Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Stan

wow Blue Posts Round-up: Mar 15

9 posts in this topic

EOyJOf1.jpg

In the most recent blue posts, Blizzard talks about Vengeance Demon Hunters & Protection Warrior changes in the latest 7.2 build and Mythic+ feedback.

Demon Hunters (Vengeance)

Demonic WardsDemonic Wards now provides mitigation against magic.

Blizzard LogoKaivax (Source)

Thank you for the suggestions and discussion.

In today’s 7.2 PTR update, we’re testing the following change:
 
  • Demonic WardsDemonic Wards now reduces all damage taken by 20% (was 10%), and increases Armor by 75% (was 120%).

What this amounts to is a passive reduction of all incoming damage, combined with a lowered defenses against physical damage, leaving almost no change to incoming physical, but a substantial new mitigation against magic.

Your feedback has been very helpful, so again, thank you!

Warriors (Protection)

Changes are coming to Warrior tanks, because they're failing a little behind in Nighthold in terms of magic mitigation.

Blizzard LogoKaivax (Source)

As before, we thank you for the good feedback.

The Nighthold has put a spotlight on magic mitigation more than previous raids, and we’ve seen how that resulted in Protection Warriors (who are typically a very well-rounded tank spec) falling a bit behind other tanks as a result.


Today’s new 7.2 PTR build includes the following change:

Warrior

Gleaming ScalesGleaming Scales is a new Artifact Trait that’s coming in 7.2, and the intention here is to provide Warriors with a way to keep up with incoming spells in encounters that are magic-heavy, such as Spell Augur Etraeus or Krosus in The Nighthold. 

We’re also testing a new change to the Protection Legendary belt Thundergod's VigorThundergod's Vigor that triples the rate at which your Thunder ClapThunder Claps reduce the cooldown on Demoralizing ShoutDemoralizing Shout.

We continue to analyze and consider everything you’re telling us here (and elsewhere!), so keep it coming. Thank you!

Mythic+ Feedback

Blizzard's interested in Mythic+ feedback and there will be further tweaks to timers.

Blizzard LogoOrnyx (Source)

Thanks for copying this over! Good feedback here that I can send on up. I think the point on differences in difficulties between affixes is particularly relevant. Seems a relevant conversation the dev team would be happy to listen to is everyone's thoughts on how you deal with the various affixes (ignore them, smaller pulls, etc), and how those experiences have evolved so far in Legion.

I would also be interested in how you guys rank the affixes in order of difficulty to deal with (this obviously changes as the rank increases, but lets look at say... 5 which is pretty average) in the current environment on live.

I'm also very aware of the differences between dungeons on Mythic+, and Ion has previously touched on the preference for Maw of Souls. I'm not exactly sure what can be done at the moment about the gaps the community sees between them, but I'm willing to take any feedback you guys want to share.

My biggest gripe with Mythic+ are the timers. Timers are the reason I didn't like CMs, and it's the reason I really dislike Mythic+ despite loving the concept.

I've seen this point of discussion too, and it's come up numerous times in my own feedback and reporting. Just wanted to say I know this is a valid opinion that I'm definitely aware of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once again they miss the mark completely. Is anyone surprised anymore?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Ammako said:

Once again they miss the mark completely. Is anyone surprised anymore?

 

I am not sure what you mean by this. Are you unhappy with how they're increasing Vengeance DH's magic mitigation or that the change made isn't the issue with Vengeance DH's right now? Do you mean you'd rather see other changes instead of this tuning method? Something wrong with the Warrior magic mitigation? Something else altogether?

 

What I personally don't like about the changes in this article is the passive ways they're dealing with magic damage. Other tanks -  instead of passive mitigations - use active mitigations (Such as the Paladin's Shield of the Righteous, the Death Knight's Anti-magic Shell or the Druid's Mark of Ursol) or/and in combination with reactive mitigations (Such as the Paladin's Light of the Protector, the Death Knight's Death Strike or the Druid's Frenzied Regeneration).

