Odinn

Hearthstone - Should Arena Cost/Rewards Be Changed?

8 posts in this topic

11372-hearthstone-should-arena-costrewar

 

At BlizzCon 2014, I confirmed with Ben Brode after the Hearthstone Fireside Chat on November 7 that the reward for completing an Arena run would convert from classic card packs to Goblins vs. Gnomes card packs. Is it time to re-evaluate that decision?

 

 

An ongoing topic of conversation since the announcement of GvG, the issue has recently resurfaced over on the Hearthstone subreddit and elsewhere. A lot of people are calling for an option to select their reward - whether using the default shop selection, or a separate selection within the Arena interface - and there is certainly an argument to be made for that.

 

Having said that, simplicity of interface/setup is very core to the Hearthstone experience. Adding more options or complicating the UI is the opposite of what the Hearthstone team wants - more so now, as they work through the UI development of the internal alpha for a smartphone interface. It's unlikely that more complex options like this would ever emerge.

 

What are the options? Effectively, there are three choices:

 

1. Continue to reward the most recent expansion's card packs as the primary Arena reward;

2. Provide some kind of mechanism for Arena pack reward selection; OR

3. Remove packs as an Arena reward, and adjust the cost/other rewards to match.

 

arena_reward_confusion.png

An example of the reward screen from an Arena run, pre-GvG.

 

I'm going to speak briefly to the third option, because I think it's the one that bears out the best in the long run.

 

Hearthstone may have been highly experimental in terms of a game and genre, by Blizzard's standards, but almost all creative mediums share a common thematic problem - they aren't necessarily designed for a long-term audience or additional content down the road (expansions, DLC, sequels, etc.). When Hearthstone was released, there were obviously discussions already brewing about content additions, but wholesale design decisions - like how Arena works, or what its rewards are - were long since made, and likely haven't been revisited in a really fundamental way since.

 

As much as having a card pack waiting at the end of an Arena seems like a great idea, and certainly made it more attractive in the earliest stages of Hearthstone's life cycle, card packs have lost their luster for many players. For those who still need cards, needing different things from the various card sets and expansions can make the reward structure frustrating (and, while it's not hugely exacerbated with only two, what happens when there are three card sets? Four? Ten?).

 

One solution, simply put, would be to lower the cost of an Arena run to 50 gold and remove the guaranteed card pack as a reward. This does a few things:

 

- It's a long-term solution. You don't have to worry about the reward structure changing every time an expansion is released.

 

- It makes Arena slightly more accessible to players. On a strict technicality, the barrier to entry is actually the same, since the 'cost' of an Arena run is 50 gold as-is; it's merely the removal of the included 100g cost for a card pack that would change.

 

- The incentive to play doesn't actually change. Card pack cost is still the same, and the risk:reward ratio for succeeding in Arena enough to go net gold positive is unchanged. Arena remains the best way to generate gold, play with cards not in your collection, and learn many of the game's fundamentals.

 

hearthstonearena-r471x.jpg

Ah, but one problem - the real money cost.

 

So what would the microtransaction solution look like? This is the one place where the current structure favours Blizzard, as getting people to purchase Arena runs to develop their card collection is better than not. Eliminating the microtransaction for Arena outright would work, but it's doubtful that Blizzard would want that.

 

One possibility would be that the $1.99 charge would cover multiple (2-3) Arena entrances. Alternately, Blizzard could implement the ability for players to simply purchase in-game gold at a similar rate ($1.99 = 150g), which would allow players to use it for Arena runs, or to top up their gold to purchase other content (card packs, Adventure mode wings, etc.).

 

What are your thoughts? Would you like to see Blizzard retrofit the cost and rewards of the Hearthstone Arena mode to reflect the way the game is growing? Would you do something like the above, or something totally different? Let us know what you think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, i really like this idea. I've always thought that if i make 50 money or more (Whats the currency called again?) then I've made profit on that arena run. I also think 50 money will make it a lot more accessible to newer players. If they added in a super complex gui it wouldn't be hearthstone, but this would be a good long term solution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Odinn, I agree completely that the current arena model is flawed and that giving the latest packs is not optimal for many players. However I wish you would have explored option 2 in a bit more detail. The option 3 that you mention, has a few serious drawbacks. 

