Jump to content
FORUMS
Sign in to follow this  
Stan

Mike Morhaime Gamelab Interviews

Recommended Posts

pSO5PzO.jpg

Ex-Blizzard President Mike Morhaime talked to multiple sites about why 50% of Blizzard's projects do not get to see the light of day, why Heroes of the Storm failed, and more.

Mike Morhaime recently talked at Gamelab in Barcelona on a variety of topics.

VG247 asked him why he thought Heroes of the Storm had failed. Morhaime said he thinks it's a great game, but they didn't pursue Dota early enough, because they were all focusing on World of Warcraft.

Quote

“But the community was doing a great job supporting it and we didn’t want to disrupt that,” Morhaime continued. “And frankly we had our hands full trying to support the growth of World of Warcraft. We felt like focusing on Warcraft was the right call at the time. In retrospect – boy, if I could go back in time and say, ‘You know what? Why don’t we have a small team that’s focused on doing something with Dota? Or why don’t we include Dota with the launch of StarCraft 2 and have a mode or something?’ I’d love to try doing that a little bit earlier. I think Heroes was probably too late.”

Mike Morhaime

Click here to read the full interview.

Eurogamer also had the chance to talk to the Ex-President of Blizzard and found out that:

  • Morhaime left Blizzard to spend more time with his family.
  • Approximately 50% of the games developed by Blizzard will never ship, because the company is known for its renowned quality. 
Quote

"I've gone back every few years and checked the math on that, and it's pretty consistent," Morhaime said today. "It's like half the titles we work on never make it."

"There's a saying that 'perfect is the enemy of great', because if you strive for perfection you'll never ship. But I do think that there's so much competition out there,"

Mike Morhaime

  • Blizzard's canceled Titan was a follow-up to World of Warcraft, but they failed to control the scope. It was an ambitious next-gen MMO, but Blizzard struggled to wrangle Titan's engine into a workable enough state, so they made Overwatch out of it.
Quote

"The pitch was basically an evolution of a sort of Team Fortress-style game in a superhero universe,"

"It was going to leverage some of our best technology from Titan and World of Warcraft. We were going to take some characters and worlds from the Titan universe design.

"We thought we could make a really compelling game with much tighter scope control. And I think it was probably one of the best decisions that we made. We took something that wasn't going to ship for a very long time, might never have shipped, and turned it into an awesome game."

Mike Morhaime

Other discussed subjects include Diablo III's RMAH, and Diablo: Immortal. You can read the full interview at Eurogamer.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Heroes of the Storm was never supposed to be a standalone game. Blizzard originally planned it as a custom game for Starcraft 2. I wonder if Morhaime forgot about that.

HotS just became its own game because the community supported the "Blizzard DotA" minigame idea. It still came further than it was ever supposed to be. So in that case it did not really fail. They just pushed this idea too far with expensive tournaments and and too many development goals.

Resources that could have been spend on their main projects.
 

 

Edited by Alkasar
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Alkasar said:

HotS just became its own game because the community supported the "Blizzard DotA" minigame idea. It still came further than it was ever supposed to be. So in that case it did not really fail. They just pushed this idea too far with expensive tournaments and and too many development goals.

Indeed, they have invested too much into e-sports as they wanted every of their current games to become an e-sport. It was forced, instead of allowing a rather small scene to grow organically. This is rather worrying about Overwatch too, where there is also a heavy push for e-sport, way too much (imo) invested into it, again forced through heavy marketing, instead of letting people organise it themselves with maybe some smaller financial support. Many casuals are leaving that game as well. I can see OWL running for like 1 or 2 years more, but after that? I'm not sure.

Another thing was that HotS initially scared away many casual players (which was a targeted audience at the beginning), there were no skins for f2p players to unlock, long grind to get heroes (when DotA 2 had heroes for free). I still remember how people who tried HotS with me (things like Oni Genji OW challenge) left early, because "29,99 unicorn" and other stuff locked behind paywall. It seems they had overestimated how much value their trademarks had to players unfamiliar with Blizzard characters. For many, playing classic heroes was what had drawn them into the game, but for others (on top of nothing cosmetic available for f2p player) it did nothing. It was rather bizarre watching people claim characters like Kael etc., were cloned from other mobas.

Edited by Arcling

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For OWL to pay back properly it will have to go on way longer than that, so lets hope it doesn't go out that fast, for the game (and Blizzard's reputation with everyone who bought teams) sake.

