blizzcon BlizzCon 2023 Broadcast Schedule

[Staff 1,378]

Blizzard has released the broadcast schedule for BlizzCon 2023!

The event is free to watch for everyone and you don't need to buy a Virtual Ticket this year!

• The opening ceremony on November 3 starts at 11 AM PDT or 8 PM Paris time. 
• The next WoW expansion will be unveiled at 1:30 PM PDT or 10:30 PM Paris time.
• We'll hear more about what's to come for Classic at 3:30 PM PDT or 12:30 AM Paris time.
• A deep dive for WoW takes place on November 4 at 12 PM PDT or 9PM Paris time.
• We'll have a Diablo 4 Campfire Chat at 2:30 PM or 11:30 PM Paris time!

(Source)

BlizzCon 2023 is almost here! For those tuning in from home, we’ll be streaming all BlizzCon Arena content for free. Whether you plan to join in person or virtually, we wanted to share a first look at all the events in store. Visit Blizzard’s YouTube channels or Twitch on November 3-4 to catch all the panels and programming below. BlizzCon is for the community, so feel free to share it with yours by co-streaming.

BLIZZCON BROADCAST SCHEDULE

November 3

• 11AM – Opening Ceremony
• 1:30PM – World of Warcraft: What’s Next
• 2:30PM – Overwatch 2: Deep Dive
• 3:30PM – World of Warcraft Classic: What’s Next
• 4:30PM – Hearthstone: What’s Next
• 5:30PM – Warcraft Rumblings

November 4

• 12PM – World of Warcraft: Deep Dive
• 1:30PM – Overwatch 2: What’s Next
• 2:30PM – Diablo IV Campfire Chat
• 4:45PM – Community Night
• 6:15PM – LE SSERAFIM Appearance

Live streaming on Blizzard’s YouTube and Twitch channels; all times are listed in PDT.

For those of you planning your in-person BlizzCon experience around your game of choice, check out the on-site schedules for:

• World of Warcraft
• Diablo IV
• Hearthstone
• Warcraft Rumble

BlizzCon Collection – on sale now

Virtual attendees can also pick up the BlizzCon Collection, a new set of digital goodies and in-game items, in the Battle.net Shop now. These bundles are a must-have for any player journeying through World of Warcraft, Diablo IV, Overwatch 2, Hearthstone, and Warcraft Rumble. Whether you’re a seasoned hero or just starting your adventure, don’t miss out. Visit the Battle.net Shop to purchase.

Whether you will be joining us in person or online, we can’t wait to see you! To stay up to date with all things BlizzCon, be sure to follow us on social media, and head to BlizzCon.com for everything you need to know about the show.

[Dejo93 984]

Even with the new leak, I see so little excitement for the game. Guess this is what happens when you replace talented workers with low IQ diversity hires, so you can chase the ESG score.

Hope that Blackrock money was worth it, because that well is drying up fast

Edited October 27, 2023 by Dejo93

[Frostbeardthedwarf 0]

I bet the panel for Warcraft Rumble will be full /sarcasm

[Dreamcatcher 65]

52 minutes ago, Dejo93 said:

Even with the new leak, I see so little excitement for the game. Guess this is what happens when you replace talented workers with low IQ diversity hires, so you can chase the ESG score.

Hope that Blackrock money was worth it, because that well is drying up fast

You have been like this as long as i can remember. 😁

[Krimzin 60]

1 hour ago, Dejo93 said:

Even with the new leak, I see so little excitement for the game. Guess this is what happens when you replace talented workers with low IQ diversity hires, so you can chase the ESG score.

Hope that Blackrock money was worth it, because that well is drying up fast

Aww someones butthurt with Blizzard.. thats so cute..

[TheRagingwolf 202]

1 hour ago, Dejo93 said:

Even with the new leak, I see so little excitement for the game. Guess this is what happens when you replace talented workers with low IQ diversity hires, so you can chase the ESG score.