 

First off, while the overall cost to reward ratio remains the same this idea is far more punishing to weaker/less experienced players. The truth is, a large % of players never go positive in arenas and about half of all arenas end with 3 wins or less (which usually rewards less than the cost of admission). For a newer player doing arenas, he spends 150 gold, wins a game or 2, and gets a pack + 30 odd gold. Sure he "lost" 20 gold, but in the process he's added cards, and as a ratio he lost about 13% of the original 150 gold value. 

 

Under your proposed system, said player pays 50 gold and gets a return of 30 gold. Again, he's "lost" 20 gold, yet he gained no packs. Instead of losing 13% of his original gold, he's lost 40%. A player doing multiple runs could wind up with less gold than he started with, and no cards to show for his trouble. 

 

By the same token, this rewards stronger players exponentially more too. If I get a reward of a pack + 200 gold, i've effectively doubled my 150 gold entrance fee. On your proposed system, if I get a 200 gold i've actually increased my entrance fee by 4x. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that Menlyn hit on most of the points I was going to make; your proposal, while interesting, has some significant disadvantages, particularly when you are just getting started in the game  I'd add that removing the guaranteed card pack (even while lowering the cost of the arena correspondingly) would also seem to make the Arena much less appealing to those players who just want to build up their card collection and have little interest in simply playing Arena.  The assurance of getting a card pack for their endeavor can entice people who otherwise never set foot in the Arena to give it a go.

 

Personally, I think that the best way to fix this issue would be via a method of card selection, aka method 2 of the three you mentioned.  Providing a 'Pack Token' or something similar that could be traded in at the store for a pack of the player's choosing seems like a pretty workable solution.  It allows player more control over their rewards while effectively leaving the cost and underlying reward structure of the Arena untouched.  That said, it does mean adding another 'currency' to the game, which could complicate the UI (not that I think it would be terribly complex, but still) and might be troublesome to program into the game.

 

If that doesn't do the job, there's at least one other method which you don't seem to touch on that could be used to handle these issues: Keep a guaranteed pack of cards each run, but randomize the type of pack*.   The complaints aren't so much that Arena costs too much or shouldn't be giving out a pack of cards with each game, it's that Arena is *only* giving out GvG packs, with only GvG cards.  If that weren't the case, I think there'd be a lot less complaining about the Arena reward system.  (There'd still be some, I'm sure, but that should handle many of the issues.)

 

*Or randomize the cards contained within the pack; getting a special 'Arena Pack' with random cards from the Classic and GvG sets (and any future sets) would be pretty neat.   To make sure it's not a complete waste to those who have all the cards in the existing sets, here could be a guarantee that each pack will have at least one (or maybe two) card(s) from the latest set, along with the current 'at least one Rare or above' promise, but otherwise, just a random assortment of cards from all available sets.  But that's just my thought.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree with Menlyn about the drawbacks he mentioned. Using his same example, a newer player doing arenas now spends 150 gold, let's say he wins a game or 2, and in the end gets a pack + 30 odd gold: summing up, he spent 120 gold and got a pack.

Under the system proposed by Odinn, said player can pay 100 gold in the shop to get a card pack, and pay 50 gold for an Arena run, from which he gets the said 30 gold: summing up, he spent 120 gold and got a pack, which is exactly the same as in the previous case. Moreover, in this situation the said player could also have played an Arena run if he had less than 150 gold, and was also free to choose from which expansion the pack would be!

Maybe I can agree with Menlyn if we are speaking about the "feelings" some new players may have about it, but if we are talking about what is rationally better for newer and older players, the new option is better for both: gold is counted in numbers, percentages can be misleading..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Having Arena be a standalone game component where you could learn strategy and card mechanics, while simultaneously still having the ability to go 'gold positive' by winning, changes nothing about the Arena ecosystem. Removing the card pack reward and the cost thereof from the Arena would change nothing about how or why Arena is played.

