys it. I truly hope because everybody knows that at some point WoW was life.

Edited by Avataris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      PC Gamer had the chance to talk to Blizzard President Mike Ybarra who said Blizzard's job is to satisfy impatient players who want "new stuff every day, every hour".
      Interview Highlights
      Blizzard is now adapting to the Microsoft Era under the umbrella of Xbox and Phil Spencer. The focus remains on maintaining their live service model. Blizzard President Mike Ybarra emphasized the challenge of satisfying players who demant constant new content. He acknowledged the high expectations of players for new updates and experiences on a nearly continuous basis. The live service model is expected to continue with their upcoming unannounced survival game. Ybarra stressed out the difficulty of delivering new content on regular basis while ensuring fair and satisfying monetization strategies to players. Ybarra didn't rule out the possibility of Blizzard exploring shorter, non-live service games. Ybarra is yet to have discussions with Phil Spencer about the future direction under the new ownership. You can read the full interview here.
    • By Staff
      We're liveblogging all the important announcements and highlights from the opening ceremony. Check back often for updates!
      BlizzCon 2023 Opening Ceremony Highlights
      World of Warcraft
      Chris Metzen is now on stage talking about the next WoW expansion. The next expansion is titan-themed, light vs the void. The new storyline feels like the culmination of 20 years of storytelling. They are adding something called World of Warcraft: Worldsoul Saga which will cover multiple expansions at a faster pace.
      The first chapter is called World of Warcraft: The War Within, you will meet the Nerubians and descend to the Heart of Azeroth. The second part of the saga is called World of Warcraft: Midnight - In this chapter, you will be returning to the old world, to the fabled lands of Quel'thalas. There, the forces of the void have invaded Azeroth, they are plunging the world into the darkness. You will banish the shadow forever. The final part of the saga is called World of Warcraft: The Last Titan. In this chapter you will return to Northrend. There, at Ulduar you will bear witness to the return of titans to Azeroth. There, you will uncover a vast conspiracy. One that stretches throughout the history of the world. One that challenges everything you know about the world and it's called Silithus. They are now playing a trailer for the War Within. In the War Within, we will be meeting Xal'atath who is leading a Nerubian civilization. New zones include Azj-Kahet, Isle of Dorn, The Ringing Deeps. New features include Delves, and Warbands! You can treat alts as family and there will be account-wide reputation! Earthen Dwarves are coming as an Allied Race in War Within. War Within releases in Fall 2024. World of Warcraft Classic
      Holy Longdale is now talking about WoW. They are adding a new way of playing Hardcore in Classic. Cataclysm Classic was just announced. It's coming in the first half of 2024. Season of Discovery was announced for Classic. It will include game-altering abilities. The season will allow Warlocks to be tanks and Mages can become healers. The initial cap will be 25. Season of Discovery launches on November 30. Warcraft Rumble
      Warcraft Rumble launched yesterday. The game has 70 bosses and plenty of dungeons. They will be adding new minions every season. In Season 1 it's Sylvanas. Hearthstone
      Showdown in the Badlands is the latest Hearthstone expansion launching on November 14. Catch-up card packs will be introduced to Hearthstone You will find more details here. They have announced Battlegrounds Duos with a shared health pool, team combat, you can fight with your friends instead of against them.
      World of Warcraft
      John Hight revealed the future of WoW will be revealed today, so expect a new WoW expansion! Diablo
      Rod Fergusson is now talking about Diablo 4. Diablo 4 is the biggest launch in Blizzard's history with more than 1.5 billion hours played. The devs are talking about quality-of-life improvements to the game implemented based on community feedback. Next week, they're adding 5 Malignant Rings to Season 2 that let you relive the fun you've had during the Season of the Malignant. Enchanting Preview Window will be added to the Occultists. Abbatoir of Zir a new Seasonal Event. Midwinter Blight in Diablo 4 starts on December 2. Blizzard revealed Vessel of Hatred, a new Diablo 4 expansion coming in late 2024. It follows the story of Mephisto in a lush jungle.
      You can find Blizzard's official recap here. Overwatch
      Aaron Keller is now talking about Overwatch.  Overwatch Art Director has revealed a new hero for Overwatch named Mauga. A new Clash PvP mode is planned for Overwatch 2 in 2024. The Hanamura map is returning as Hanaoka. Competitive is being reworked with new rewards. They have two new Heroes planned in 2024. More details to be unveiled tomorrow. Intro
      Blizzard President Mike Ybarra welcomes everyone at BlizzCon. This is the first in-person BlizzCon taking place after 4 long years. Phil Spencer, CEO of Microsoft Gaming, is now on stage. It's his first BlizzCon. He talks about how much he enjoys playing Diablo 4 Season 2 with friends. He didn't announce Game Pass for Blizzard games. Ybarra says the Microsoft merge is "start of a new era" for Blizzard. Livestream Video
      Here's the official stream, with all the content free to watch, and you can check out the official schedule here as well.
    • By Staff
      Players getting the free to play Warcraft Rumble on their mobile devices were greeted with a nice bonus! The game released a day early and those trying it out today found a Hearthstone card back and the WoW Gnomelia Battle Pet reward just for starting the game! 
      MiT_Epona posted the rewards screen, but the items are not yet unlocked in their respective games. Presumably this is due to the early launch and they will be arriving to players tomorrow, when Rumble was originally set to be launched. 

      Source: Rumble battle pet inc (don’t have in game yet).
    • By Staff
      It seems the Rumble just couldn't wait any longer! The Warcraft mobile game was scheduled to release tomorrow, but Blizzard pushed the button early and it has begun rolling out already! Plenty of players are reporting seeing it in their stores, but it's a rollout so it may take a while longer to get to you if it hasn't yet. 
      You can get the game here:
      Apple Store     Google Play
       
      If you're unfamiliar with it, you can check out the game overview here and here's a couple of videos as well, one with the basics and one with some recent updates.
       
       
    • By Staff
      Following their recent $69 billion acquisition of Activision-Blizzard-King, Microsoft is actively working to integrate and foster trust with their new teams. Key figures from Microsoft's leadership, including Phil Spencer, Matt Booty, and Sarah Bond, recently made their inaugural visit to Blizzard's headquarters in Irvine, California.
      During the visit, Phil Spencer took the opportunity to address the Blizzard staff. He emphasized that Xbox is in a phase where they are keenly listening to the needs and aspirations of the Blizzard team. Spencer further conveyed Microsoft's commitment to being a reliable partner for Blizzard, expressing a strong desire to support the studio in achieving its goals.
      Notably, observers at the event pointed out a distinct separation in branding between Activision and Blizzard. This has led to speculations about Blizzard possibly regaining some managerial autonomy in the future.
      You can read the full article over on Windows Central.
      Blizzard President Mike Ybarra and Global Community Lead Adam Fletcher even included some photos from the event/meeting on Twitter.
      Placeholder for tweet 1716936523395076605 Placeholder for tweet 1716934774902935669
×
×
  • Create New...