Hope that Blackrock money was worth it, because that well is drying up fast

In the realm of 3rd grade insults, takes one to know one.

[Arcling 877]

3 hours ago, Dejo93 said:

Even with the new leak, I see so little excitement for the game. Guess this is what happens when you replace talented workers with low IQ diversity hires, so you can chase the ESG score.

Hope that Blackrock money was worth it, because that well is drying up fast

Are you serious? This is painful to read.

[TheRagingwolf 202]

1 hour ago, Arcling said:

Are you serious? This is painful to read.

Yeah, it's like they answered the question "Tell me you're xenophobic without telling me you're xenophobic." but were never asked to do so.

[Ken007 76]

Looking forward to see what's next. Raids, dungeons, quests, new zones- the game is almost twenty years old now, it won't change much. The next expansion happens to coincide with the twentieth anniversary, so maybe a surprise? Dragonflight was a giant step forward in listening to the players and getting content out, hopefully that will continue. What's next for Classic might be the more interesting one. Will there be a Classic expansion?

[Arcling 877]

19 hours ago, TheRagingwolf said:

Yeah, it's like they answered the question "Tell me you're xenophobic without telling me you're xenophobic." but were never asked to do so.

This isn't the first time he's said something like this, so I guess that's how he usually is.

[Dejo93 984]

2 hours ago, Arcling said:

This isn't the first time he's said something like this, so I guess that's how he usually is.

ok, how exactly am I xenophobic? This has nothing to do with other nations, but with the declining quality of the product because of the people hired

[Mascaron 40]

On 10/27/2023 at 1:47 PM, Dejo93 said:

Guess this is what happens when you replace talented workers with low IQ diversity hires, so you can chase the ESG score.

Do you not know what diversity means? You're blaming the state of the game on the race and *filtered* and nationality and gender and religion of the people hired to work on it. 

Nationality is part of diversity, so xenophobic applies.

Edited October 28, 2023 by Mascaron

[Arcling 877]

1 hour ago, Dejo93 said:

ok, how exactly am I xenophobic? This has nothing to do with other nations, but with the declining quality of the product because of the people hired

In addition to what was said before, you also appear to believe that companies would hire underqualified people just so they would lose money due to hiring them in exchange for some meager PR? This sounds ridiculous.

Edited October 28, 2023 by Arcling

[darkgreenwax 410]

Just jumping into the diversity hotpot.

Diversity in the workplace actually promotes creativity, innovation, and productivity by challenging trends, collaborating, and gaining new perspectives. It also reduces negative occurrences like group-think and echo chambers.

[Dahaka99 46]

14 hours ago, Dejo93 said:

ok, how exactly am I xenophobic? This has nothing to do with other nations, but with the declining quality of the product because of the people hired

Wait you guys have Xenophobia? 

[Pandabuffel 153]

6 hours ago, TyZone said:

Diversity in the workplace actually promotes creativity, innovation, and productivity by challenging trends, collaborating, and gaining new perspectives. It also reduces negative occurrences like group-think and echo chambers.

Exactly this. At my previous job I did all the hiring and we were just a small team of 5 guys. Then someone applied with dreadlocks and who looked a bit like a stoner, but his application was pretty good. The other guys didn't want him because he would be worthless just judged by his looks, but I gave him the job anyway since I couldn't turn down a good candidate. The guy turned out to be a really good and enthousiastic worker with completely new and different ideas and worked himself up to a leading position in no-time. A bit later I tried hiring the first female worker. Again the first 4 other guys didn't want to because they thought it was no work-environment for women. It took me a lot of convincing to finally be able to hire women as well. I hired 3 women afterwards and again they contributed in a lot of good ways and different perspectives. When I left that company a few years ago my position was given to one of those women, which shows that they did excellent work.

I just notice a lot of people judge a lot, if not all books by their covers nowadays and aren't willing to give people a fair chance just because of their (false) assumptions.