Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Stan

wow Gul'dan Testing & Blue Posts (Class Feedback)

7 posts in this topic

Ru3EIGx.jpg

Elisande and Gul'dan are available for testing on December 13. Another set of blues is up dealing with MM Hunters, Rogues and Destruction Warlocks.

Gul'dan PTR Testing

Elisande and Gul'dan  will be tested out on Public Test Realms for the first time on Heroic difficulty. You can preview all encounter abilities in the in-game journal. Gul'dan's encounter has a Mythic-only phase, where Khadgar returns Illidan to his dormant body, but he will be somehow possessed. This phase information was removed from the journal lately.

Blizzard LogoWatcher

On Tuesday, December 13, we will be conducting focused raid tests of Heroic Nighthold bosses.
Remember that Heroic difficulty scales for groups between 10 and 30 players, so feel free to assemble and bring a group of any size within that range. 

Tuesday, December 13

Elisande – Heroic Nighthold
13:30 PST (16:30 EST, 22:30 CET)

Gul'dan – Heroic Nighthold
15:00 PST (18:00 EST, 24:00 CET)

As always, this testing schedule is very fluid and subject to the realities of a PTR environment. We might have to change the time of a testing session, change the bosses being tested, or cancel a test entirely, due to bugs, server hardware issues, etc. Keep an eye on this forum for the latest information, and thank you in advance for testing and providing feedback.

(Source)

Following yesterday's blue posts from feedback threads on the official forums, we got a few updates specifically for MM hunters, Destruction Warlocks & Rogues.

Marksmanship Hunters

Blizzard LogoSigma

We definitely understand that Marksmanship Hunters were used to a version of Vulnerable on live that was, for all practical purposes, full uptime (i.e. it could be up for every or virtually every Aimed ShotAimed Shot). Skilled players will still be able to have a great majority of their Aimed ShotAimed Shots affected by Vulnerable even in 7.1.5, albeit with a higher demand on focus management and good use of WindburstWindburst. That is intended, even if it involves losing a degree of comfort in essentially never being without a Vulnerable when you want it. The debuff is less diluted and has more significance when it requires that sort of attention, and it is not without payoff: the damage of an Aimed ShotAimed Shot with Vulnerable is significantly higher than in 7.1, and can be further increased with the new Patient SniperPatient Sniper. The ability to use Piercing ShotPiercing Shot with Vulnerable (and potentially Patient SniperPatient Sniper) is an example of a new option allowing a very strong burst.

While the fundamental mechanic driving it is a proc, the proc rate is quite high, and our goal is to make sure it is the sort of randomness that provides variation to a rotation while allowing responsive gameplay and room for mastery. The ability to wait on a Hunter's MarkHunter's Mark while pooling focus to get full value from the Vulnerable will be more important than before. WindburstWindburst, as well as the talent options SidewindersSidewinders and SentinelSentinel, allow on-demand Vulnerables as a resource to deal with situations where you have focus but not a Mark (or simply to make sure you have one for a key burst moment without having to react to a proc). Finally, removing the Vulnerable requirement for Marked ShotMarked Shot to do strong damage removes a reliance on multiple rapid procs and/or SidewindersSidewinders in order to use consistent buffed Marked ShotMarked Shots.

As the PTR goes on, we welcome feedback on what problems turn up when you try to put this into practice, but I wanted to explain a bit more what our expectation was.

(Source)

Rogues

Blizzard LogoSigma

Cheat DeathCheat Death at 6 minutes is ridiculous... At the very least they need to make it reset on death, or no one is going to use it.

It does.

To say a bit more on the 7.1.5 changes to various “cheat death” effects, including Cheat DeathCheat Death, CauterizeCauterize, PurgatoryPurgatory, and Last ResortLast Resort: firstly, the cooldown increase is not the only change—the cooldowns (specifically, the cooldown-enforcing debuffs) will now clear on death. So if you Cheat Death early in a dungeon, yes, you should avoid dying again for the next 6 minutes. However, in the event you do die (or the group wipes), you will return to combat with Cheat DeathCheat Death once again available.