 

In reality, having the ability to choose a card pack reward would probably be the optimal solution, but I put this concept forward as an alternative because, as mentioned, I don't foresee a way in which Blizzard could add a simple, intuitive way to make that selection to the existing interface. In many of the other Blizzard games - WoW or StarCraft, for sake of argument - complex UI modification (for playing, spectating, or otherwise) isn't uncommon, and there are tons of non-obvious elements that make up the game's interface functionality. Hearthstone, particularly to retain its draw as a mobile game, has different challenges in that regard.

 

(There's also a whole separate conversation to be had about whether it matters if, for example, Blizzard eventually retires the original Expert cards into the base 'free' core cards that you get when you first start playing, obviating the concern about breadth of card pack options altogether.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love the idea of making Arena entries more affordable at 50 gold. i'm at a point right now as a player where i've kind of hit my ceiling on Ranked play (10ish) and need more dust to craft more epic & legendary cards, which is best attained through Arena runs. Plus, the versatility of Arena, the surprises & the ability to tinker and play with cards that a player doesn't have make it a lot more fun for me than Constructed Play. I honestly think that the rewarded card pack should just give players a combination of GvG and Classic cards! A lot of newer players to Hearthstone don't have a continuous flow of classic cards (some of which are really useful) unless they spend the dust to craft them or buy classic packs (which isn't a great idea in the current meta). I think that would solve a lot of the potential UI issues as well!

This is kind of unrelated but i also think you should be able to pick which chapter of an expansion you want to buy. You shouldn't be forced to buy all the chapters just to get to the ones that give you the rewards that you really want! Obviously, it's not possible before all of the chapter have been released, but i think a few month after the complete expansion is out you should be able to pick and chose which chapters you want! I had this issue with Naxx, because I really wanted to get undertaker and Kelthuzad but had to play through the entire expansion just to get to them!

Edited by KevinGarnett

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello people,

I think that the simplest way to permit to choose which card pack award by ending an arena session, without the need to modifiy the GUI in any way, would be simply to make add combo box in options. In "miscellaneous" or "preferences" sections, an option named "preferred card packs" or "arena desired reward", would do the job.

 

simple, fast, and no GUI modify needed.

 

bye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Aleco
      If you're not a fan of playing huge Legendary minions every turn, then you may need to rethink your approach to Hearthstone.
       
      The Hearthstone team is on a roll with Tavern Brawls! After Top 2, one of the most well-received Tavern Brawls in recent memory, this week's Tavern Brawl is titled  "Cloneball!".
       

       
      Each player's deck is filled with four copies of random Legendary minions, including minions from the Wild format. Players will also receive a number of copies of "Offensive Play", a card which reduces the cost of your next Legendary minion by 3 Mana, as well as all other copies of that same Legendary in your hand:
       

       
      Though it's difficult to game plan for a specific strategy as the Legendary minions you receive appear to be random, I thought it was pretty sweet to play Loatheb into Onyxia into Onyxia into Onyxia. Slamming huge Legendary minions onto the battlefield is one of the most fun things to do in all of Hearthstone, and you'll get to do it again and again in this week's brawl!
      As is true with most brawls where the class cards aren't incredibly important, Warlock is strong by virtue of Life Tap. However, Paladin has some of the strongest Legendary minions in the history of the Hearthstone, so you could also try to high-roll a deck full of Tirion Fordrings and Wickerflame Burnbristles.
    • By Zadina
      The targeted cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms, Dark Pact, Crystal Core and Naga Sea Witch.
      The community's prayers have been answered as nerfs for six problematic cards have been announced.
      UPDATE - The nerfs went live earlier today. You can disenchant the affected cards and get full dust value until June 5, 2018.
      Four of these cards are Spiteful Summoner, Possessed Lackey, Call to Arms and Naga Sea Witch. Even though there were a lot of interesting suggestions as to how these cards could be handled, Team 5 chose the simplest, yet elegant, way to weaken them: increase their mana cost. The first three cards will have their mana cost increased by 1, whereas Naga Sea Witch will jump to an extreme 8 mana!
      Dark Pact will now restore 4 health to your hero, instead of 8. Lastly, Crystal Core will undergo a second nerf in its history: it will now produce 4/4 minions. Do you think it will survive even its second nerf like Unleash the Hounds or Sylvanas Windrunner did?
      Some of the cards that we know the team was considering changing, but will remain unscathed for now are Sunkeeper Tarim, Doomguard, Bloodreaver Gul'dan and Baku Paladin Hero Power.
      These changes will take effect after the end of the HCT playoffs at the end of May.
      Daxxarri
      In an update that will arrive some time after the HCT Playoffs are complete, we will be making balance changes to the following cards:
      Naga Sea Witch – Will cost 8 mana. (Up from 5)
      In update 9.1, we introduced a rule change to increase the consistency of Hearthstone game mechanics. The change affected precisely when Naga Sea Witch’s cost change was applied to cards. This allowed it to be combined with the cost reduction effects on giants, and as a result, it became fairly easy to reduce their mana cost to 0.
       
