Jump to content
FORUMS
Stan

Activision Blizzard Q2 2019 Earnings Call

Recommended Posts

43256-activision-blizzard-q1-2019-earnin

The Q2 2019 Earnings Call was held on August 8 and Blizzard remains at 32 million monthly active users (MAUs). WoW subscribers increased since mid-May, following the release of WoW Classic Beta and Rise of Azshara.

Q2 2019 Earnings Call Highlights

  • Hearthstone MAUs increased Q/Q following the release of the Rise of Shadows expansion and deeper, more engaging new single-player content in the quarter.
  • Overwatch MAUs were relatively stable Q/Q, with engagement increasing following the release of the Workshop.
  • World of Warcraft® subscribers increased since mid-May, following the release date announcement and beta for World of Warcraft Classic and the Rise of Azshara update.
  • At Blizzard, daily time spent per player increased Y/Y.
  • Overwatch League hours viewed continued to grow Y/Y in the two stages held during Q2. Season to date, viewership and average minute audience have grown double digits Y/Y.
  • Activision Blizzard delivered approximately $800M of in-game net bookings in Q2.
  • Revenues and operating income are down Y/Y, reflecting lower in-game revenues.
  • Operating margin fell Y/Y, with the revenue decline partially offset by lower costs.
  • They continue expanding their development teams and resources to accelerate the delivery of content in their pipeline, pursue business models, etc.

Slide Presentation

Q2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-001.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-002.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-003.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-004.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-005.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-006.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-007.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-008.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-009.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-010.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-011.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-012.jpgQ2 2019 ATVI Slides vF-page-013.jpg

(Source)

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    If I am not mistaken they didn't include Starcraft on the "games we are currently working on" list. Heroes of the Storm I was expecting, but Starcraft? It would be a shame if we didn't get any more work done with the franchise. I guess RTSs are too hard to monetize.

    • Sad 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, lChronosl said:

    If I am not mistaken they didn't include Starcraft on the "games we are currently working on" list. Heroes of the Storm I was expecting, but Starcraft? It would be a shame if we didn't get any more work done with the franchise. I guess RTSs are too hard to monetize.

    Yeah, seems there are now no plans for another Starcraft. They can still provide balance patches, these war chests for supporting e-sports prize pool and maybe a co-op commander (although it looks like there is now one per year, also they're running out of characters). HotS has been missing from their financial reports for a while. It's hard to get stable casual audience for RTS like SC2, as it is too fast and one mistake can often decide between victory and defeat. 

    Edited by Arcling
    • Sad 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    5 hours ago, lChronosl said:

    If I am not mistaken they didn't include Starcraft on the "games we are currently working on" list. Heroes of the Storm I was expecting, but Starcraft? It would be a shame if we didn't get any more work done with the franchise. I guess RTSs are too hard to monetize.

    Sadly, RTS is in significant decline. A 4x would probably be more of whats in store for the future of SC (Especially considering how all the commanders play, allows for quite a bit of faction filling for a 4x)

    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    On 8/10/2019 at 5:28 PM, Frogspoison said:

    Sadly, RTS is in significant decline. A 4x would probably be more of whats in store for the future of SC (Especially considering how all the commanders play, allows for quite a bit of faction filling for a 4x)

    "RTS is in decline" really sounds to me like "Horror games are dead" did back in the early 2010s. They're in decline because there hasn't been a major, big-budget RTS release since... what, grey goo? Planetary Annihilation? Do either of those count? I don't think they meet the 'big budget' standard that Starcraft 2 did. Command and conquer rivals could be argued, but I'm not even sure I'd lump that in with traditional RTS games. The mere fact that SC 2 is still king of the RTS is partially because it's so good and so pro-oriented, and partially because no one has even tried for the throne.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    On 8/12/2019 at 3:44 PM, LostDeep said:

    "RTS is in decline" really sounds to me like "Horror games are dead" did back in the early 2010s. They're in decline because there hasn't been a major, big-budget RTS release since... what, grey goo? Planetary Annihilation? Do either of those count? I don't think they meet the 'big budget' standard that Starcraft 2 did. Command and conquer rivals could be argued, but I'm not even sure I'd lump that in with traditional RTS games. The mere fact that SC 2 is still king of the RTS is partially because it's so good and so pro-oriented, and partially because no one has even tried for the throne.

