Blainie

heroes Climbing from Bronze 5 to Grand Master with Nostromia!

20 posts in this topic

W4XOAVH.jpg

Ever wondered how difficult it might be to climb from Bronze 5 to Grand Master in HoTS? This Russian streamer has decided to undertake the task, while only solo queuing the whole way!

The streamer in question is none other than Nostromia, a Russian streamer that normally plays at the Grand Master level. She managed to grab herself a low MMR account and is attempting to show that it's possible to climb from Bronze 5 all the way to Grand Master. 

The Reddit post over on /r/heroesofthestorm which really highlighted her stream has described her progress as follows:

  • She has a nearly 100% win-rate, with a score of 42-1.
  • She is currently in the Silver leagues.
  • Her main heroes played are Falstad and Zagara.
  • While she has a limited grasp of English, she uses simple commands to communicate with other players that are not Russian.

If you're interested in watching her climb, you can always check out her stream at twitch.tv/nostromiagaming.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, its possible because she's already a grand master skill level player.  It still isn't possible for a Bronze 5 skill level player to make it to grand master, that's the whole point of the mmr and rankings... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Estelise said:

Yeah, its possible because she's already a grand master skill level player.  It still isn't possible for a Bronze 5 skill level player to make it to grand master, that's the whole point of the mmr and rankings... 

She's mainly doing it to dispel the myth that like.. "it's impossible to carry in HoTS because that role doesn't exist". These sort of things. It's also going to give us an average number of wins in order to level up through each rank and so on. It will be REALLY useful for collecting data in my opinion, data that will help a lot of players.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one said it's impossible to climb from bronze to grand master when you can actually carry your team cause you have the skill, the problem is that a good player with good skills that can see where the team is failing but can't carry them is not able to climb the ladder, because he plays or matched up with players that can't see their fault

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I highly doubt she can do this. However, I hope she does. It will give me hope. I have many Hero's friends that reach a rank and then just go down, down, down. I cheer for them, gain hope, and then lose it. 

 

 

And I have many proofs with words that 'prove' MMR hell. I hope to have doubt about my arguments with some empirical data. 

 

Sincerely, I am smiling and excited about her success. And I have been defending MMR hell vigorously. 

 

 

There may be a point however, after a single player's skill cannot overcome the lack of skill in his/her four teammates. Nonetheless, that record is impressive. 

Edited by greatCraft
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, mnime said:

No one said it's impossible to climb from bronze to grand master when you can actually carry your team cause you have the skill, the problem is that a good player with good skills that can see where the team is failing but can't carry them is not able to climb the ladder, because he plays or matched up with players that can't see their fault

This was actually one of the biggest criticisms of HoTS - it's not possible to carry because a carry doesn't exist, due to a lack of items, such as a heavily farmed ADC in LoL.

Not saying I agree with this, that is.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Blainie said:

This was actually one of the biggest criticisms of HoTS - it's not possible to carry because a carry doesn't exist, due to a lack of items, such as a heavily farmed ADC in LoL.

Not saying I agree with this, that is.

True, scratch that part where I said "no one".

It is possible but don't you think good players with high skill cap should play in high leagues even if they can't carry a team?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, mnime said:

True, scratch that part where I said "no one".

It is possible but don't you think good players with high skill cap should play in high leagues even if they can't carry a team?

For sure. I think it's interesting to see her play in the lower leagues too though. Not only from a results point of view (25 games to go from Bronze to Silver, for example), but to see what really separates the players.

When you watch her play Falstad, the Bronze players have no idea what is going on when she jumps over the walls and gusts them straight into her team. You can see that those plays are what allow her to carry, regardless of her having items or not. Those plays can literally create a win for a team.

It's a different kind of entertainment from watching top players I think. It's going to be one-sided for sure. On a normal day, I definitely think GMs should play GMs, Gold should play Gold etc., but I definitely want to see this played out. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, greatCraft said:

I highly doubt she can do this. However, I hope she does. It will give me hope. I have many Hero's friends that reach a rank and then just go down, down, down. I cheer for them, gain hope, and then lose it. 