      We think Hearthstone is better all around when interactions are consistent, and we like the fact that a Naga Sea Witch giants deck archetype exists. That said, we also understand that, with its current functionality, this deck can generate early board states that are unreasonable for most classes to deal with. By increasing the cost of Naga Sea Witch to 8 mana, the deck’s concept remains intact, but the combo is delayed until later in a match when more decks are likely to have the tools to handle the arrival of so many giants.

      Spiteful Summoner – Will cost 7 mana. (Up from 6)
      After set rotation arrived with the Year of the Raven, Spiteful Summoner became more powerful and consistent when used in decks containing 10 mana cost spells. This is because the pool of 10 mana cost minions in Standard is smaller, so players could more reliably count on getting a powerful minion from Spiteful Summoner’s effect. Even considering the deckbuilding sacrifices that an effective Spiteful Summoner deck requires, we think that increasing the card’s mana cost to 7 is more in line with the powerful outcomes that are possible when it’s used alongside cards like Ultimate Infestation.

      Dark Pact – Will restore 4 Health. (Down from 8)
      There are two aspects of Dark Pact that make it powerful. At a cost of 1 mana, it’s easily used alongside cards like Carnivorous Cube, Possessed Lackey, and Spiritsinger Umbra for big combo turns. It also gives Warlocks enough healing potential so that aggressively using Lifetap and playing cards like Kobold Librarian and Hellfire feel less consequential. We left Dark Pact’s cost intact so it can still be used as part of interesting combos, but lessened the healing it provides so Warlocks will need to more carefully consider how much damage they take over the course of a match.

      Possessed Lackey – Will cost 6 mana. (Up from 5)
      Some of the card combos involving Possessed Lackey present situations that are too difficult to deal with in the early-to-mid stages of the game. Increasing its mana cost to 6 delays some of those powerful card combos to turns that are easier for opposing decks to overcome.

      Call to Arms – Will cost 5 mana. (Up from 4)
      Currently, there are three popular Paladin decks: Even Paladin, Murloc Paladin, and Odd Paladin. Among the three decks, Even Paladin and Murloc Paladin have consistently been the most powerful two archetypes over the first few weeks since the release of The Witchwood. Call to Arms moving to 5 mana restricts it from being used in Even decks and reduces its power somewhat when used in Murloc and other Paladin decks.
      We expect that players will experiment with Call to Arms at 5 mana in Odd Paladin decks, but we don’t expect this card to have much of an impact. This is because Odd Paladin can’t access 2 mana minions (meaning Call to Arms could only ever summon three 1 mana minions if played in that deck).

      Note: As a result of this change, we are adjusting the “Greymane’s Alliance” deck recipe. It will now have two copies of Saronite Chain Gang in place of Call to Arms.
      The Caverns Below – The quest reward, Crystal Core, will read: For the rest of the game, your minions are 4/4. (Down from 5/5)
      The Quest Rogue deck uses a strategy that’s strong against slow, control-heavy and fatigue decks, but struggles against most other deck archetypes. There’s a fine line between being powerful against very slow decks and being powerful versus virtually all non-aggressive strategies. By changing the quest reward to make the resulting minions 4/4 instead of 5/5, Quest Rogue should still be a reasonable option versus slow, extreme late-game decks, but offer a less polarized matchup with more moderate control decks.