I think a lot of new life, and even quite a bit of what Titan was all about, as a MMO, can be injected into Overwatch if they make compelling PvE content for it...in the style that Destiny 2 and WoW itself are well known for. Can't wait for developments in that side of things :) especially now that Destiny 2 is abandoning Battle.net (rip WoW Tokens).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/30/2019 at 3:11 AM, Stan said:

Blizzard's canceled Titan was a follow-up to World of Warcraft, but they failed to control the scope. It was an ambitious next-gen MMO, but Blizzard struggled to wrangle Titan's engine into a workable enough state, so they made Overwatch out of it.

well if it was going to be anything like Overwatch, Im glad they kept up WoW instead.  100%.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Arcling said:

For many, playing classic heroes was what had drawn them into the game,

Thats actually what drew me in, and continues to make me pick up the matches a few times a month, just kill a couple daily quests and call it a day.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kinda sucks to see them say the game "failed" and that they "stopped supporting" it, neither of which is technically true even if it did turn out to be something of a disappointment for the studio. It does little more than fuel the fire for internet poo stains.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
21 hours ago, Arcling said:

Indeed, they have invested too much into e-sports as they wanted every of their current games to become an e-sport.

I never understood why HotS should be an e-sport game.  It is the opposite and everybody who had just the slightest idea about Esport HAD to know, that HotS would have no chance against Dota or LOL.

HotS is just a noob-friendly game that you could play casually. That sounds why worse then it is.

I have played Dota for a long time and have thousands of games, but I got tired of it after a few years.
I played HotS for some time with a few friends - never close to the number of Dota, just a few casual games.

And that's a good thing. If you want a highly competetive game, where a more skilled opponent will *filtered* you hard - you can play LoL or Dota.
But if you want just a more casual game? Then Dota + LoL are horrible for you. If a teammate plays badly and feeds the enemy you can forfeit the game fast.

If you are worse then your opponent you get outleveled, outskilled and outgeared - and a higher opponent with more gold (better items) and more skill? The game snowballs out of control fast. He kills you one or two times, he last hits creeps and he denies -> after a few minutes the game is effectively over.

In HotS there is no gold -> Being better won't result in having better items and better stats.

Outleveling is way slower, because of team-experience. There is no need for last hitting / denying.

All this is much more "noob-friendly" - and like I said, that's a good thing. Because the "hardcore" gamer can choose between LoL + Dota. (and that's why I played quite a few games with friends - we wouldn't have played Dota or Lol, becaus it would be much too stressfull.)

BUT: All this makes HotS the oppositite of what is attractive to e-sport. HotS HAD to fail as e-sport-title, there was no other outcome.

And everybdoy had to know that. Well, everybody except blizzard. No idea why, probably dellusions of grandeur.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WedgeAntilles said:

All this is much more "noob-friendly" - and like I said, that's a good thing. Because the "hardcore" gamer can choose between LoL + Dota. (and that's why I played quite a few games with friends - we wouldn't have played Dota or Lol, becaus it would be much too stressfull.)

BUT: All this makes HotS the oppositite of what is attractive to e-sport. HotS HAD to fail as e-sport-title, there was no other outcome.

And everybdoy had to know that. Well, everybody except blizzard. No idea why, probably dellusions of grandeur.

That's why I like HotS, it's faster and I don't have to bother about things like last-hitting and so on. I know LoL and DotA players certainly hated these aspects of HotS, most of them also didn't like how you can't solo carry in this game. HotS is more team dependent, both teams might have potatoes, but the one with the worst potato is bound to lose and others don't have much control to change the outcome, which is especially annoying in ranked (that's why I stick to qm and it's fine).

They even didn't market this properly to casual playerbase, bad monetisation at launch etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LoL is boring as fk. I don't understand how people can spend so much time just walking around at such a slow pace. It feels a lot like an RPG PvP zone to me from bigger MMOs. Haven't played Dota since the Warcraft 3 mod first came out where you could play as the cat lady or a troll so no clue about it as it currently is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they could help out HotS a lot by just advocating for the existing streamers and bigger matches.  

Go a long way for legimizing and growing a organic base.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      The lost Vikings, Blackthrone and Rock n' Roll racing are being bundled in the Blizzard Arcade Collection, with plenty of quality of life upgrades! This is also free if you purchased any of the Blizzard Celebration Package bundles!


    • By Starym
      One (or more) of the BlizzConline predictions is closer to reality, as the Diablo 4 "beta access" page has been updated today, in addition to the WoW one!
      As spotted by BlizzPlanet, the technical support page for the Diablo 4 beta, which has existed since the official D4 page went up, was updated today. So what was changed? A very crucial and relevant part, as it turns out, the line "There have been no announcements regarding a Diablo IV beta at this time."

