Stan

Shard Times

20 posts in this topic

UZe7vF3.jpg

Blizzard has been inconsistent with Shard pricing of items and recently, players found out that some skins cost way more than they should, which caused an outrage on reddit.

Here's a quote from 2.0 launch patch notes:

Blizzard LogoBlizzard (Source)

Much like new Heroes receive a Gold price reduction once they’ve been in the Nexus for a few weeks, new Skins and Mounts that are unlockable using Gems start at a higher than normal Shard price. These items will receive a Shard price reduction a few weeks after they are added to the game.
  • New items that are only unlockable via Loot Chests and Forging (such as a new version of an existing Skin) will not start at a higher Shard price, or receive a Shard price reduction.

The problem is that Xul's Bone Visage skin should cost 400 Shards, but it's at 600, Shadow Demonic Auriel, Kerrigan's MEKA skin and the Horrific Prime Evil Diablo skin should cost 1,600 Shards, but they cost 2,400 Shards. Spyrian responded that all new skins and mounts start at a higher shard price for several weeks following release and will have their price reduced after they've been in-game for a couple of weeks. Items from the Sun's Out, Guns Out will remain at their current prices throughout the event.

Blizzard LogoBlizzard (Source)

Hey guys, just so there’s more transparency on this, we changed our approach to new item shard pricing so that all new skins and mounts now start at higher shard prices for a couple of weeks following release. In part, we felt there were too many rules around which new items have higher shard prices and which don’t, and feel this will be more consistent.

As mentioned above, these items will receive a price reduction after they've been in-game for a couple of weeks. If you’re short on shards, waiting a bit before picking them up is an option as well. Waiting may also give you a little more time to earn shards from the Loot Chests you receive as progression rewards. However, special event items, such as our Suns's Out, Guns Out skins and mounts, will remain at their current prices throughout the event.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure, technically we don't have to spend any real monies on these skins, but that is kind of a low blow from their part.

One thing that is really rustling my jimmies is how the Sun's Out, Gun's Out loot chests only have a chance of containing the items from the event; as far as I know, they were supposed to be a 100% drop, am I right? At least one item should be from the event. Or did I misread the blue notes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't have a problem with this. it honestly made sense. Though i will say 2400 shards is a lot. takes more than a month just to get 1600.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Valhalen said:

Sure, technically we don't have to spend any real monies on these skins, but that is kind of a low blow from their part.

One thing that is really rustling my jimmies is how the Sun's Out, Gun's Out loot chests only have a chance of containing the items from the event; as far as I know, they were supposed to be a 100% drop, am I right? At least one item should be from the event. Or did I misread the blue notes?

Not sure I understand where you're getting at, all the loot boxes I've opened so far during the event had at least 1 item from said event, so that counts as 100% drop in my opinion..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Rashaall said:

Not sure I understand where you're getting at, all the loot boxes I've opened so far during the event had at least 1 item from said event, so that counts as 100% drop in my opinion..

A lot of times I've opened and didn't get anything, not even a spray.

Also, it should be guaranteed to drop when you re-roll, which is not the case.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Valhalen said:

A lot of times I've opened and didn't get anything, not even a spray.

Also, it should be guaranteed to drop when you re-roll, which is not the case.

He is right, i've opened more than 50 chests, and not even half of them had an item of the event, so... its pretty unfair. Guys, not even 25/50, that's not cool. How come i have to lvl up more than 50 lvls to have all the things i want from an event? To people who dont have stim packs this is insane, its a lot of time playing... 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got to thank Blizzard for 5 (five!) legendary Tychus skins. I want them all because I got all others legs already. And thanks for not changing Odin skin in these legendaries. Who cares how their Odins look?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, HenrySteinway said:

I got to thank Blizzard for 5 (five!) legendary Tychus skins. I want them all because I got all others legs already. And thanks for not changing Odin skin in these legendaries. Who cares how their Odins look?

I got disappointed they didn't change Odin for those skins.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What i hate about the new system is that for a skin to be legendary it used to have to be either changed attack animations or voice overs or both. But now they get away with just tossing in a new skin and not changing any of the animations or voice overs and calling it a legendary skin and making you farm a ton of shards for something that should be epic at best.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So.... Shadow Demonic Auriel will be 1600 in a few weeks? I know a guy whos saving his shards then! :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎7‎/‎13‎/‎2017 at 3:23 PM, Valhalen said:

Sure, technically we don't have to spend any real monies on these skins, but that is kind of a low blow from their part.

One thing that is really rustling my jimmies is how the Sun's Out, Gun's Out loot chests only have a chance of containing the items from the event; as far as I know, they were supposed to be a 100% drop, am I right? At least one item should be from the event. Or did I misread the blue notes?

Spot on sir.  I can't afford to spend a ton of money for skins and the fact that you are hiking shard prices is terrible in my opinion.  I play a lot of games and it is somewhat difficult to obtain enough shards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Darkjester79 said:

Spot on sir.  I can't afford to spend a ton of money for skins and the fact that you are hiking shard prices is terrible in my opinion.  I play a lot of games and it is somewhat difficult to obtain enough shards.

Yeah, ever since 2.0 launched I've been saving shards for when Blizzard finally released The Lost Vikings announcer. I recently bought my very first skin, the Admiral Krakenov, so I'm sitting at 2000 shards. And everything costs so damn much.

Edited by Valhalen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 15/07/2017 at 1:54 AM, Valhalen said:

Yeah, ever since 2.0 launched I've been saving shards for when Blizzard finally released The Lost Vikings announcer. I recently bought my very first skin, the Admiral Krakenov, so I'm sitting at 2000 shards. And everything costs so damn much.

Still saving for my Prime Evil Diablo skin :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are so worried about making money with the new gems and loot chests system since you can purchase 'packs' of each of those things. Then why not just throw some shards into each real money gem packs too. With the amount of shards that are a 'bonus' to purchasing them ascending with the cost of the packs too. It would act as further incentive for people to actually buy their real money stuff in the first place. Since you could use them to forge other skin variations you want that aren't able to be purchased by way of gems. Seems like a no-brainer business idea to appear more consumer friendly to the players to me. You of course wouldn't want to make it TOO high an amount that you could just forge the new gem/bundle based skins. So I suppose they could make it so you get a comparable amount of shards per gems that you buy. Since you have to spend gems to buy any bundles or packs of stuff. Again making it more appealing to buy gems in the first place. Maybe say 100 shards per 100 gems. Since I'm pretty sure it's 100 gems=$1 OR if they're really that worried about it then half the amount of shards to gems you purchase with real money. That seems fair enough. Better then none at all.

Edited by CyberDVonaven
Had some more ideas to better flush out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Blainie said:

Still saving for my Prime Evil Diablo skin :(

The Prime Evil Diablo skin was the very first legendary I got from loot boxes in 2.0, and I don't even like his D3 design. And I've got all variations of Tychus summer skin from loot boxes as well, and I don't even play Tychus.

Meanwhile, I've been wanting to get the Bucaneer Falstad, Lumberjack Uther, Love Goddess Tyrande from loot boxes, but nothing. Life is fucking unfair.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, CyberDVonaven said:

That seems fair enough. Better then none at all.

I'd definitely be on board with having the shards included, yeah. I understand that they wanted to implement a slightly more RNG-element to the game with the boxes, but it sucks having to spend so much just to try and find enough shards to get the legendary you want.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Valhalen said:

The Prime Evil Diablo skin was the very first legendary I got from loot boxes in 2.0, and I don't even like his D3 design. And I've got all variations of Tychus summer skin from loot boxes as well, and I don't even play Tychus.

Meanwhile, I've been wanting to get the Bucaneer Falstad, Lumberjack Uther, Love Goddess Tyrande from loot boxes, but nothing. Life is fucking unfair.

Uhhh - so I have the ones you want (all of them), and you have the legendaries I want. Swap? :(

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Blainie said:

Uhhh - so I have the ones you want (all of them), and you have the legendaries I want. Swap? :(

Man, I'd do it right now if I could. The RNG God trolls me a lot by giving me stuff from characters I'll never touch (I have ALL voice lines for Tracer and not a single one for Auriel, my main).

Would be nice if Blizzard implemented a system where you could gift other players with stuff you have in exchange for their duplicate value in Shards.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Valhalen said:

Man, I'd do it right now if I could. The RNG God trolls me a lot by giving me stuff from characters I'll never touch (I have ALL voice lines for Tracer and not a single one for Auriel, my main).

Would be nice if Blizzard implemented a system where you could gift other players with stuff you have in exchange for their duplicate value in Shards.

That'd be pretty awesome, but I imagine it'd lead to them seeing it as a hit on their profits, so it'll probably never happen :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan

      Heroes of the Storm Highlights are back with another fun episode of WTF Moments! 
      Episode 102 kicks off with an Abathur slap fest, Blaze entering his Bunker to soak Pyroblast and Garrosh throwing D'Va's Self-Destruct into enemies, killing three of them!
      Don't forget to submit your own replays here for a chance to be featured in an upcoming episode and let us know your favorite moments in the comments below!
      Previous Episodes
      WTF Moments Episode 101 WTF Moments Episode 100 WTF Moments Episode 99 & Best of 2017
    • By Oxygen
         
      Our sixteenth Heroes of the Storm Meta Tier list for the Maiev patch of February is here!
      We present our sixteenth Heroes of the Storm Meta Tier List for the Maiev patch of February 2018.
      Note: This list also takes the February 9 balance patch into account.
      Welcome to Icy Veins's Meta Tier List for the Maiev patch. The goal if of this list is to try and detail game's current metagame state. The prime goal of such lists is to inform players regarding popular and trending team composition drafting strategies (i.e. the drafting metagame). Although tier listings are generally the product of balance, many factors come into play when discussing the relative perceived strengths of heroes, including player regions, maps, play style, skill level, and, of course, personal perception. As such, any tier list—including this very one—should never be interpreted as gospel, but rather, as a guide to better grasp what to expect with regards to typical drafting experiences. One useful application of such lists is to allow you know which heroes to look out for in terms of practice and counterplay, ultimately improving your knowledge of the game.
      Using the list
      As stated above, tier lists are easy to mistake for gospel. As new strategies are discovered and experimented with, so changes the perception of the relative strengths of each hero. Tier lists still prove to be useful as a snapshot of player expectations in terms of drafting. Although it is generally considered preferable to focus on high tier heroes (Prime and Core tiers), it is important to note that Heroes of the Storm's wild character and map designs make it so that any given hero's tier position is prone to fluctuate depending on the situation at hand.
      One classic example of such is that of Kerrigan on the Infernal Shrines map. Although we currently judge her to be a mid-tier hero, her drafting priority shoots up to first-pick or first-ban material on this specific map due to the nature of its objective. Certain heroes also synergise so well with each other that the sole fact of having the opportunity of drafting them together is generally enough to increase their potential. Tassadar and Tracer, for instance, are generally nightmarish to deal with for many. There are too many examples of these interactions to reasonably produce here, but we invite you to consult our guides to know exactly where and when each hero shines. The guides have been linked in the lists below for your convenience - just click any of the hero names to access them.
      A ↑ next to a hero's name means its tier list position has increased since the previous month whereas a ↓ means just the opposite. Additionally, a + or - sign indicates short-to-medium term predictions (which is to say, about a month) for tier increase(s) or decrease(s), respectively. These are often updated after significant balance patches and/or when clear trends are emerging.
      If you're newer to the game, also consider visiting our glossary for a comprehensive list of discrete Heroes of the Storm terms.
      Current ranked mode map rotation
       
      Prime Tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Arthas Genji - - E.T.C. Greymane     Sonya Hanzo       Maiev (new)     Prime tier heroes are considered to be extremely strong in all situations, and show no obvious weakness. They are very often banned or picked right away, as they generally dictate the pace of most matches.
       
      Core Tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Anub'arak Falstad Alexstrasza Abathur↑ Dehaka Jaina↑ Brightwing- Azmodan Diablo+ Junkrat Lúcio+ Nazeebo Muradin Li-Ming Malfurion↑ Sylvanas Stitches Malthael (reworked)+ Stukov  Zagara Varian (Taunt) Valla Uther   Core tier heroes are strong in a wide variety of situations and have few counter-picking possibility. They should form the core of your team, and be picked after Prime Tier heroes have been distributed.
       
      Viable Tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Artanis Alarak Ana Murky Blaze+ Cassia Auriel Xul D.Va Chromie Kharazim   Garrosh Gul'dan+ Li Li+   Johanna Illidan Lt. Morales   Leoric Kael'thas+ Rehgar   Tyrael  Kel'Thuzad Tyrande    Zarya Kerrigan↓       Lunara       Nova↓       Ragnaros+       Samuro       The Butcher       Thrall       Tracer+       Tychus↑       Varian (Colossus Smash)       Zeratul       Zul'jin↓     Viable tier heroes are generally well-rounded that have either fallen out of favour, or, inversely, are on the rise in popularity, due to the current Prime tier contenders.
       
      Niche Tier
      Warrior Assassin Support Specialist Chen Cho'gall Tassadar Gazlowe Cho'gall Raynor   Medivh Rexxar Valeera↓   Probius↓   Varian (Twin Blades of Fury)   Sgt. Hammer↓ Niche tier heroes have niche application on certain maps or for certain team compositions. They may also picked to "round out" your team composition when your team composition is missing out on key components, such as a "jungler" (mercenary camps), a solo laner, or solid waveclear.
       
      Lost Vikings Tier
      The Lost Vikings Bottom tier Heroes are deemed to be either considerably weaker than the majority of other Heroes, or much more challenging to play properly. Although they may situationally shine, these Heroes are generally avoided by most players.
       
      Metagame assessment
      Maiev: Where do I even begin? Despite heavy-handed nerfs delivered less than a week after her release, Maiev continues to dominate popularity (read: is banned about 5 times more than she is played at all levels) and top win rates. The fact that I'm not sure what exactly contributes to her success is probably a good indicator of what actually contributes to her success: everything. High survivability, high mobility, high damage potential through Fan of Knives's ability to reset, the ability to both set up and follow up for and on crowd control through Spirit of Vengeance + Umbral Bind, serviceable waveclear, and Vault of the Wardens on a ridiculously short cooldown for good measure to make her an unviable target for heroic ability chains. Warden's Cage ended up the favoured heroic ability choice for Maiev, and it's rather easy to see why; it just works well with the rest of her kit on top of being quite easy for anyone to use, though Containment Disc is not to be underestimated either. She's at the top of the food chain, so Prime tier it is. Expect further nerfs.
      Jaina: Jaina was last month's surprise for me, which is why I had her marked for promotion. I slightly feared Genji players, but after witnessing some more competent Jaina play (including my own not-so-competent experimentation), it's safe to say that Summon Water Elemental is absolutely key to dealing with him (along pretty much every other assassin in the game). For games with little melee assassin pressure, Ring of Frost remains a powerful win condition. Jaina also sports what is arguably the game's best waveclear potential, and can deal with mercenary camps extremely well with Frost Shards and Ice Lance. 
      Malthael: I can certainly see how Malthael's rework may have seemed rather grim to anyone underestimating the power of cleaving attacks. This change, though accompanied by slight nerfs to his damage and survivability, allowed his already powerful laning  to improve, just as with his ability to deal with mercenary camps. One should never underestimate the power of PvE, particularly in less organised play. Furthermore, his reliance upon Tormented Souls was reduced, allowing for Last Rites to actually get some playtime. I've been impressed with it, and I'm probably going to update his builds to reflect this newfound power.
      Abathur: Abathur is the kind of hero that comes and goes with the metagame state and who generally thrives in assassin-oriented states. As with Genji, I wouldn't be fooled by his limited winrates; he just simply tends to do better at higher level, more organised play, and particularly in longer matches. To avoid on Haunted Mines and Braxis Holdout. Please pick your Ultimate Evolution target responsibly, and go for an assassin, with Maiev, Genji, Hanzo, and Jaina making incredible targets. Incidentally, avoid Evolve Monstrosity; it has been tested and rejected a long time ago.
      Tychus: Not a big leap in tier, but a leap nonetheless. He went from seeing pretty much no play for quite a while to seeing some, including tournament play. As expected, he does well against Blaze and a few other bruisers, on top of being on the more resilient side of ranged assassins. Commandeer Odin is excellent, but the real sleeper here is Neosteel Coating, which can do funny things with Relentless Soldier.
      Probius: Nearly as unpopular as The Lost Vikings. Though I don't think he's bad, I certainly think he does not have a place in the current meta. All of the top picks do extremely well against him, as does diving in general. I really wish I had more insights here, but the very few times I did see him in the last month, it was rather sad to witness. 
      Sgt. Hammer: I initially had her as viable, but upon reading user comments, I had to agree: she does extremely well against team compositions that cannot deal with her, and poorly otherwise. This is basically what the Niche tier should be defined by. We could discuss at length why this design is rather unhealthy for the game, but I think Blizzard has recognized this by not releasing a single specialist in over a year.
    • By Stan

      Check out items available in the next Collection Update starting February 20.
      Blizzard (Source)
      Weekly Collection Update: Feb 20 – 27, 2018
      Our next Collection Update will begin on Tuesday, February 20! Check out the list of featured items and Hero discounts below.  Upcoming Hero Sales
      Falstad — Sale Price: 312 Gems Thrall — Sale Price: 250 Gems The following Skins and Mounts will enter the Featured Item Rotation, and will be unlockable using Gems until next week's Collection Update:
      Upcoming Featured Skins
      Storm Lord Falstad  World-Shaman Thrall  Riptide Rehgar  Black Grand Marshal Uther  Neon War World Sgt. Hammer  Old Marshal Raynor  Azure Lo’Gosh Varian  Obsidian Desert Queen Zagara  Upcoming Featured Mounts
      Cyber Wolf  Jade Nimbus Cloud
    • By Stan

      The free Hero rotation has been updated for the week of February 20.
      Free-to-Play Hero Rotation: February 20, 2018
      Raynor Muradin Sonya Nazeebo Uther Jaina Lunara Lt. Morales Xul Leoric Alarak (Slot unlocked at Player Level 5) D.Va (Slot unlocked at Player Level 10) Illidan (Slot unlocked at Player Level 15) Stitches (Slot unlocked at Player Level 20) (Source)
    • By Oxygen
      Oxygen discusses Heroes of the Storm's newly announced performance-based matchmaking system and why it may prove to be problematic.

       
      One of the biggest changes announced at BlizzCon 2017 was the introduction of the performance-based matchmaking system for ranked game modes in Heroes of the Storm.
      In a nutshell, this new system seeks to quickly adjust individual player matchmaking rating (MMR) by using data from past performance, other players, and a number of other unspecified systems. Unfortunately, players quickly found out how flawed the system was upon receiving seemingly unjustified penalties to their MMR despite perceived strong performance, and ultimately figured out how to game the system to maximise their gains by exhibiting counterintuitive in-game behaviour.
      And unfortunately for Blizzard, the release of the system coincided with other “bugs” that affected placements and general matchmaking, which exacerbated the problem. Not one but two placement match history resets have now been performed. Blizzard claimed that the issues were not related to the new performance-based matchmaking system, but the system in question has been disabled for three days at the time of writing. I can’t help but to wonder why the system was disabled if it in fact wasn’t part of the issues, but I’ll offer Blizzard a highly skeptical benefit of the doubt for now. They need all the help they can get.
      However, I’m not here to criticise Blizzard’s course of action, which I believed to be reasonable and timely enough, if not a bit opaque. I’d much rather look into the very existence of the performance-based matchmaking system. I’ll start by going over some of the comments made in the official system announcement linked above.
      Blizzard (Source)
      The team-focused nature of Heroes presents challenges when using this system to determine an individual player’s matchmaking rating, since any single player is only 1 part of the 5-man team that won or lost the match. The system works since, all things being equal, a player will win more games than they lose over the long run if their skill is higher than other players at the same rank.
      I must admit I was not ready to respond to a “we know it works, but we’re changing it anyway” approach. Leaving aside the obvious flaw in basic argumentation theory, I know how frustrating it is to have a strong performance and still lose; I’ve certainly been there before. But, in general, players need to be groomed into being able to look at the larger, statistically-significant picture. If you consistently perform well and are never the cause for losses, you will rise. After all, the opposing team would have 5 chances of “messing up” whereas yours would only have 4. This means that if you can maintain an approximate 55.5% win rate, you know you’re good. (That approximate 55.5% value comes from 100 - 4 / 9 * 100; this calculation essentially compares each team’s chance at a liability if you’re never a negative factor, hence why it only take 9 players into account and giving each player an approximate 11.11…% of the responsibility for losing.). If your win rate is actually higher than that, you may even be good enough to even make up for negative factors on your team. That’s powerful, and certainly doesn’t require any fancy system to work, even in a team environment, unlike what Blizzard seems to be claiming. Even if your impact is small, you still have an impact.
      However, I don’t want people to get me wrong here; in theory, I think that the idea of a performance-based matchmaking system is great, though just not for the purpose of long-term MMR adjustment. If Heroes of the Storm did have a way to accurately identify high- and low-level players, the matchmaking experience would be vastly improved for both groups: high-level players would no longer have to endure low-level players with high MMR uncertainty, whereas low-level players would no longer be thrown into victimizing and soul-crushing matches. Higher match quality promotes player retention; player retention is profitable for everyone.
      Blizzard (Source)
      What differentiates a highly skilled player on a given Hero isn’t always obvious, though.
      In a complex game such as Heroes of the storm, is it ever? The system is claimed to be “dynamic”, which means that, over time, it reevaluates how it defines skilled play for a given hero as it is fed new data. However, in practice, I just don’t think "skill" is something that can be reliably measured by in-game performance data alone. Nor should it be. Let us draw comparisons between Heroes of the Storm and chess, which has used a similar matchmaking system known as ELO for some decades now. In chess, what would you say matters most between the two following statements?
      Claiming multiple pieces without trading your own?
      or…
      Focusing on claiming key pieces during key moments?
      The answer is “it depends”. Although both tactics may lead to victory, the first style is opportunistic whereas the second is analytical. Unfortunately for the second player, their strategy would be much harder for a performance-based system to evaluate; how would it know what defines a key piece, let alone a key moment? The first approach is mathematical; one is better than zero and, generally, “free” trades correlate with winning, which is more or less why they are inexistant at a high level chess unless intentional.
      In chess, you aren’t rewarded for losing less, and the reason for this is that the underlying ELO system is robust and self-correcting; rating resets don’t occur every couple months, let alone twice in a week, and rating gains and losses are small. Of course, the ELO system isn’t beyond reproach, but I think it’s fair to say that players understand that long-term results are what matter, not individual game results. And, it doesn’t run the risk of overvaluing Queen taking Rook because of insufficient or misinterpreted data.

      Queen literally takes Rook during a Tribute fight. Siege damage is important to Zagara, says data.
      As you can tell probably tell by now, I’m very skeptical about how such a system is supposed to evaluate what differentiates a highly skilled player, period, regardless of what hero it is they’re playing. Here’s a concrete example of what I mean by that: Although I don’t consider myself to be a particularly strong mechanical player, I have always managed to maintain a rather high win/loss ratios, for a team game, back in my active days anyway. Why? I’d be lying if I didn’t say that many of these victories weren’t simply due to outdrafting opponents, clear non-confrontational shotcalling, encouraging teammates, defusing infighting, taking every match seriously, knowing when and why to engage, going over mistakes, and generally making powerful macro decisions. On top of being that one weird guy that says “can play anything*, prefer assassin or specialist, let’s try to ban x and pick y.” Doesn’t reading that first thing in any given lobby instill confidence in the rest of your teammates? I bet this translates into wins every once in a while, so why not do it?
      I tend to thrive on waveclear tanks with strong engaging power because they let me decide exactly when a minion wave needs to push or when an enemy hero needs to die despite low mechanical ceilings.

      And now you know how to ban me out.
      *…whereas I couldn’t outplay most of my opponents to save my life. I accept my fate as one of the worst Illidan players in existence, and I’m fine with it.

      I have nothing to add, your honor.
      The great irony here is that none of the aforementioned elements that I feel make me, and probably many other players, reasonably strong are – nor can be – taken into account by any automated system because they’re simply too subjective. Why exactly am I being punished for not mindlessly using my abilities on-cooldown and padding my numbers? We get it; dealing damage is important. But what about useful damage? How can that ever be taken into account by a machine? This might sound like an argument from incredulity but, as I see it, we have plenty of evidence to conclude that the system isn’t quite working as intended.
      Of course, within this system, winning is still what matters most, and by far. Fortunately for me, my skillset does tend to translate into wins. But obfuscating one’s point gains and losses behind questionable variables is going to, at best, confuse players, and at worst, breed harmful behaviour. These two consequences have already been observed.
      TL;DR:
      A solid performance-based matchmaking system can have positive effects on matchmaking by allowing players to find their appropriate MMR faster. However, what defines a good player in a complex, team-oriented game goes well beyond what any data collection system can collect, interpret, and use. In its current state, the performance-based matchmaking system is at best unnecessary and at worst obfuscating, and ultimately risks breeding harmful player behaviour.
      I’ll allow myself to end on a bit of wisdom: If you play to improve, you’ll never lose a game in your life. And the sooner you quit worrying about your rank, the sooner you’ll be able to focus on what really matters.