      (source) Are you happy with these changes? Do you think some cards will still be playable or are all six cards useless now? What's your opinion on the unchanged cards?
    • By Damien
      This thread is for comments about our Even Rogue deck list guide.
    • By Aleco
      Get your games in with Cubelock and Even Paladin while you can! The upcoming balance patch will drop on the 22nd.
       
      Confirmed today on the official Hearthstone blog, the upcoming balance patch will go live on May 22nd.
      Though the nerfs had been announced several days ago, a timeline had previously not been provided for when the nerfs would go live. For those who have yet hear, the following cards will be receiving nerfs:
      Naga Sea Witch will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 8 Mana Spiteful Summoner will have its Mana cost increased from 6 to 7 Mana Dark Pact will restore 4 Health instead of 8 health Possessed Lackey will have its Mana cost increased from 5 to 6 Mana Call to Arms will have its Mana cost increased from 4 to 5 Mana Crystal Core will turn minions into 4/4s instead of 5/5s  
    • By Aleco
      This week's episode features a fresh take on a popular deck, courtesy of Casie.
      Can you guess the next move?
      Situation #22: Let's Even the Odds
      Picking up where we left off last week, we find ourselves in the middle of an odd/even matchup between Warlock and Shaman. I picked this situation partially because it was an interesting spot with many options available to us, and also because its a ladder situation I highly doubt any of my readers have encountered before:

      Commenters quickly identified several key factors about this matchup, namely that Defile and Hellfire are off the table for our opponent and that the only "board clear" available for our opponent is Despicable Dreadlord. Our opponent is more likely to have single target removal (such as Voodoo Doll) or is looking to play a demon-related 5 drop next turn in Skull of the Man'ari, Possessed Lackey, or Doomguard.
      Bozonik summed up this situation excellently in his comment from last week's thread:
      There seemed to be a consensus among commenters that "Option 1", Hero Power + Sea Giant was the line here. It puts a big nasty minion on the board, applying pressure and forcing our opponent to have Voodoo Doll. In the heat of the moment I went with "Option 2", the full clear, but after looking back on things and reading over the comments I believe Hero Power + Giant was the correct line. Despicable Dreadlord is really the only card which gives us serious trouble next turn (since our opponent won't be able to play Possessed Lackey and kill it) and this line plays around Dreadlord while applying just as much pressure as the other options.
      I was secretly hoping that the tap + Giant wasn't the correct line here (because its the most obvious one), but the obvious solution is often the correct one. If you're ever in a situation such as this where you have no idea what your opponent is up to, it's probably best to go for the "obvious" line and not get cute.
      Situation #23: Broken Mirrors
      Today's deck comes courtesy of Kevin "Casie" Eberlein, who cut the dragon package from Mind Blast Priest to turn the deck into something with much more of a combo/aggro feel to it. Many pros are pegging Mind Blast Priest to be the next "best deck in the meta" after the nerfs drop, and Casie's list has a serious advantage in the mirror match:
      Though I didn't find nearly as much success with the deck as Casie did, it did provide me with plenty of interesting situations for What's the Move! Here's the one I ended up choosing for this week's episode:

      It's turn 2, we're on The Coin, and our ladder opponent just played a Wild Pyromancer. For the purposes of this exercise, we can say that we're 100% confident our opponent is on Mind Blast Priest. However, this isn't a mirror match at all. We have Prophet Velen, Holy Smite, two copies of Holy Fire (most Mind Blast Priests run just one), and Lifedrinker in our deck, which gives us a huge advantage in late-game Anduin vs Anduin races. Knowing that we have an advantage in the late game should color our decision heavily on turn two, where have a surprising number of options available to us.
      So, what's the move?