 

 

And I have many proofs with words that 'prove' MMR hell. I hope to have doubt about my arguments with some empirical data. 

 

Sincerely, I am smiling and excited about her success. And I have been defending MMR hell vigorously. 

 

 

There may be a point however, after a single player's skill cannot overcome the lack of skill in his/her four teammates. Nonetheless, that record is impressive. 

I also believe in MMR Hell, 

Because matchmaking greatly depends on "Luck", if you're a lucky guy, you get decent players, if you're unlucky like me, you play your placement, start in D4 and then you go up to D1, but then you keep getting afkers, troll pickers, ragers. The question is why is it just me that gets trolls in my team? and the answer is Luck! I'm unlucky.

And this MMR hell affects all of blizzard's games, even in Overwatch I tried solo queue, got placed in rank 61 after placements and now I'm 35... and I swear to God half of my loses are because of leavers and people who keep playing Ana with a bad comp or Genji without any skill, even if you beg them to change, they don't.

 

And the thing that frustrates me more than anything is that, is my skill cap really this low? I can vividly see where the team is failing but my teammates can't, how is it that I'm teamed up with them?

Edited by mnime

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, mnime said:

I also believe in MMR Hell, 

Because matchmaking greatly depends on "Luck", if you're a lucky guy, you get decent players, if you're unlucky like me, you play your placement, start in D4 and then you go up to D1, but then you keep getting afkers, troll pickers, ragers. The question is why is it just me that gets trolls in my team? and the answer is Luck! I'm unlucky.

And this MMR hell affects all of blizzard's games, even in Overwatch I tried solo queue, got placed in rank 61 after placements and now I'm 35... and I swear to God half of my loses are because of leavers and people who keep playing Ana with a bad comp or Genji without any skill, even if you beg them to change, they don't.

And the thing that frustrates me more than anything is that, is my skill cap really this low? I can vividly see where the team is failing but my teammates can't, how is it that I'm teamed up with them?

I feel like MMR hell is often seen in the wrong way. People seem to think MMR hell is like, OMG IF IT WERENT FOR THESE SHIT PLAYERS I'D BE GRAND MASTER EASY.

That's not what we're saying. I'm not saying I'd be a GM, BUT I am saying that I could comfortably pull my weight in a team that is a few ranks above me. I just can't reach that level because I'm not good enough to carry those that can't pull their weight at my current level. 

I agree about OW too. Ana shouldn't have been allowed in this season of comp IMO. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Blainie said:

That's not what we're saying. I'm not saying I'd be a GM, BUT I am saying that I could comfortably pull my weight in a team that is a few ranks above me. I just can't reach that level because I'm not good enough to carry those that can't pull their weight at my current level. 

This, 100%.  It's nice to see someone looking at it this way, because I feel like that is exactly where I am.  I am by no means a GM, but can definitely pull my weight when I play with teams above my hero league rank.  The thing is that when I play HL, yes I can see the mistakes that my teammates are making, but my personal play isn't good enough to completely make up for them.  Just because I play well and don't make those mistakes doesn't mean the other players are the only thing holding me back.  Maybe someday I'll get good enough to carry teams and make amazing play after amazing play, but until that time I'll keep up the grind!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No doubt, it is possible to climb, but:

1 game with afkler/troller/feeder/etc , trades with another game you won. So 2 matches and about 40-60minutes game time is lost. If it is a uprank or downrank game you lose an additional game you won. 60-80 minutes game time lost and 3 matches wasted.

 

My badest streak was 5 matches with afkler in a row and in addition 2 matches with troll picks.

A week or more of hardwork totally wasted and loosing 2 ranks.