Most, if not all of us main tanks, prefer the active and reactive mitigations as opposed to the passive mitigations listed in this article. Actively engaging the player in how to deal with mechanics rather than have it be a flat out stat is much more desirable and on top of that raises the skill ceiling (Differentiates good from bad players and allows striving towards perfection of execution of mechanics).

 

I can only assume Blizzard decided on this passive change for the Vengeance DH because they do not have the timeframe to weave in/design a suitable active magic mitigation skill. A "quick and dirty" change to Demon Spikes however might have been good enough (Lower physical damage mitigation and add a magic damage mitigation to it, and alter the Demonic Wards passive skill to make it balanced). But this might mean people will complain that Demon Spikes would be a glorified Shield of the Righteous and make points about homogenization.

 

The Demon Hunter is the new class so it makes sense that it is not as well defined and developed as other classes. The same was true for the Monk and Death Knight when they got released. And even in Legion we have seen complete overhauls of the rune system for DK's and brews for Monks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I Dont like timers."

That's a heck of a solution!  How else do you propose to make cutoffs for who receives how many rewards, or who receives none or substantially fewer rewards? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Yridaa said:

I am not sure what you mean by this. Are you unhappy with how they're increasing Vengeance DH's magic mitigation or that the change made isn't the issue with Vengeance DH's right now? Do you mean you'd rather see other changes instead of this tuning method? Something wrong with the Warrior magic mitigation? Something else altogether?

 

What I personally don't like about the changes in this article is the passive ways they're dealing with magic damage. Other tanks -  instead of passive mitigations - use active mitigations (Such as the Paladin's Shield of the Righteous, the Death Knight's Anti-magic Shell or the Druid's Mark of Ursol) or/and in combination with reactive mitigations (Such as the Paladin's Light of the Protector, the Death Knight's Death Strike or the Druid's Frenzied Regeneration).

Most, if not all of us main tanks, prefer the active and reactive mitigations as opposed to the passive mitigations listed in this article. Actively engaging the player in how to deal with mechanics rather than have it be a flat out stat is much more desirable and on top of that raises the skill ceiling (Differentiates good from bad players and allows striving towards perfection of execution of mechanics).

 

I can only assume Blizzard decided on this passive change for the Vengeance DH because they do not have the timeframe to weave in/design a suitable active magic mitigation skill. A "quick and dirty" change to Demon Spikes however might have been good enough (Lower physical damage mitigation and add a magic damage mitigation to it, and alter the Demonic Wards passive skill to make it balanced). But this might mean people will complain that Demon Spikes would be a glorified Shield of the Righteous and make points about homogenization.

 

The Demon Hunter is the new class so it makes sense that it is not as well defined and developed as other classes. The same was true for the Monk and Death Knight when they got released. And even in Legion we have seen complete overhauls of the rune system for DK's and brews for Monks.

So out of curiosity, have we forgotten about Empower WardsEmpower Wards ?  Demon spikes functions very much like IronfurIronfur in it's effect.  Empower Wards is a bit different that Mark of UrsolMark of Ursol in that it has a cooldown which Mark of Ursol does not (.5 seconds is not a cooldown), however they are both still active Magic damage mitigation abilities.  Which I personally use on my DH when tanking quite often.

I think the point Blizzard is getting at is that the DH as a tank is geared more towards physical mitigation through passives and actives while not really being able to equally mitigate active damage.  While I agree some tuning could be required I'm not sure adjusting their passive is the right course of action.  Personally I would like to see Empower Wards have maybe 2 charges as well as Demon Spikes having it's 2 charges.  However this may increase the the active magic mitigation to a point that is over-tuned but at this point I'd rather the class be over-tuned than left behind the curve.