More broadly, we examined the value of these effects as a whole and concluded they are too easily available. When Cheat DeathCheat Death was first added as a deep Subtlety talent (before the change to modern talent rows), its power and cooldown reflected the significant investment into that tree. In the current game, not only is its opportunity cost much lower, but, taking a look at the gameplay of healing and survivability challenges, the power level of such a frequent extra life is very high. For example, RebirthRebirth has a 10 minute cooldown, and is a distinctively powerful ability that significantly contributes to a class’s perceived power in dungeons. ReincarnationReincarnation has a 30 minute cooldown, and is far from being meaningless or forgotten. If we were adding Cheat DeathCheat Death and its ilk today and evaluating its power, there would be little justification for a cooldown as short as 2 minutes. Preventing a death that might otherwise have scuttled the entire current attempt at a dungeon or raid boss has more value than that.

On Last ResortLast Resort in particular, we are aware that Vengeance Demon Hunters felt somewhat reliant on this to avoid deaths to unexpected burst damage, and we will be monitoring whether they need other changes to compensate (for example, they have increased health on PTR, increased baseline damage reduction, and a stronger Metamorphosis effect). And on PurgatoryPurgatory, its cooldown was increased the least because it conditional, and it was also made more reliable: the effect will now always last for 3 seconds regardless of whether you momentarily go above 0 HP during that window.

(Source)

Destruction Warlocks

Blizzard LogoSigma

One problem that Destruction Warlock had was a number of talent rows with very obvious "single-target" vs. "AoE" talent picks. This has clear downsides--a requirement to swap talents often (and as a corollary, a feeling of being significantly crippled when not using the ideal talent loadout for a given situation). Clearly, it's a DPS loss single-target to say you can no longer have both EradicationEradication and Reverse EntropyReverse Entropy, and a DPS loss in some AoE situations to say you can no longer have both CataclysmCataclysm and Fire and BrimstoneFire and Brimstone. But making that swap, and then making sure throughout PTR that Destruction DPS remains reasonably consistent with live, will leave the spec more well-rounded and not as pigeonholed by talent choices in a given situation. PTR already has buffs to Summon DoomguardDoomguard and Summon ImpImp damage that help with numbers in all situations, as well as buffs to various talents to help futher improve flexibility.

(Source)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't wait to have a crack, is the Tues 13th actually the Wed for Aus? (just wanted to make sure)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/11/2016 at 0:37 AM, Kirbyzki said:

Can't wait to have a crack, is the Tues 13th actually the Wed for Aus? (just wanted to make sure)

I would assume so, yeah. From what I can see, 13:30 PST is 08:30 the next day for Aussies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Guldan on a PTR.... Well its sad that Blizzard backed down from their words that, it won`t be tested on PTR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Dantalian said:

Guldan on a PTR.... Well its sad that Blizzard backed down from their words that, it won`t be tested on PTR.

I think it had to be done after what happened with Xavius. If another tier was destroyed for the race due to no testing, it'd be pretty lame :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/12/2016 at 5:18 PM, Dantalian said:

Xavius was tested, but not fixed that is not the testers problem.