 

Can you carry with a bot/feeder/troller/afkler on silver? I doubt it MMR hell stands for running in circles, the good old "Hell League"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, ghostdeini said:

This, 100%.  It's nice to see someone looking at it this way, because I feel like that is exactly where I am.  I am by no means a GM, but can definitely pull my weight when I play with teams above my hero league rank.  The thing is that when I play HL, yes I can see the mistakes that my teammates are making, but my personal play isn't good enough to completely make up for them.  Just because I play well and don't make those mistakes doesn't mean the other players are the only thing holding me back.  Maybe someday I'll get good enough to carry teams and make amazing play after amazing play, but until that time I'll keep up the grind!

It's the biggest misconception about MMR hell for sure. It happens in both HoTS and OW, but it seems the only way to fix it is play in a party. It sucks.

46 minutes ago, Skund said:

1 game with afkler/troller/feeder/etc , trades with another game you won.

This is always terrible. I hate it when someone refuses to play properly and just feeds because your team doesn't want them to first pick Nova, or pick a hero into a counter. It's really annoying. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is a workaround for this, there is a very good skill rating measurement system in overwatch, and blizzard keeps telling the community that they like the idea and they want to add it to heroes too.

Let's say it happens. It's not that hard to figure out the skill of a player, am I wrong? I mean in Overwatch you're either helping your team by doing damage, blocking damage, healing or taking objective. The same can be done for HotS. In heroes you're either doing damage which involves poking and team fights or pushing lanes, as a tank you're taking damage and also dealing some, as a support you heal, and all can participate in objectives, someone who does very low damage, doesn't help much on objectives, die many times and maybe afk once in a while to type and flame teammates :D MUST be in the lowest MMR among players, this player MUST lose MMR regardless of his team's defeat. because he's just bad and toxic! This way not only you see players of same skill level after a month, but you also know that if someone flaming or trolling he will lose MMR and eventually end up in lower leagues. 

This way you know if you wanna rank up, you need to stop feeding (which makes players play more safe, is awesome!) you need to help objectives at all times unless you're helping your team more than that by pushing lanes (Like Abathur, although every time I play abathur I always hide in a bush near minions to get the xp for team, locusts push passively and I help objective with symbiotic, I hate Murky players who ignore objectives completely!!) , you need to deal enough damage, heals to help your team (You can say doing huge amounts of damage is way easy with Nazeebo compared to Murky, but the system can give more value to that amount of damage you deal when the enemy dies within 5 seconds. Or landing a very good CC can be a big score too.)  Just like in Overwatch when you see a D.Va with a perfect ult which kills 4 and wins the match for her team and gets the play of the match, This can happen in Heroes, the engine sucks but they can work on it.

 

TL:DR - We need a system that can rate your skill after each game based on your damage dealt, healing done, damage taken and objective time. And this system's score should affect your MMR directly. If you Troll you lose MMR regardless of the outcome of the match.

Edited by mnime

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, mnime said:

I think there is a workaround for this, there is a very good skill rating measurement system in overwatch, and blizzard keeps telling the community that they like the idea and they want to add it to heroes too.

Let's say it happens. It's not that hard to figure out the skill of a player, am I wrong? I mean in Overwatch you're either helping your team by doing damage, blocking damage, healing or taking objective. The same can be done for HotS. In heroes you're either doing damage which involves poking and team fights or pushing lanes, as a tank you're taking damage and also dealing some, as a support you heal, and all can participate in objectives, someone who does very low damage, doesn't help much on objectives, die many times and maybe afk once in a while to type and flame teammates :D MUST be in the lowest MMR among players, this player MUST lose MMR regardless of his team's defeat. because he's just bad and toxic! This way not only you see players of same skill level after a month, but you also know that if someone flaming or trolling he will lose MMR and eventually end up in lower leagues. 