    The problem with real-time strategy is that because it's real time, you never have the time to properly think through your decisions, or else you'll fall behind on your macro-management. You never get a chance to take a step back and assess the situation, which turns off a lot of people who enjoy strategy games. Meanwhile, there's so much multitasking to do and so much information to keep track of that your traditional fast-reflex FPS fans (i.e. the types of people who play CS:GO and Overwatch) are turned off as well.

     

    From my point of view, an RTS like Starcraft is kinda the worst of both worlds between action games and strategy games; too much information to keep track of, not enough time to process any of it. I think it'll always be a niche genre, especially in multiplayer.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    On 8/13/2019 at 5:06 PM, Monlyth said:

    The problem with real-time strategy is that because it's real time, you never have the time to properly think through your decisions, or else you'll fall behind on your macro-management. You never get a chance to take a step back and assess the situation, which turns off a lot of people who enjoy strategy games. Meanwhile, there's so much multitasking to do and so much information to keep track of that your traditional fast-reflex FPS fans (i.e. the types of people who play CS:GO and Overwatch) are turned off as well.

     

    From my point of view, an RTS like Starcraft is kinda the worst of both worlds between action games and strategy games; too much information to keep track of, not enough time to process any of it. I think it'll always be a niche genre, especially in multiplayer.

    I can see that, but it's still not as if anyone's really taken big swings at the genre. It's got flaws, by all means, but it still has an appeal and there hasn't been many people trying. I'm hopeful for the upcoming Iron Harvest, though as a Kickstarter game that's very much on a dangerous edge. I do think the 'golden age' for multiplayer RTS is done, but there's still plenty of market for single-player experiences. Market that's surprisingly untapped at times, with everyone and their dog trying to make Battle Royale or E-Sports games.

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites
    9 hours ago, LostDeep said:

    I can see that, but it's still not as if anyone's really taken big swings at the genre. It's got flaws, by all means, but it still has an appeal and there hasn't been many people trying. I'm hopeful for the upcoming Iron Harvest, though as a Kickstarter game that's very much on a dangerous edge. I do think the 'golden age' for multiplayer RTS is done, but there's still plenty of market for single-player experiences. Market that's surprisingly untapped at times, with everyone and their dog trying to make Battle Royale or E-Sports games.

    I think that if Real-time strategy is going to make a comeback, it needs to get out of the shadow of Starcraft. It's a great series, to be sure, but the formula still has a lot of room for improvement. Like the multitasking; when there's so much multitasking that even the best players in the world frequently struggle to keep up with everything, there's a serious problem. Real-time strategy should acknowledge the limits of the human body, and the human brain.

    And I think real-time strategy needs to emphasize the strategy part of it more.  I think there needs to be more emphasis on out-thinking your opponent, instead of just having a better APM and by extension, better macro and better micro. If my chosen strategy is a great counter to my opponent's strat and I can predict almost every move he makes, but he can still easily beat me with "brute force" by just building more stuff than me or running circles around me with micro-heavy units, I think that's a little problematic.

    Specifically, I'd like to see an RTS that also puts emphasis on pre-battle preparations, like the SC2 campaign. Choosing upgrades for your units before the battle starts. I think that'd make an interesting game, if difficult to balance.

    Edited by Monlyth
    • Like 1

    Share this post


    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
    Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

    Guest
    Reply to this topic...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

    • Recently Browsing   0 members

      No registered users viewing this page.

