Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Starym

The SEC Launches Activision Blizzard Investigation

Recommended Posts

59966-activision-blizzard-lawsuit-allege
 

According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, the US SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) has launched "a wide-ranging investigation into Activision Blizzard", including its handling of the sexual misconduct and workplace discrimination accusations.

The report is based on the word of people familiar with the investigation and documents viewed by The Wall Street Journal and claims that Activision Blizzard, as well as several of its senior executives (including CEO Bobby Kotick) have been subpoenaed by the SEC. The main goal of the investigation is to determine "whether Activision and its executives properly disclosed allegations of workplace harassment and gender-pay issues, and whether any of that information should have been shared earlier with investors and other parties". The agency is asking for documents - minutes from Activision Blizzard board meetings, personnel files and separation agreements, as well as CEO Bobby Kotick's communications with senior executives within the company in relation to the sexual harassment or discrimination complaints by employees.

The investigation itself has been confirmed by an Activision spokesperson, saying that it concerns “the company’s disclosures regarding employment matters and related issues,” that the subpoenas are for current and former employees, and that the company is cooperating with the investigation fully.

This comes following the recent lawsuit by the California's Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which accuses the company of discrimination, sexual harassment and more after a 2-year long investigation, and was recently amended by adding temporary workers and claims of investigation tampering.

You can read more on the story over on the Wall Street Journal, although it requires a subscription.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Lithari said:

ffs, more??

well a lot of people knew this was coming cause, if you wanna see REAL results and change, making your investors wonder if you were hiding stuff and that you might lose them money, cause the truth is nothing affects change more and there is nothing (some) people care about more, than some (probably rich) person maybe losing their money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was to be expected. Maybe this will get some results. But is anything going to happen to former employees who were accused in that lawsuit? Probably not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Logical next step but its nothing that we shouldn't have seen coming it was clear that the stockholders would have wanted more information and since all that lawsuit stuff is not really unexpected. Was only a matter of time and btw. till now this changes nothing at least in terms of new informations this is only an investigation at this point. So hold your doomsayer stuff ^^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Nayrusa said:

Logical next step but its nothing that we shouldn't have seen coming it was clear that the stockholders would have wanted more information and since all that lawsuit stuff is not really unexpected. Was only a matter of time and btw. till now this changes nothing at least in terms of new informations this is only an investigation at this point. So hold your doomsayer stuff ^^

I don't practice in the US but by accounting standards in quite a few countries in Europe public companies are REQUIRED to disclose outstanding lawsuits that can result in material expenses as well as make necessary provisions to cover possibly expenses that could result from those lawsuits. Given that if the investigation escalated the resulting expenses could be significant enough in size to be material, a provision would have had to be made in quite a few places in the world were corporate governance is somewhat (but not a lot) more strict.

Edited by Nym85

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Nym85 said:

I don't practice in the US but by accounting standards in quite a few countries in Europe public companies are REQUIRED to disclose outstanding lawsuits that can result in material expenses as well as make necessary provisions to cover possibly expenses that could result from those lawsuits. Given that if the investigation escalated the resulting expenses could be significant enough in size to be material, a provision would have had to be made in quite a few places in the world were corporate governance is somewhat (but not a lot) more strict.

All true, but also keep in mind that California is a [guestures vaguely with hands whilst making a face] where companies can just fire people without warning or reason so by those standards alone, it easily might not be the case that companies in CA are required to do anything but whatever the hell they want.

That said, good luck doing that when Shareholders decide to start selling off their stock on account of them finally realising what we've all known LITERALLY SINCE THE THE 1990S about Bobby "Second Most Evil Entity in Videogames" Kotick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Apologised said:

All true, but also keep in mind that California is a [guestures vaguely with hands whilst making a face] where companies can just fire people without warning or reason so by those standards alone, it easily might not be the case that companies in CA are required to do anything but whatever the hell they want.

That said, good luck doing that when Shareholders decide to start selling off their stock on account of them finally realising what we've all known LITERALLY SINCE THE THE 1990S about Bobby "Second Most Evil Entity in Videogames" Kotick.

Employee rights and shareholder rights are very different beasts politically.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Staff
      Blizzard games like World of Warcraft, Hearthstone, and Overwatch 2 might soon make a comeback in China, thanks to Blizzard reportedly teaming up again with NetEase.
      The news comes from Core Esports, which suggests Blizzard's game services could be back by the end of March or the beginning of April.
      After 14 years of partnership, Blizzard and NetEase hit a rough patch in 2022, leading to failed negotiations. Consequently, when the licensing agreement concluded on January 23, 2023, Blizzard's game services were suspended across mainland China.
      For more details, you can check out the article in Chinese or find an English translation by Amy Chen on esports.gg.
    • By Staff
      As the Microsoft-Activision deal closes, Bobby Kotick will only stay on as CEO through the end of the year and leave on January 1, 2024.
      Placeholder for tweet 1712818483442987422 Based on the value of his shares, Robert Kotick will leave with around $400 million and if Microsoft/Xbox wants to get rid of Kotick, he will also receive a minimum payout of $250 million.

      Image courtesy of Dexterto.
    • By Staff
      According to WSJ, Bobby Kotick, former CEO of Activision Blizzard, has floated the idea of buying TikTok to potential partners.
      Former Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick has reportedly shown interest in purchasing TikTok, as legislation in the U.S. threatens to ban or force the sale of the popular app over national security concerns.
      Kotick is said to be seeking partners for the potential acquisition, discussing the opportunity with notable figures including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. The move comes amid growing scrutiny over TikTok's data privacy practices and its ties to China, with U.S. lawmakers pushing for decisive action.
      You can read the whole news piece over at WSJ.
      Bobby Kotick left his position at Activision Blizzard in December 2023 after Microsoft finalized its purchase of the company. Post-acquisition, he reportedly received over $375 million, as detailed by Forbes.
      Source: WSJ 
×
×
  • Create New...