This way you know if you wanna rank up, you need to stop feeding (which makes players play more safe, is awesome!) you need to help objectives at all times unless you're helping your team more than that by pushing lanes (Like Abathur, although every time I play abathur I always hide in a bush near minions to get the xp for team, locusts push passively and I help objective with symbiotic, I hate Murky players who ignore objectives completely!!) , you need to deal enough damage, heals to help your team (You can say doing huge amounts of damage is way easy with Nazeebo compared to Murky, but the system can give more value to that amount of damage you deal when the enemy dies within 5 seconds. Or landing a very good CC can be a big score too.)  Just like in Overwatch when you see a D.Va with a perfect ult which kills 4 and wins the match for her team and gets the play of the match, This can happen in Heroes, the engine sucks but they can work on it.

 

TL:DR - We need a system that can rate your skill after each game based on your damage dealt, healing done, damage taken and objective time. And this system's score should affect your MMR directly. If you Troll you lose MMR regardless of the outcome of the match.

Problem is, these things aren't always useful. Let's take two scenarios, both in the same game.

  1. Bastion is on defense and does nothing but fire straight into Mei's Ice Wall and Reinhardt's shield. He kills nobody, but has 5 times more damage than anyone else on his team. 
  2. Tracer is on attack, she barely kills anyone, but she manages to keep overtime going continuously, but dies very quickly on the point. It's enough to let her team get back onto the point and fight though.

By damage done, the Bastion is doing loads. In reality, he never touches the point and pads his damage constantly. Tracer will be shown by medals and numbers to be doing less, but she is way more useful to her team. 

I think it's a lot more difficult to make it work than we think. In HoTS, a warrior could sit there, suicide 15 times and take loads of damage. So by the warrior stat, he's doing well, but he's not contributing. What about a warrior that takes less damage, but doesn't die? Is he better or worse? What if the 15 deaths are instead incredibly important, allowing his team to win the team fight?

I really think it's insanely hard to calibrate these systems properly to discern between good and bad players, especially when the metrics measure a good and bad player in the same way. Loads of deaths could be a terrible player feeding or a good player sacrificing themselves to let their team win.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Blainie said:

Problem is, these things aren't always useful. Let's take two scenarios, both in the same game.

  1. Bastion is on defense and does nothing but fire straight into Mei's Ice Wall and Reinhardt's shield. He kills nobody, but has 5 times more damage than anyone else on his team. 
  2. Tracer is on attack, she barely kills anyone, but she manages to keep overtime going continuously, but dies very quickly on the point. It's enough to let her team get back onto the point and fight though.

By damage done, the Bastion is doing loads. In reality, he never touches the point and pads his damage constantly. Tracer will be shown by medals and numbers to be doing less, but she is way more useful to her team. 

I think it's a lot more difficult to make it work than we think. In HoTS, a warrior could sit there, suicide 15 times and take loads of damage. So by the warrior stat, he's doing well, but he's not contributing. What about a warrior that takes less damage, but doesn't die? Is he better or worse? What if the 15 deaths are instead incredibly important, allowing his team to win the team fight?

I really think it's insanely hard to calibrate these systems properly to discern between good and bad players, especially when the metrics measure a good and bad player in the same way. Loads of deaths could be a terrible player feeding or a good player sacrificing themselves to let their team win.

Very good point. 

Giving more value to the damage heroes deal within 5 seconds of a kill or assist is a good idea for the first scenario IMO. Nazeebo's poke, Bastion's wall/shield damage are not completely wasted but an assist is way more valuable and could get a multiplier.

Dying in HotS more than a few times just hurts your team no matter what. I remember someone suggested for tanks that if the death was within a few seconds of team fight (atleast 4 members of team are dealing damage to heroes) or objective battle (atleast 4 members of the team presence near the objective), it means he died for a reason. This way tanks who just jump in and engage 1v5 and die without waiting for their teammates or their healer to help them are considered feeders.