He wasn't tested on Mythic and that was where the biggest issues were

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan

      Ion conducted a Q/A yesterday and Lore came to the forums to answer additional questions about Legendary items, revolving around bad luck protection and Relinquished items.
      It deals with bad luck protection for every spec and how the system handles Legendary items that can drop for more than a single spec. The unidentified Legendary items we reported about earlier were just a developer idea with the intent to fix loot specialization and Legendaries. It won't be implemented now as bad luck protection will now function for every spec individually. Legendary items targetting was also confirmed via Relinquished items.
      Lore (Source)
      1) How does the above work in regards to Non-spec-based Legendaries (like Shard of the Exodar for mages, who works for all 3 specs. Does it account for ALL specs, or just the one that it was dropped on?
      If a Legendary can drop for your spec, it counts. An easy way to check this is to open the Adventure Guide ingame (Shift-J by default) and click the "Loot" tab without having a dungeon or raid selected. That'll show you which Legendaries are counted for your spec.
      2) Very similar to the above, how do items like Prydaz, Xavaric's Magnum Opus/Sephuz's Secret/Kil'jaeden's Burning Wish etc work under this system? Does it count for the spec it dropped on, or for all specs?
      Same as above.
      3) The PTR has had "Unidentified <Class> Legendary" items in its database for a while, and it's been speculated that these were a 'failsafe' for people accidentally getting a legendary in the 'wrong spec' and blowing their accrued Bad Luck Protection -- are these unidentified items still going live, are they going to be scrapped in light of the spec-based droprate/BLP ? If they are going live, is it intended behavior that people could play offspecs with low number of legendaries, or none, get these items quickly (since the first 2 legendaries drop faster), and then swap to their 'main spec' as a way to get a few more legendaries 'quickly' (in comparison to the norm) ?
      These were part of an experimental concept that we've since decided not to go ahead with, at least for now. The idea wasn't exactly what you're speculating, but our concerns were similar.
      4) How does BLP 'acquisition' work under this new spec-based system? Do I 'build up' BLP for all specs as I play, or only for the one currently set as my Loot Specialization? If it builds for all of them, this has possible unintended consequences, where once I get an item in 1 spec, I know I should swap to the others and get items 'relatively fast' since the BLP is built up a fair bit (assuming it wasn't RNGesus giving you an item very very early on)
      This one I'm actually not certain on the answer, but I'll look into it.
      So basically if you have utility legendaries you are even more screwed than before because you already have that many legendaries for every spec.
      I can see where you're coming from, but I'd make the argument that if you have cross-spec Legendaries and play multiple specs, you're already at an advantage in that they're functional for your other specs. I have the Leggings of The Black Flame and Unison Spaulders on my Mistweaver; neither of them do anything at all when I play Brewmaster.
      I feel like this comes back to a lot of the utility legendaries are still just "bad" some like Prydaz, Xavaric's Magnum Opus and Sephuz's Secret are better. But there are other's like Acherus Drapes and Uther's Guard that remain disappointing as ever to receive. I leveled a DK as a fun alt, got Acherus Drapes as its first legendary, i am tempted to just delete the character and try again if I had gotten Prydaz i wouldn't have felt this way as it has far more value. Or i have been considering leveling my warrior and just hoping for better luck. You mentioned this in the QA but please take a close look at all the legendarys (including healer ones). To make sure there aren't so many egregious outliers, i should emphasize this is a much larger problem for healers right now than DPS.
      Yep, this is the important point to remember: if a legendary just sucks, then that's the problem we need to fix. Similarly, if your spec sucks without a particular legendary, then that legendary also needs to be fixed to not be so impactful.

      Regarding Prydaz, specifically: It's maybe not the most exciting legendary right now, but it's certainly strong. The stats make it a solid, reliable throughput upgrade, and in the immortal words of Sebudai: "It's pretty easy to figure out how much DPS you're doing as a corpse on the ground."

      As for Sephuz: it has a weird, but temporary, issue. When you only have one or two legendaries, it sucks that it does nothing on the fights where you can't proc it. No argument there. Eventually, though, you'll have a third legendary, and it opens up for some interesting gameplay, where you swap it on for fights with a lot of dispels, interrupts, or controllable targets, and swap it out for the ones that don't. It's not always useful, but it's really good when it is. That's not a bad thing.

      Those seem to be the two that most commonly come up as "bad," but we'll keep discussing the other options as well. I know there's a few tweaks planned to some that haven't yet hit the PTR.

      Overall, though, I just wanted to drive home the point that if you're upset at how long it might take you to get your next Legendary because the ones you have are bad, we want to fix that by making the ones you have better.
      We.Want.A.Way.To.Target.Spec.Specific.Slot.Specific. BEST IN SLOT.
      A) I think your spacebar is broken.

