L0rinda

hearthstone Batstone Twist Announced: More Cards Banned

12 posts in this topic

b3sEeph.png

Firebat has announced the twist in his Batstone event scheduled for tomorrow, Wednesday September 14.

Each player in the event has been allowed to ban an additional card in the event, to go alongside the cards already banned by the community. The originally banned cards were:

Yogg-Saron, Hope's EndTuskarr TotemicFiery War AxeBarnes, and Call of the Wild.

Players battled through a qualifying event with that ban list, and the event was eventually won by Ness, winner of Insomnia 57. He joins a strong lineup of seven invited players who will now use the additional ban list pictured below.

Placeholder for tweet 775573801778098176

For those who don't know the scene well enough to know the players by their faces, they are Thijs, StrifeCro, Chakki, SuperJJ, Kolento, Ostkaka, TidesofTime, and Ness. This is an outstanding lineup. The event will be cast by Firebat and Zalae on Firebat's Twitch channel from midday EDT (6pm CEST) on September 14. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, now they've banned every single good card in the game. 

Jokes aside, this is going to make a very good tournament where everyone brings 3 Control decks and viewers bring their ResidentSleeper pillows because with those bans, Nzoth and Murloc Paladin, heavy Warrior decks, RenoLock and Tempo Mage look like relatively untouched and really potent choices, espectially since there is (no) powerful Aggro decks, Miracle and Hunter to punish them. I say (no) but it is implied that bans weaken said decks a lot, rendering them practically but not absolutely powerless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can just tell Tides has been hit by a topdecked Doomguard one too many times.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cool format! Removing my least favorite cards is nice. I am only sad Barnes is banned, but I understand why. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should make for an interesting tournament.  (Taking this to it's extreme, all the decks would consist of 30 Wisps each, with all the hero powers banned, and the Wisps.  Then the winner would be determined by playing chess, but only with pawns and kings.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Paracel said:

Okay, now they've banned every single good card in the game. 

Jokes aside, this is going to make a very good tournament where everyone brings 3 Control decks and viewers bring their ResidentSleeper pillows because with those bans, Nzoth and Murloc Paladin, heavy Warrior decks, RenoLock and Tempo Mage look like relatively untouched and really potent choices, espectially since there is (no) powerful Aggro decks, Miracle and Hunter to punish them. I say (no) but it is implied that bans weaken said decks a lot, rendering them practically but not absolutely powerless.

I am also secretly hoping there will also be a lot of good priest decks this time. Yeah it sucks against certain deckslike Murloc Paladin/Renolocks/C'thun Warr. But overall with these nerfs, Priests willl be in a much better position to compete as most other counter decks that punish priest hard (freeze mage, miracle rogue, mid hunter etc) will not be there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

30 Wisps sound cool, but in reality the player who goes first wins, no exceptions. He gets to attack first, creating a 4-point health lead, that player #2 can't handle, because after the first trade it's a stalemate, even though he is always 1 Wisp ahead after his turn 2 trade. This actually showcases how overpowered going first in Hearthstone is.

18 minutes ago, mimech said:

Should make for an interesting tournament.  (Taking this to it's extreme, all the decks would consist of 30 Wisps each, with all the hero powers banned, and the Wisps.  Then the winner would be determined by playing chess, but only with pawns and kings.)

 

4 minutes ago, sc47 said:

I am also secretly hoping there will also be a lot of good priest decks this time. Yeah it sucks against certain deckslike Murloc Paladin/Renolocks/C'thun Warr. But overall with these nerfs, Priests willl be in a much better position to compete as most other counter decks that punish priest hard (freeze mage, miracle rogue, mid hunter etc) will not be there.

Because the rest of Priest counter decks you've mentioned and I'm predicting to be popular, I don't expect Priest to be exactly powerful - a classic lvl 2 metagame thinking, "Paper is nerfed, so there is a bunch of Rock, so Sciccors is bad", even though there still can be Paper and you can actually beat some kinds of Rock with Priest Sciccors if you shenanigan Resurrect really hard. Perhaps there would be players with lvl 1 metagame thinking who will follow the pattern and think Priest is their Rock deck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder why Purify wasn't banned... I guess we're going to see all Purify decks now, huh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Paracel said:

30 Wisps sound cool, but in reality the player who goes first wins, no exceptions. He gets to attack first, creating a 4-point health lead, that player #2 can't handle, because after the first trade it's a stalemate, even though he is always 1 Wisp ahead after his turn 2 trade. This actually showcases how overpowered going first in Hearthstone is.

 

Because the rest of Priest counter decks you've mentioned and I'm predicting to be popular, I don't expect Priest to be exactly powerful - a classic lvl 2 metagame thinking, "Paper is nerfed, so there is a bunch of Rock, so Sciccors is bad", even though there still can be Paper and you can actually beat some kinds of Rock with Priest Sciccors if you shenanigan Resurrect really hard. Perhaps there would be players with lvl 1 metagame thinking who will follow the pattern and think Priest is their Rock deck.

I agree with you. I think Priest can be that Rock deck which can counter decks like tempo mage and zoo. I hope the good old Elise control priest version with double cabal and the heavy removal package makes a comeback (not the Resurrect/Onyx Bishop package). Even dragon priest might be pretty strong. Lets see.