It would be a really complicated code. But since I remember, any game that had a matchmaking system suffered from this exact problem. The code needs to be smart and there are a lot of workarounds, I think Blizzard developers are smart enough to write it, don't you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/31/2016 at 0:43 AM, mnime said:

Very good point. 

Giving more value to the damage heroes deal within 5 seconds of a kill or assist is a good idea for the first scenario IMO. Nazeebo's poke, Bastion's wall/shield damage are not completely wasted but an assist is way more valuable and could get a multiplier.

Dying in HotS more than a few times just hurts your team no matter what. I remember someone suggested for tanks that if the death was within a few seconds of team fight (atleast 4 members of team are dealing damage to heroes) or objective battle (atleast 4 members of the team presence near the objective), it means he died for a reason. This way tanks who just jump in and engage 1v5 and die without waiting for their teammates or their healer to help them are considered feeders.

It would be a really complicated code. But since I remember, any game that had a matchmaking system suffered from this exact problem. The code needs to be smart and there are a lot of workarounds, I think Blizzard developers are smart enough to write it, don't you think?

If anyone can do it, I hope Blizzard can :P It would make me so happy when playing both OW and HoTS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 30/07/2016 at 1:32 PM, Blainie said:

Problem is, these things aren't always useful. Let's take two scenarios, both in the same game.

  1. Bastion is on defense and does nothing but fire straight into Mei's Ice Wall and Reinhardt's shield. He kills nobody, but has 5 times more damage than anyone else on his team. 
  2. Tracer is on attack, she barely kills anyone, but she manages to keep overtime going continuously, but dies very quickly on the point. It's enough to let her team get back onto the point and fight though.

By damage done, the Bastion is doing loads. In reality, he never touches the point and pads his damage constantly. Tracer will be shown by medals and numbers to be doing less, but she is way more useful to her team. 

I think it's a lot more difficult to make it work than we think. In HoTS, a warrior could sit there, suicide 15 times and take loads of damage. So by the warrior stat, he's doing well, but he's not contributing. What about a warrior that takes less damage, but doesn't die? Is he better or worse? What if the 15 deaths are instead incredibly important, allowing his team to win the team fight?

I really think it's insanely hard to calibrate these systems properly to discern between good and bad players, especially when the metrics measure a good and bad player in the same way. Loads of deaths could be a terrible player feeding or a good player sacrificing themselves to let their team win.

I think the way around this in terms of coding and understanding would be to perhaps divide role stat by death, to assess true value of a player.  For example:

Player 1. Dying 10 times and doing 100, 000 damage might be made to look like a great player cos of the high damage but like you say,  those 10 deaths could mean that to get that 100, 000 damage,  the team have suffered missing objectives and such and lost the game

Whereas,

Player 2. Someone who did 70, 000 who died 3 times technically did less damage would be possibly judged as the inferior player 

Now for some basic maths 

1. 100, 000 divided by 10 is 10, 000

2. 70, 000 divided by 3 is 23, 333

With this we can now see that player 2 performed a lot better even though the role was less.  This is incredibly simplified however I think it's a starting point for a new approach. 

 

Same goes for xp

Take the xp and divide by deaths and you can find an effectiveness statistic

 

You can even go one further to combine these two statistics 

 

Role ÷ deaths + experience ÷ deaths = X 

Then divide x by 2 because you quantified 2 different stats 

 

With enough thought you could find out so much about the value of a player from this method alone

 

Ultimately its a team game that's won or lost on decisions but we already have systems in place (MVP),  we could just make them more sophisticated 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/22/2016 at 2:38 PM, Lakecide said:

With enough thought you could find out so much about the value of a player from this method alone

The issue is, as soon as deaths become important as a stat, people will play differently. It's why they currently aren't ranked for medals.