After having played Guardian Druid, Protection Paladin, a very minor amount of current level 101-110 Protection Warrior, and Vengeance Demon Hunter I honestly enjoy the DH more.  It's a more active play-style than the others which I like.  Granted I don't run the "typical" passive talents.  For Mythic+ I really enjoy using Spirit BombSpirit Bomb and Soul BarrierSoul Barrier as it creates a very interactive tanking experience.  However for single target Raid Boss fights these talents are not ideal and thus I switch them out depending.

I think it comes down to that I like where DH is, but I think it could be more.  I think that Blizzard is trying to get to that "more" point but maybe aren't going about it the right way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

2 hours ago, Yridaa said:

I am not sure what you mean by this. Are you unhappy with how they're increasing Vengeance DH's magic mitigation or that the change made isn't the issue with Vengeance DH's right now? Do you mean you'd rather see other changes instead of this tuning method? Something wrong with the Warrior magic mitigation? Something else altogether?

Because Warriors struggle with magic mitigation and Blizzard's answer is to nerf Spell Reflection.

On Live we have 30% for 5 seconds on a 24 seconds cooldown. For a raid like Nighthold which is full of magic damage this simply does not cut it especially with the nerfs to Ignore Pain from Emerald Nightmare which they never reverted or amended. They were giving us 10 seconds active time on Spell Reflection with that new 7.2 trait, and they're scrapping that in favor of 50% reduction instead.

Sure, every 24 seconds you'll be able to block 20% more of some of the bigger hits. Where 24 seconds sometimes still isn't enough, but you're expected to eat everything else with Ignore Pain anyway (doubled duration on Spell Reflection would have helped a fair amount here, at least you could have have 40% uptime on it. fwiw Guardian Druids can get 100% uptime on 30% magic damage reduction on top of their other mitigation abilities. Also as far as I'm aware they have a flat 6% damage reduction on everything; that includes magic damage, and correct me if I'm wrong but I don't see that on Warriors.)

They're seemingly acknowledging that magic damage is a problem so they're buffing Vengeance DH in what I think is a good way. Is it enough? I don't know, but at least it's a clear buff. It overall doesn't really touch their physical damage reduction, but it helps with magic mitigation. Then they "fix" it for warriors by effectively nerfing one of our magic damage mitigation abilities and buffing a legendary, of all things they could choose to buff.

Edited by Ammako

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

13 hours ago, DeathsDesign said:

So out of curiosity, have we forgotten about Empower WardsEmpower Wards ?  Demon spikes functions very much like IronfurIronfur in it's effect.  Empower Wards is a bit different that Mark of UrsolMark of Ursol in that it has a cooldown which Mark of Ursol does not (.5 seconds is not a cooldown), however they are both still active Magic damage mitigation abilities.  Which I personally use on my DH when tanking quite often.

u shouldnt be serious while u are saying .5 isnt cooldown , it also costs 45 rages mate. thats something that you got to keep it in mind to use those rages wisely

Edited by Unicurn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Unicurn said:

u shouldnt be serious while u are saying .5 isnt cooldown , it also costs 45 rages mate. thats something that you got to keep it in mind to use those rages wisely

Thing is... .5 seconds isn't a cooldown in my opinion because the Global Cooldown is  1 second, and the average time it takes someone to press a button from the time their brain triggers the notion that a button press is needed is around .25-1 second (imho... no research to back this up).  As far as the rage is concerned if you're playing the druid class properly rage management shouldn't be an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/16/2017 at 5:06 PM, DeathsDesign said:

Thing is... .5 seconds isn't a cooldown in my opinion because the Global Cooldown is  1 second, and the average time it takes someone to press a button from the time their brain triggers the notion that a button press is needed is around .25-1 second (imho... no research to back this up).  As far as the rage is concerned if you're playing the druid class properly rage management shouldn't be an issue.

you right mate but since it does not stacks or anything i think its all ok ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