    • Similar Content

      • By Stan
        Blizzard today confirmed they no longer manufacture physical authenticators. If you own one, it will still work, though.
        Forum users wondered whether the physical authenticator has been discontinued and Blizzard confirmed they no longer manufacture them, but they are still supported. If you own one and think it may run out of juice, consider switching to the mobile app.
        Blizzard (Source)
        I’ve been searching all over the place, and I can’t see a place where it says that these have been discontinued. But the link to the store where they used to sell them is just a 404 now.
        So, does Blizzard no longer provide hardware authentication? I’m starting to make the move away from phone apps and into authentication hardware like a yubikey.
        We no longer manufacture, or offer physical authenticators. Sorry!
        Wow…ok that is totally unexpected!
        I still have mine. I assume it will be supported as long as the battery lasts. Is that the case? I really really dislike phone apps.
        Yes, they’re still supported just no longer manufactured.
        Will there be a new physical authenticator down the pipeline, or should we just think of it gone from now on?
        I don’t have any information to share on that front. 
        Any information how they are supposed to change up their authenticators?
        The process for changing or removing an authenticator hasn’t changed. Nothing about the authenticator system has changed except that the physical keychain is no longer available for purchase.
        If their keychain authenticators are still working* and they would like to change to a mobile authenticator they can do so pretty easily:
        Removing the Blizzard Authenticator Once the old authenticator is removed, they can immediately attach the new one.
        *If the authenticator is no longer working, this article will still be able to assist them. If they have a SMS number associated with their account they can use that for removal or they can contact customer support if they need assistance.
      • By Stan
        Gerber Kawasaki Inc. owns roughly 90,000 shares of Activision, worth about $4.3 million, according to Bloomberg, and the company's Investment Advisor Representative Nick Licouris thinks Disney should be the buyer of Activision, amid declining share price.
        Disney is in the firm’s top three holdings, with a 13F filing listing more than 152,000 shares valued at almost $22 million, based on the data gathered by Bloomberg.
        The Disney investor sees potential benefits between Activision's growing esports business and Disney's TV network. He also sees an opportunity for Disney to leverage its film and TV characters. The declining share price over the past months could very well mean that Activision could become a takeover target.
        Furthermore, the article discusses Disney's history in the video-game industry, their struggles and how the company ramped up hundreds of millions of dollars in losses, ultimately deciding to go with licensing instead of publishing.
        Disney already televises Overwatch League under a multiyear deal and the acquisition could lead to closer ties, according to Licouris.
        Click here to read the full article
      • By Starym
        After Mike Morhaime, another co-founder of Blizzard Entertainment is now leaving, as Frank Pearce departs after 28 years with the company. He has some really nice words about both the old and new guard at Blizzard and seems incredibly happy with his journey so far. We also get a comment from CEO J. Allen Brack who looks back on his time with Frank.
        Frank Pearce (source)
        From Frank Pearce
        The time has come for me to step away from Blizzard and pass the torch to the next generation of leaders.
        My journey as part of the Blizzard community began over 28 years ago. Allen offered me an opportunity to join him and Mike in their adventure and dream to make video games. Video games were a passion that we shared, and I had only a fleeting hope that I would have the opportunity to make games one day. The decision was easy for me - I did not have the benefit of internet searches to help start me down the path. Allen’s offer letter was the best and only chance I thought I might ever have. Looking back, I know how incredibly fortunate I was to have been a part of what Blizzard has become.
        Our efforts were always guided by well-intentioned purpose. We made games that we wanted to play, believing that like-minded people would also want to play those games. Today we characterize it more specifically with the ambitious vision of bringing the world together through epic entertainment. I am so proud to have had the chance to positively impact the lives of so many people through the experiences we have created.
        My time at Blizzard encompasses the entirety of both my professional career and my adult life. I have countless fond memories. Working with the best developers in the world on the best franchises in the world definitively stands out. Even more prominent are my memories of our first BlizzCon where I realized the special importance of the people and communities that had become part of the experience for our players.
        Words cannot express the gratitude I feel to have been involved with Blizzard, our games, our employees, and most importantly our community. Before Blizzard I struggled to find a place in which I felt I belonged. Now I know I will always have a place, as will many other people. Thank you to all of you for providing me the sense of inclusion I require as a person.