There are times when I would rather have someone swap to Tracer and suicide 5 times, but reset the Overtime timer 5 times, as opposed to a Widowmaker that gets 2 kills, but watches as we lose due to not resetting the timer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan

      Our guide section has been updated with the Lucio Build Guide. Are you ready to drop the bass?
      It offers two ways of building Lucio:
      Reverse Amp Build The emphasis is put on AoE damage and Movement Speed slow. Good if you're playing as a secondary Support. Sound Barrier Build Focuses on Lucio's defensive capabilities. Feedback and comments are always welcome and can be submitted here.
    • By Oxygen

      We present our third Heroes of the Storm Meta Tier List for the Lúcio patch of Febuary 2017.
      Our third Heroes of the Storm Meta Tier List for the month of Febuary 2017 has arrived!
      Welcome to Icy Veins's Meta Tier List for the Lúcio patch. The goal if of this list is to try and detail game's current metagame state. The prime goal of such lists is to inform players regarding popular and trending team composition drafting strategies (i.e. the drafting metagame). Although tier listings are generally the product of balance, many factors come into play when discussing the relative perceived strengths of heroes, including player regions, maps, play style, skill level, and, of course, personal perception. As such, any tier list - including this very one - should never be interpreted as gospel, but rather, as a guide to better grasp what to expect with regards to typical drafting experiences. One useful application of such lists is to allow you know which heroes to look out for in terms of practice and counterplay, ultimately improving your knowledge of the game.
      Using the list
      As stated above, tier lists are easy to mistake for gospel. As new strategies are discovered and experimented with, so changes the perception of the relative strengths of each hero. Tier lists still prove to be useful as a snapshot of player expectations in terms of drafting. Although it is generally considered preferable to focus on high tier heroes (Prime and Core tiers), it is important to note that Heroes of the Storm's wild character and map designs make it so that any given hero's tier position is prone to fluctuate depending on the situation at hand.
      One classic example of such is that of Kerrigan on the Infernal Shrines map. Although we currently judge her to be a mid-tier hero, her drafting priority shoots up to first-pick or first-ban material on this specific map due to the nature of its objective. Certain heroes also synergise so well with each other that the sole fact of having the opportunity of drafting them together is generally enough to increase their potential. Tassadar and Tracer, for instance, are generally nightmarish to deal with for many. There are too many examples of these interactions to reasonably produce here, but we invite you to consult our guides to know exactly where and when each hero shines. The guides have been linked in the lists below for your convenience - just click any of the hero names to access them.
      If you're newer to the game, also consider visiting our glossary for a comprehensive list of discrete Heroes of the Storm terms.
      New this month!
      As per usual, a big 'thank you' to everyone who contributed to last month's list. Starting this month, I'll be giving bits of insight on some of the more notable tier changes.  You may note that this list features not one, but two new heroes! This is a small side effect of waiting around the middle of any given month to update this list. As a reminder, since last month, the number of arrows next to individual hero names represents the number of tiers they have gone up or down from. Refer to the last section for this.
       
      Prime Tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Artanis Ragnaros Malfurion - Varian (Tank)↑   Rehgar   Prime tier heroes are considered to be extremely strong in all situations, and show no obvious weakness. They are very often banned or picked right away, as they generally dictate the pace of most matches.
       
      Core Tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Dehaka Falstad Brightwing Murky↑↑↑ Diablo↓ Gul'dan   Nazeebo E.T.C. Jaina   Sylvanas Johanna Kael'thas     Zarya Li-Ming       Samuro       Thrall↓       Tychus       Valla       Zeratul       Zul'jin     Core tier heroes are strong in a wide variety of situations and have few counter-picking possibility. They should form the core of your team, and be picked after Prime Tier heroes have been distributed.
       
      Viable Tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Anub'arak Alarak↓ Auriel - Arthas Chromie Kharazim   Chen Kerrigan Lt. Morales   Muradin↓ Lunara Lúcio (New)   Rexxar↑ Raynor Tassadar↑   Tyrael Greymane↑       Valeera (New)       Varian (Damage)    
      Viable tier heroes are generally well-rounded that have either fallen out of favour, or, inversely, are on the rise in popularity, due to the current Prime tier contenders.
       