  • Similar Content

    • By Starym

       
      The first hotfixes yesterday were pretty small and didn't have a lot to go over, but today's are quite significant: Broken Shore buildings get cheaper, most classes get PvE tweaks and fixes, Cathedral and Nighhold get some bugs ironed out and more.
      March 29 (source)
      Broken Shore
      The number of Legionfall War Supplies required to complete construction of the Broken Shore buildings has been significantly reduced. Broken Shore rare spawn creatures that get markers on your map and minimap should remain marked for you after they’ve been slain. Classes
      Death Knight Howling Blast will now correctly deal its area damage if it kills the primary target. Runic Chills reduces Sindragosa's Fury cooldown by 1 second per proc (was 3 seconds). Thronebreaker damage reduced by 50%. Druid Wax and Wane bonus 15% (from 5%). Wax and Wane affects Sunfire in addition to Moonfire (tooltip won't be clear about this in 7.2). Hunter Unerring Arrows bonus is now 4% per point (was 10% per point). Mage Aegwynn's Intensity trait adds the correct amount of critical strike % to Arcane Missiles. Monk Split Personality cooldown reduction increased to 5 seconds per rank (was 3 seconds per rank). Whispers of Shaohao’s heal radius is now set to 30 yards from the respective Mist. Paladin Righteous Verdict bonus increased to 8% per point (was 5% per point). Priest Shadowfiend modified by Glyph of the Sha is now properly affected by the Artifact Trait Fiending Dark. Rogue Sinister Circulation now has a 0.5 second proc cooldown. Warlock Rend Soul's proc rate is now 4% (was 12%). Rend Soul's damage is no longer doubled by Reap Souls, but its proc rate still is. Warrior Soul of the Slaughter Artifact Trait proc chance increased to 1.0%/Rage (was 0.5%) and healing increased by 50%. Class Hall
      Active Artifact Knowledge work orders will instantly complete when a player zones into the order hall if that player has 25 or less total Artifact Knowledge. Dungeons and Raids
      Cathedral of Eternal Night Group Finder groups should now properly end the dungeon with Mephistroth. The Nighthold High Botanist Tel’arn Solarist Tel'arn and Naturalist Tel'arn now properly mirror High Botanist Telarn's current health when they spawn after Nightosis and all throughout the fight. Spellblade Aluriel Fel Stomp (Mythic difficulty-only) once again properly displays its visual. Items
      Green Drum will now reliably upgrade Legion Legendary items from 910 to 940. Professions
      An appropriate amount of Obliterum is now given from obliterating crafted items. Quests
      Players are no longer prevented from entering the Vault of Eyir if “The Gates Are Closed” is available. Previous hotfixes.
    • By Stan

      Another impressive video by Mionee, who managed to solo Nightbane in Karazhan just before Patch 7.2 went live.
      Two weeks ago, she uploaded her Mythic Archimonde solo video and now here's Nightbane!
    • By Starym