        I have been lucky enough to work with J and Ray for many years, and now it is their responsibility to define how the adventure continues. They are game development leaders that are incredibly talented, experienced, and truly understand what is foundationally most important for Blizzard and our community. I know that the future of Blizzard will be amazing under their guidance. There are many exciting initiatives in the works, and I can’t wait to see the end results.
        Everything I have done at Blizzard has been driven by my passion. I have worked very hard and very passionately for a very long time. Now it is time for me to reflect and be thoughtful about what comes next. I plan to spend more time active in the outdoors. I’d like to learn to play an instrument. I hope to devote more time to aspects of my life that may not have gotten as much attention in the past. One thing is for certain – I will continue to be a part of the Blizzard family.
        My request and hope for all of you is that you continue living the Blizzard values and that you be kind and respectful to one another as you experience what Blizzard creates in the future. Blizzard is a special place and a special community, and everyone with whom you interact is important to the Blizzard journey as it continues forward. Thanks to everyone for the wonderful past I have enjoyed, and thank you in advance for the great future I expect we will share.
        Play nice, play fair,
        Frank
        From J. Allen Brack
        The time has come to say goodbye to one of my heroes, one of our founders, as well as one of our friends. When I moved into my new position last year, Frank stepped into an advisory role to help with the transition, specifically working with Ray Gresko and me on our games, culture, and the future of Blizzard. His support has been invaluable to us and to say we’re going to miss him is an understatement.
        The first time I met Frank was during a lunch interview to join Blizzard. I was nervous not only because I was excited about the opportunity to join a company I loved, but because I was sitting face-to-face with one of the founders of Blizzard.
        Frank can be intimidating, and sometimes comes across as a bit gruff. Underneath is a person of deep feeling, and of deep love for both the family of Blizzard, and the unique and caring community that has grown around Blizzard games. Frank is also a person I’m proud to call a close friend. Frank was one of the people who got me into running, and we’ve run dozens of races together over the years.
        Like many of us, Frank is an introvert. Thus many of you haven’t seen a lot of him publicly, nor seen the deep impact he’s had on Blizzard, and on the culture specifically. But Frank has been here from the beginning, building and expanding the foundation and championing the values behind everything Blizzard does. Blizzard is better because of Frank Pearce.
        A few BlizzCons ago, Frank talked about the value of human connection through video games, feeling a sense of belonging within the community, and that comes from a very personal place for Frank. Frank might be hanging up his armor now, but because of the influence he’s had in helping to build Blizzard and the connections he’s made with so many of us, veterans and new recruits alike who are all carrying the same torch forward, he’ll always be here with us.
        We love you Frank.
        JAB
        Frank Pearce, Blizzard co-founder leaves after 28 years.
      • By Stan
        Ex-Blizzard President Mike Morhaime talked to multiple sites about why 50% of Blizzard's projects do not get to see the light of day, why Heroes of the Storm failed, and more.
        Mike Morhaime recently talked at Gamelab in Barcelona on a variety of topics.
        VG247 asked him why he thought Heroes of the Storm had failed. Morhaime said he thinks it's a great game, but they didn't pursue Dota early enough, because they were all focusing on World of Warcraft.
        Click here to read the full interview.
        Eurogamer also had the chance to talk to the Ex-President of Blizzard and found out that:
        Morhaime left Blizzard to spend more time with his family. Approximately 50% of the games developed by Blizzard will never ship, because the company is known for its renowned quality.  Blizzard's canceled Titan was a follow-up to World of Warcraft, but they failed to control the scope. It was an ambitious next-gen MMO, but Blizzard struggled to wrangle Titan's engine into a workable enough state, so they made Overwatch out of it. Other discussed subjects include Diablo III's RMAH, and Diablo: Immortal. You can read the full interview at Eurogamer.
      • By Damien
        Le Monde, one of France's most respected publications, said in a piece published yesterday (full content for subscribers only) about the layoffs at Blizzard Europe and that Diablo 4 was shown to Blizzard employees.
        The article focuses mostly on the struggles at Blizzard Europe caused by the process of laying off 30% of the employees, which has apparently not been completed yet. Later in the article, the author starts explaining Blizzard's current situation, with most of its titles reaching the end of their lives or having not performed as expected. The following paragraph then follows about the future of the company.
        This translates as:
        What about the future? Teams at Blizzard Entertainment have already been presented with the long-awaited Diablo 4 and know that a new Overwatch game is in development. But neither of these two games will be released before 2020, at the very best, and employees at Versailles have no idea if they will still be around when they eventually release. « Activision Blizzard will be making less of a profit, but this will still amount to a lot of profit », says a veteran employee.
        In a piece about Blizzard's layoffs in France, Le Monde says that Diablo 4 has been shown to Blizzard employees.
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...