Edited by sc47

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, sc47 said:

I agree with you. I think Priest can be that Rock deck which can counter decks like tempo mage and zoo. I hope the good old Elise control priest version with double cabal and the heavy removal package makes a comeback (not the Resurrect/Onyx Bishop package). Even dragon priest might be pretty strong. Lets see.

I'd love a return to Dragon Priest in Standard. Was one of my favourite decks (played it to Golden Priest)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you'll use proxy, you can circumvent the ban. Try advanced.name, or other.

Edited by J0v1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, J0v1 said:

If you'll use proxy, you can circumvent the ban. Try advanced.name, or other.

I'm so confused in so many ways

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Zadina
      We have a new Tavern Brawl this week! Its name is Spellbook Duel.
      For this Brawl, you choose your class and then you pick 10 different cards to fill your deck. Instead of drawing cards each turn, you Discover a copy of a card from your deck. If you use card drawing mechanics, like Arcane Intellect, you don't actually draw from your deck. You will, in fact, get a 1-mana spell called Peruse, which again allows you to Discover a copy of a card from your deck.
      Obviously, there are a lot of possible deck combinations you can use to tackle this new Tavern Brawl. The first things that pop into mind are anything that contains Reno Jackson and Kazakus, as well as Jade Druid to extend the possibility of getting these precious Jade Idols. Once again, Mage is the clear winner of this Brawl with cards like Sorcerer's Apprentice, Arcane Intellect and Flamewaker.
      Bear in mind that some cards are not recommended, since they remove cards from your Discover pool. Examples are Fel Reaver and Tracking. Moreover, cards that put another card directly into play, like Mysterious Challenger and Mad Scientist, will also make your Discover pool smaller. Lastly, according to a Reddit user, Renounce Darkness won't deduct 1 mana from the cards you discover throughout the game.
      There are already a lot of disgusting decks for Spellbook Duel out there. We are waiting for your suggestions and any other useful info in the comments!
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Grimy Goons Dragon Paladin Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Control Jade Shaman Gadgetzan Standard deck.
    • By TheBeninator
      So the latest expansion, Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, has been out for more than a month now, and I was curious what everyone´s opinion on it was. Personally, I love the set. It adds more synergy with types of cards that weren´t as popular beforehand. For example, sets like secret mage, demon warlock, taunt warrior, and beast druid/hunter, have all gotten big buffs and can be viable in the meta. I got rank 13 with secret mage and taunt warrior alone, and hope to get to legend with them. What about you?
    • By Zadina
      The live Q&A with the two well-known Hearthstone devs took place yesterday and we've made a recap of the most interesting points.
      First of all, if you want to watch the whole thing, the VOD can be found here (it starts at 14:10). If you prefer a shorter version, Redditor EpicMelon has made a 10-min video of everything important said. Ultimately, if you don't feel like watching videos, we've made a summary of anything worth noting from yesterday's Q&A.
      Ben started talking about the new player experience, a topic he has discussed again this week. He repeated that most new players start off by playing versus A.I., some go to Casual and a minority goes to Ranked. The team has made it so that in Casual new players are exclusively matched against other new players and their MMR is kept to a 50% winrate.
      One of the currently most discussed hot topics in the Hearthstone community is the Ranked ladder. The team is satisfied with how clear the current system is in how it works. However, they do realise that its grindiness and the monthly reset can be a disadvantage and feel repetitive. To counter that, they are looking into short-term increasing the amount of bonus stars players can gain. This will hopefully increase the number of players in medium and higher ranks and move veterans away from Rank 20. However, they don't want everyone to be a Legend player either, since this would devalue the ranking. New breakpoints are also an idea the Hearthstone team is considering. As far as winstreaks stopping at Rank 5 are concerned, the idea behind this is that they wanted players to get to Legend "legit"; this could change as well, though.
      Moving to the topic of Arena, Dean announced that they are thinking of moving it to Standard format. Moreover, they want to try decreasing the amount of commons you get, as well as the amount of neutral Classic and Basic cards (especially minions). Some of these changes for Arena are already ready to be added to the game they are just waiting for the right time to patch them in. In early February, top 100 rankings for Arena will be published - just like the Ranked season ones. These rankings will be calculated based on highest average wins per run basis with a minimum requirement of 30 runs.
      The guys had a few things to say about the current meta, too. Pirate Warrior represented 30% of the meta game near the launch of Mean Streets of Gadgetzan, while there were also a lot of Pirate Shamans and Rogues. Thankfully, these numbers have dropped as other decks (like Jade Druid and Reno decks) started surfacing. Pirate decks are slightly more popular than Team 5 would like and decks with the pirate package feel same-y. If this persists, they might take a look at Pirates. Hunters and Paladins are having a hard time at the moment because they can't keep up with the aggro pirate decks. Overall, the internal meta report shows a stability in the meta: there is only a 3% difference between the winrates of the top deck and the 11th best deck.
      Lastly, there was mention of the Wild format. Ben admitted that they could do some things better for Wild. For example, it's possible that Blizzard will encourage more Wild tournaments in the future. The upcoming rotation will be interesting since Wild will have more card sets than Standard. Wild is far from dead: it's just half as popular as Standard, although Ben hasn't looked in the numbers recently. Earlier in the stream, Ben also said that the team is considering two options to keep Standard fresh: either nerfing cards or just move them to Wild.
      Lastly, Ben and Dean talked about various other small topics like the possibility of reprinting cards (no actual answer given), more Hunter and Paladin talk, wording inconsistencies and rewriting old cards, how a healthy meta is defined and Team 5 itself.