      Watcher explains what could be the blueprint for all future expansions.
      Watcher explains the logic behind the mechanic, how it will be tweaked and why it wasn't in the patch notes.
      Update: there was a followup post that explained the three major changes that have gone live for the mechanic.
      ___________________________________________________________
      As players have noticed, 7.2 brought with it a huge change that wasn't quite mentioned in the patch notes, namely that creatures now scaled not only with your level, but with item level as well. Game Director Ion "Watcher" Hazzikostas steeped in and confirmed this was indeed intended, but also took some time to explain why the mechanic was implemented, why it wasn't mentioned in the patch notes and clarified that it may be a little too steep at the moment. It's a lot to read, but well worth it, as it seems the devs are paving the way for what WoW will look like in many future expansions, going for a very open-world scaled to your power level environment, that is so very popular in the single player RPG genre.
      Watcher (source)
      Apologies for the delay in getting information out on this - our initial focus was on putting out other patch-day fires.
      Yes, this reflects a deliberate change, but it's also not working exactly as we intended. The scaling may be too steep, and the fact that unequipping a piece of gear can ever be helpful is a bug in the system. We'll be looking into making changes to correct this in the very near future.
      Power progression is an essential part of the WoW endgame, and the last thing we want is to undermine that. We stressed the importance of that progression when discussing how the level-scaling system worked in Legion around the time of the expansion's launch, and explained why we then had no plans to scale foes' power based on gear. But as we've watched Legion unfold, we've come to observe some side-effects of our endgame content plan and the associated rewards structure that made us reconsider.
      We've never had the initial outdoor world content stay relevant for this long in an expansion before. By the end of Mists of Pandaria, for example, the mantid of Dread Wastes that had once been reasonable foes were completely trivial. They'd basically evaporate if a raid-geared player looked in their general direction. But there wasn't much reason besides achievements or completionism to revisit the Klaxxi dailies once Isle of Thunder was out or, later on, Timeless Isle. And the enemies in those later zones could be tuned to a proportionally more challenging baseline difficulty.
      But in Legion, while the new content in Broken Shore is the focus of 7.2, and we've made sure that the core outdoor rewards (both dropped and from Nethershards) are superior to the rep-related rewards from the original factions, the intent is not for the Broken Shore to completely replace the rest of the game. You'll still go back to the other Broken Isles zones for emissaries, Legion Assaults (coming next week!), Order campaign quests, improved world quest rewards, and more. And as 7.1 and 7.1.5 progressed, we could see that even with Nighthold gear the pacing of combat was getting a bit silly - what would happen once new content made that level of gear more common, and once the Tomb raid pushed limits even higher?
      To reiterate, power progression is an essential part of the WoW endgame. We absolutely want you to feel overpowered as you return to steamroll content that once was challenging. But there's a threshold beyond which the game's core mechanics start to break down. When someone trying to wind up a 2.5sec cast can't get a nuke off against a quest target before another player charges in and one-shots it, that feels broken. And even for the Mythic-geared bringer of death and destruction, when everything dies nearly instantly, you spend more time looting corpses than you do making them. You spend an order of magnitude longer traveling to a quest location than you do killing the quest target. You stop using your core class abilities and instead focus on spamming instants to tap mobs as quickly as possible before they die.
      Our goal is basically to safeguard against that degenerate extreme. We tune outdoor combat for a fresh 110 around a 12-15sec duration against a standard non-elite, non-boss enemy. It's great for gear, over the course of an expansion to cut that time in half, or even by two-thirds. But once you get down to a duration of one or two global cooldowns, the game just wasn't built to support that as the norm. (Note that this is an current-content endgame concern; running legacy content for completion/transmog/etc. purposes is a totally different story.)
      The intent of our change in 7.2 was to smooth out that progression curve a bit, not flatten it out, and certainly never to invert it. If you get a great set of item upgrades that make you 5% stronger, maybe the world gets 1-2% tougher. Perhaps instead of getting 400% stronger over the course of the expansion relative to the outdoor world, you only get 250% stronger. But you should always be getting more powerful in relative terms, and upgrades should always matter. From some reactions so far, it sounds like we may be off on that tuning. And as noted above, the fact that unequipping items can ever be helpful is a bug that we'll be investigating and fixing.
      Finally, there's the natural question of why we didn't patch-note this. It was not to be deceptive; we know it's impossible to hide a change from millions of players. But the system was meant to feel largely transparent and subtle, just like level-scaling does if you don't stop and really think about it, and so we did want players to first experience the change organically. Your feedback and reactions and first impressions of the system are more useful in this particular case when they are not skewed by the experience of logging in and actively trying to spot the differences. Thank you for that, and I look forward to continued discussion.
    • By Starym