      Niche tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Cho'gall Cho'gall Li Li Abathur Leoric Illidan Tyrande Azmodan Sonya Nova Uther Gazlowe Stitches The Butcher   Medivh   Tracer   Sgt. Hammer       The Lost Vikings       Xul       Zagara Niche tier heroes have niche application on certain maps or for certain team compositions. They are generally picked to "round out" your team composition when your team composition is missing out on key components, such as a "jungler" (mercenary camps), a solo laner, or solid waveclear.
       
      Bottom Tier
      - Bottom tier Heroes are deemed to be either considerably weaker than the majority of other Heroes, or much more challenging to play properly. Although they may situationally shine, these Heroes are generally avoided by most players.
       
      Monthly metagame assessment
      If I could describe the last month and a half's metagame with one word, it would probably be nothing, because I'm currently being chain-stunned and can't take any action.
      Support heroes without access to Cleanse certainly struggle, which is why I'm skeptical about putting Lúcio, the latest addition to the cast, anywhere above the Viable tier, despite solid win rates I expect will soon go down as people figure out how to better deal with him (i.e. stop chasing him).
      The Cleanse point is further exacerbated by Murky's outrageous newfound dominance, with Octo-Grab being the ultimate (or should I say, Heroic) stun button, earning him a steep 3-tier promotion. Although his recent success may even justify a Prime tier position, I'll play this one conservatively and allow players to figure out just how to counter the murloc, who hasn't seen any serious play in nearly two years. Core tier it is, but he's certainly on the watch list for an impending promotion if things don't go as planned.
      Valeera also possesses her own baked-in powerful stunning effect in the form of Cheap Shot. This is particularly relevant due to the most recent buffs that will certainly cause her to rise in popularity and in effectiveness, in spite of Cheap Shot itself being nerfed by some 0.25 seconds. Although on the lower end of the win rates spectrum, I suspect she falls into the Medivh category of high potential, difficult to master heroes. Some of her counters (Protection Varian, notably) are currently very popular, making it difficult to justify anything above Viable tier.
      While we're on the subject of Protection Varian, it would seem that the buffs to Parry-related talents and the recent shuffling of his utility (on top of the Taunt buffs) have finally caught up to the average player, as thousands have begun to grasp the advanced concept of following up and attacking stationary targets. This goes to show that a dismal early game presence can be made up by a strong, meta-defining heroic ability.
      In response to this new Prime tier contender, two of the most popular tanks have begun to slowly disappear, with Diablo and Muradin each taking a tier hit. If Diablo has been the target of some very recent nerfs, on top of players figuring out his one-trick-pony-esque playstyle, Muradin's skillshot-based stun (in the form of Storm Bolt) can't seem to find a place in a highly point-click oriented metagame. Both heroes are still strong, but not nearly as contested as they were before.
      Alarak and Thrall are two heroes that are also suffering in this meta. Both are without instant gap closers to punish mispositioning or get out of trouble or burst damage to effectively follow up on crowd control. While Thrall remains a strong solo laner, Alarak certainly is the one that suffers most as of lately.
      Finally, Greymane, Rexxar, and Tassadar all saw small or big revisions to some of their talents and abilities, and it has done much needed good to their state. Greymane is particularly interesting in his newfound ability to threaten tanks through Cursed Bullet, something that was once reserved to Tychus.  If the general public has yet to adopt the wolf, it has slowly started to adopt the bear: Rexxar's win rates are going through the roof, and he's seeing more and more play, and particularly on maps that require holding specific objectives. As for Tassadar, his role as a "secondary healer" has been solidified with a much needed damage potential increase, in the form of Archon and consistent slowing effects.
    • By Stan