      Both the Diablo Immortal and WoW beta support pages were also updated at the same time, and while it seems pretty obvious we'll be getting the Immortal beta announced (and perhaps invites sent out) at the event, the WoW update might signify a similar situation for the Burning Crusade Classic! For the Wow page, the part that was taken out (again, spotted by BlizzPlanet) was “Beta access isn’t guaranteed. We send out a limited number of invitations, based on several criteria.”
      While this may just be a routine cleanup of the wording on the pages, perhaps only specifically related to the Diablo Immortal beta which then triggered an update to the rest of the pages, at least the BC beta seems solidly likely, while the D4 one seems a little pie in the sky - although I have been very wrong on the D4 development progress before.
      My bet would be 100% Immortal beta announcement at BlizzConline and 80% Burning Crusade beta. I can also see both starting immediately during the event or right after it, while Diablo 4 at best might get a "alpha/beta this year" nod.
    • By Staff
      The huge Orc statue at Blizzard's office campus in Irvine was created in 2007, but do you know how it came to be? Here are some interesting facts!
      (Source)
      When visitors pass through the gates of Blizzard's office campus in Irvine, they immediately gravitate toward the Orc statue! A dear hero in Blizzard’s heart, the statue is a popular spot for:
      Meeting people ("Let's meet at the Orc statue!") Posts on social media Symbolic events; passionate founder speeches often take place in front of the Orc Holiday community projects 1 trillion photos and selfies* *Actually: only a billion
      The Orc Statue
      Statue created in 2007
      Information
      "Create a larger-than-life sculpture of a fearsome wolf-mounted orc warrior from Warcraft;" that was the challenge Blizzard presented to New Zealand-based Weta Workshop.
      Blizzard worked closely with Weta artisans in New Zealand and China to turn the small prototype into a bronze behemoth.
      After over a year of intense work, the 12 foot tall, 2 ton bronze orc warrior now stands watch in the courtyard of Blizzard Entertainment’s Irvine campus.
      Creation
      First Thing’s First: Modeling
      A team in New Zealand scanned the original 12-inch tall statuette and created a virtual 3D model
      Up Next: Details, Details, Details
      The 3D model was then sent to a manufacturing center in China, where the artists sculpted, molded, cast, waxed, bronzed, welded, and buffed to turn the virtual presentation into a 12 foot tall statue.
      Last, but Not Least: Delivery
      The massive sculpture was transported from China to Irvine using a custom-built steel dolly and shipping container, and set into place with a crane.
      Fun Facts:
      The sculpture was designed with a mechanical connection so it could be separated into two pieces to be transported. The sculpture is made of high-copper bronze, which is why the raw metal has a salmon pink color. The statue in Irvine is surrounded by a runed compass with Blizzard's eight core values at its points. Blizzard also awarded a version of this statue to World of Warcraft players who had been playing for ten years to celebrate the game's 10 year anniversary.  































      Orc and Wolf Statue Credits
      Designed by: Nick Carpenter, Sam Didier, and Glenn Rane
      Sculpted by: Eden Small, Richard Taylor, and Daniel Cockersell
      Manufactured by: WETA limited
    • By Staff
      Here's a recap of Activision Blizzard's latest earnings call from yesterday. We learn that Diablo Immortal will launch later this year, and we probably won't be hearing about a Diablo 4 or Overwatch 2 release date until 2022.
      Q4 2020 Earnings Call Highlights
      Strong execution enabled Activision Blizzard to exceed our fourth-quarter outlook, capping a remarkable year for the company in which revenues grew 25%, operating income increased 70%, and earnings per share increased 45% Y/Y. Activision Blizzard delivered better-than-expected results in the fourth quarter and is entering 2021 with strong momentum. In 2020, Activision Blizzard saw the benefits of fundamental changes to our core franchises, including deeper and more consistent engagement with current and new players across multiple platforms. Much of our growth was driven by strong execution in premium content, in-game operations, expanding our presence on mobile, and ramping new engagement models. Blizzard had 29 million monthly active users (MAUs), increasing year over year for the sixth consecutive quarter. Strong engagement across both Classic and modern modes drove full-year WoW net bookings growth of 40% year over year, to the highest level in nearly a decade. World of Warcraft In Q4, franchise net bookings grew Y/Y sharply, driven by strong sales of the Shadowlands expansion, subscriber growth, and high participation in value-added services. Player and engagement trends since the Shadowlands release are stronger than levels typically seen at this point after an expansion launch. Diablo IV & Overwatch 2 (?) Activision Blizzard  are making significant progress against their development pipeline for other key intellectual properties, which they expect to fuel further growth in 2022 and beyond. Diablo Immortal On mobile, the first stage of regional testing for Diablo Immortal in December and January was met with very positive feedback and strong engagement metrics. More players will get to experience the game in further rounds of testing ahead of the launch planned for later this year. Overwatch League The Overwatch franchise continues to engage its community with in-game content and celebrate its players in the Overwatch League, where teams are preparing for the start of the fourth season in April. BlizzConline The Blizzard team is looking forward to channeling the spirit of BlizzCon to engage and celebrate the community at BlizzConline on February 19th and 20th, where they will share more about the plans for their franchises. Source
    • By Stan
      BlizzConline 2021 is just around the corner, and IGN Nordic discovered a Blizzard employees' profile on LinkedIn that mentions an unknown title with the codename "Fenway."
      What Fenway refers to remains unknown at this time. Fenway was first mentioned in a Game Producer's bio on LinkedIn (see below). Image courtesy of IGN Nordic.

      Do you think Blizzard will announce a completely new title, or is Fenway codename for the long-rumored Diablo 2 remaster or TBC Classic? The dev's profile mostly mentions Classic titles, so I wouldn't be surprised if "Fenway" was TBC Classic to be honest.
      Source: IGN Nordic
×
×
  • Create New...