       
      The release timeline for 7.2 has been unveiled, covering the next 3 weeks and on. We've got the Legion Assaults, PvP Brawls, new followers and Order Hall upgrades, class-specific World Quests, Class Mounts and the actual tomb of Sargeras raid to look forward to! It's also explained how the time gating of certain content isn't just to bother us, but actually has very specific story-related reasons.
      Ornyx (source)
      We’ve seen some confusion around the availability and timing of various aspects of the 7.2 patch, and we’d like to clarify our plans for releasing the remaining pieces of Patch 7.2’s content:
      Week 2 (next week): Legion Assaults begin, first PvP Brawl becomes available Week 3: Chapter 5 of the Class Order Hall campaign unlocks, which activates new followers, new Order Hall upgrades, and class-specific World Quests Week 4+: Ongoing story pieces unlock, leading up to the eventual opening of the Tomb of Sargeras raid, and the ability to earn Class Mounts Several of these pieces tie into the overarching story being told in 7.2: our return to the Broken Shore for vengeance, followed by the Legion’s response, and the eventual buildup toward the assault on the Tomb of Sargeras and Kil’jaeden himself. With the release of Patch 7.2, that series of events is set into motion, but they don’t all occur immediately. For example, the upcoming Legion Assaults are a direct response to our initial attack on the Broken Shore. Those assaults, in turn, prompt some of the later parts of the Order Hall campaign. These events occur in a chronological order, and we want to give players the chance to be there as it happens, rather than having some of it unfold off-screen or rushing it along.
      But aside from the narrative, pacing content releases helps with clear direction and player focus. During PTR testing, where we had the calendar advanced to allow for testing of all content in parallel, players were pulled in many different directions from the outset. While the heart of the patch lies on the Broken Shore, Legion Assaults were drawing players back to the original Broken Isles zones, and many Order Campaign questlines sent players to other expansions’ continents. With the content release structure we settled on, Broken Shore can stand alone as the initial focus of attention. We didn’t open the Tomb of Sargeras raid with the patch because we don’t want to rush players who are still progressing through Nighthold, but that same sort of logic applies to nearly all other features.
      We apologize that that hasn’t been clear enough from the start, but hope that this will help relieve some concerns.
    • By Starym

      After the not great reception of the new system, there's three major changes coming today or already live.
       
      After yesterday's detailed explanation on the new itemlevel scaling system and the not-so-great-to-put-it-mildly response from the community, today we're getting specifics on what will change compared to how it was when secretly implemented with 7.2's launch. Two of the three major changes (no scaling to creature damage and much smaller creature HP scaling) are already live, while the third (not getting any benefit from un-equipping an item) will go live later today. Whether there will actually be any noticeable changes to how outdoor mob combat feel at all after these changes remains to be seen, but it's looking more and more like the new scaling system will be mostly negligible.
      Lore (source)
      Thanks for the feedback on this issue. It’s clear that we need to make some changes here, so here are our current plans:
      We’re removing the increase to damage dealt by creatures in the world. Our overall goal with this change is to keep the amount of time it takes to kill a creature from getting ridiculously short, and increasing the damage they deal is unnecessary for that goal. Instead, this was making you feel like they were becoming more dangerous, which was not our intent. We’re significantly reducing the rate at which creature health scales with your item level. Again, all we’re trying to do here is prevent cases where monsters die too quickly for players to react to their presence, particularly around World Quests. Our initial tuning was far more aggressive than it needed to be, which could make it feel like your upgrades weren't actually helping. This change will make it very clear that you are still becoming noticeably stronger than your enemies as your gear improves. Those two changes are already live, and you should be seeing them in-game now. Later today, we’ll be correcting a separate issue that’s causing unequipping an item to drastically alter the power of enemies you’re facing. The above changes make it so that’s never the right thing to do anyway, but this is still a strange/buggy interaction that needs to be fixed. It should also be noted that this change was on the Patch 7.2 PTR (and has been since January). We didn’t communicate anything about it initially because we wanted to get testers’ raw and honest feedback about it when they encountered it themselves, rather than attempting to pre-empt or otherwise influence their opinions ahead of time. When that feedback never came, we assumed that meant it was an acceptable change – i.e., those who hadn’t noticed it weren’t bothered by it, and those who had noticed it thought it was fine. Clearly that was a false assumption, and we should have drawn attention to it later in the PTR cycle, so that we could have caught these issues before Patch 7.2 went live.