      A little hotfix was deployed to live servers today that fixes a rare AI bug and an issue with Lucio's Sonic Amplifier.
      Blizzard Entertainment (Source)
      Hotfix Patch Notes: Feb 17
      Bug Fixes
      A.I.
      General: Fixed a rare issue that could cause A.I. players to stop functioning correctly during a Versus A.I. match. Heroes, Abilities, and Talents
      Lúcio: Learning Sonic Amplifier will no longer cause Amp It Up to benefit from Synaesthesia Auditiva. Previous hotfixes are from a week ago.
      Blizzard Entertainment (Source)
      Hotfix Patch Notes: Feb 8
      Bug Fixes
      General
      Color Blind Mode: Fixed an issue causing Minimap icons for uncaptured Merc Camp to appear very similar in color to Merc Camps that have been captured by allies. Graphics: Targeting indicators will no longer disappear after minimizing the client during Battleground loading while also running the game using DirectX9 in Fullscreen mode. Battlegrounds
      Infernal Shrines: Punishers will no longer repeatedly attempt to walk into the opposing team’s starting area when lead beyond Keeps to a Protected Core. Tomb of the Spider Queen: Webweavers will no longer stop advancing down lane after encountering an opposing Scouting Drone when no other enemies are nearby. Heroes, Abilities, and Talents
      Ice Block: Fixed an issue which allowed Brightwing and Malfurion to use certain active Talents while in Stasis. Seasoned Marksman: Fixed an issue causing Seasoned Marksman to increase the damage dealt by Titan Killer. Kael’thas: Fixed an issue that could cause Pyroblast to move unpredictably when fired at a target that enters and exits the mines. Kael’thas: Fixed an issue that could cause Pyroblast’s targeting indicator to persist indefinitely when targeting a Hero as they become Unrevealable. Nazeebo: The Corpse Spiders vase will no longer fall through the terrain when the Ability does not hit any enemies at its landing location. Ragnaros: Activating Empower Sulfuras will no longer cause Ragnaros to lose his current target if that target was automatically acquired during attack-move command. Ragnaros: Catching Fire’s Talent and Quest Progress tooltips now each state that Ragnaros gains 1.5 Health Regeneration per Regeneration Globe he gathers. Zagara: Mutalisks will now correctly fly around or over unpathable terrain.
    • By Stan

      Next week, three Heroes and two skins will be added to the sale.
      The sale for the week of February 21 doesn't follow the usual pattern. We get three Heroes instead of one!
      Blizzard Entertainment (Source)
      Weekly Sale Items for February 21 – 28, 2017  Stitches —  4.19 EUR // 3.19 GBP Tracer —  4.99 EUR // 3.69 GBP Zarya —  4.99 EUR // 3.69 GBP Psycho Stitches Skin — 3.69 EUR // 2.70 GBP Widowmaker Nova Skin — 4.99 EUR // 3.69 GBP
    • By Stan

      One shot, one kill! Ghost Protocol is returning as this week's Heroes Brawl.
      All players play as Novas on Towers of Doom. Snipe not only instantly kills an opponent, it also reduces the opposing team's Core by 1 health. You have full access to talents and abilities. Playing 3 games awards 1,000 Gold and the portrait below.
      Blizzard Entertainment (Source)
      Lock and load, Heroes! This week's Heroes Brawl mode is Ghost Protocol, an all-Nova snipe-battle on Towers of Doom. Be sure to practice your aim before heading into battle, because every shot counts in this game mode – Snipe not only instantly kills enemy Heroes, but it also reduces the enemy team’s Core health by 1! Good luck, have fun!

      Rules:
      Every player is locked in as Nova, Default skin vs. Spectres Landing a Snipe on an enemy Hero will instantly kill them All deaths remove one health from the opposing team’s Core All players have full access to Talents and Heroic Abilities Be the first team to bring the enemy’s Core health to zero to secure victory! Rewards:
      Complete three matches of Ghost Protocol to earn 1,000 Gold and the following portrait: