Stan

Patch 7.3: Feral Druid, Frost DK & Mage Changes

Sign in to follow this  

5 posts in this topic

ICdqBUu.jpg

This week's 7.3 build brings more class changes to Feral Druids, Frost Death Knights and Frost Mages.

Feral Druids

The initial round of changes can be found here.

Blizzard LogoBlizzard (Source)

Short update for some changes in the next PTR build:

ThrashThrash will generate 1 combo point baseline - as an energy-spending non-finishing move attack, it feels like it should. The Tier 19 2pc bonus which previously had this effect has been changed to a 15% damage increase to Thrash. With these changes, Thrash is still intended to not be used in the baseline single-target rotation (not counting the effects of sets/legendaries).

Additionally, to help out Feral AOE a bit more, the energy costs of ThrashThrash and SwipeSwipe are being reduced by 5. (to 45 Energy and 40 Energy, respectively).

Moment of ClarityMoment of Clarity will, as an additional feature of the talent, allowOmen of ClarityOmen of Clarity's clearcasting proc to stack up to 2 times (and is now tooltipped). This should be sufficient with how the clearcasting procs are better spaced out in 7.3.

Frost Death Knights

In addition to upcoming Frost Death Knight changes we posted about earlier, build 24608 also contains the following:

Blizzard LogoBlizzard (Source)

I believe a few more updates actually made their way into the next PTR (some potentially still in progress):

--ObliterationObliteration now causes Howling BlastHowling Blast to grant Killing MachineKilling Machine, as well as Frost StrikeFrost Strike. This should help with feeling like you can use RimeRime procs without interfering with ObliterationObliteration.
--The overall damage buff is 21%, not 27%. Just a new estimate of what's correct to roughly account for all the talent changes. Rest assured the goal is to find the accurate amount by which the talent changes would hurt total DPS and correct for that, even before looking into possible further adjustments for class balance.

Finally, the L75 row is generally redesigned. The overall situation seemed to be that PermafrostPermafrost did a rather low amount of shielding, but was usually taken because the other options had so little use. Some of this might be a little preliminary, but the ideas on PTR are:
--PermafrostPermafrost shields for 75% of autoattack damage (from 30%).
--White WalkerWhite Walker redesigned to: "Wraith WalkWraith Walk cools down 100% more quickly anytime no enemy is within 10 yards."
--New talent Inexorable Assault (replacing Volatile ShieldingVolatile Shielding): "For every 2 seconds spent in combat without melee attacking, you gain a stack of Inexorable Assault. Each stack causes your next autoattack to deal additional Frost damage."
(PTR numbers might vary slightly from the above)

Both of the new talents are going in a direction we want to better explore on slow melee specs like Frost: helping to address time off target, without power-creeping general movement capability. Overall, sprints and gap closers are very prevalent on melee specs (likely too much so across the game), and it's been increasingly hard to deliver on slower, heavy-hitter melee archetypes. Most of that discussion is much longer-term, but I wanted to give some context for trying to resist the direction of having every melee spec use a short-cooldown sprint/charge, and try to branch out into more class-appropriate ways of dealing with the problem.

Frost Mages

Blizzard LogoBlizzard (Source)

Few quick fixes:
--Frozen OrbFrozen Orb should be affected by ShatterShatter
--Ice TimeIce Time should be included in the spec passive (0% anyway).
--EbonboltEbonbolt damage can proc procs (rarely matters much since most procs are RPPM)
--EbonboltEbonbolt and FlurryFlurry damage no longer log a second cast entry
edit: --Freezing RainFreezing Rain last 12 seconds, unmodified by haste. This didn't match its tooltip anyway, so I changed the tooltip, and I don't see any reason it needed to be affected by haste.

Quick comment:
It's generally right that Frost's mastery is very narrow (scaling-wise, essentially a % buff to FrostboltFrostbolt with a few quirks). The narrower a mastery is, the more potential problems with needing to attach very high numbers to it for stat balance, that risk interfering with the rotation priority somehow. It's become more of an issue in Legion, since the large number of added effects on the class (as with every class) means that FrostboltFrostbolt is a much lower % of damage done as it used to be. I'm not sure there's a short-term fix, but ideally FrostboltFrostbolt would be a more substantial portion of damage in the future in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Both of the new talents are going in a direction we want to better explore on slow melee specs like Frost: helping to address time off target, without power-creeping general movement capability. Overall, sprints and gap closers are very prevalent on melee specs (likely too much so across the game), and it's been increasingly hard to deliver on slower, heavy-hitter melee archetypes.

So their solution to this problem is adding a talent instead of making it a baseline passive perk? This would make that  talent yet again a no brainer / must have rendering the other choices on that tier useless.

Allthough i like the fact that they at least TRY to look into the mobility issues but that is all they came up with? ToS hurts so much with all those movement heavy encounters as a DK... :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, Stan said:

Both of the new talents are going in a direction we want to better explore on slow melee specs like Frost: helping to address time off target, without power-creeping general movement capability.

Perfect.  Although the 2 seconds lost vs one stronger (yet already weak) auto attack...  it seems like it should be higher but I will wait and see how it plays out.

Edited by PatrickHenry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Ulathar said:

So their solution to this problem is adding a talent instead of making it a baseline passive perk? This would make that  talent yet again a no brainer / must have rendering the other choices on that tier useless.

Allthough i like the fact that they at least TRY to look into the mobility issues but that is all they came up with? ToS hurts so much with all those movement heavy encounters as a DK... :(

Well you have to take into account that this is a utility tier. Every class has a utility tier. This tier is definitely not a no brainer. For instance, why would you ever take ineroxable assault on fights like Goroth, Sisters, and Inquistion where there is very little movement. The talent would be close to useless. All three of these talents look viable, Assualt on Avatar, Mistress, Maiden, KJ, and potentially host; Wraith Walk for open world and world questing; and permafrost on fights like Goroth, Sisters, and Inquisition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mage discussion is a bit meh - not sure if I want a more Frostbolt focused spec at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stan
      In the next World of Warcraft content update, you will be able to hide everything except for pants at the Transmogrifier.
      In the latest Live Developer Q&A it was revealed that a "Hide Chest" function is coming in Rise of Azshara. Today, we learned that you'll be able to hide not only your chest armor, but every slot except for pants.
      Blizzard (Source)
      They said in the Q&A that we will be getting a “Hide Chest” option soon!
      Once this change hits we will be able to hide cloaks, helms, belts, shoulders, chests, and shoes! (If you have Griftah’s authentic Troll shoes)
      So why not let us hide EVERYTHING!
      Id be fine with just hide gloves and bracers since those are the two pieces that annoy me the most whenever i am trying to make an elegant transmog. Also we can basically already “Hide” our pants on most classes anyway thanks to loincloths and other skimpy leggings.
      Okay! Done.
      Except for the pants.
      I spoke to the development team just now, and they are determined to make this a set of changes that give players ways to hide every slot.
      Except pants.
      We’ll let you know as soon as we have details on how that’s going to come about in a future update to the game.
      The "Hide Chest" option is probably the most exciting one, because you will be able to show off tattoos and fel marks on your character. This applies to Demon Hunters, Lightforged Draenei, Mag'har Orcs, Nightborne, and Zandalari Trolls.
    • By Stan
      Loot trading, introduced back in Wrath, will be preserved in WoW Classic. Back in the day, you would open a ticket and it could take days for the item to reach the intended recipient, so Blizzard decided to keep it.
      The two-hour loot trading system in Classic will only apply to soulbound raid gear. Dungeon gear, however, will not be tradable by any means.
      TL;DR: Loot trading will be available in Classic content with a raid lock.
      Blizzard (Source)
      At BlizzCon 2018, we talked about how we plan to keep loot trading in World of Warcraft Classic. We added loot trading in Wrath of the Lich King to solve a common problem: a player could accidentally loot an item meant for another player or give it to the wrong person using Master Loot. They would then have to contact Blizzard to get the item moved to the intended recipient, which might take days. We wanted to keep loot trading in WoW Classic because the end result is the same – the correct person gets the item – and it’ll save everyone time.
      But we heard your concerns about the potential for abuse of the loot trading system in parties of five. It’s possible that abusive play could take the form of a group of four players colluding to deny loot to a stranger who joined their party as a pick-up. Raid groups, being much larger, come with more understanding on the part of solo players that loot distribution can depend on the whims of the many players and raid leaders who know each other.
      Taking that into consideration, we’ve decided that the two-hour loot trading system in WoW Classic will only apply to soulbound gear that drops in raids. Soulbound loot that drops in five-person content will not be tradeable at any time. What we hope to do is to strike a balance between saving players time and minimizing the potential for abuse of the system. We think this approach better addresses the concerns we’ve heard from players on the subject.
      Awesome solution! However, I must ask.
      Will UBRS/LBRS be counted as a 5 man dungeon in this situation (as in no loot trading)? I would hope so since normally guilds would run their own 40 and 20 man raids.
      The answer to the UBRS question is: loot trading will be available in content that has a raid lock. UBRS will not have a raid lock.
      A big part of loot trading (in a 2-hour window) as a solution to a concern is that raid locks require you to wait a week (or 3 days) before you can try again for the loot that was accidentally given to the wrong person.
    • By Stan
      Players recently abused a bug related to the Draught of Ten Lands potion. Separating the potion into multiple stacks resulted in more Draught of Ten Lands applications than intended. Everyone who exploited the bug have had their account suspended.
      Draught of Ten Lands was added in Patch 8.1. The elixir can be purchased for 5 Warfront Service Medals from Warfront vendors. Splitting the elixir into individual stacks caused players to receive multiple 10% Draught of Ten Lands applications and abnormal Experience gains.

      Fun fact, the ban wave comes just in time for the Welcome Back Weekend which lasts through March 24. We're still waiting on Blizzard for an official statement regarding the ban wave. The suspensions are somewhat inconsistent according to Reddit, ranging from 7 days up to 1 month.
      (Source)
    • By Starym
      Here come more hotfixes, today focused on the Brawler's Guild issues, Wintergrasp Honor gains have been buffed, Paladins get a reduction in haste gains for Light of the protector and there's more quest and achievement fixes as well.
      March 21 (source)
      Achievements
      The Dinner Impossible is now again possible to achieve in Arathi Basin. Allied Races
      Brawler’s Guild
      · Players who purchase a Rumble Card should now be automatically added to the queue for the upcoming rumble.
      · Fixed an issue that prevented players from receiving credit for "Solving the Mystery " after killing a mystery boss.
      · Fixed an issue that prevented Mindbreaker Gzzaj from dealing damage to Alliance players when casting Mind Break.
      · Fixed a bug that prevented players from being awarded victory if a player defeated Ro-Shambo playing the Rock, Paper, Scissors game.
      Classes
      · Paladin
      Fixed an issue that allowed Light of the Protector ’s global cooldown to be reduced more than intended by haste.  
      Player versus Player
      · Honor gained within Battle for Wintergrasp has been increased, putting it in line with other Epic Battlegrounds.
      · The Ivory Feather can be used once again in battlegrounds to gain Mark of Prey .
       
      Quests
      · Players will no longer be trapped in the combat phase for "The Darnassus Mission ".
      · Fixed a bug that caused spider NPCs to evade and prevent players from completing "The Council Has Spoken ".
      Previous hotfixes.
    • By Stan
      Game Director Ion Hazzikostas today answered your Battle for Azeroth questions and here are the highlights! The WoW dev team is internally discussing a level squish and no Allied Races are planned for Patch 8.2.
      Q&A Highlights
      They're not ready to talk about Rise of Azshara just yet, but the big info dump is coming very soon. They are working on ways to lessen the RNG of the Weekly Mythic Cache. In the past, they've experimented with different ilvl gaps and found that 15 item level gaps between difficulties work best for rewards to feal meaningful. The WoW development team has no incentive to make something that makes people spend more time in the short term, but isn't fun and it's burning them out, that's a terrible design. All they want to do is to make a game that is as engaging and fun as possible. Secondary stats are more important than primary stats in some instances and that's a problem they're trying to address. They're going to add a Caverns of Time portal in the next content update to Portal Rooms. There's a UI improvement in the works that will help players with path finding when the quest takes place on a different continent. The "Hide Chest" function is coming in the next content update. The team is also working to loosen transmog restrictions and make them more consistent across the board. They want to increase character customization, but not at the level of sliders. Adding eye color options is a possibility, but the way how the engine derives data from the game and how characters are built does not allow for simple height adjustments. Allied Races serve as a tool of deepening their storytelling and they're excited to add new ones where it make sense. Rise of Azshara is not going to have a new set of Allied Races. Repeatable Allied Race unlock questlines are a cool suggestion, they're going to discuss it with the dev team. 120 is a very large number when it comes to levels. It would be too overwhelming and not fun to reward players for each earned level. They're internally discussing a level squish, to make levels feel meaningful again. WoW Classic will have a dedicated RP realm. RPPVP is not planned right now. From a technical perspective, they shifted the infrastructure for how groups are built from Guilds to Communities (something that is consistent and tied in to the Battle.net platform more broadly). They've lost some things in the transition. They've readded the ability to have guild ranks that couldn't speak in chat. Two Sides to Every Tale was added to recognize two very distinct narratives in Battle for Azeroth, it's not a beginning trend of playing both factions. It's very similar to Double Agent. Legion was an awkward place for the game's economy. After BfA launched, they increased Gold gain from various sources to help players support repairs. Guilds can earn Gold by selling BoE items and they also want motivate Gold collectors by adding sinks. There are no plans to remove the Demon Hunter realm restriction in Battle for Azeroth. Reputations are tied to outdoor content. They don't plan to make dungeons award reputation. Hati was a beloved companion specific to Hunters so they brought him back. Thal'kiel may also return in the future, but they have nothing specific to announce at this time. Click here to watch the VOD.