      B) You'll be able to do exactly that through the Relinquished gear tokens in Patch 7.2.
      Wait, was this a confirmation that we can actually target slots?
      Correct. The current plan is that if you purchase a Relinquished token for, say, shoulders, and it gives you a legendary, it gives you legendary shoulders.

      Massive wall of caveats here just because I don't want to over-promise:
      This is PTR. Anything can change at any moment. Many things already have. We don't have a solid handle yet on how long it will take to earn these things, or what the chance of them becoming a legendary will be. We need to be confident that the Broken Shore content itself is stabilized before we can start figuring out things like how quickly you earn Nethershards or how much these tokens cost. Their primary purpose is still as catch-up gear, similar to what was available on the Timeless Isle or Hellfire Peninsula. We don't consider this a "silver bullet" solve to all legendary-related issues, and aren't trying to make it be one. Still, if you just desperately want that one specific legendary, this might be an option worth considering.
    • By Stan

      Blizzard's trying to fix the issue of Legendary items and loot specialization with unidentified Legendaries. Every time a Legendary item drops, you'll be able to switch between specs and then discover a Legendary appropriate for your specialization.
      Update: Lore confirmed in a blue post that these were part of a concept that they won't go live with at least for now.
      Lore (Source)
      These were part of an experimental concept that we've since decided not to go ahead with, at least for now. The idea wasn't exactly what you're speculating, but our concerns were similar. It's interesting that the items are bound to Battle.net Account, so you might end up mailing them to your alt (must be the same class) on a different realm.
      Unidentified Death Knight Legendary Unidentified Demon Hunter Legendary Unidentified Druid Legendary Unidentified Hunter Legendary Unidentified Mage Legendary Unidentified Monk Legendary Unidentified Paladin Legendary Unidentified Priest Legendary Unidentified Rogue Legendary Unidentified Shaman Legendary Unidentified Warlock Legendary Unidentified Warrior Legendary Don't forget that crafted Legendary items are coming in 7.2 and the latest build added affixes and made them BoE.
      Celumbra, the Night's Dichotomy Rethu's Incessant Courage The Sentinel's Eternal Refuge Vigilance Perch Please note the nature of PTR. Anything may change before Patch 7.2 goes live.
    • By Stan

      Further fixes for Legendary items underway. Relinquished items were introduced in the latest build of 7.2 (#23623). The items are unique per slot and have a chance to contain Legendary items.
      Relinquished Items
      The persisting problem with Legendaries is that you don't get the one you want or need. Not anymore though. Relinquished items discover an item appropriate for your loot specialization and not only that, they have a chance to contain a Legendary item, most likely on a slot-per-slot basis.
      Relinquished Bracers Relinquished Choker Relinquished Cloak Relinquished Gauntlets Relinquished Girdle Relinquished Hood Relinquished Leggings Relinquished Ring Relinquished Spaulders Relinquished Treads Relinquished Trinket Relinquished Tunic Example: Relinquished Hood may contain only Head slot Legendary items, such as Darckli's Dragonfire Diadem or Uncertain Reminder. Such slot restrictions increase the chances of getting the Legendary item you want. The question is what's the probability of getting a Legendary item?
      Unidentified Legendary Items
      Update: Unidentified Legendary items were considered, but they won't go live as bad luck protection for individual specializations will be implemented.
      The previous build (#23578) added items that create Legendaries based on your set loot spec. This may represent an overall fix for loot spec problems. I think unidentified Legendaries will drop by default and we won't need to worry about loot spec.
      Unidentified Death Knight Legendary Unidentified Demon Hunter Legendary Unidentified Druid Legendary Unidentified Hunter Legendary Unidentified Mage Legendary Unidentified Monk Legendary Unidentified Paladin Legendary Unidentified Priest Legendary Unidentified Rogue Legendary Unidentified Shaman Legendary Unidentified Warlock Legendary Unidentified Warrior Legendary Taken from here.
      What do you think about the latest changes?
    • By Stan

      Four color variations are available for the Rogue's Class Mount Shadowblade's Murderous Omen and you get it by assassinating the infiltrating homunculi via Hiding In Plain Sight (Stormwind) // Hiding In Plain Sight (Orgrimmar).
      Greetings, Shadowblade. I hope you are not too upset that I began without you, I have a bit of trouble controlling myself around the mindless undead. Yes, you heard me right. Taerir, the very Taerir that has been standing in the Hall of Shadows for many months now, was the undead pawn of a dreadlord. And there are more of them - in our cities, rising through the ranks of the aristocracy, growing in power and influence, and nearly undetectable.
      The /mountspecial is shared with the Blizzard store mount  Heart of the Aspects animation.
      As usual, characters in our Class Mount preview videos wear Tier 20 Sets and the Rogue is no exception.
    • By Stan

      Game Director Ion "Watcher" Hazzikostas was answering player-submitted questions, dealing with a wide-variety of topics such as Legendary items, Artifact Power, 7.2 relics, Mythic raiding and more. Our round-up covers most of the discussed topics.
      Artifacts
      Balance of Power appearances won't be account-wide. Effort requirements will be revisited. Hidden Artifact appearances have bad luck protection since 7.1.5. Artifact appearances aren't cannon, they're only cosmetics, so alt-friendliness isn't important. Artifact Power
      The goal is to offer progressing of your character providing choices during the process. The developers don't want AP to be the only reward you're looking out for.  Repetitive farming of Mythic+ isn't fun, which is why a lot of AP rewards were removed from chests and redistributed elswhere. In addition to that the amount of AP gained from the weekly chest has been increased. Devs want to add diminishing returns to bring players to a point where there's no desire to farm AP any longer. They don't want the final 7.2 trait to feel mandatory. You won't be able to use items that grant AP that you got with Artifact Knowledge 25 or less to avoid grinding before 7.2. New catch-up tomes will be added (similar to those you can buy now). Datamining
      Game files contain a lot of placeholders, abandoned data or developer ideas. Their removal would cost time that is spent elsewhere for designing new things. Mythic Raiding
      The devs think there's a lot of grinding, but some issues should be addressed in 7.2 (chain running Maw was specifically mentioned). Legendary Items
      It wouldn't make sense making legendaries change based on your spec, as they have a fantasy behind them. Further bad luck protection improvements down the road for 7.2. The system will evaluate how many legendary items you acquired for a specific spec. If you don't have any for spec X, you'll have a higher chance to get one, even though you have more for spec Y. Guilds benching players for bad legendaries based on sims aren't making a right choice. Crafted legendary items in 7.2 were introduced to keep professions relevant, not to address issues with Legendary items. They can be sold. Crafted legendaries aren't intended to be best and don't count against bad luck protection. Patch 7.1.5
      Changes to secondary stats were a success, but Unstable Arcanocrystal is an exception. The item won't be used that much when item level increases with Tomb raid in 7.2. PvP Q/A
      In a few weeks, there will be a PvP Q/A with Holinka including an esports 2017 announcement. Relics
      Order Hall research in 7.2 has two additional tiers and the 7th tier adds a secondary trait to relics. These relics narrow down the difference between best and worse relics and offer exciting relic rewards from a variety of bosses. The secondary trait will always be a throughput trait and different from the first one. Tier 20 Set Bonuses
      Still in development, nothing's final and they will change before release. Legion Tier Sets went to 6/6 to allow equipping of Legendary items and the team thinks it's cool to have a cloak matching your set. No plans to make 2-piece bonuses from different Tier Sets exclusive, but if they find out it's the only option they will take a closer look at the issue. Trinkets
      Players prefer trinkets with stats not active abilities. Trinket tuning for 7.2 is still in the works. Below is the VoD to the Live Developer Q/A